--S-A- HAARP

[Guest guest]

Vandalism In The Sky By Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Manning

Techno-Net is the protest form of the 1990s -- picketing on the information

highways. For example, a fast-growing assortment of men and women around the

world are using the InterNet (started by the U.S. military for information

transfer-and-exchange that would never be interfered with) to draw attention to

a questionable military project in Alaska. Now these InterNetting, e-mailing,

faxing folks are blowing holes in the Department of Defense secrecy wall, by

using the government's own system.

The printed-word part of the protest started when Dennis Specht, an

anti-nuclear activist then living in Alaska, sent a news item to Nexus on the

topic of HAARP --- the High frequency Active Auroral Research Program. Then an

Alaskan political activist and science researcher in Anchorage, Nick Begich,

networked with Patrick and Gael Crystal Flanagan, who are self-described

TechnoMonks living in Sedona, Arizona, and was told to check out that same

Australian-based magazine. Begich was surprised to see an item from his hometown

in Nexus, and immediately headed to the local library to dig out the documents

cited in the article.

That research led to articles and the book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP:

Advances in Tesla Technology, which is 230 pages of detailed information on this

intrusive project. This article will only give highlights. Despite the amount of

research (350 footnotes), at its heart it is a story about ordinary people who

took on an extraordinary challenge.

HAARP Boils The Upper Atmosphere HAARP will zap the upper atmosphere with a

focused and steerable electromagnetic beam. It is an advanced model of an

" ionospheric heater " . (The ionosphere is the electrically-charged sphere

surrounding Earth's upper atmosphere. It ranges between about 40- to 600 miles

above Earth's surface.)

Put simply, the apparatus for HAARP is a reversal of a radio telescope;

antennas send out signals instead of receiving. HAARP is the test run for a

super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere

by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce

back onto earth and penetrate everything -- living and dead.

HAARP publicity gives the impression that the High-frequency Active Auroral

Research Program is mainly an academic project with the goal of changing the

ionosphere to improve communications for our own good. However, other U.S.

military documents put it more clearly -- HAARP aims to learn how to " exploit

the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes " . Communicating with

submarines is only one of those purposes.

Press releases and other information from the military on HAARP continually

downplay what it could do. Publicity documents insist that the HAARP project is

no different than other ionospheric heaters operating safely throughout the

world in places such as Arecibo, Puerto Rico; Tromso, Norway and the former

Soviet Union. However, a 1990 government document indicates that the

radio-frequency (RF) power zap will drive the ionosphere to unnatural

activities.

" ...at the highest HF powers available in the West, the instabilities

commonly studied are approaching their maximum RF energy dissipative capability,

beyond which the plasma processes will 'runaway' until the next limiting factor

is reached. "

If the military, in cooperation with the University of Alaska Fairbanks, can

show that this new ground-based " Star Wars " technology is sound, they both win.

The military has a relatively-inexpensive defense shield and the University can

brag about the most dramatic geophysical manipulation since atmospheric

explosions of nuclear bombs. After successful testing, they would have the

military megaprojects of the future and huge markets for Alaska's North Slope

natural gas.

Looking at the other patents which built on the work of a Texas' physicist

named Bernard Eastlund, it becomes clearer how the military intends to use the

HAARP transmitter. It also makes governmental denials less believable. The

military knows how it intends to use this technology, and has made it clear in

their documents. The military has deliberately misled the public, through

sophisticated word games, deceit and outright disinformation.

The military says the HAARP system could:

give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of

atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the

military through at least 1986).

replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system

operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology.

Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned

for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and accurate system.

provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while

keeping the military's own communications systems working.

provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the

computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to

verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements.

be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over

a large area.

be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other

technologies obsolete.

The above abilities seem like a good idea to all who believe in sound national

defense, and to those concerned about cost-cutting. However, the possible uses

which the HAARP records do not explain, and which can only be found in Air

Force, Army, Navy and other federal agency records, are alarming. Moreover,

effects from the reckless use of these power levels in our natural shield - the

ionosphere - could be cataclysmic according to some scientists.

Two Alaskans put it bluntly. A founder of the NO HAARP movement, Clare

Zickuhr, says " The military is going to give the ionosphere a big kick and see

what happens. "

The military failed to tell the public that they do not know what exactly will

happen, but a Penn State science article brags about that uncertainty. Macho

science? The HAARP project uses the largest energy levels yet played with by

what Begich and Manning call " the big boys with their new toys " . It is an

experiment on the sky, and experiments are done to find out something not

already known. Independent scientists told Begich and Manning that a HAARP-type

" skybuster " with its unforeseen effects could be an act of global vandalism.

HAARP History

The patents described below were the package of ideas which were originally

controlled by ARCO Power Technologies Incorporated (APTI), a subsidiary of

Atlantic Richfield Company, one of the biggest oil companies in the world. APTI

was the contractor that built the HAARP facility. ARCO sold this subsidiary, the

patents and the second phase construction contract to E-Systems in June 1994.

E-Systems is one of the biggest intelligence contractors in the world -- doing

work for the CIA, defense intelligence organizations and others. $1.8 billion of

their annual sales are to these organizations, with $800 million for black

projects -- projects so secret that even the United States Congress isn't told

how the money is being spent.

E-Systems was bought out by Raytheon, which is one of the largest defense

contractors in the world. In 1994 Raytheon was listed as number forty-two on the

Fortune 500 list of companies. Raytheon has thousands of patents, some of which

will be valuable in the HAARP project. The twelve patents below are the backbone

of the HAARP project, and are now buried among the thousands of others held in

the name of Raytheon.

Bernard J. Eastlund's U.S. Patent # 4,686,605 , " Method and Apparatus for

Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or Magnetosphere "

was sealed for a year under a government Secrecy Order.

The Eastlund ionospheric heater was different; the radio frequency (RF)

radiation was concentrated and focused to a point in the ionosphere. This

difference throws an unprecedented amount of energy into the ionosphere. The

Eastlund device would allow a concentration of one watt per cubic centimeter,

compared to others only able to deliver about one millionth of one watt.

This huge difference could lift and change the ionosphere in the ways

necessary to create futuristic effects described in the patent. According to the

patent, the work of Nikola Tesla in the early 1900's formed the basis of the

research.

What would this technology be worth to ARCO, the owner of the patents? They

could make enormous profits by beaming electrical power from a powerhouse in the

gas fields to the consumer without wires.

For a time, HAARP researchers could not prove that this was one of the

intended uses for HAARP. In April, 1995, however, Begich found other patents,

connected with a " key personnel " list for APTI. Some of these new APTI patents

were indeed a wireless system for sending electrical power.

Eastlund's patent said the technology can confuse or completely disrupt

airplanes' and missiles' sophisticated guidance systems. Further, this ability

to spray large areas of Earth with electromagnetic waves of varying frequencies,

and to control changes in those waves, makes it possible to knock out

communications on land or sea as well as in the air. The patent said:

" Thus, this invention provides the ability to put unprecedented amounts of

power in the Earth's atmosphere at strategic locations and to maintain the power

injection level, particularly if random pulsing is employed, in a manner far

more precise and better controlled than heretofore accomplished by the prior

art, particularly by detonation of nuclear devices of various yields at various

altitudes... "

'..it is possible not only to interfere with third party communications but to

take advantage of one or more such beams to carry out a communications network

even though the rest of the world's communications are disrupted. Put another

way, what is used to disrupt another's communications can be employed by one

knowledgeable of this invention as a communication network at the same time. "

.'.. large regions of the atmosphere could be lifted to an unexpectedly high

altitude so that missiles encounter unexpected and unplanned drag forces with

resultant destruction ...

" Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper atmosphere

wind patterns by constructing one or more plumes of atmospheric particles which

will act as a lens or focusing device. ... molecular modifications of the

atmosphere can take place so that positive environmental effects can be

achieved. Besides actually changing the molecular composition of an atmospheric

region, a particular molecule or molecules can be chosen for increased presence.

For example, ozone, nitrogen, etc., concentrations in the atmosphere could be

artificially increased...

Begich found eleven other APTI patents. They told how to make Nuclear-sized

Explosions without Radiation " , power-beaming systems, over-the-horizon radar,

detection systems for missiles carrying nuclear warheads, electromagnetic pulses

previously produced by thermonuclear weapons and other Star-Wars tricks. This

cluster of patents underlay the HAARP weapon system.

Related research by Begich and Manning uncovered bizarre schemes. For example,

Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for manipulating

and disrupting human mental processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation

(the stuff of HAARP) over large geographical areas. The most telling material

about this technology came from writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National

Security Advisory to U.S. President Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor

to U.S. President Johnson and a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote

about use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental

warfare. The documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the

negative effects on human health and thinking.

The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. More

than 40 pages of the book, with dozens of footnotes, chronicle the work of

Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this

use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing

this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva. It even gave the

frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the same ranges which HAARP

is capable of broadcasting.

The following statement was made more than twenty-five years ago, in a book by

Brzezinski which he wrote while a professor at Columbia University:

" Political strategists are tempted to exploit research on the brain and

human behavior. Geophysicist Gordon J. F.MacDonald -- specialist in problems of

warfare -- says accurately-timed, artificially-excited electronic strokes 'could

lead to a pattern of oscillations that produce relatively high power levels over

certain regions of the earth...In this way, one could develop a system that

would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations in

selected regions over an extended period'...No matter how deeply disturbing the

thought of using the environment to manipulate behavior for national advantages

, to some, the technology permitting such use will very probably develop within

the next few decades. "

In 1966, MacDonald was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee

and later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He

published papers on the use of environmental control technologies for military

purposes. The most profound comment he made as a geophysicist was, " The key to

geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities to

which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater

amounts of energy. " While yesterday's geophysicists predicted today's advances,

are HAARP program managers delivering on the vision?

The geophysicists recognized that adding energy to the environmental soup

could have large effects. However, humankind has already added substantial

amounts of electromagnetic energy into our environment without understanding

what might constitute critical mass. The book by Begich and Manning raises

questions: Have these additions been without effect, or is there a cumulative

amount beyond which irreparable damage can be done? Is HAARP another step in a

journey from which we cannot turn back? Are we about to embark on another energy

experiment which unleashes another set of demons from Pandora's box?

As early as 1970, Zbigniew Brzezinski predicted a " more controlled and

directed society " would gradually appear, linked to technology. This society

would be dominated by an elite group which impresses voters by allegedly

superior scientific know-how. Angels Don't Play This HAARP further quotes

Brzezinski:

" Unhindered by the restraints of traditional liberal values, this elite would

not hesitate to achieve its political ends by using the latest modern techniques

for influencing public behavior and keeping society under close surveillance and

control. Technical and scientific momentum would then feed on the situation it

exploits " , Brzezinski predicted.

His forecasts proved accurate. Today, a number of new tools for the " elite "

are emerging, and the temptation to use them increases steadily. The policies to

permit the tools to be used are already in place. How could the United States be

changed, bit by bit, into the predicted highly-controlled technosociety? Among

the " steppingstones " Brzezinski expected were persisting social crises and use

of the mass media to gain the public's confidence.

In another document prepared by the government, the U.S. Air Force claims:

" The potential applications of artificial electromagnetic fields are

wide-ranging and can be used in many military or quasi-military

situations...Some of these potential uses include dealing with terrorist groups,

crowd control, controlling breaches of security at military installations, and

antipersonnel techniques in tactical warfare. In all of these cases the EM

(electromagnetic) systems would be used to produce mild to severe physiological

disruption or perceptual distortion or disorientation. In addition, the ability

of individuals to function could be degraded to such a point that they would be

combat ineffective. Another advantage of electromagnetic systems is that they

can provide coverage over large areas with a single system. They are silent and

countermeasures to them may be difficult to develop... One last area where

electromagnetic radiation may prove of some value is in enhancing abilities of

individuals for anomalous phenomena. "

Do these comments point to uses already somewhat developed? The author of the

government report refers to an earlier Air Force document about the uses of

radiofrequency radiation in combat situations. (Here Begich and Manning note

that HAARP is the most versatile and the largest radio-frequency-radiation

transmitter in the world.)

The United States Congressional record deals with the use of HAARP for

penetrating the earth with signals bounced off of the ionosphere. These signals

are used to look inside the planet to a depth of many kilometers in order to

locate underground munitions, minerals and tunnels. The U.S. Senate set aside

$15 million dollars in 1996 to develop this ability alone --

earth-penetrating-tomography. The problem is that the frequency needed for

earth-penetrating radiations is within the frequency range most cited for

disruption of human mental functions. It may also have profound effects on

migration patterns of fish and wild animals which rely on an undisturbed energy

field to find their routes.

As if electromagnetic pulses in the sky and mental disruption were not enough,

Eastlund bragged that the super-powerful ionospheric heater could control

weather. Begich and Manning brought to light government documents indicating

that the military has weather-control technology. When HAARP is eventually built

to its full power level, it could create weather effects over entire

hemispheres. If one government experiments with the world's weather patterns,

what is done in one place will impact everyone else on the planet. Angels Don't

Play This HAARP explains a principle behind some of Nikola Tesla's inventions --

resonance -- which affects planetary systems.

Bubble Of Electric Particles Angels Don't Play This HAARP includes interviews

with independent scientists such as Elizabeth Rauscher. She has a Ph.D., a long

and impressive career in high-energy physics, and has been published in

prestigious science journals and books. Rauscher commented on HAARP. " You're

pumping tremendous energy into an extremely delicate molecular configuration

that comprises these multi-layers we call the ionosphere. " The ionosphere is

prone to catalytic reactions, she explained; if a small part is changed, a major

change in the ionosphere can happen.

In describing the ionosphere as a delicately balanced system, Dr. Rauscher

shared her mental picture of it -- a soap-bubble-like sphere surrounding Earth's

atmosphere, with movements swirling over the surface of the bubble. If a big

enough hole is punched through it, she predicts, it could pop.

Slicing The Ionosphere Physicist Daniel Winter, Ph. D. , of Waynesville,

North Carolina, says HAARP high-frequency emissions can couple with longwave

(low-frequency, or ELF) pulses the Earth grid uses to distribute information as

vibrations to synchronize dances of life in the biosphere. Dan terms this

geomagnetic action 'Earth's information bloodstream'., and says it is likely

that coupling of HAARP HF (high-frequency) with natural ELF (extremely low

frequency) can cause unplanned, unsuspected side effects.

David Yarrow of Albany, New York, is a researcher with a background in

electronics. He described possible interactions of HAARP radiations with the

ionosphere and Earth's magnetic grid:

" HAARP will not burn 'holes' in the ionosphere. That is a dangerous

understatement of what HAARP's giant gigawatt beam will do. Earth is spinning

relative to thin electric shells of the multilayer membrane of 'ion-o-speres'

that absorb and shield Earth's surface from intense solar radiation, including

charged particle storms in solar winds erupting from the sun. Earth's axial spin

means that HAARP -- in a burst lasting more than a few minutes -- will slice

through the ionosphere like a microwave knife. This produces not a 'hole', but a

long tear -- an incision. "

Crudely Plucking The Strings " Second concept: As Earth rotates, HAARP will

slice across geomagnetic flux...a donut-shaped spool of magnetic strings -- like

longitude meridians (on maps). HAARP may not 'cut' these strings in Gaia's

magnetic mantle, but will pulse each thread with harsh, out-of-harmony high

frequencies. These noisy impulses will vibrate geomagnetic flux lines, sending

vibrations all through the geomagnetic web. "

" The image comes to mind of a spider on its web. An insect lands, and the

web's vibrations alert the spider to possible prey. HAARP will be a man-made

microwave finger poking at the web, sending out confusing signals, if not

tearing holes in the threads. "

" Effects of this interference with symphonies of Gaia's geomagnetic harp are

unknown, and I suspect barely thought of. Even if thought of, the intent (of

HAARP) is to learn to exploit any effects, not to play in tune to global

symphonies. "

Among other researchers quoted is Paul Schaefer of Kansas City. His degree is

in electrical engineering and he spent four years building nuclear weapons. " But

most of the theories that we have been taught by scientists to believe in seem

to be falling apart, " he says.

He talks about imbalances already caused by the industrial and atomic age,

especially by radiation of large numbers of tiny, high-velocity particles " like

very small spinning tops into our environment. The unnatural level of motion of

highly-energetic particles in the atmosphere and in radiation belts surrounding

Earth is the villain in the weather disruptions, according to this model, which

describes an Earth discharging its buildup of heat, relieving stress and

regaining a balanced condition through earthquakes and volcanic action.

'Feverish' Earth " One might compare the abnormal energetic state of the Earth

and its atmosphere to a car battery which has become overcharged with the normal

flow of energy jammed up, resulting in hot spots, electrical arcing, physical

cracks and general turbulence as the pent-up energy tries to find some place to

go. "

In a second analogy, Schaefer says " Unless we desire the death of our planet,

we must end the production of unstable particles which are generating the

earth's fever. A first priority to prevent this disaster would be to shut down

all nuclear power plants and end the testing of atomic weapons, electronic

warfare and 'Star Wars'. "

Meanwhile, the military builds its biggest ionospheric heater yet, to

deliberately create more instabilities in a huge plasma layer -- the ionosphere

-- and to rev up the energy level of charged particles.

Electronic Rain From The Sky They have published papers about electron

precipitation from the magnetosphere (the outer belts of charged particles which

stream toward Earth's magnetic poles) caused by man-made very low frequency

electromagnetic waves. " These precipitated particles can produce secondary

ionization, emit X-rays, and cause significant perturbation in the lower

ionosphere. "

Two Stanford University radio scientists offer evidence of what technology can

do to affect the sky by making waves on earth; they showed that very low

frequency radio waves can vibrate the magnetosphere and cause high-energy

particles to cascade into Earth's atmosphere. By turning the signal on or off,

they could stop the flow of energetic particles.

Weather Control Avalanches of energy dislodged by such radio waves could hit

us hard. Their work suggests that technicians could control global weather by

sending relatively small 'signals' into the Van Allen belts (radiation belts

around Earth). Thus Tesla's resonance effects can control enormous energies by

tiny triggering signals.

The Begich/ Manning book asks whether that knowledge will be used by

war-oriented or biosphere-oriented scientists.

The military has had about twenty years to work on weather warfare methods,

which it euphemistically calls weather modification. For example, rainmaking

technology was taken for a few test rides in Vietnam. The U.S. Department of

Defense sampled lightning and hurricane manipulation studies in Project Skyfire

and Project Stormfury. And they looked at some complicated technologies that

would give big effects. Angels Don't Play This HAARP cites an expert who says

the military studied both lasers and chemicals which they figured could damage

the ozone layer over an enemy. Looking at ways to cause earthquakes, as well as

to detect them, was part of the project named Prime Argus, decades ago. The

money for that came from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA,

now under the acronym ARPA.)

In 1994 the Air Force revealed its Spacecast 2020 master plan which includes

weather control. Scientists have experimented with weather control since the

1940's, but Spacecast 2020 noted that " using environmental modification

techniques to destroy, damage or injure another state are prohibited " . Having

said that, the Air Force claimed that advances in technology " compels a

reexamination of this sensitive and potentially risky topic. "

40 Years Of Zapping The Sky? As far back as 1958, the chief White House

advisor on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the U.S.

defense department was studying " ways to manipulate the charges of the earth and

sky and so affect the weather " by using an electronic beam to ionize or

de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area.

In 1966, Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald was associate director of the

Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California,

Los Angeles, was a member of the President's Science Advisory Committee, and

later a member of the President's Council on Environmental Quality. He published

papers on the use of environmental-control technologies for military purposes.

MacDonald made a revealing comment:

" The key to geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental

instabilities to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release

vastly greater amounts of energy. "

World-recognized scientist MacDonald had a number of ideas for using the

environment as a weapon system and he contributed to what was, at the time, the

dream of a futurist. When he wrote his chapter, " How To Wreck The Environment " ,

for the book Unless Peace Comes, he was not kidding around. In it he describes

the use of weather manipulation, climate modification, polar ice cap melting or

destabilization, ozone depletion techniques, earthquake engineering, ocean wave

control and brain wave manipulation using the planet's energy fields. He also

said that these types of weapons would be developed and, when used, would be

virtually undetectable by their victims. Is HAARP that weapon? The military's

intention to do environmental engineering is well documented.

U.S. Congress' subcommittee hearings on Oceans and International Environment

looked into military weather and climate modification conducted in the early

1970's. " What emerged was an awesome picture of far-ranging research and

experimentation by the Department of Defense into ways environmental tampering

could be used as a weapon, " said another author cited in Angels Don't Play This

HAARP.

The revealed secrets surprised legislators. Would an inquiry into the state of

the art of electromagnetic manipulation surprise lawmakers today? They may find

out that technologies developed out of the HAARP experiments in Alaska could

deliver on Gordon MacDonald's vision, because leading-edge scientists are

describing global weather as not only air pressure and thermal systems, but also

as an electrical system.

'Small Input, Big Effect' HAARP zaps the ionosphere where it is relatively

unstable. A point to remember is that the ionosphere is an active electrical

shield protecting the planet from the constant bombardment of high-energy

particles from space. This conducting plasma, along with Earth's magnetic field,

traps the electrical plasma of space and holds it back from going directly to

the earth's surface, says Charles Yost of Dynamic Systems, Leicester, North

Carolina.

" If the ionosphere is greatly disturbed, the atmosphere below is

subsequently disturbed. " .

Another scientist interviewed said there is a super-powerful electrical

connection between the ionosphere and the part of the atmosphere where our

weather comes onstage, the lower atmosphere.

One man-made electrical effect - power line harmonic resonance - causes

fallout of charged particles from the Van Allen (radiation) belts, and the

falling ions cause ice crystals (which precipitate rain clouds).

What about HAARP? Energy blasted upward from an ionospheric heater is not much

compared to the total in the ionosphere, but HAARP documents admit that

thousandfold-greater amounts of energy can be released in the ionosphere than

injected. As with MacDonald's " key to geophysical warfare " , " nonlinear " effects

(described in the literature about the ionospheric heater) mean small input and

large output. Astrophysicist Adam Trombly told Manning that an acupuncture model

is one way to look at the possible effect of multi-gigawatt pulsing of the

ionosphere. If HAARP hits certain points , those parts of the ionosphere could

react in surprising ways.

Smaller ionospheric heaters such as the one at Arecibo are underneath

relatively placid regions of the ionosphere, compared to the dynamic movements

nearer Earth's magnetic poles. That adds another uncertainty to HAARP - the

unpredictable and lively upper atmosphere near the North Pole.

HAARP experimenters do not impress common sense Alaskans such as Barbara

Zickuhr, who says " They're like boys playing with a sharp stick, finding a

sleeping bear and poking it in the butt to see what's going to happen. "

Could They Short-Circuit Earth? Earth as a spherical electrical system is a

fairly well-accepted model. However, those experimenters who want to make

unnatural power connections between parts of this system might not be thinking

of possible consequences. Electrical motors and generators can be caused to

wobble when their circuits are affected. Could human activities cause a

significant change in a planet's electrical circuit or electrical field? A paper

in the respected journal Science deals with manmade ionization from radioactive

material, but perhaps it could also be studied with HAARP-type skybusters in

mind:

" For example, while changes in the earth's electric field resulting from a

solar flare modulating conductivity may have only a barely detectable effect on

meteorology, the situation may be different in regard to electric field changes

caused by manmade ionization... "

Meteorology, of course, is the study of the atmosphere and weather. Ionization

is what happens when a higher level of power is zapped into atoms and knocks

electrons off the atoms. The resulting charged particles are the stuff of HAARP.

" One look at the weather should tell us that we are on the wrong path, " says

Paul Schaefer, commenting on HAARP-type technologies.

Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology is about the

military's plan to manipulate that which belongs to the world - the ionosphere.

The arrogance of the United States government in this is not without precedent.

Atmospheric nuclear tests had similar goals. More recently, China and France put

their people's money to destructive use in underground nuclear tests. It was

recently reported that the US government spent $3 trillion dollars on its

nuclear program since its beginnings in the 1940's. What new breakthroughs in

life science could have been made with all the money spent on death?

Begich, Manning, Roderick and others believe that democracies need to be

founded on openness, rather than the secrecy which surrounds so much military

science. Knowledge used in developing revolutionary weapons could be used for

healing and helping mankind. Because they are used in new weapons, discoveries

are classified and suppressed. When they do appear in the work of other

independent scientists, the new ideas are often frustrated or ridiculed, while

military research laboratories continue to build their new machines for the

killing fields.

However, the book by Manning and Begich gives hope that the military-

industrial- academic- bureaucratic Goliath can be affected by the combined power

of determined individuals and the alternative press. Becoming informed is the

first step to empowerment.

 

" Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke wrote: Great suggestion.. Do

you have any particular website or video link

you can send us to so we can all be on the same page to discuss it?

Misty

 

, Orus Moon

<orusmoon11 wrote:

>

> Check out HAARP sometime...............

 

 

 

 

 

 

In my heart, I think a woman has two choices: either she's a feminist

or a masochist. "

—Gloria Steinem

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Check out the all-new Mail beta - Fire up a more powerful email and get

things done faster.