How cell phones & Wi-Fi signals can cause cell damage, etc.

[Guest guest]

Ken Uzzell

 

http://heal-me.com.au

 

Interesting article on how cell phones & Wi-Fi signals can cause cell

damage, etc.

 

Non-thermal bio-electro-magnetic effects explained

Why calcium and potassium effects in the research are so important

John is proud of his machine for harvesting ripe apples. It works by shaking

the tree with just the right force. If it is too weak, no apples fall off, if

it is too strong, they all fall off, but if it is just right, only the ripe

ones fall off and can be harvested. If you can follow this, you will be able to

see easily how weak electromagnetic fields can give biological effects without

generating significant heat.

 

Their effect is to reduce the stability of the delicate membranes that surround

living cells and divide them into compartments. They are made mostly of

negatively charged molecules interspersed with positively-charged ions that

help to bind them together. Divalent ions (ions with two charges) such as

calcium are better at binding than monovalent ions (having only one charge)

such as potassium. Bawin and her co-workers in 1975 showed that electromagnetic

fields can selectively remove calcium from cell membranes, which would reduce their

stability. This has been repeated in other laboratories and has been found to

occur only with very weak radiation and is restricted to certain 'amplitude

windows', above and below which there is no effect.

 

The explanation is simple if we remember John's apple harvester. The

alternating electromagnetic fields 'shake' the cell membranes, with the

negatively-charged structural components and the positive binding ions moving

in opposite directions. If the field is too weak, nothing happens. If it is too

strong, all the ions are driven off and then back onto the membrane with each

cycle. But if it is 'just right' only the more strongly charged ions (such as

divalent calcium) are affected and are selectively removed. Their place is then

taken by less-affected monovalent ions such as potassium. This occurs mainly

with low frequency alternating fields or radio-frequency fields that are

amplitude-modulated or pulsed at a low frequency.

 

This effect is particularly strong at around 16Hz, which is the ion cyclotron

resonant frequency for potassium ions in the Earth's magnetic field. Free ions

progressively absorb electromagnetic energy at their resonant frequencies,

which increases their ability to replace calcium ions and so enhances the

calcium loss from membranes. Potassium is the most likely ion to replace

calcium since it is by far the most abundant free positive ion in living cells

(it outnumbers free calcium by about 10,000 to 1). Its 16Hz resonant frequency

therefore gives the largest loss of calcium from membranes.

 

Many other biological effects tend to be most extreme at around the 16Hz

resonant frequency of potassium, suggesting that the replacement of calcium by

potassium in cell membranes may be fundamental to a large number of them. For

example, this has caused considerable concern about the effects on health of

the TETRA system for mobile communications, which use a pulse frequency of

17.6Hz.

 

These effects are biologically important because the loss of calcium ions

weakens the membranes so that they are more likely to tear and develop

temporary holes, making them permeable even to large molecules such as enzymes.

The leakage of digestive enzymes from lysosomes (membrane-bound organelles that

normally digest waste) into the rest of the cell is almost certainly

responsible for the fragmentation of DNA caused by prolonged exposure to mobile

phone radiation in human and animal cell cultures. This genetic damage has been

reported in several studies and is likely to cause cancer, a reduction in

fertility (both of which are now becoming apparent) and possible mutations in

future generations.

 

Wireless networks (WLAN; Wi-Fi)

There is no reason to believe that wireless networks are any safer. Although

the signal is weaker, this does not necessarily mean it is safer. Because the

effect only occurs in specific 'amplitude windows', a weaker signal could even

be more dangerous, especially since the router radiation is continuous.

 

An important consideration for teachers is that the radiation from WiFi could

make neurones leak, the effect being to increase their internal calcium

concentration, which will accelerate the production of action potentials. This

can improve the response-time to simple stimuli, but will also generate

spurious action potentials that could result in confused thought and an

inability to concentrate on complex tasks like classroom learning. The likely

immediate outcomes of WiFi in schools may be symptoms similar to Attention

Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in some of the more electrosensitive

pupils.

 

FROM: http://www.hese-project.org/hese-uk/en/niemr/resonance1.php

(Other articles of interest there, too.)

 

 

Radiating

UNCONDITIONAL LOVE & Truth

To ALL who share our circle, our

universe, our love, our trust.

May

I always be found worthy.

Gratitude

& Thankfulness to All of Us

aSoaringHawk

Look at everything as though you were seeing it either for the

first or last time. Then your time on earth will be filled with joy & glory.

Thank you for YOU, ALL!