Guest guest Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 ganesh - from which text did vagbhata take 100% of the information, copy it, and then form an entirely new book from it? lets see your citations - i provided several examples for " dr " rahul like many ancient medical writers, vagbhata did take information from earlier texts and compile them into his own, but he did not do this to deceive and claim another's words and personal/clinical experience as his own - in many respects he was simply performing a huge public service, to preserve and disseminate the ancient ayurvedic knowledge, and to make it a little more intelligible and what was the result? vagbhata single-handedly revived and supported the practice of ayurveda, making his text(s) the most celebrated and perhaps the most useful of any existing ayurvedic text ever - can we say the same of dr. rahul's website? as a last note, perhaps you should ask the people from whom dr rahul took this information, and ask them if its ok that he did it unlike in vagbhata's case, where the knowledge was in threat of being lost, i found the plagiarized materials simply by copying and pasting in google best... todd caldecott ________ > Vagbhata was a 100% copy and paster............ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 9, 2007 Report Share Posted July 9, 2007 The concept of plagiarism only dates back to around the English Renaissance; before that the message was considered the important thing, not the author, and it was fairly routine for people to take material from one text to enrich their own and with so few books, as you say, it was a real service. It is all a matter of perspective. I think with the web, we are swinging back the other way. It is a fairly hot topic in the English departments right now and we are debating it, documenting it, and grading down for it Darla On 7/9/07, Todd Caldecott <todd wrote: > from which text did vagbhata take 100% of the information, copy it, > and then form an entirely new book from it? <snip> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 Dear I could not bear it when Gerald compared Vagbhata with another person because I worship Vagbhata. I thought that I was responding to Gerald's ironic message rather reciprocally. I am sorry that you were annoyed at my comments as any Ayurvedist would be annoyed. I respect your faith in Ayurveda. With regards KKGanesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 no worries! we are on the same page then best... todd Caldecott > Posted by: " ganesh kk " gnshkk gnshkk >I am sorry that you > were annoyed at my comments as any Ayurvedist would be annoyed. I > respect your faith in Ayurveda. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 11, 2007 Report Share Posted July 11, 2007 > I could not bear it when Gerald compared Vagbhata with another person because I worship Vagbhata. I thought that I was responding to Gerald's ironic message rather reciprocally. I am sorry that you were annoyed at my comments as any Ayurvedist would be annoyed. I respect Hi Ganesh and other members, Thanks for the fascinating responses. First of all, let me say I have no strong moral stance about plagiarism per se; but I do get annoyed when it is used dishonestly. Nowadays, intellectual property is a complex issue that we have to deal with more carefully. Therefore, when I implied that Vagbhata was a plagiarist, I did not mean it with any negative intent. I said it with tongue in cheek, to point out, as you say, the irony of a common practice of yesterday being continued today. You were right to point out the difference between the situations. I do not really worship anyone in Ayurveda, which may be a reflection of my superficial understanding. My understanding is that Vagbhata etc, were human beings like us, struggling with our mundane issues, and doing the best we can. I do admire and respect Vagbhata though, for the valuable work he has done in making Ayurveda more comprehensible for us today. Sometimes I may say things that challenge widely accepted beliefs. This is always done in good faith, for the sake of discussion and helping us all expand our knowledge and awareness. After all, it takes two eyes to perceive depth. I am very grateful to have discovered this great forum, and its thought-provoking differences of opinion and knowledge. Thank you all. Best regards, Gerald Auckland, Aotearoa - New Zealand Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.