Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The third leading cause of death in the US

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an

article in JAMA:

<A

HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\

uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul

26;284(4):483-5

 

Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason

that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to

black and white.

 

The headline:

Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000

Deaths Every Year

 

If you have an interest, you can read the article at:

http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

 

Rich in Minnesota

 

<A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions of hits

to your favorite web site for FREE!</A>

http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine how much I like having this junk clutter up my mail box. Besides it

has been proven that the largest cause of death is stupidity. Like believing

any statistic that get published in the internet!

 

 

 

 

-

<rputman

<undisclosed-recipients:>

Wednesday, October 16, 2002 10:17 AM

The third leading cause of death in the US

 

 

> I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an

> article in JAMA:

> <A

HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & l

ist_uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A>

2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5

>

> Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason

> that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything

to

> black and white.

>

> The headline:

> Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000

> Deaths Every Year

>

> If you have an interest, you can read the article at:

> http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

>

> Rich in Minnesota

>

> <A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions

of hits to your favorite web site for FREE!</A>

> http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see the article at either url that you posted.

 

 

 

rputman wrote:

 

>I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an

>article in JAMA:

><A

HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\

uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul

26;284(4):483-5

>

>Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason

>that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to

>black and white.

>

>The headline:

>Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000

>Deaths Every Year

>

>If you have an interest, you can read the article at:

>http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

>

>Rich in Minnesota

>

> <A HREF= " http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822 " >Get millions of

hits to your favorite web site for FREE!</A>

> http://www.forcedclicks.com/cgi-bin/vbc.cgi?7822

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Friends,

 

To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC

area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of

the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of the

US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by

doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people were killed by

automobiles in the same area during that time period.

 

If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial

sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more

likely to put me in contact with doctors.

 

At 08:17 AM 10/16/2002, you wrote:

>I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is from an

>article in JAMA:

><A

>HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list\

_uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal

>American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5

>

>Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a reason

>that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change everything to

>black and white.

>

>The headline:

>Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing 250,000

>Deaths Every Year

>

>If you have an interest, you can read the article at:

>http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

>

>Rich in Minnesota

 

 

--

 

With kindest regards,

 

Barry Carter

<bcarter

2319 Balm

Baker City, Oregon 97814

Phone: 541-523-3357

Web Pages:

Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm

ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

 

We must either let the Law of Love rule us through and through or not at

all. Love among ourselves based on hatred of others breaks down under the

slightest pressure. The fact is such love is never real love. It is an

armed peace. And so it will be in this great movement in the West against

war. War will only be stopped when the conscience of mankind has become

sufficiently elevated to recognize the undisputed supremacy of the Law of

Love in all the walks of life. Some say this will never come to pass. I

shall retain the faith till the end of my earthly existence that this shall

come to pass . . .

--Mahatma Gandhi--

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I do live in the DC area, and it would be nice if we could pick and

choose like that but the risks are cumulative, and unlike automotive

risks there are really not any things we can do to reduce our odds vs

the sniper. You can only go so long without buying gas, groceries.....

 

Go pick some other example. We have more than enough to worry about

here as it is.

 

- Karen

 

Barry Carter wrote:

 

> Dear Friends,

>

> To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington

> DC

> area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population

> of

> the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent

> of the

> US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were

> killed by

> doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people were killed

> by

> automobiles in the same area during that time period.

>

> If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial

>

> sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is

> more

> likely to put me in contact with doctors.

>

> At 08:17 AM 10/16/2002, you wrote:

> >I imagine that the answer would surprise many people. The news is

> from an

> >article in JAMA:

> ><A

>

>

HREF= " http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_\

uids=10904513 & dopt=Abstract " >Journal

>

> >American Medical Association</A> 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5

> >

> >Note: I tried to remove all the color from what I copied, but for a

> reason

> >that I don't understand, AOL software would not let me change

> everything to

> >black and white.

> >

> >The headline:

> >Doctors Are The Third Leading Cause of Death in the US, Causing

> 250,000

> >Deaths Every Year

> >

> >If you have an interest, you can read the article at:

> >http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

> >

> >Rich in Minnesota

>

>

> --

>

> With kindest regards,

>

> Barry Carter

> <bcarter

> 2319 Balm

> Baker City, Oregon 97814

> Phone: 541-523-3357

> Web Pages:

> Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm

> ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm

>

> We must either let the Law of Love rule us through and through or not

> at

> all. Love among ourselves based on hatred of others breaks down under

> the

> slightest pressure. The fact is such love is never real love. It is an

>

> armed peace. And so it will be in this great movement in the West

> against

> war. War will only be stopped when the conscience of mankind has

> become

> sufficiently elevated to recognize the undisputed supremacy of the Law

> of

> Love in all the walks of life. Some say this will never come to pass.

> I

> shall retain the faith till the end of my earthly existence that this

> shall

> come to pass . . .

> --Mahatma Gandhi--

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't the guy have to be a total idiot to try it again? I

would think that while he's totally insane to be sniping to

begin with, he doesn't actually want to get caught, but then

maybe he does. Either way, with the " alert " going (at least

that's what's being reported on the news) and a " heads up " sort

of thing by the gov. agencies, you'd think it might be a bit

safer.

 

Its really kinda like the attack on the World Trade Center. We

could all be quaking under our sheets at home and never go out,

but we can't live that way. Eventually, we have to live again.

Its not a comparison of real equal magnitude perhaps, but it is

a comparison of " terror " .

 

As far as statistic for yearly deaths, I think it depends on

whats being sold. I'm not sure where the polls are from and

what the comparisons are, however, I'd say if you find someone

advertising how many deaths there are a year, you'll find

they're advertising something or other or perhaps doing a fund

raising of some sort.

 

So, if people want to now start thinking about how doctors cause

so many deaths, its a great way for the holistic or alternative

medicine areas to get back at the medical for all the times they

tried to put them out of business. I don't know that for a

fact, however, its a good shot. Its all very money and

political oriented as far as I can tell.

 

Lyn

--- Karen O'Donoghue <karen wrote:

> Well I do live in the DC area, and it would be nice if we

> could pick and

> choose like that but the risks are cumulative, and unlike

> automotive

> risks there are really not any things we can do to reduce our

> odds vs

> the sniper. You can only go so long without buying gas,

> groceries.....

>

> Go pick some other example. We have more than enough to worry

> about

> here as it is.

>

> - Karen

>

> Barry Carter wrote:

>

> > Dear Friends,

> >

> > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the

> Washington

> > DC

> > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the

> population

> > of

> > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6

> percent

> > of the

> > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people

> were

> > killed by

> > doctors in the same period of time. Only about 80 people

> were killed

> > by

 

snipped for brevity...

 

 

 

Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More

http://faith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Caroline wrote:

> << this thread is certainly about current events, but not particularly the

> list's subject matter >>

>

To make the best choices, consumers need to be informed. The article at

http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

gives people various specific data related to allopathic health care. There

are likely people on this list who have friends who may be facing a decision

about some health condition and may be wondering which route to take --

allopathic or holistic. I believe that most people in such situations would

have NO IDEA of the dangers of going the allopathic route. To the extent that

such information remains hidden, it does the patient a disservice by

depriving them of an informed choice.

 

<< Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no

matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner

for the effort in anyone's eyes. >>

 

For perspective, let's look at this issue in a slightly different context.

Imagine Caroline that you were a researcher several decades ago who

discovered that cigarettes cause cancer. Should you not release your findings

to the public because that would be negativity/mud slinging?

 

How about the people who discovered the tire problems on Ford Explorers that

were causing fatal accidents. Should they have not released their findings

because that would be negative and not taking the high road?

 

Dr. Mercola is on a mission to inform consumers -- the idea being that

INFORMED consumers will make better choices regarding their health care.

Would you really prefer to RESTRICT information given to consumers to only

the good news?!

 

Tom Vizzini wrote: << It has been proven that the largest cause of death is

stupidity. Like believing any statistic that get published in the internet! >>

 

 

KNOWING the ramifications of a choice and then making a bad choice anyway is

one thing. But NOT realizing the ramifications of a choice is something else

-- not stupidity.

 

Sure Tom, a lot of bogus stuff is published on the Internet. But sometimes it

is possible to discern bogus from valid. In this case, the data was published

in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA, the fountainhead

of allopathic medicine. I have to give them credit for introspection. After

all, how could an organization improve on a serious problem if they refuse to

acknowledge the existence of that problem?

 

Rich Putman in Minnesota

 

A Bumper Sticker for Women

PRINCESS, HAVING HAD SUFFICIENT

EXPERIENCE WITH PRINCES, SEEKS FROG.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi All:

 

I just wanted to make a comment on this thread (which is certainly

about current events, but not particularly the list's subject

matter...)

 

I believe that people interested in holism, true holism, which

approaches the entire person, should bear two things in mind when

beginning a business in holism.

 

The first is, that you must not lose sight of your ideals in pursuit

of success and money, or lose yourself and what is holistic about you

in the process. Secondly, approaching a client holistically is what

holistic practitioners are all about. That takes more time and

individual effort, something the current system is not all about. So

yes, although sometimes it can be money and politically oriented, my

personal opinion is that it takes a special person, a focused and

honest and generous person, to be a pioneer.

 

What holism does not need is the same people who have saturated

allopathy with sales pitches and aggression to do the same to what

ideally should be a more client focused, choice oriented way of

approaching health.

 

Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no

matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner

for the effort in anyone's eyes.

 

Bear that in mind.

 

Personally, as a person who " straddles the fence " , working in the

allopathic as well as holistic systems, I want to be a bridge, not a

bridge burner. Efforts to burn bridges are wasteful, and do not

accomplish the goal of information people seem to think they do.

Frankly, it just disgusts me to see people dissing each other, mostly

out of spite and poverty consciousness.

 

Thanks,

Caroline

 

>

> So, if people want to now start thinking about how doctors cause

> so many deaths, its a great way for the holistic or alternative

> medicine areas to get back at the medical for all the times they

> tried to put them out of business. I don't know that for a

> fact, however, its a good shot. Its all very money and

> political oriented as far as I can tell.

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I for one agree with Caroline. The focus should not

be on scare tactics, but on information. One of the

unfortunate aspects of wellness is that often one is

forced into complicated decisions and challenges when

one is ill and has the least amount of energy to make such

choices. As many people are already suspicious of alternative

medicine, I feel an approach of righteousness and hostility toward

the mainstream medical community only serves to further alienate

the uninformed public. They are forced into choosing sides and

therefore go with what is known, what is familiar.

 

This is not to indicate that I don't appreciate information as you have

listed below. I actually find it fascinating. I am just wary of any sort

of burn and scorch campaign. Reece

-

rputman

Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:05 AM

Re: The third leading cause of death in the US

 

 

Caroline wrote:

> << this thread is certainly about current events, but not particularly the

> list's subject matter >>

>

To make the best choices, consumers need to be informed. The article at

http://www.mercola.com/2000/jul/30/doctors_death.htm

gives people various specific data related to allopathic health care. There

are likely people on this list who have friends who may be facing a decision

about some health condition and may be wondering which route to take --

allopathic or holistic. I believe that most people in such situations would

have NO IDEA of the dangers of going the allopathic route. To the extent that

such information remains hidden, it does the patient a disservice by

depriving them of an informed choice.

 

<< Negativity and mud slinging is not the high road. It is petty and no

matter what the motivation, it doesn't make the slinger any cleaner

for the effort in anyone's eyes. >>

 

For perspective, let's look at this issue in a slightly different context.

Imagine Caroline that you were a researcher several decades ago who

discovered that cigarettes cause cancer. Should you not release your findings

to the public because that would be negativity/mud slinging?

 

How about the people who discovered the tire problems on Ford Explorers that

were causing fatal accidents. Should they have not released their findings

because that would be negative and not taking the high road?

 

Dr. Mercola is on a mission to inform consumers -- the idea being that

INFORMED consumers will make better choices regarding their health care.

Would you really prefer to RESTRICT information given to consumers to only

the good news?!

 

Tom Vizzini wrote: << It has been proven that the largest cause of death is

stupidity. Like believing any statistic that get published in the internet! >>

 

 

KNOWING the ramifications of a choice and then making a bad choice anyway is

one thing. But NOT realizing the ramifications of a choice is something else

-- not stupidity.

 

Sure Tom, a lot of bogus stuff is published on the Internet. But sometimes it

is possible to discern bogus from valid. In this case, the data was published

in the Journal of the American Medical Association - JAMA, the fountainhead

of allopathic medicine. I have to give them credit for introspection. After

all, how could an organization improve on a serious problem if they refuse to

acknowledge the existence of that problem?

 

Rich Putman in Minnesota

 

A Bumper Sticker for Women

PRINCESS, HAVING HAD SUFFICIENT

EXPERIENCE WITH PRINCES, SEEKS FROG.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Barry,

 

God I hate word problems.

 

 

-

" Barry Carter " <bcarter

 

 

 

> Dear Friends,

>

> To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC

> area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of

> the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of

the

> US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by

> doctors in the same period of time.

 

If you believe the statistics then you would be right. But you have to

define what " killed by doctors " really means. So far that could mean

anything died under a doctors care or killed by negligence. I mean if

someone is sick they go to the doctor. If you use the logic that those who

die after seeing doctors are killed by those doctors then we don't have to

cure cancer. It is the doctors that kill the patients and not cancer. Kill

the doctors and then all the patients will live.....right? I mean the

statistic for cancer patients who die while under a doctors care has to be

close to 100%...right? So kill the doctors...patient live!

 

The bottom line is that each time this junk comes up it blames doctors for

everything. Well I have know MANY people who have used holistic medicines

that not only did not work but damaged the patient. So were are the

statistics on holistic homicide? How many people die while using holistic

medicine? Are you willing to look that up?

 

I don't know but I am willing to bet that if we just used statistics and

figured out how many professional holistic healers were out there and then

found out how many of there patients died, it would be shocking.

 

Look, I know the value of holistic medicine. I use it all the time for

myself. If those in holistic medicine think that the only way for them to

gain credibility is if they undermine others. Then maybe they do not have as

much to offer as they claim. Attacking others so that you look good is a

flawed tactic and will backfire.

 

Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is deceptive. It

leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well. I would not

want a deceptive person giving me medical advice. The view that holistic

healers are all angels and doctors are all devils does not promote your

goal. It is not even true.

 

 

 

 

 

Only about 80 people were killed by

> automobiles in the same area during that time period.

>

> If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial

> sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more

> likely to put me in contact with doctors.

 

Wow really bad math. And stupid. If you really wanted to find the facts.

Check how many people were killed by negligence of doctors in the SAME area

as the sniper. Then compare that to the amount of people who died in cars in

the SAME AREA as the sniper. Now you have a viable statistic that can be

compared to something.

 

Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died last year

if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because it does

not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad.

 

Tom Vizzini

http://www.Essential-Skills.com

Real Skills for the Real World

Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video

http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm

3 Dimensional Mind videos now available

http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why this portion was left out of this thread if there was no

agenda,

 

Three caveats should be noted. First, most of the data are derived from

studies in hospitalized patients. Second, these estimates are for deaths

only and do not include adverse effects that are associated with disability

or discomfort. Third, the estimates of death due to error are lower than

those in the IOM report.1

 

 

Read that third part. It is an important distinction.

 

Then add the last line of the article:

 

Alternative explanations for these realities deserve intensive exploration.

 

I would say that these are interesting deletions from this thread.

 

Tom Vizzini

http://www.Essential-Skills.com

Real Skills for the Real World

Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video

http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm

3 Dimensional Mind videos now available

http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm

 

 

 

 

-

" Dave Benware " <Bompa

 

Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:25 PM

Re: Re: The third leading cause of death in the US

 

 

> " In this case, the data was published in the Journal of the

> American Medical Association - JAMA, "

>

>

> That's what you say.

>

>

****************************************

> home page:

> FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html

> For List Help Email: -owner

> To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: -

>

> All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright

group and the individual authors.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rich:

 

Imagine you have a list called . Imagine that you have someone who

is posting things that are off topic.

 

You do the math.

 

I am going to ask that this thread end. It is not on topic for the Mind Body

Connection and does not belong here.

 

I was subtle before. Now I am not.

 

Thank you.

Caroline

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

Broadband? Dial-up? Get reliable MSN Internet Access.

http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Tom,

 

In " The Individual and the Nature of Mass Events " Jane Roberts used the

term " epidemic of belief " to describe the phenomena wherein groups of

people focus on a problem and thereby exacerbate that problem. This

phenomena is at the very heart of the body/mind connection and is very

strongly related to the topic of this forum.

 

In making the comparison between three different sets of death statistics I

was calling attention to an incipient epidemic of belief which is having

profound ill effects on the health of people across the country. A sniper

(or two) with the implicit cooperation of the national news media has made

people fearful to go about the normal routines of their daily lives. This

epidemic of fear is certain to have adverse health effects in many more

people than those few who have been killed or wounded by the sniper(s).

 

Who's agenda does it serve to promote a fearful population?

 

If there is a connection between the spirit and matter and if our mind is a

party in this connection then I would expect that our thoughts would have a

great effect on our health.

 

We hear people talk of the flow of love and connection as being the source

of life. We hear that fear is the blockage that impedes this flow and leads

to disease and other unpleasantness. It was not my intention to make people

fearful of doctors or automobiles, rather it was my intention to put the

Journal of the American Medical Association article statistics into the

context of other epidemics of belief and how we are dealing with them.

 

I was suggesting that we can be manipulated by the structures in our

culture and that these manipulations generally use fear as their main tool.

If fear gets us to agree to greater restrictions of personal freedom and,

as a side benefit, increases our utilization of health care services I can

imagine that there are several structures which might benefit from this.

 

At 09:54 AM 10/17/2002, you wrote:

 

 

>Hi Barry,

>

>God I hate word problems.

>

>

>-

> " Barry Carter " <bcarter

>

>

>

> > Dear Friends,

> >

> > To help put this into perspective the serial sniper in the Washington DC

> > area has killed 9 people since October 2nd. Given that the population of

> > the District of Columbia, Virginia and Maryland is about 4.6 percent of

>the

> > US population we would expect that approximately 480 people were killed by

> > doctors in the same period of time.

>

>If you believe the statistics then you would be right. But you have to

>define what " killed by doctors " really means. So far that could mean

>anything died under a doctors care or killed by negligence. I mean if

>someone is sick they go to the doctor. If you use the logic that those who

>die after seeing doctors are killed by those doctors then we don't have to

>cure cancer. It is the doctors that kill the patients and not cancer. Kill

>the doctors and then all the patients will live.....right? I mean the

>statistic for cancer patients who die while under a doctors care has to be

>close to 100%...right? So kill the doctors...patient live!

>

>The bottom line is that each time this junk comes up it blames doctors for

>everything. Well I have know MANY people who have used holistic medicines

>that not only did not work but damaged the patient. So were are the

>statistics on holistic homicide? How many people die while using holistic

>medicine? Are you willing to look that up?

>

>I don't know but I am willing to bet that if we just used statistics and

>figured out how many professional holistic healers were out there and then

>found out how many of there patients died, it would be shocking.

>

>Look, I know the value of holistic medicine. I use it all the time for

>myself. If those in holistic medicine think that the only way for them to

>gain credibility is if they undermine others. Then maybe they do not have as

>much to offer as they claim. Attacking others so that you look good is a

>flawed tactic and will backfire.

>

>Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is deceptive. It

>leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well. I would not

>want a deceptive person giving me medical advice. The view that holistic

>healers are all angels and doctors are all devils does not promote your

>goal. It is not even true.

>

>

>

>

>

>Only about 80 people were killed by

> > automobiles in the same area during that time period.

> >

> > If I lived in the DC area I would not be as concerned about the serial

> > sniper as I would be about driving since an accident while driving is more

> > likely to put me in contact with doctors.

>

>Wow really bad math. And stupid. If you really wanted to find the facts.

>Check how many people were killed by negligence of doctors in the SAME area

>as the sniper. Then compare that to the amount of people who died in cars in

>the SAME AREA as the sniper. Now you have a viable statistic that can be

>compared to something.

>

>Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died last year

>if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because it does

>not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad.

>

>Tom Vizzini

>http://www.Essential-Skills.com

>Real Skills for the Real World

>Advanced Rapport Mastery-The Secrets of Accelerated Magical Rapport Video

>http://www.essential-skills.com/AdvancedRapport.htm

>3 Dimensional Mind videos now available

>http://www.essential-skills.com/3dmind.htm

>

>

>

>

>

>****************************************

> home page:

> FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html

>For List Help Email: -owner

>To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: -

>

>All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright

>group and the individual authors.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tom

 

, " Tom Vizzini " <tom@e...> wrote:

> Attacking others so that you look good is a

> flawed tactic and will backfire.

>

 

Not going to make a comment here other than - Think about your

sentence above and then re-read your post to Barry.

Do you notice anything?

 

> Using statistics that do not clear define the parameters is

deceptive. It

> leads me to believe those who use them are deceptive as well.

 

Notice any incongruency?

 

 

>

> Wow really bad math. And stupid.

 

Anything happening yet?

 

>

> Now here is one that you ignore. How many poeple would have died

last year

> if they did not see a doctor? Nope you don't want that one because

it does

> not fit your agenda. That is what I think is sad.

>

 

Hmmm. Sad.

 

 

Best Wishes

 

ThomasR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...