The Great Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Hoax Exposed

[Guest guest]

The Great Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Hoax Exposed

 

Mike Adams

News Target

December 28, 2007

 

Watch the video:

 

 

 

For the last several years, HPV vaccines have been marketed to the

public and mandated in compulsory injections for young girls in

several states based on the idea that they prevent cervical cancer.

Now, NewsTarget has obtained documents from the FDA and other sources

(see below) which reveal that the FDA has been well aware for several

years that Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) has no direct link to cervical

cancer.

 

NewsTarget has also learned that HPV vaccines have been proven to be

flatly worthless in clearing the HPV virus from women who have already

been exposed to HPV (which includes most sexually active women),

calling into question the scientific justification of mandatory

" vaccinate everyone " policies.

 

Furthermore, this story reveals evidence that the vaccine currently

being administered for HPV — Gardasil — may increase the risk of

precancerous cervical lesions by an alarming 44.6 percent in some

women. The vaccine, it turns out, may be far more dangerous to the

health of women than doing nothing at all.

 

If true, this information reveals details of an enormous public health

fraud being perpetrated on the American people, involving FDA

officials, Big Pharma promoters, and even the governors of states like

Texas. The health and safety of tens of millions of young girls is at

stake here, and what this NewsTarget investigative report reveals is

that HPV vaccinations may not only be medically useless; they may also

be harmful to the health of the young girls receiving them.

 

This report reveals startling facts about the HPV vaccine that most

people will find shocking:

 

• How it may actually increase the risk of precancerous lesions by

44.6 percent.

 

• The FDA has, for four years, known that HPV was not the cause of

cervical cancer.

 

• Why mandatory HPV vaccination policies may cause great harm to young

girls.

 

• Why HPV infections are self-limiting and pose no real danger in

healthy women

 

• Little-known FDA documents that reveal astounding facts about Gardasil

 

• How Big Pharma promoted its Gardasil vaccine using disease mongering

and fear mongering

 

This story begins at a company called HiFi DNA Tech, LLC

(http://www.hifidna.com) a company involved in the manufacture of

portable HPV testing devices based on DNA sequencing analysis. HiFi

DNA Tech has been pushing to get the FDA to classify its HPV detection

technology as a " Class II " virology testing device. To understand why

this is a big deal, you have to understand the differences between

" Class II " and " Class III " virology testing devices.

 

Based on FDA rules, a Class III virology testing device is one that is

considered by the FDA to have " premarket approval, " meaning that it

cannot yet be sold to the public. In order for such a device to be

marketed to the public, it must be downgraded to Class II status,

which is considered a " special controls " status. Class II devices are,

" …those devices for which the general controls by themselves are

insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and

effectiveness, but for which there is sufficient information to

establish special controls to provide such assurance, including

performance standards, postmarket surveillance, patient registries,

development and dissemination of guidelines, recommendations, and any

other appropriate actions the agency deems necessary. "

 

In other words, a Class II device may or may not actually be safe, but

the FDA considers is safe enough to release to the public.

 

HiFi DNA Tech has been trying to get its HPV detection device

downgraded to a Class II device based on the following arguments:

 

• For more than 20 years, the FDA had regulated the HPV test as a

" test for cervical cancer. "

 

• But since at least 2003, the FDA has changed its position on the

relationship between Human Papilloma Virus and cervical cancer,

stating that the HPV strain is " not associated with cervical cancer. "

 

• Accordingly, HiFi DNA Tech is arguing that the HPV test it has

developed is no longer a test for cervical cancer, but is merely a

test for the presence of Human Papilloma Viruses — a shift that makes

the test far more reliable in its primary purpose. In other words, the

test is merely detecting the presence of a virus, not making a

diagnosis of a disease (which would be a much higher standard to meet).

 

On October 12, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech sued the Food and Drug

Administration in an attempt to force it to downgrade its HPV

detection technology to Class II (see

http://www.news-medical.net/?id=31180 ). Earlier in the year — on

March 7, 2007, HiFi DNA Tech filed the HPV PCR test reclassification

petition with the FDA. It is the information in this petition document

that led us to the FDA's knowledge that HPV is not linked to cervical

cancer.

 

Got all that? This is a somewhat complex story to follow, so here it

is again in summary:

 

• A company that manufacturers a DNA testing device that can detect

the presence of HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) is petitioning the FDA

(and suing the FDA) to get it to reclassify its medical device as a

" Class II " device based on the revelation that the FDA has already

adopted the position that HPV infections do not directly cause

cervical cancer.

 

• This would mean that the FDA has been aware for years that HPV does

not cause cervical cancer, which means that the FDA's approval of the

Gardasil vaccine — as well as the national push for Gardasil

vaccinations — is based on a grand medical hoax that, not

surprisingly, appears to be designed to exploit the fear of cancer to

sell vaccines. The victims in all this, of course, are the young girls

who are apparently being subjected to a medically useless (and

potentially dangerous) vaccine.

 

• None of this information was apparently known during the more recent

debates over the safety and efficacy of Gardasil, the HPV vaccine now

in use. This means that the public debate over mandatory HPV

vaccinations lacked key elements that now seem essential to reaching

rational, evidence-based conclusions over the safety and efficacy of

such vaccines.

 

Next, we reveal the FDA's statement that HPV is " not associated with

cervical cancer. "

 

The Reclassification Petition, dated March 7, 2007, is still posted on

the FDA's website:

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0210/07p-0210-ccp0001-01-vol1.pdf

 

In case the FDA removes this document (as it has been known to do),

we've posted a backup copy of the document on our own servers:

http://www.NewsTarget.com/downloads/FDA-HPV.pdf

 

This document reveals the following text:

 

The FDA news release of March 31, 2003 acknowledges that " most

infections (by HPV) are short-lived and not associated with cervical

cancer " , in recognition of the advances in medical science and

technology since 1988. In other words, since 2003 the scientific staff

of the FDA no longer considers HPV infection to be a high-risk disease

when writing educational materials for the general public whereas the

regulatory arm of the agency is still bound by the old classification

scheme that had placed HPV test as a test to stratify risk for

cervical cancer in regulating the industry.

 

NewsTarget sought to verify the existence of the FDA news release

referenced by this petition reclassification document and found that,

indeed, the FDA news release exists. In fact, it's still posted on the

FDA website at http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00890.html

 

In it, the FDA says, " The HPV DNA test is not intended to substitute

for regular Pap screening. Nor is it intended to screen women under 30

who have normal Pap tests. Although the rate of HPV infection in this

group is high, most infections are short-lived and not associated with

cervical cancer. " (Emphasis added.)

 

In other words, the FDA knew in 2003 that HPV infections are not

associated with cervical cancer.

 

Furthermore, the FDA states, in the same press release, " Most women

who become infected with HPV are able to eradicate the virus and

suffer no apparent long-term consequences to their health. "

 

In other words, HPV infections do not cause cervical cancer! Remember,

the entire push for mandatory HPV vaccinations of young girls across

the country has been the urgent call to " save " these young girls from

cervical cancer. The vaccine push has been about " savings lives. " But

as these documents clearly reveal, HPV is no threat to the lives of

young girls. In fact, as you will see below, HPV infections are

naturally self-limiting!

 

HPV Infections Resolve Themselves, Without Vaccines

 

As the reclassification petition reveals, HPV infections are naturally

self-limiting — meaning that they are controlled naturally, without

requiring intervention with drugs or vaccines. It is not the HPV virus

itself that causes cervical cancer but rather a persistent state of

ill-health on the part of the patient that makes her vulnerable to

persistent infections.

 

As the petition states:

 

" Based on new scientific information published in the past 15 years,

it is now generally agreed that identifying and typing HPV infection

does not bear a direct relationship to stratification of the risk for

cervical cancer . Most acute infections caused by HPV are

self-limiting [1, 4-7]. …Repeated sequential transient HPV infections,

even when caused by " high-risk " HPVs, are characteristically not

associated with high risk of developing squamous intraepithelial

lesions, a precursor of cervical cancer.

 

A woman found to be positive for the same strain (genotype) of HPV on

repeated testing is highly likely suffering from a persistent HPV

infection and is considered to be at high risk of developing

precancerous intraepithelial lesions in the cervix . It is the

persistent infection, not the virus, that determines the cancer risk. "

 

The FDA agrees with this assessment of the relationship between HPV

and cervical cancer, as evidenced by its 2003 news release quoted above.

 

Next, we reveal evidence that HPV vaccines actually cause precancerous

lesions in women.

 

The reclassification petition cited above also reveals that Gardasil

vaccines may increase the risk of developing precancerous lesions by

44.6 percent in some groups of women. This is found in a quote

referencing a document mentioned in the petition, which states:

 

" PCR-based HPV detection device with provision for accurate HPV

genotyping is more urgently needed now because vaccination with

Gardasil of the women who are already sero-positive and PCR-positive

for vaccine-relevant genotypes of HPV has been found to increase the

risk of developing high-grade precancerous lesions by 44.6%, according

to an FDA VRBPAC Background Document : Gardasil HPV Quadrivalent

Vaccine. May 18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting.

www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf "

 

NewsTarget tracked down the correct URL of the document referenced

above and found it in the FDA docket archives. We have placed a safe

backup copy at: http://www.NewsTarget.com/downloads/FDA-Gardasil.pdf

 

Sure enough, this document reveals startling information about the

extreme dangers apparently posed by Gardasil vaccinations. On page 13,

this document states:

 

" Concerns Regarding Primary Endpoint Analyses among Subgroups

 

There were two important concerns that were identified during the

course of the efficacy review of this BLA. One was the potential for

Gardasil to enhance disease among a subgroup of subjects who had

evidence of persistent infection with vaccine-relevant HPV types at

baseline. The other concern was the observations of CIN 2/3 or worse

cases due to HPV types not contained in the vaccine. These cases of

disease due to other HPV types have the potential to counter the

efficacy results of Gardasil for the HPV types contained in the vaccine.

 

1. Evaluation of the potential of Gardasil™ to enhance cervical

disease in subjects who had evidence of persistent infection with

vaccine-relevant HPV types prior to vaccination. The results of

exploratory subgroup analyses for study 013 suggested a concern that

subjects who were seropositive and PCR-positive for the

vaccine-relevant HPV types had a greater number of CIN 2/3 or worse

cases as demonstrated in the following table:

 

Observed Efficacy

- 44.6%

 

It appeared that subjects in this subgroup of study 013 who received

Gardasil™ might have had enhanced risk factors for development of CIN

2/3 or worse compared to placebo recipients. "

 

Revealing the Dangers of Gardasil

 

This revelation should be quite shocking to anyone who has been

following the debate over Gardasil and mandatory vaccinations of

teenage girls. First, it reveals that Gardasil appears to increase

disease by 44.6 percent in certain people — namely, those who were

already carriers of the same HPV strains used in the vaccine.

 

In other words, it appears that if the vaccine is given to a young

woman who already carries HPV in a " harmless " state, it may " activate "

the infection and directly cause precancerous lesions to appear. The

vaccine, in other words, may accelerate the development of

precancerous lesions in women.

 

This is information that has simply not been made available in the

debate over Gardasil vaccination policies. The pro-vaccination

rhetoric has always been about " saving lives " and it carried the

implied statement that Gardasil is perfectly safe for all women,

posing absolutely no increased risk of cancer. What these documents

reveal, however, is that Gardasil may, in fact, pose a serious

increase in the risk of cervical cancer in some recipients of the vaccine.

 

The FDA directly admits the vaccine is utterly useless in these women,

stating in the same document, " Finally, there is compelling evidence

that the vaccine lacks therapeutic efficacy among women who have had

prior exposure to HPV and have not cleared previous infection (PCR

positive and seropositive). "

 

What this essentially means is that the " safe " administering of the

Gardasil vaccine requires that it be administered only to virgins

(because virtually all women who are sexually active carry HPV

strains). That, of course, would require the direct questioning of the

sexual habits of all young girls before administering the vaccine.

 

Is this what the Governor of Texas really had in mind when he mandated

such vaccinations for all young girls in Texas? … a male doctor with a

vaccination needle in his hand and a thirteen-year-old girl sitting in

a private clinic room behind closed doors, with the male doctor asking

her, " Have you ever had sex? "

 

Clearly, this kind of patient questioning crosses all kinds of ethical

barriers when such vaccinations are made mandatory (as they have been

made in Texas). It puts the State in the positioning of ascertaining

the sexual habits of very young teenage girls and then potentially

causing them harm. It's not hard to suppose that most sexually active

teenage girls would claim to still be virgins (especially if their

parents were present), creating a situation where vaccines would be

routinely administered to precisely the HPV carrier subgroups for

which it has been demonstrated to greatly increase the risk of

precancerous lesions.

 

In other words, under a mandatory Gardasil vaccination scenario like

what exists in Texas today, a sexually-active young teenage girl has

to make a tough choice:

 

1) She can lie to her doctor, claim to be a virgin, receive the

vaccine and thereby potentially increase her risk of cervical cancer.

 

2) She can tell her doctor she's sexually active, thereby surrendering

her privacy and possibly subjecting herself to various consequences

from her sexual status being learned by her parents or guardians. (One

would hope, of course, that such sexual habits were not secrets, but

alas, we live in the real world where many teenage girls do indeed

have sex at a very early age…)

 

Furthermore, the young girl is unlikely to be given accurate

information about the health risks associated with the vaccine, since

virtually all health authorities are heavily involved in promoting

pro-vaccination propaganda, routinely ignoring scientific evidence

that might give reasonable people pause.

 

Naturally, the better scenario here is that the young girl is not

sexually active to begin with, but in a society where 8th and 9th

graders are already routinely engaged in sexual activities — almost

always unbeknownst to their parents — it seems naive to expect that

such girls would suddenly honor pledges of celibacy in order to

protect themselves from possible future dangers posed by a present-day

vaccine (especially when doctors blindly claim the vaccine is harmless).

 

There are also serious questions about the safety of the vaccine for

non-sexually-active young women. Yet even if the vaccine poses no

increased risk of cervical cancer for non-sexually-active young girls,

there's still the more serious question of: Does the vaccine work?

Does it really prevent cervical cancer in the first place? And that

question has already been clearly answered by the FDA's own admission

that HPV infections are not the cause of cervical cancer in the first

place.

 

When considering the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil vaccinations

on young teens, there are essentially four quadrants to consider, as

shown in the table below:

Quadrant I: Non-Sexually Active

No Gardasil Vaccine Quadrant II: Non-Sexually Active

Receives Gardasil Vaccine

Quadrant III: Sexually Active

No Gardasil Vaccine Quadrant IV: Sexually Active

Receives Gardasil Vaccine

 

Based on what we've learned from the FDA's own documents, here are the

likely outcomes of each of the four quadrants:

 

Quadrant I: Non-Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine

Outcome: No risk of cervical cancer.

 

Quadrant II: Non-Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine

Outcome: No medical benefit from vaccine.

 

Quadrant III: Sexually Active, No Gardasil Vaccine

Outcome: HPV presence is self-limiting and does not lead to cervical

cancer.

 

Quadrant IV: Sexually Active, Receives Gardasil Vaccine

Outcome: 44.6% Increased risk of precancerous lesions. No reduction in

cancer risk.

 

In other words, Gardasil adds no benefits to any quadrant! There is no

subgroup that actually benefits from a Gardasil vaccination. But there

is at least one quadrant in which Gardasil achieves an increased risk

of disease. Put another way, Gardasil helps no one, but it harms some.

 

This is hardly a position from which to mandate the vaccine for

everyone, especially since the vaccine has been widely prescribed as

" completely safe " for everyone. It is widely claimed by medical

authorities that the vaccine has no downside: No health risks, no

increased risk of disease and no potential to cause harm in women.

Clearly, these assumptions have no basis in scientific fact.

 

Keep in mind, too, that Merck, the manufacturer of Gardasil, has

publicly suggested that young boys should receive Gardasil

vaccinations! Why? Because they might engage in oral sex with girls

who carry the virus. Therefore, the story goes, young boys should be

vaccinated against this virus that they claim causes cervical cancer!

(Never mind the fact that boys don't have a cervix…) There is no end,

it seems, to the pseudoscientific nonsense that will be spouted in an

effort to sell more Garsasil vaccines to people who don't need them.

 

To further investigate this conclusion, NewsTarget took a closer look

at research published in the Journal of the American Medical

Association (August, 2007), entitled, " Effect of Human Papillomavirus

16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine Among Young Women With Preexisting

Infection "

 

This research sought to determine the usefulness of the HPV vaccine

among women who already carry HPV (which includes virtually all women

who are sexually active, regardless of their age).

 

This document can currently be found at a University of Louisville

document archive reprinted from JAMA. Click here to read the PDF yourself.

 

Just in case that copy disappears, we've also hosted the PDF here:

http://www.newstarget.com/downloads/HPV-Vaccine-Effects.pdf

 

This document reveals startling information about the ineffectiveness

of the Gardasil vaccine. It reveals that the HPV vaccine often caused

an increase in the presence of HPV strains while utterly failing to

clear the viruses in most women.

 

These shocking results caused the study authors to publish this

sobering conclusion, printed in JAMA:

 

" No significant evidence of a vaccine therapeutic effect was observed

in analyses restricted to women who received all doses of vaccine or

those with evidence of single HPV infections at entry (Table2). We

observed no evidence of vaccine effects when we stratified the

analysis on selected study entry characteristics reflective of

[various parameters] (TABLE3). Similarly, no evidence of vaccine

effects was observed in analyses stratified by other study entry

parameters thought to potentially influence clearance rates and

efficacy of the vaccine, including time since sexual initiation, oral

contraceptive use, cigarette smoking, and concomitant infection with C

trachomatis or N gonorrhoeae (Table 3). "

 

In other words, the authors found no evidence that the vaccine worked

at all. This observation led the authors to offer this damning

conclusion that appears to render Gardasil nothing more than a grand

medical hoax:

 

" … rates of viral clearance over a 12-month period are not influenced

by vaccination. "

 

The study goes on to state words that should cause every doctor,

Governor and health authority across the United States (and around the

world) to rethink Gardasil vaccination policies:

 

" …given that viral clearance rates did not differ by treatment group

and that persistent viral infection is the best established predictor

of risk of progression, it is unlikely that vaccination could have a

significant beneficial impact on rate of lesion progression.1,17

 

Results from our community-based study provide strong evidence that

there is little, if any, therapeutic benefit from the vaccine in the

population we studied. Furthermore, we see no reason to believe that

there is therapeutic benefit of the vaccine elsewhere because the

biological effect of vaccination among already infected women is not

expected to vary by population.

 

In other words, the vaccines didn't work on the population studied,

and there is no reason to believe that those same vaccines would

magically work on other populations, since the biology of women and

HPV is so similar across various populations.

 

It is difficult to take an honest look at this scientific evidence and

the statements made by the FDA and not come to the conclusion that

mandatory Gardasil vaccination policies being pushed across U.S.

states right now are based on something other than science.

 

There are many theories exploring the motivation for such vaccination

policies. Possible theories include:

 

Financial benefit: Big Pharma is pushing mandatory Gardasil

vaccination policies so that it can profit from selling more vaccines

to the states. This idea is at least partially supported by the fact

that the first state Governor to mandate such vaccines (Texas Gov.

Rick Perry) had undisclosed ties to Big Pharma. (A top official in

Perry's administration worked directly for Merck, the manufacturer of

Gardasil.)

 

Conspiracy to poison the people: This theory, which may stretch the

bounds of belief in some readers, proposes that such mandatory

vaccines are put in place in order to create future disease by

poisoning the people with dangerous chemicals and DNA fragments that

are knowingly added to vaccines. The poisoning of the people, it is

said, will pay off in future profits for Big Pharma when those people

develop other serious diseases requiring " treatment " with medications.

Many people who support this theory currently believe, for example,

that AIDS was engineered by human scientists and then administered to

the gay population in New York in the late 1980's through vaccines.

 

Control the sheeple: This theory supposes that the main purpose of

mandatory vaccines is to train the American public to get used to

submitting to compulsory medicines. Once a certain segment of the

population is targeted and effectively injected with mandatory

medicines, these policies can be extended to other groups and,

eventually, can encompass the entire population.

 

The first theory — Financial Benefit — is the simplest and easiest

theory to believe. It requires nothing more than simple greed on the

part of Big Pharma, along with the usual level of corruption at the

FDA. NewsTarget believes this is the most likely explanation for

events surrounding Gardasil vaccination policies, but we do not rule

out other possible explanations, either.

Profits at Any Cost

 

What's clear in all this is that mandatory HPV vaccination programs

are not based on anything resembling good science. They seem to be

based on a carefully planted meme — an idea that, coincidentally,

spreads from one person's mind to the next much like a virus, gaining

momentum as the mainstream media (MSM), health authorities, FDA and

drug company reps repeat the meme on a regular basis. And what is that

meme? That HPV causes cervical cancer, and, therefore, HPV

vaccinations could halt cervical cancer and save lives.

 

This meme appears to have no real scientific basis. It is more of an

urban legend than anything resembling scientific fact. Furthermore, it

appears to have been conjured by those in a position to financially

benefit from the adoption of that meme (the drug companies who

manufacture, sell, and profit from the sale of HPV vaccines). In this

case, that drug company is Merck, a powerful corporation with a

dubious history rife with charges of price fixing, large-scale tax

avoidance (it set up offshore accounts to avoid billions in U.S.

taxes), widespread biopiracy, conspiring with the FDA to discredit its

critics, burying negative evidence about its drugs (see the history of

Vioxx at www.NewsTarget.com/vioxx.html ) and numerous other actions

that many consider to be criminal in nature.

 

There is no question that Merck has the lack of ethics, the

willingness and the means to commit medical fraud on an unprecedented

scale. Based on the information revealed in this report, the mandatory

vaccination of young girls with Gardasil appears to be the boldest

medical hoax yet perpetrated by the company. You can read the true

history about Merck and its crimes at:

http://www.newstarget.com/Merck.html

 

NewsTarget believes Merck is currently engaged in a massive medical

fraud, and that it has influenced, corrupted or otherwise recruited

FDA officials and state health authorities in a grand scheme to sell

vaccines that are at best medically worthless, and at worst medically

dangerous. Halting cervical cancer seems to have nothing to do with

the marketing and prescribing of Gardasil. The entire campaign push

for mandatory HPV vaccinations seems to be based entirely in the realm

of sales and marketing.

 

The " marketing " of HPV vaccines involves classic disease mongering —

spreading fear about a disease as a way of corralling patients into

begging for the " solution " that just happens to be readily available

from the same pharmaceutical company that promoted the disease in the

first place. The hype over cervical cancer and Gardasil seems to be

nothing more than a classic case of fear-based marketing designed to

create such consumer fear over cervical cancer that a massive public

outcry would result in legislation mandating the vaccines.

 

Please share this article with others.

 

Permission is granted to reprint this article in its entirety, for any

non-commercial purpose, as long as full credit is given to the author

(Mike Adams) and a clearly visible clickable link is placed back to

this URL at NewsTarget.com. You may also freely quote from this

article with proper citation.

 

HiFi DNA Tech files lawsuit against FDA

http://www.news-medical.net/?id=31180

 

Reclassification Petition - Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA Nested

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Detection Device (K063649 )

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0210/07p-0210-ccp0001-01-vol1.pdf

 

FDA Approves Expanded Use of HPV Test

http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00890.html

 

VRBPAC Background Document, Gardasil™ HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine, May

18, 2006 VRBPAC Meeting

http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4222B3.pdf

 

Effect of Human Papillomavirus 16/18 L1 Viruslike Particle Vaccine

Among Young Women With Preexisting Infection

Journal of the American Medical Association, August, 2007

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1444