Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Medical Study: Untreated Cancer Patients Live Longer

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

While I am sure this was posted with the best of intentions, it is still

hogwash. I went to the website, and all that was there was basically what was

posted below. No medical facts, no tests, no nothing, just an " opinion " and one

that is very dangerous at that. Early detection, coupled with treatment, has

saved many lives, and has cured many people. I did not say all people. The

numbers are there. We all probably know people that are still living that were

diagnosed with cancer many years ago. They are alive because they sought and

received treatment. For an example that everyone knows, John Wayne, who had a

lung removed many, many years before he died. And no, he did not die of lung

cancer.

 

Dangerous stuff to be posting.

 

Roger

 

 

-

Misty L. Trepke

Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:34 PM

[s-A] [AltMedForum] Medical Study: Untreated Cancer Patients Live

Longer

 

 

Comments?

Misty L. Trepke

http://www..com

 

Untreated Cancer patients live 4 times longer- Study

 

MEDICAL STUDY SHOWS: UNTREATED PATIENTS LIVE 4 TIMES LONGER

 

than those who got conventional cancer therapy Excerpts below quote

a speech by Dr. Hardin Jones, a prominent cancer researcher and

former professor at the Donner Lab of Medical Physics at the

University of California (at both Berkeley and Davis.)

 

Dr. Hardin Jones published these statistics in his article tin

Transactions, New York Academy of Science, series 2, v. 18, n.3,

p.322. Write us for others who collected their own cancer survival

statistics, and who accuse official studies of being " doctored " or

skewed by drug sponsors, to show some benefits for chemotherapy.

 

" My studies have proved conclusively that cancer patients who refuse

chemotherapy and radiation actually live up to FOUR TIMES LONGER

THAN TREATED CASES. "

 

Dr. Jones, formerly a physiologist with the University of California

Department of Medical Physics, has been studying cancer for more

than 23 years. He has traveled the world collecting data on the

dreaded disease and presented his findings to the American Cancer

Society and medical schools.

 

" Beyond a shadow of a doubt, radical surgery on cancer does more

harm than good. " As for radiation treatment -- most of the time it

makes not the slightest difference whether the machine is turned on

or not. "

 

Dr. Jones noted that " unfortunately, it seems to be only a question

of time, usually, before the disease pops up again all over the

body. "

 

" Every cancer patient who keeps in excellent physical shape may have

many good years left. The alternative is to squander those years as

an invalid through radical medical intervention, which has zero

chance of extending life. "

 

Dr. Jones continued, " It's utter nonsense to claim that catching

cancer symptoms early enough will increase the patient's chances of

survival. "

 

" Furthermore, untreated breast cancer cases show a life expectancy

four times longer than treated ones. ~ " My wife and I have discussed

what she would do if breast cancer was diagnosed in her, " Dr. Jones

continued. " And we both agreed that she would do nothing as regards

to treatment, except to keep as healthy as possible. I guarantee she

would live longer! "

 

http://www.brwwellness.com/ten.htm

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Do you remember what was the cause of John Wayne's death? I do remember

they said there was 42 pounds of undigested junk in his colon - maybe

that's what he died from. Remember everybody, you need to

bacterialize!!!

Carol

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

whole-food supplements that provide nutrients

essential for the health of people, pets and plants.

<http://www.BlueGreenSolutions.com> http://www.BlueGreenSolutions.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

Roger Kimble [rzk357]

For an example that everyone knows, John Wayne, who had a lung removed

many, many years before he died. And no, he did not die of lung cancer.

 

Roger

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...