Guest guest Posted November 23, 2000 Report Share Posted November 23, 2000 There are risks and costs to a program of action. But they are far less than the long-range risks and costs of inaction. -- John F. Kennedy PLEASE FORWARD: From the desk of Robert Flammia Editor/Publisher The Rub, a newsletter by and for those giving or receiving the benefits of massage or other somatic practices. I believe it fitting to quote JFK on the 37th anniversary of his assassination. If you are in favor of licensing massage or favor the NCE, to avoid angst, delete this message now. But before you go, please read at least the first part, written by a massage school owner She titled it 'The Myths of Licensing' . This mailer is an attempt to raise consciousness in those that may favor licensing who are in unlicensed states , for those who are in licensed states that are discontent and a request for financial help to support a booth at the League of Cities Conference in Boston. First... 'The Myths of Licensing' by Ramona Moody " You're right about massage therapists who don't really understand the issues in licensing. In years of teaching massage classes, I've noticed the myths they believe: 1. Licensing will make us " respectable. " (The most important kind of respect is self-respect, which evidently we as a group don't have.) 2. If we have state licensing, we can bill insurance. (Not necessarily.) 3. Insurance billing will guarantee income. (Ask doctors and chiropractors what insurance companies have done to their income.) 4. Higher requirements will keep out the prostitutes. (When the 1000 hour exemption was passed in San Diego, all the parlor owners sent their employees to school to get 1000 hours of training. Or, they bought certificates from the couple of schools in California that sell certificates without requiring attendance in classes.) 5. If we have state licensing we won't have to go through the cities any more. (The truth is, if we have state licensing we just add a layer of bureaucracy. We would still have to go to the cities for local licensing, the same as any other profession.) Also, many don't understand that when you lobby to get a law passed, the proposed law is put out on the floor so that anyone and everyone can comment and suggest changes. The law you propose is never going to be the law you get passed in the end. All groups will have their own agenda to protect and will want to make changes in your proposal that suit their own agendas. Without understanding the needs and concerns of all involved, you'll never get any kind of consensus and agreement on a beneficial law. " We have heard the stories of what has happened in states that got what was asked for. The Chiropractic Board governs massage in MD. Other boards not related to massage govern in other states. The ante goes up without any of the workers having any say in it. State boards grab power from those not wanting to be associated with massage. Out of hand boards. It will only get worse. -------- Now, a synopsis of the Freedom For Healthcare Access Act signed into law in Minnesota, in May, 2000. Are you aware that, in May, the most enlightened piece of legislation, related to healthcare in this country, was signed into law in Minnesota? The bill is entitled, Freedom of Healthcare Access Bill. The following is a very brief synopsis of what the bill wanted to address and what the bill accomplished: 1. Non-medical health care practitioners of all kinds for decades have been vulnerable to charges of practice of medicine without a license. 2. Licensed health care professionals are vulnerable to being disciplined and losing their license for practicing holistic care outside of the scope of their conventional standards. 3. In our country we expect to be able to practice our professions and trades without interference. The medical laws have changed that for the healing professions. Licensure requires the legislature to give the authority of the police power of the state to a particular group. This creates some bizarre dialogues in the natural health community and does not work for care and practices that have for centuries been part of the public domain. 4. The Minnesota Model is based on beliefs that: There are many different types of healers and trades and arts. Practices should remain in the public domain. Consumers have a right to truthful information. Consumers have the right to be treated with integrity, honesty, safety, and truthfullness by practitioners. Government should balance its' ability to protect the public and the consumers right of access. 5. The Minnesota Model is based on the client healer relationship. It mandates that all unlicensed practitioners can practice as long as: 1. No surgery, radiation, prescription drugs, puncture of the skin etc etc etc. 2. They follow specific ethical guidelines. 3. They provide the client with proper disclosure. The bill sets up an office " Unlicensed Complementary and Alternative Health Care " in the Department of Health to take complaints from the public and provide discipline when necessary. How bad can a bill like this be? The gist of this law will be carried to Boston to present at the League of Cities Conference in order to show local governments an alternative to restrictive ordinances which prevent healers outside of medicine to practice. This bill was written with the consumer in mind. Why the League of Cities Conference? Because the AMTA and the NCE are going to be there. They are the only folk at the conference representing anything related to our trade or, for that matter, healthcare. They are spending a lot of money to plant seeds which lead to how we, as workers, are governed in cities. They do work both ends against the middle, at the state level with paid lobbyists and at local levels with model ordinances and taking action at the League of Cities. You can help keep our freedom to practice as we please, by sending a non deductible donation too MN Natural Health Legal Reform Project 3236 17th Ave So #1 MPLS MN 55407 Please mark it Boston Action. If you prefer to remain anonymous, write me. In getting involved with this movement, I have been told the important thing to remember is to think outside of the box. Where did that concept come from? I am looking at the big picture of which massage, and the field of somatics, are but one small piece. There are many other folk out there wanting to do their own thing without the yoke of unnecessary governance. The MN Act is a true practitioner/client oriented piece of work. Please think outside the box and support our efforts If you want off this rub mailer ask Happy Thanksgiving. Robert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.