Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Smallpox: Bringing a Dead Disease Back to Life by Tim O' Shea

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I thought this was interesting:

 

 

Smallpox: Bringing a Dead Disease Back to Life

 

Page 2 of 2 (Page 1)

 

By Tim O'Shea

 

License To Kill

 

How about England?

 

A compulsory " immunization " program was set up in England in 1853

using Jenner's methods. (McBean p.13) [8] Before that time, the

highest number of deaths in a 2 year period in England from smallpox

was about 2000. Results of this " immunization " :

 

Year Deaths

1857-9 14,244

1863-5 20,059

 

In response, in 1867 Parliament enacted a stricter vaccination law,

and 97% of the people were inoculated. Result:

 

Year Deaths

1868 44,840

 

Null, Part III, p23 [22]

 

Great vaccine, huh?

 

Alfred Russell Wallace offers abundant proof how vaccine statistics

were manipulated in England during the 1800s - the who and the why

of it. After a thorough presentation charting actual deaths

throughout the UK and the Continent from smallpox and from the

vaccine, Wallace concludes that smallpox vaccine

 

" ...has actually increased susceptibility to the disease. ... the

conclusion is in every case the same: that vaccination is a gigantic

delusion; that it has never saved a single life; but that it has

been the cause of so much disease, so many deaths, such a vast

amount of utterly needless and altogether undeserved suffering, that

it will be classed by the coming generation among the greatest

errors of an ignorant and prejudiced age, and its penal enforcement

the foulest blot on the generally beneficent course of legislation

during our century. "

 

- Alfred R. Wallace, Chapter VI 1898 [6]

 

Slow Learners

 

What most people don't know is that just after the US began

vaccinating for smallpox (1902) England stopped. By 1907 England

finally got the message: no more compulsory smallpox vaccination.

Holland, same thing in 1928. Australia - 1925 (Anderson, p 10) [7]

 

How long did it take the US to figure it out? We finally stopped in

1971, the last holdout in the world.

 

The low ebb of the infectious diseases arrived in the 1970s. From

1950 to 1970, zero cases of smallpox were reported in the U.S. After

several years passed, however, there are now a few cases of

smallpox, but they only occur among the ranks of the vaccinated!

(Scheibner) [23]

 

What's important to notice is that smallpox vaccination in the U.S.

persisted another 30 years after the disease was at an incidence of

practically zero. Again, the only source of death from smallpox in

the U.S. for 30 years was from the vaccine itself. (Mendelsohn, p

232, World Book, 1994) [24, 25]

 

Even though smallpox vaccination became mandatory in the US after

1902, what is less commonly known is that by 1929, all states but

nine no longer made it compulsory. Reason: too many deaths and

complications. (H.B. Anderson, p 2) [7]

 

Today smallpox occurs nowhere in nature.

 

Dissenting Voices

 

Other physicians of the smallpox era were not that impressed with

the vaccine. William Howard Hay MD, at an address he gave on 25 June

1937, remarked:

 

" ...of all the insane things we have advocated in medicine - that is

one of the most insane, to insist on the vaccination of children or

anyone else for the prevention of smallpox, when as a matter of

fact, we are not able to prove that vaccination saved one man from

smallpox. " [26]

 

Philippine Fiasco

 

After WWI, there was a lot of surplus smallpox vaccine that didn't

get used. So we looked to another market we could control. When the

U.S. mandated a mass smallpox vaccination program in the Philippines

in 1917, some 25 million shots were given to those people. 163,000

Filipinos came down with the disease after the vaccination, and

75,339 Filipinos died from it, quadrupling the death rate prior to

the inoculation program.

 

That's way more than the total number of Americans who died in the

entire Vietnam war! American " immunization " of its Philippine

territory caused several horrific epidemics there that didn't quite

make the six o'clock news. (Anderson, p 69 W.H.Hay, also James, p

410) [7, 26, 27]

 

Fairy Tales Can Come True

 

To sum up, what Jenner did was to take an old superstition of

Gloucester dairymaids and pander it into a fortune for himself and

the English government by the most ridiculous " scientific " posturing.

 

The New Smallpox Market

 

Bringing the discussion to the present, post-9/11 politics has

created marketing niches like the world has never seen.

 

In classic Edward L Bernays style, the illusion of a smallpox threat

has been created - an $800 million illusion. [Appleby) [28] With no

proof whatsoever, the scripted media daily barrages the unlettered

public with likely scenarios of Muslim terrorists unleashing

weaponized smallpox into metropolitan areas, supposedly resulting in

epidemics of smallpox spreading like wildfire through an

unvaccinated population, etc.

 

In an eerie replay of the social politics of 200 years ago,

scientific fact is brushed aside and we are distracted from the

lessons of our own history, as though these events never took place:

 

smallpox disappeared worldwide in 1977

the only deaths from smallpox since 1970 have been from the vaccine

smallpox vaccine killed thousands in England, France, Prussia, and

the Philippines

the sham premise of Jenner is still widely held

smallpox vaccine historically has killed the most people of any

vaccine ever invented

the vaccine is for a completely different disease - a disease of

cows

the vaccine does not confer immunity to smallpox

the reason that our country and every other country in the world

stopped vaccinating was that the vaccine not only did not work, but

was causing the disease and other pathological and fatal side

effects

no biological viral or bacterial agent has ever been deployed as a

weapon, either by a country of by an individual

A few other small details that should not be missed: there is no

proof that any 'terrorists' have weaponized smallpox or are

preparing to use it anywhere in the world at this time. It's all

conjecture.

 

Despite all this, the FDA, CDC, Office of Home Security, plus many

of the brave new 'defensive' offices that have recently emerged at

the trough, decided that a few companies should start producing

enough vaccine to give all 280 million Americans 'protection.' [29]

The companies include: Aventis in France, Acambis in England, and

Wyeth in the US. The working sales slogan was that we only had 15

million doses and we need another 255.

 

So the circus is on. The companies are pretending to be racing

against the clock, and it makes great press because the story

provides both criteria for a successful media issue: fear and

uncertainty.

 

The No-Solution Solution

 

Awash in media overload with respect to the new smallpox vaccine as

the solution to the vague, ill-defined, unfounded

bioterrorist " threat, " we should try to remember a few facts based

in physical reality:

 

the entire program is predicated upon a premise that is

scientifically unproven: namely that one dose of the new vaccine

would confer lasting immunity... to anything.

many would die or suffer permanent injury from this 'protective'

measure

illustrative of the mentality of our decision makers is a comment in

a 25 Apr 02 New England Journal of Medicine editorial, [3] whereby

the author tries to comfort us by surmising that mass smallpox

vaccination today would " only " kill 180 people, which is the same

number who die on our highways every day and a half, he trivializes.

(Bicknell)

Such a ludicrous statement in our best medical journal makes the

colossal assumption that those who did not die would be immune by

virtue of the vaccination, a fact that cannot be proven. Perhaps

this is why even such an irresponsible author as this recommends

voluntary smallpox vaccinations to be available to anyone who wants

them - a magnanimous offer indeed. This same genius later upped his

death estimate when he was quoted in the 23 Sept 02 New York Times,

citing 500 deaths that would result from mass smallpox vaccination.

[32]

 

the original vaccine claimed to confer immunity to the natural

disease. Bioterrorist smallpox would be an entirely different

strain, being weaponized. So there could be no testing that could

prove effectiveness or the wisdom of mass injecting this most

dangerous vaccine

Acambis is in England. Aventis is in France. Yet England and France

are not gearing up for mass smallpox vaccination. Why not? Because

the only market in the world is here in the US. Because the threat

is a perceived threat, created by US media.

with the ridiculous story on 27 Mar 02 (Washington Post [30]) that

suddenly Aventis had " discovered " 70 to 90 million 'forgotten' doses

of smallpox vaccine in one of their freezers, a few questions come

to mind: Is it 70 or is it 90? 20 million doses is a lot to

overlook.

And isn't it odd that the company who has been given a $400 million

contract that they couldn't possible meet in the one year time frame

suddenly discovers these lost doses in one of its own freezers? And

with no clinical trials whatsoever glibly postulates that the doses

can be 'diluted' down five or ten times, which coincidentally takes

the pressure off production deadlines? The mind boggles at this

serendipitous synchronicity.

 

And why doesn't this French company want the valuable vaccine for

the French? How altruistic of them to sacrifice their own national

safety, and put their old buds the Americans first. This virgin

looks somewhat pregnant, n'est-ce pas?

 

Most Americans Can't Receive Smallpox Vaccine

 

A major blow to the best laid plans of the New Vaccinators came on

10 Sept 02 with the Reuters article [1] about the CDC announcing how

the new smallpox vaccine is not to be recommended for:

 

HIV people - anyone on immunosuppressive drugs - anyone with eczema

The CDC quoted a new study in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical

Immunology, describing reactions that include blindness, scarring,

and death. [31] So the vaccine is therefore contraindicated in all

these cases, according to the CDC.

 

Eczema patients alone comprise half the US population. AIDS patients

and those on immunosuppressive drugs add another significant

proportion to the group of those who shouldn't be vaccinated.

 

In addition, the omniscient media seem to have forgotten that most

Americans over 31 years of age have already been vaccinated for

smallpox, since the vaccine was only halted in 1971 in the US.

Remember? So if the vaccine is supposed to work, then obviously

these people will not need a new shot, right?

 

Then who does that leave? Ten percent of the population would be a

reasonable estimate.

 

It's not much of a stretch to see how the threat of smallpox is a

marketing tool, right out of classic Bernays Public Relations 101,

that is being used to justify paying vaccine manufacturers $800

million for a vaccine that is unproven, untested, and

contraindicated for 90% of the population.

 

Why then are our new masters shrieking about the 280 million doses

we need to protect the American people from this imminent

bioterrorist threat?

 

Could it just be the money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...