Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Taj Mahah

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Group Please read this. We should ask Baba to explain this.

Ramachandran

 

Hidden Truths About Taj Mahal

 

BBC says about Taj Mahal---Hidden Truth - Never say it is a Tomb

 

Aerial view of the Taj Mahal

 

 

The interior water well

 

Frontal view of the Taj Mahal and dome

 

Close up of the dome with pinnacle

 

Close view of the pinnacle

 

Inlaid pinnacle pattern in courtyard

 

Red lotus at apex of the entrance

 

Rear view of the Taj & 22 apartments

 

View of sealed doors & windows in back

 

Typical Vedic style corridors

 

The Music House--a contradiction

 

A locked room on upper floor

 

A marble apartment on ground floor

 

The OM in the flowers on the walls

 

Staircase that leads to the lower levels

 

300 foot long corridor inside apartments

 

One of the 22 rooms in the secret lower level

 

Interior of one of the 22 secret rooms

 

Interior of another of the locked rooms

 

Vedic design on ceiling of a locked room

 

Huge ventilator sealed shut with bricks

 

Secret walled door that leads to other rooms

 

Secret bricked door that hides more evidence

 

Palace in Barhanpur where Mumtaz died

 

Pavilion where Mumtaz is said to be buried

 

 

NOW READ THIS.......

 

No one has ever challenged it except Prof. P. N. Oak, who believes

the whole world has been duped. In his book Taj Mahal: The True Story,

Oak says the Taj Mahal is not Queen Mumtaz's tomb but an ancient Hindu

temple palace of

Lord Shiva (then known as Tejo Mahalaya ) . In the course of his

research Oak discovered that the Shiva temple palace was usurped by

Shah Jahan from then Maharaja of Jaipur, Jai Singh. In his own court

chronicle,

Badshahnama, Shah Jahan admits that an exceptionally beautiful

grand mansion in Agra

was taken from Jai SIngh for Mumtaz's burial . The ex-Maharaja of

Jaipur still

retains in his secret collection two orders from Shah Jahan for

surrendering the Taj building. Using captured temples and mansions, as

a burial place for dead courtiers and royalty was a common practice

among Muslim rulers.

 

For example, Humayun,Akbar, Etmud-ud-Daula and Safdarjung are all

buried in such mansions. Oak's inquiries began with the name of Taj

Mahal. He says the term ' Mahal ' has never been used for a building

in any Muslim countries from Afghanisthan to Algeria . 'The unusual

explanation that the term TajMahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal was

illogical in atleast two respects.

 

Firstly, her name was never Mumtaz Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani ,'

he writes.

Secondly, one cannot omit the first three letters 'Mum' from a

woman's name to derive the remainder as the name for the building.'Taj

Mahal, he claims, is a corrupt version of Tejo Mahalaya, or Lord

Shiva's Palace . Oak

also says the love story of Mumtaz and Shah Jahan is a fairy tale

cre ated by court sycophants, blundering historians and sloppy

archaeologists Not a single royal chronicle of Shah Jahan's time

corroborates the love story.

 

Furthermore, Oak cites several documents suggesting the Taj Mahal

predates Shah Jahan's era, and was a temple dedicated to Shiva,

worshipped by Rajputs of Agra city. For example, Prof. Marvin Miller

of New York took a

fewsamples from the riverside doorway of the Taj. Carbon dating

tests revealed that the door was 300 years older than Shah Jahan.

European traveler Johan Albert Mandelslo,who visited Agra in 1638

(only seven years after Mumtaz's death), describes the life of the

city in his memoirs. But he makes no reference to the Taj Mahal being

built. The writings of Peter Mundy, an English visitor to Agra within

a year of Mumtaz's death, also suggest the

Taj was a noteworthy building well before Shah Jahan's time.

 

Prof. Oak points out a number of design and architectural

inconsistencies that support the belief of the Taj Mahal being a

typical Hindu temple rather than a mausoleum. Many rooms in the Taj !

Mahal have remained sealed

since Shah Jahan's time and are still inaccessible to the public .

Oak asserts they contain a headless statue of Lord Shiva and other

objects commonly used for worship rituals in Hindu temples Fearing

political

backlash, Indira Gandhi's government tried to have Prof. Oak's

book withdrawn from the bookstores, and threatened the Indian

publisher of the first edition dire consequences . There is only one

way to discredit or

validate Oak's research.

 

The current government should open the sealed rooms of the Taj

Mahal under

U.N. supervision, and let international experts investigate.

 

Do circulate this to all you know and let them know about this

reality.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...