Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an article in JAMA: <A HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\ uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5 Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to black and white. The headline: Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000 Deaths Every Year If you have an interest, you can read the article at: http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm Rich in Minnesota <A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions of hits to your favorite web site for FREE!</A> http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 Imagine how much I like having this junk clutter up my mail box. Besides it has been proven that the largest cause of death is stupidity. Like believing any statistic that get published in the internet! - <rputman <undisclosed-recipients:> Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:17 AM The third leading cause of death in the US > I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an > article in JAMA: > <A HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & l ist_uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5 > > Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason > that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to > black and white. > > The headline: > Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000 > Deaths Every Year > > If you have an interest, you can read the article at: > http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm > > Rich in Minnesota > > <A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions of hits to your favorite web site for FREE!</A> > http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 I didn't see the article at either url that you posted. rputman wrote: >I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an >article in JAMA: ><A HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\ uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5 > >Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason >that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to >black and white. > >The headline: >Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000 >Deaths Every Year > >If you have an interest, you can read the article at: >http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm > >Rich in Minnesota > > <A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions of hits to your favorite web site for FREE!</A> > http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 16, 2002 Report Share Posted October 16, 2002 Dear Friends, To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of the US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people were killed by automobiles in the same area during that time period. If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more likely to put me in contact with doctors. At 08:17 AM 10/16/2002, you wrote: >I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an >article in JAMA: ><A >HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list\ _uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal >American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5 > >Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason >that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to >black and white. > >The headline: >Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000 >Deaths Every Year > >If you have an interest, you can read the article at: >http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm > >Rich in Minnesota -- With kindest regards, Barry Carter <bcarter 2319 Balm Baker City, Oregon 97814 Phone: 541-523-3357 Web Pages: Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm We must either let the Law of Love rule us through and through or not at all. Love among ourselves based on hatred of others breaks down under the slightest pressure. The fact is such love is never real love. It is an armed peace. And so it will be in this great movement in the West against war. War will only be stopped when the conscience of mankind has become sufficiently elevated to recognize the undisputed supremacy of the Law of Love in all the walks of life. Some say this will never come to pass. I shall retain the faith till the end of my earthly existence that this shall come to pass . . . --Mahatma Gandhi-- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Well I do live in the DC area, and it would be nice if we could pick and choose like that but the risks are cumulative, and unlike automotive risks there are really not any things we can do to reduce our odds vs the sniper. You can only go so long without buying gas, groceries..... Go pick some other example. We have more than enough to worry about here as it is. - Karen Barry Carter wrote: > Dear Friends, > > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington > DC > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population > of > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent > of the > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were > killed by > doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people were killed > by > automobiles in the same area during that time period. > > If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial > > sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is > more > likely to put me in contact with doctors. > > At 08:17 AM 10/16/2002, you wrote: > >I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is > from an > >article in JAMA: > ><A > > HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\ uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal > > >American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5 > > > >Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a > reason > >that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change > everything to > >black and white. > > > >The headline: > >Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing > 250,000 > >Deaths Every Year > > > >If you have an interest, you can read the article at: > >http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm > > > >Rich in Minnesota > > > -- > > With kindest regards, > > Barry Carter > <bcarter > 2319 Balm > Baker City, Oregon 97814 > Phone: 541-523-3357 > Web Pages: > Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm > ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm > > We must either let the Law of Love rule us through and through or not > at > all. Love among ourselves based on hatred of others breaks down under > the > slightest pressure. The fact is such love is never real love. It is an > > armed peace. And so it will be in this great movement in the West > against > war. War will only be stopped when the conscience of mankind has > become > sufficiently elevated to recognize the undisputed supremacy of the Law > of > Love in all the walks of life. Some say this will never come to pass. > I > shall retain the faith till the end of my earthly existence that this > shall > come to pass . . . > --Mahatma Gandhi-- > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Wouldn't the guy have to be a total idiot to try it again? I would think that while he's totally insane to be sniping to begin with, he doesn't actually want to get caught, but then maybe he does. Either way, with the " alert " going (at least that's what's being reported on the news) and a " heads up " sort of thing by the gov. agencies, you'd think it might be a bit safer. Its really kinda like the attack on the World Trade Center. We could all be quaking under our sheets at home and never go out, but we can't live that way. Eventually, we have to live again. Its not a comparison of real equal magnitude perhaps, but it is a comparison of " terror " . As far as statistic for yearly deaths, I think it depends on whats being sold. I'm not sure where the polls are from and what the comparisons are, however, I'd say if you find someone advertising how many deaths there are a year, you'll find they're advertising something or other or perhaps doing a fund raising of some sort. So, if people want to now start thinking about how doctors cause so many deaths, its a great way for the holistic or alternative medicine areas to get back at the medical for all the times they tried to put them out of business. I don't know that for a fact, however, its a good shot. Its all very money and political oriented as far as I can tell. Lyn --- Karen O'Donoghue <karen wrote: > Well I do live in the DC area, and it would be nice if we > could pick and > choose like that but the risks are cumulative, and unlike > automotive > risks there are really not any things we can do to reduce our > odds vs > the sniper. You can only go so long without buying gas, > groceries..... > > Go pick some other example. We have more than enough to worry > about > here as it is. > > - Karen > > Barry Carter wrote: > > > Dear Friends, > > > > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the > Washington > > DC > > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the > population > > of > > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 > percent > > of the > > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people > were > > killed by > > doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people > were killed > > by snipped for brevity... Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Caroline wrote: > << this thread is certainly about current events, but not particularly the > list's subject matter >> > To make the best choices, consumers need to be informed. The article at http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm gives people various specific data related to allopathic health care. There are likely people on this list who have friends who may be facing a decision about some health condition and may be wondering which route to take -- allopathic or holistic. I believe that most people in such situations would have NO IDEA of the dangers of going the allopathic route. To the extent that such information remains hidden, it does the patient a disservice by depriving them of an informed choice. << Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner for the effort in anyone's eyes. >> For perspective, let's look at this issue in a slightly different context. Imagine Caroline that you were a researcher several decades ago who discovered that cigarettes cause cancer. Should you not release your findings to the public because that would be negativity/mud slinging? How about the people who discovered the tire problems on Ford Explorers that were causing fatal accidents. Should they have not released their findings because that would be negative and not taking the high road? Dr. Mercola is on a mission to inform consumers -- the idea being that INFORMED consumers will make better choices regarding their health care. Would you really prefer to RESTRICT information given to consumers to only the good news?! Tom Vizzini wrote: << It has been proven that the largest cause of death is stupidity. Like believing any statistic that get published in the internet! >> KNOWING the ramifications of a choice and then making a bad choice anyway is one thing. But NOT realizing the ramifications of a choice is something else -- not stupidity. Sure Tom, a lot of bogus stuff is published on the Internet. But sometimes it is possible to discern bogus from valid. In this case, the data was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA, the fountainhead of allopathic medicine. I have to give them credit for introspection. After all, how could an organization improve on a serious problem if they refuse to acknowledge the existence of that problem? Rich Putman in Minnesota A Bumper Sticker for Women PRINCESS, HAVING HAD SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE WITH PRINCES, SEEKS FROG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Hi All: I just wanted to make a comment on this thread (which is certainly about current events, but not particularly the list's subject matter...) I believe that people interested in holism, true holism, which approaches the entire person, should bear two things in mind when beginning a business in holism. The first is, that you must not lose sight of your ideals in pursuit of success and money, or lose yourself and what is holistic about you in the process. Secondly, approaching a client holistically is what holistic practitioners are all about. That takes more time and individual effort, something the current system is not all about. So yes, although sometimes it can be money and politically oriented, my personal opinion is that it takes a special person, a focused and honest and generous person, to be a pioneer. What holism does not need is the same people who have saturated allopathy with sales pitches and aggression to do the same to what ideally should be a more client focused, choice oriented way of approaching health. Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner for the effort in anyone's eyes. Bear that in mind. Personally, as a person who " straddles the fence " , working in the allopathic as well as holistic systems, I want to be a bridge, not a bridge burner. Efforts to burn bridges are wasteful, and do not accomplish the goal of information people seem to think they do. Frankly, it just disgusts me to see people dissing each other, mostly out of spite and poverty consciousness. Thanks, Caroline > > So, if people want to now start thinking about how doctors cause > so many deaths, its a great way for the holistic or alternative > medicine areas to get back at the medical for all the times they > tried to put them out of business. I don't know that for a > fact, however, its a good shot. Its all very money and > political oriented as far as I can tell. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Well, I for one agree with Caroline. The focus should not be on scare tactics, but on information. One of the unfortunate aspects of wellness is that often one is forced into complicated decisions and challenges when one is ill and has the least amount of energy to make such choices. As many people are already suspicious of alternative medicine, I feel an approach of righteousness and hostility toward the mainstream medical community only serves to further alienate the uninformed public. They are forced into choosing sides and therefore go with what is known, what is familiar. This is not to indicate that I don't appreciate information as you have listed below. I actually find it fascinating. I am just wary of any sort of burn and scorch campaign. Reece - rputman Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:05 AM Re: The third leading cause of death in the US Caroline wrote: > << this thread is certainly about current events, but not particularly the > list's subject matter >> > To make the best choices, consumers need to be informed. The article at http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm gives people various specific data related to allopathic health care. There are likely people on this list who have friends who may be facing a decision about some health condition and may be wondering which route to take -- allopathic or holistic. I believe that most people in such situations would have NO IDEA of the dangers of going the allopathic route. To the extent that such information remains hidden, it does the patient a disservice by depriving them of an informed choice. << Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner for the effort in anyone's eyes. >> For perspective, let's look at this issue in a slightly different context. Imagine Caroline that you were a researcher several decades ago who discovered that cigarettes cause cancer. Should you not release your findings to the public because that would be negativity/mud slinging? How about the people who discovered the tire problems on Ford Explorers that were causing fatal accidents. Should they have not released their findings because that would be negative and not taking the high road? Dr. Mercola is on a mission to inform consumers -- the idea being that INFORMED consumers will make better choices regarding their health care. Would you really prefer to RESTRICT information given to consumers to only the good news?! Tom Vizzini wrote: << It has been proven that the largest cause of death is stupidity. Like believing any statistic that get published in the internet! >> KNOWING the ramifications of a choice and then making a bad choice anyway is one thing. But NOT realizing the ramifications of a choice is something else -- not stupidity. Sure Tom, a lot of bogus stuff is published on the Internet. But sometimes it is possible to discern bogus from valid. In this case, the data was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA, the fountainhead of allopathic medicine. I have to give them credit for introspection. After all, how could an organization improve on a serious problem if they refuse to acknowledge the existence of that problem? Rich Putman in Minnesota A Bumper Sticker for Women PRINCESS, HAVING HAD SUFFICIENT EXPERIENCE WITH PRINCES, SEEKS FROG. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Hi Barry, God I hate word problems. - " Barry Carter " <bcarter > Dear Friends, > > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of the > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by > doctors in the same period of time. If you believe the statistics then you would be right. But you have to define what " killed by doctors " really means. So far that could mean anything died under a doctors care or killed by negligence. I mean if someone is sick they go to the doctor. If you use the logic that those who die after seeing doctors are killed by those doctors then we don't have to cure cancer. It is the doctors that kill the patients and not cancer. Kill the doctors and then all the patients will live.....right? I mean the statistic for cancer patients who die while under a doctors care has to be close to 100%...right? So kill the doctors...patient live! The bottom line is that each time this junk comes up it blames doctors for everything. Well I have know MANY people who have used holistic medicines that not only did not work but damaged the patient. So were are the statistics on holistic homicide? How many people die while using holistic medicine? Are you willing to look that up? I don't know but I am willing to bet that if we just used statistics and figured out how many professional holistic healers were out there and then found out how many of there patients died, it would be shocking. Look, I know the value of holistic medicine. I use it all the time for myself. If those in holistic medicine think that the only way for them to gain credibility is if they undermine others. Then maybe they do not have as much to offer as they claim. Attacking others so that you look good is a flawed tactic and will backfire. Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is deceptive. It leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well. I would not want a deceptive person giving me medical advice. The view that holistic healers are all angels and doctors are all devils does not promote your goal. It is not even true. Only about 80 people were killed by > automobiles in the same area during that time period. > > If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial > sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more > likely to put me in contact with doctors. Wow really bad math. And stupid. If you really wanted to find the facts. Check how many people were killed by negligence of doctors in the SAME area as the sniper. Then compare that to the amount of people who died in cars in the SAME AREA as the sniper. Now you have a viable statistic that can be compared to something. Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died last year if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because it does not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad. Tom Vizzini http://www.Essential-Skills.com Real Skills for the Real World Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm 3 Dimensional Mind videos now available http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 " In this case, the data was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA, " That's what you say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 I wonder why this portion was left out of this thread if there was no agenda, Three caveats should be noted. First, most of the data are derived from studies in hospitalized patients. Second, these estimates are for deaths only and do not include adverse effects that are associated with disability or discomfort. Third, the estimates of death due to error are lower than those in the IOM report.1 Read that third part. It is an important distinction. Then add the last line of the article: Alternative explanations for these realities deserve intensive exploration. I would say that these are interesting deletions from this thread. Tom Vizzini http://www.Essential-Skills.com Real Skills for the Real World Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm 3 Dimensional Mind videos now available http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm - " Dave Benware " <Bompa Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:25 PM Re: Re: The third leading cause of death in the US > " In this case, the data was published in the Journal of the > American Medical Association - JAMA, " > > > That's what you say. > > **************************************** > home page: > FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html > For List Help Email: -owner > To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - > > All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright group and the individual authors. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 17, 2002 Report Share Posted October 17, 2002 Rich: Imagine you have a list called . Imagine that you have someone who is posting things that are off topic. You do the math. I am going to ask that this thread end. It is not on topic for the Mind Body Connection and does not belong here. I was subtle before. Now I am not. Thank you. Caroline _______________ Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access. http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 22, 2002 Report Share Posted October 22, 2002 Dear Tom, In " The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events " Jane Roberts used the term " epidemic of belief " to describe the phenomena wherein groups of people focus on a problem and thereby exacerbate that problem. This phenomena is at the very heart of the body/mind connection and is very strongly related to the topic of this forum. In making the comparison between three different sets of death statistics I was calling attention to an incipient epidemic of belief which is having profound ill effects on the health of people across the country. A sniper (or two) with the implicit cooperation of the national news media has made people fearful to go about the normal routines of their daily lives. This epidemic of fear is certain to have adverse health effects in many more people than those few who have been killed or wounded by the sniper(s). Who's agenda does it serve to promote a fearful population? If there is a connection between the spirit and matter and if our mind is a party in this connection then I would expect that our thoughts would have a great effect on our health. We hear people talk of the flow of love and connection as being the source of life. We hear that fear is the blockage that impedes this flow and leads to disease and other unpleasantness. It was not my intention to make people fearful of doctors or automobiles, rather it was my intention to put the Journal of the American Medical Association article statistics into the context of other epidemics of belief and how we are dealing with them. I was suggesting that we can be manipulated by the structures in our culture and that these manipulations generally use fear as their main tool. If fear gets us to agree to greater restrictions of personal freedom and, as a side benefit, increases our utilization of health care services I can imagine that there are several structures which might benefit from this. At 09:54 AM 10/17/2002, you wrote: >Hi Barry, > >God I hate word problems. > > >- > " Barry Carter " <bcarter > > > > > Dear Friends, > > > > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC > > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of > > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of >the > > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by > > doctors in the same period of time. > >If you believe the statistics then you would be right. But you have to >define what " killed by doctors " really means. So far that could mean >anything died under a doctors care or killed by negligence. I mean if >someone is sick they go to the doctor. If you use the logic that those who >die after seeing doctors are killed by those doctors then we don't have to >cure cancer. It is the doctors that kill the patients and not cancer. Kill >the doctors and then all the patients will live.....right? I mean the >statistic for cancer patients who die while under a doctors care has to be >close to 100%...right? So kill the doctors...patient live! > >The bottom line is that each time this junk comes up it blames doctors for >everything. Well I have know MANY people who have used holistic medicines >that not only did not work but damaged the patient. So were are the >statistics on holistic homicide? How many people die while using holistic >medicine? Are you willing to look that up? > >I don't know but I am willing to bet that if we just used statistics and >figured out how many professional holistic healers were out there and then >found out how many of there patients died, it would be shocking. > >Look, I know the value of holistic medicine. I use it all the time for >myself. If those in holistic medicine think that the only way for them to >gain credibility is if they undermine others. Then maybe they do not have as >much to offer as they claim. Attacking others so that you look good is a >flawed tactic and will backfire. > >Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is deceptive. It >leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well. I would not >want a deceptive person giving me medical advice. The view that holistic >healers are all angels and doctors are all devils does not promote your >goal. It is not even true. > > > > > >Only about 80 people were killed by > > automobiles in the same area during that time period. > > > > If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial > > sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more > > likely to put me in contact with doctors. > >Wow really bad math. And stupid. If you really wanted to find the facts. >Check how many people were killed by negligence of doctors in the SAME area >as the sniper. Then compare that to the amount of people who died in cars in >the SAME AREA as the sniper. Now you have a viable statistic that can be >compared to something. > >Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died last year >if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because it does >not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad. > >Tom Vizzini >http://www.Essential-Skills.com >Real Skills for the Real World >Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video >http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm >3 Dimensional Mind videos now available >http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm > > > > > >**************************************** > home page: > FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html >For List Help Email: -owner >To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - > >All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright >group and the individual authors. > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 30, 2002 Report Share Posted October 30, 2002 Hi Tom , " Tom Vizzini " <tom@e...> wrote: > Attacking others so that you look good is a > flawed tactic and will backfire. > Not going to make a comment here other than - Think about your sentence above and then re-read your post to Barry. Do you notice anything? > Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is deceptive. It > leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well. Notice any incongruency? > > Wow really bad math. And stupid. Anything happening yet? > > Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died last year > if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because it does > not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad. > Hmmm. Sad. Best Wishes ThomasR Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.