Difference between Bach Flower Remedies and homeopathic remedies

[Guest guest]

Dear group members,

 

I read with interest an interesting discussion that took place about

the possbility of overdoing Bach Flower Remedies in another group.

One member who is a practiotioner of both Bach Flower Remedies and

Homeopathy wrote that one could start getting the very emotions and

other symptoms that one started curing and that new symptoms may come

up, alerting us for new remedies. Others, felt that BFRs are harmless

if continued after the cure has taken place and in that way are not

going to be proven unlike homeopathic remedies.

 

As some members rightly pointed out, the need for a remedy comes from

within and so if the need passes, usually we forget to take them. And

if someone starts taking BFRs or any other substance deliberately to

see what happens, one is intending to prove the remedy. And intention

is very important for provings to come up even in homeopathy. So, the

remedy interacts accordingly. This is my view and is also supported

by the Reiki group in which I am a member.

 

There was an interesting discussion in one of the popular homeopathic

forums about the role of intent in provings. Intent sets up the

sensitivity. To a sensitive, even a small single dose may set off a

big reaction. To one who is not sensitive, a good number of

repetitions may be needed. It is like saying hello three times to

some one who is thinking of something else before we can get the

attention. One hello or no hello is needed if the other person is

already attentive, i.e. tuned in.

 

I feel there is scope to unify both schools of thought with a little

more friendly discussion. What Dr.Bach wrote in respect of Flower

essences is official, and that is that Bach Flower Remedies stop

acting once their purpose is served. Other experiences may need to be

integrated after understanding the causative factors.

 

One difference to be kept in mind is that BFRs are dilutions and not

potencies unlike homeopathic remedies. That makes a big difference.

 

Pl. do share your perceptions.

 

Regards.

 

Swamy

[Guest guest]

namaste,swamy ji,

this is a very interesting point.i do agree that intent makes a lot of difference to the remedy and person taking the remedy.should a person start a remedy dtermined to prove its worthlessness,it will not really benefit him in any way for he has already built up so much psychic resistance to it.

regards,seeker"S.V.Swamy" <swamy wrote:

Dear group members,I read with interest an interesting discussion that took place about the possbility of overdoing Bach Flower Remedies in another group. One member who is a practiotioner of both Bach Flower Remedies and Homeopathy wrote that one could start getting the very emotions and other symptoms that one started curing and that new symptoms may come up, alerting us for new remedies. Others, felt that BFRs are harmless if continued after the cure has taken place and in that way are not going to be proven unlike homeopathic remedies. As some members rightly pointed out, the need for a remedy comes from within and so if the need passes, usually we forget to take them. And if someone starts taking BFRs or any other substance deliberately to see what happens, one is intending to prove the remedy. And intention is very

important for provings to come up even in homeopathy. So, the remedy interacts accordingly. This is my view and is also supported by the Reiki group in which I am a member. There was an interesting discussion in one of the popular homeopathic forums about the role of intent in provings. Intent sets up the sensitivity. To a sensitive, even a small single dose may set off a big reaction. To one who is not sensitive, a good number of repetitions may be needed. It is like saying hello three times to some one who is thinking of something else before we can get the attention. One hello or no hello is needed if the other person is already attentive, i.e. tuned in.I feel there is scope to unify both schools of thought with a little more friendly discussion. What Dr.Bach wrote in respect of Flower essences is official, and that is that Bach Flower Remedies stop acting once their purpose is served. Other experiences may need to

be integrated after understanding the causative factors.One difference to be kept in mind is that BFRs are dilutions and not potencies unlike homeopathic remedies. That makes a big difference.Pl. do share your perceptions.Regards.Swamy

[Guest guest]

Dear Surruku,

 

Thanks for adding your perception. And one kind request to all, who

reply. Kindly remove the mails at the bottom including only a small

portion of the latest mail to help in reconnecting. The subject

anyway helps us in connecting. If the subject needs to be changed,

pl. keep the old subject in brackets.

 

Thanks for understanding.

 

Regards.

 

Swamy

 

wholistichealth , surruku surruku

<surruku> wrote:

> namaste,swamy ji,

> this is a very interesting point.i do agree that intent makes a lot

of difference to the remedy and person taking the remedy.should a

 

messages curtailed....