Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 Replacing incandescent bulbs with fluorescent? I thought Fluorescent bulbs were being phased out because they contain dangerous levels of mercury. Betsy " Misty L. Trepke " <mistytrepke wrote: Comments? Misty L. Trepke http://health. Health warning over planned changeover to greener bulbs http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/latestnews/Health-warning-over- planned-changeover.3644526.jp by Marc Horne THE UK Government's planned switchover from traditional lightbulbs to low-energy lighting could cause health problems for tens of thousands of people, experts have warned. The process of phasing out the conventional pear- shaped 'incandescent' bulbs and replacing them with more energy- efficient fluorescent models begins this month and is due to be completed by 2011 as part of the UK's efforts to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions. But Professor John Hawk, dermatology spokesman for the British Skin Foundation, warned that the new bulbs will cause problems for people with light-sensitive skin. Hawk told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: " Fluorescent lights seem to have some sort of ionising characteristic, where they affect the air around them. This does affect a certain number of people, probably tens of thousands of people in Britain. Certain forms of eczema, for example, flare up anywhere near fluorescent lights. " I strongly suggest that incandescent bulbs remain available for use in the home. " Keven Verdun, chief executive of the Lighting Association, insisted that the needs of people with medical conditions were being taken into account during the switchover. The full article contains 191 words and appears in Scotland On Sunday newspaper.Last Updated: 05 January 2008 9:03 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.