Fwd: [SymphonicHealth] More on: 75% oncologists replied that they WOULD NOT TAKE CHEMO

December 9, 2007

jdrape wrote: <SymphonicHealth ><jdrapeSun, 9 Dec 2007 11:23:09 -0500[symphonicHealth] More on: 75% oncologists replied that they WOULD NOT TAKE CHEMOHYPERLINK"http://alternativecancer.us/conventional.htm"http://alternativecancer.us/conventional.htmIn 1986 McGill Cancer Center scientists surveyed 118 oncologists whospecialized in lung cancer. They were asked if they would take chemo if theydeveloped lung cancer. Three-quarters replied that they WOULD NOT TAKECHEMO. From "Reclaiming Our Health"of the by John Robbins, 1996. Publishedby HJ Kramer, Box 1082, Tiburon, CA 94920. In 1984 an unusual convention of doctors was held in Chicago. Nine eminentphysicians from all over the United States spoke to an auditorium

packedwith their colleagues. The name of the conference was Dissent in Medicine.The theme at the conference was the propensity of the nation's medicalhierarchy to lie to the public. Among the speakers was Alan S. Levin, M.D.,professor of immunology at the University of California, San Francisco,Medical School, who stated that "Practicing physicians are intimidated intousing regimes which they know do not work. One of the most glaring examplesis chemotherapy, which does not work for the majority of cancers."----------------Despite the yearly fanfare regarding new cancer drugs, the percentage ofAmericans dying from cancer in 2003 was about the same as it was in 1970.But, still conventional doctors can't prescribe alternatives cancertreatments. Six hundred lobbyists paid by pharmaceutical companies are doingtheir best to make sure that conventional doctors never can prescribealternative cancer

treatments.After 2003, the number of new cancer cases became artificially reduced whichallowed agencies like the American Cancer Society to claim that progress isbeing made. In 2004 the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reported that VAhospitals in at least 13 states are no longer reporting cancer cases andthat reporting has been inconsistent in 14 additional states. Therefore, asmany as 70,000 new cancer cases (about 5% of the national total) were notreported. Any improvement in the number of cancer cases is therefore indoubt. ----------------Considering Chemo? A study of over 10,000 patients shows clearly that chemo’s supposedly strongtrack record with Hodgkin’s disease (lymphoma) is actually a lie. Patientswho underwent chemo were 14 times more likely to develop leukemia and 6times more likely to develop cancers of the bones, joints, and soft tissuesthan those patients who did not undergo

chemotherapy (NCI Journal 87:10). Safe and effective plant based treatments cannot produce large profitsbecause they cannot be patented. Large profits are needed to pay for theexpensive FDA approved clinical trials. So plant based treatments never getFDA approved to treat a disease. Your doctor can only prescribe treatmentsthat are FDA approved. If your doctor prescribes treatments that are not FDAapproved, he or she can be sued. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.17/1179 - Release 12/9/200711:06 AM