Guest guest Posted January 31, 2005 Report Share Posted January 31, 2005 Ramesh: You are kind and wise. I appreciated your saying to one of the other members " If I disagree, it does not mean that I am your opponent. " A simple yet profound phrase like that, assists everyone in being able to express opinion without conflict. Thank you. Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Monday, January 31, 2005 2:40 AM Re: Legend part 3 > > > Hello Christina, > Thanks for your valuable comments. I agree with u that not to worship any > living Guru and no one man or woman having all the answer. I think that it > would be better to follow the route of science in this sphere because > scientific way is one and only one but the ways of different Gurus are > different, alike our religions. I dont believe in synthesis of science and > religion because scientific way is one whereas religous ways are > different. I dont find any answer why we are organizing the symposium on " > Synthesis of science and religion. > Ramesh chandra > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 3, 2005 Report Share Posted February 3, 2005 Hello Christina, Thanks a lot for your true comments. Everyone should be cooperative in the group without any hostility. I would like to quote Mahatma Gandhi who has said that if the difference of opinion means hostility then my greatest enemy is my wife. Thanks. Ramesh Chandra Christina Alexandra Hyland <calexa wrote: Ramesh: You are kind and wise. I appreciated your saying to one of the other members " If I disagree, it does not mean that I am your opponent. " A simple yet profound phrase like that, assists everyone in being able to express opinion without conflict. Thank you. Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Monday, January 31, 2005 2:40 AM Re: Legend part 3 > > > Hello Christina, > Thanks for your valuable comments. I agree with u that not to worship any > living Guru and no one man or woman having all the answer. I think that it > would be better to follow the route of science in this sphere because > scientific way is one and only one but the ways of different Gurus are > different, alike our religions. I dont believe in synthesis of science and > religion because scientific way is one whereas religous ways are > different. I dont find any answer why we are organizing the symposium on " > Synthesis of science and religion. > Ramesh chandra > **************************************** home page: FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html For List Help Email: -owner To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright group and the individual authors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 Hello christina, I know that u r a good distant healer . Now as i think it would be better to conduct any distant healing experiment for the sake of its efficacy. I would like to refer me any chronic case for distant healing. In the same way i shall also refer u a case for distant healing. If we both become successful then it would be a lesson on how does our mind affect our body. My distant healing session losts for a weekend period. There would be three sessions for distant healing within a weeks time and the ailing person could be healed. Do u agree with my proposal or not?. Awaiting your respnse. Thanks. Ramesh chandra Christina Alexandra Hyland <calexa wrote: Ramesh: You are kind and wise. I appreciated your saying to one of the other members " If I disagree, it does not mean that I am your opponent. " A simple yet profound phrase like that, assists everyone in being able to express opinion without conflict. Thank you. Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Monday, January 31, 2005 2:40 AM Re: Legend part 3 > > > Hello Christina, > Thanks for your valuable comments. I agree with u that not to worship any > living Guru and no one man or woman having all the answer. I think that it > would be better to follow the route of science in this sphere because > scientific way is one and only one but the ways of different Gurus are > different, alike our religions. I dont believe in synthesis of science and > religion because scientific way is one whereas religous ways are > different. I dont find any answer why we are organizing the symposium on " > Synthesis of science and religion. > Ramesh chandra > **************************************** home page: FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html For List Help Email: -owner To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright group and the individual authors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 Hi Ramesh: I don't think I am the healer at all, but thank you for your praise. As a nurse and energetic healer, I have done my part for 25 years. The people (patients/clients) seem to improve greatly with the methods I employ, but I can assure you that I am just tapping into the vast resources of collective unconscious, to assist those wonderful people needing a " leg up " so to speak. Thank you for your offer, but I do not need any patients or clients for the purpose of validation. My healing list is full, I put my energy out there, and then I let go. Everyone seems to respond and demonstrate improvement. I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. Thank you for the exchange of energy offer, I simply don't need patients now, but would possibly take them if the need is great, on a case by case basis. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 5, 2005 Report Share Posted February 5, 2005 Hi Ramesh: I don't think I am the healer at all, but thank you for your praise. As a nurse and energetic healer, I have done my part for 25 years. The people (patients/clients) seem to improve greatly with the methods I employ, but I can assure you that I am just tapping into the vast resources of collective unconscious, to assist those wonderful people needing a " leg up " so to speak. Thank you for your offer, but I do not need any patients or clients for the purpose of validation. My healing list is full, I put my energy out there, and then I let go. Everyone seems to respond and demonstrate improvement. I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. Thank you for the exchange of energy offer, I simply don't need patients now, but would possibly take them if the need is great, on a case by case basis. x Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:48 AM Re: simple profound phrase > > > Hello christina, > I know that u r a good distant healer . Now as i think it would be better > to conduct any distant healing experiment for the sake of its efficacy. I > would like to refer me any chronic case for distant healing. In the same > way i shall also refer u a case for distant healing. If we both become > successful then it would be a lesson on how does our mind affect our body. > My distant healing session losts for a weekend period. There would be > three sessions for distant healing within a weeks time and the ailing > person could be healed. Do u agree with my proposal or not?. Awaiting your > respnse. Thanks. > Ramesh chandra > > > Christina Alexandra Hyland <calexa wrote: > > Ramesh: You are kind and wise. I appreciated your saying to one of the > other members " If I disagree, it does not mean that I am your opponent. " > A > simple yet profound phrase like that, assists everyone in being able to > express opinion without conflict. Thank you. > Christina > - > " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 > > Monday, January 31, 2005 2:40 AM > Re: Legend part 3 > > >> >> >> Hello Christina, >> Thanks for your valuable comments. I agree with u that not to worship >> any >> living Guru and no one man or woman having all the answer. I think that >> it >> would be better to follow the route of science in this sphere because >> scientific way is one and only one but the ways of different Gurus are >> different, alike our religions. I dont believe in synthesis of science >> and >> religion because scientific way is one whereas religous ways are >> different. I dont find any answer why we are organizing the symposium on >> " >> Synthesis of science and religion. >> Ramesh chandra >**************************************** > home page: > FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html > For List Help Email: -owner > To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - > > All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright > group and the individual authors. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Hello Christina, Thanks for your mail. As u have mentioned: I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. In response of your above quote i would like to take up the case for distant healing which would lost within a weekend. Kindly let me try to heal through distant healing and refer me that very critical case. Thanks with regards: sincerely yours ramesh chandra Christina Alexandra Hyland <calexa wrote: Hi Ramesh: I don't think I am the healer at all, but thank you for your praise. As a nurse and energetic healer, I have done my part for 25 years. The people (patients/clients) seem to improve greatly with the methods I employ, but I can assure you that I am just tapping into the vast resources of collective unconscious, to assist those wonderful people needing a " leg up " so to speak. Thank you for your offer, but I do not need any patients or clients for the purpose of validation. My healing list is full, I put my energy out there, and then I let go. Everyone seems to respond and demonstrate improvement. I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. Thank you for the exchange of energy offer, I simply don't need patients now, but would possibly take them if the need is great, on a case by case basis. x Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Saturday, February 05, 2005 4:48 AM Re: simple profound phrase > > > Hello christina, > I know that u r a good distant healer . Now as i think it would be better > to conduct any distant healing experiment for the sake of its efficacy. I > would like to refer me any chronic case for distant healing. In the same > way i shall also refer u a case for distant healing. If we both become > successful then it would be a lesson on how does our mind affect our body. > My distant healing session losts for a weekend period. There would be > three sessions for distant healing within a weeks time and the ailing > person could be healed. Do u agree with my proposal or not?. Awaiting your > respnse. Thanks. > Ramesh chandra > > > Christina Alexandra Hyland <calexa wrote: > > Ramesh: You are kind and wise. I appreciated your saying to one of the > other members " If I disagree, it does not mean that I am your opponent. " > A > simple yet profound phrase like that, assists everyone in being able to > express opinion without conflict. Thank you. > Christina > - > " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 > > Monday, January 31, 2005 2:40 AM > Re: Legend part 3 > > >> >> >> Hello Christina, >> Thanks for your valuable comments. I agree with u that not to worship >> any >> living Guru and no one man or woman having all the answer. I think that >> it >> would be better to follow the route of science in this sphere because >> scientific way is one and only one but the ways of different Gurus are >> different, alike our religions. I dont believe in synthesis of science >> and >> religion because scientific way is one whereas religous ways are >> different. I dont find any answer why we are organizing the symposium on >> " >> Synthesis of science and religion. >> Ramesh chandra >**************************************** > home page: > FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html > For List Help Email: -owner > To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - > > All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright > group and the individual authors. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 8, 2005 Report Share Posted February 8, 2005 Thank You most kindly Ramesh - I will make sure that this good energy returns to you also. I would like to give you the case history facts, via your own personal e-mail, as I wish not to violate the rights of another human being. How may I contact you privately via e-mail? This is not to leave anyone in the group " out " it is just for the purpose of transmitting some information. Regards, Christina - " ramesh chandra " <chandra_ramesh2002 Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:44 AM Re: simple profound phrase Hello Christina, Thanks for your mail. As u have mentioned: I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. In response of your above quote i would like to take up the case for distant healing which would lost within a weekend. Kindly let me try to heal through distant healing and refer me that very critical case. Thanks with regards: sincerely yours ramesh chandra Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 14, 2005 Report Share Posted February 14, 2005 , ramesh chandra Hello Ramesh: I sent you some information a few days ago, did you get it? Love, Christina <chandra_ramesh2002> wrote: > > Hello Christina, > Thanks for your mail. As u have mentioned: > I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if > you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. > In response of your above quote i would like to take up the case for distant healing which would lost within a weekend. Kindly let me try to heal through distant healing and refer me that very critical case. Thanks with regards: > sincerely yours > ramesh chandra > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 16, 2005 Report Share Posted February 16, 2005 Dear Christina, Now i am in touch with u on our personal e mail id. I got your message regarding distant healing and replied u intime. Thanks for your mail. Wish u all the best. sincerely yours ramesh chandra revchristinahyland <calexa wrote: , ramesh chandra Hello Ramesh: I sent you some information a few days ago, did you get it? Love, Christina <chandra_ramesh2002> wrote: > > Hello Christina, > Thanks for your mail. As u have mentioned: > I do however, have a tough case, that does not respond to my healing and if > you wish, I would refer him, to see what you can do. > In response of your above quote i would like to take up the case for distant healing which would lost within a weekend. Kindly let me try to heal through distant healing and refer me that very critical case. Thanks with regards: > sincerely yours > ramesh chandra > **************************************** home page: FAQ: http://www.geocities.com/nrgbalance/bmfaq.html For List Help Email: -owner To UNSUBSCRIBE Email: - All messages, files and archives of this forum are Copyright group and the individual authors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.