More on chemtrail sunscreen

[Guest guest]

http://www.holmestead.ca/reserved/popexplo/popexplo.html

http://www.holmestead.ca/chemtrails/newani.gif

 

 

" Mark Davey " <mark@s...> wrote:

" Everyone talks about the weather,

but nobody does anything about it. "

 

 

 

The following is a letter (e-mail) written by a friend of a

correspondent. The writer appears to have an " inside track " on the

chemtrail spraying programme. There was an opportunity to ask

specific questions relating to the aerial spraying and the " insider "

then answered the questions.

 

I am aware of the insider's place of employment and the facts

presented conform with the type of activities that are carried out

there.

 

The responses have the tone of someone with detailed inside

knowledge but for reasons of confidentiality it is unsigned. Where

population is mentioned also see the Holmestead Population Explosion

page.

 

It is a lengthy piece but when you reach the end please

continue as there is a second item following.

 

At 4 April 2003 some supplementary questions and answers have

been added. This makes the piece even longer and again the related

item follows. If you wish to skip the first section and go directly

to the new material click: Supplementary.

 

 

 

 

Points to Ponder: The Shield Project.

 

 

Here we quote the communication from " Deep Shield " :

 

Having read your email, I must say that you are full of

questions. These questions I would dismiss immediately as being the

frustrated attempts of fringe groups to bring a halt to the project,

however these reports of biological material being part of the spray

should be addressed. Therefore I will give as much attention to all

of your questions as possible.

 

 

1. What purpose do polymer threads imbedded with biological

material serve in this scenario?

 

Polymers are part of the mixture and they do form in threads

and in `tufts'. The idea is simple and comes to us from the spider.

As you may know spider webbing is very light, some newborn spiders

spin a `parachute' to catch the prevailing breeze to travel far from

their place of birth. Spiders have been able to attain high altitudes

and travel great distances for long periods of time. Most of the

elements used in the spray are heavier than air, even in their

powdered form they are heavier and will sink quickly. Mixing them

with the polymers suspends the particles in the atmosphere high above

the surface for longer periods of time, therefore in theory we do not

need to spray as often or as much material. Since the suspended

particles eventually do settle into the lowest part of the atmosphere

and are inhaled by all life forms on the surface there is an attempt

to counter the growth of mold by adding to the mixture mold growth

suppressants - some of which may be of biological material.

 

Mold comes in spores that travel on the winds; the polymers can

attract mold spores through static charges created by the friction of

the polymer threads and the atmosphere. Add a bit of warmth and

moisture and mold begins to grow. The polymer is stored in a liquid

form as two separate chemicals. When sprayed they combine behind the

plane `spinning' long polymer chains (threads). Much tinkering has

been done which the chemical matrix in past years. Many polymers

(plastics) are non-biodegradable thus add to the problem of

pollution. Various formula have been used, some which even use

biological agents. It would be great if we could reproduce the same

web material that spiders make, it is extremely strong, extremely

lightweight and breaks down relatively fast in the ecology.

 

 

2. If this spraying is to mitigate global warming, why does so

much of it take place at night?

 

Though it would appear that the dispersal rate of the spray is

fast, it is actually takes much longer to be an effective shield.

There is a desired concentration being sought. One that is thick

enough to stem the UV and the Infrared, while being thin enough to

allow visible light through. A perpetual cloud cover would have

disastrous effects on plant life; the food chain thus disrupted would

soon collapse. The desired effect wanted is a thin cover that would

theoretically create a daytime haze that allows plenty of sunlight

while providing protection. From UV radiation and also reflect enough

infrared to maintain nominal temperatures.

 

The optimal condition is to use the least amount of material to

provide the maximum amount of shielding. Ideally that would be a one-

time application which would stay suspended for years, however, as

noted, barium and aluminum and other trace elements are far heavier

than air and they sink rather rapidly. The different temperatures

between day and night causes massive volumes of air to rise during

the night, the warm air trapped at the surface rises above the

cooling air above. By strategically spraying in certain areas at

night, we get the advantage of the rising air, which not only pushes

the material higher, but also causes the material to disperse into a

thin layer.

 

I would suggest studying on the subject of weather, namely

highs and lows and how air moves to fully understand the times of

spraying. I note, it is not just global warming we are combating

here, we are also combating UV Summer. Global warming could

effectively be treated by applications during the night, when the

warm air rises. However the UV needs to be treated during the day.

This is why on some days one finds that more spraying is done during

the day. The UV indexes are monitored constantly for local areas. If

the problem were simply cooling the earth, rockets would have been

used to suspend particles in the high atmosphere. However the

delicate nature of the Ozone Layer precludes this method of

shielding. More on this in the answer to Question 6.

 

 

3. What other military programs are in place involving the

spraying of barium and what are their purposes? Do you know and

understand the chemical make up of the element?

 

A little knowledge will go a long way to understanding the need

to use barium: Barium is often used in barium-nickel alloys for spark-

plug electrodes and in vacuum tubes as a drying and oxygen-removing

agent. Barium oxidizes in air, and it reacts vigorously with water to

form the hydroxide, liberating hydrogen. In moist air it may

spontaneously ignite. It burns in air to form the peroxide, which

produces hydrogen peroxide when treated with water. Barium reacts

with almost all of the nonmetals; all of its water-soluble and acid-

soluble compounds are poisonous. Barium carbonate is used in glass,

as a pottery glaze, and as a rat poison. Chrome yellow (barium

chromate) is used as a paint pigment and in safety matches. The

chlorate and nitrate are used in pyrotechnics to provide a green

color. Barium oxide strongly absorbs carbon dioxide and water; it is

used as a drying agent. Barium chloride is used in medicinal

preparations and as a water softener. Barium sulfide phosphoresces

after exposure to light; it is sometimes used as a paint pigment.

Barite, the sulfate ore, has many industrial uses. Because barium

sulfate is virtually insoluble in water and acids, it can be used to

coat the alimentary tract to increase the contrast for X-ray

photography without being absorbed by the body and poisoning the

subject.

 

Note what Barium Oxide can do, absorb carbon dioxide - one of

the chief gasses causing the green house effect. In my answer to

Question 4 I will discuss the need to carry a current in the shield.

I would like to point out that barium and aluminum work together to

diffuse and strengthen an electrical charge. Somewhat like the

current produced when acid is introduced between two dissimilar

metals, such as iron and copper. There are military applications for

everything you can think of, can not a butter knife be used as a

weapon? The same concept holds true here.

 

 

4. What is the connection between ELF, EMF, VLF and Chemtrails

spraying? Or is there one?

 

To understand the use of radio waves in the shield, one first

understands how ozone is created. I cannot stress to you how dire the

situation really is. The shield in place is only a partial solution;

we must counter the depletion of the ozone- this means we must make

ozone in the stratosphere. Ozone at ground levels does no good;

indeed, ozone pollution at ground levels it what is used to determine

the air quality. Higher levels of ground level ozone mean that air

quality is bad. Pure ozone is an unstable, faintly bluish gas with a

characteristic fresh, penetrating odor. The gas has a density of

2.144 grams per liter at standard temperature and pressure. Below its

boiling point (-112?) ozone is a dark blue liquid; below its melting

point (-193?) it is a blue-black crystalline solid. Ozone is

triatomic oxygen, O3, and has a molecular weight of 47.9982 atomic

mass units (amu). It is the most chemically active form of oxygen. It

is formed in the ozone layer of the stratosphere by the action of

solar ultraviolet light on oxygen. Although it is present in this

layer only to an extent of about 10 parts per million, ozone is

important because its formation prevents most ultraviolet and other

high-energy radiation, which is harmful to life, from penetrating to

the earth's surface. Ultraviolet light is absorbed when its strikes

an ozone molecule; the molecule is split into atomic and diatomic

oxygen: 03+ ultraviolet light ->0+02. Later, in the presence of a

catalyst, the atomic and diatomic oxygen reunite to form ozone.

 

Ozone is also formed when an electric discharge passes through

air; for example, it is formed by lightning and by some electric

motors and generators. Ozone is produced commercially by passing dry

air between two concentric-tube or plate electrodes connected to an

alternating high voltage; this is called the silent electric

discharge method. Since UV radiation is the problem, we can not use

UV to produce more stratospheric ozone. Another method must be found.

The shield acts like one plate of the electrode, when tickled with

certain radio waves; it produces an opposite charge to stratospheric

layers producing low atmosphere to stratosphere lightening. Creating

ozone where it is needed.

 

 

5. If this is being done for the reasons you say, then why are

other chemicals being used, why are different sprays being used?

 

Correcting the ecological damage that mankind has done has

NEVER BEEN DONE BEFORE. We are relatively new to this notion of

terraforming on a real scale. That is what we are doing,

Terraforming. We are trying to recreate the ideal life-sustaining

conditions on a dying planet. We have never done this before, not

intentionally. We are testing and trying different methods. Granted,

if we do nothing 89% of all species will go extinct and humanity

stands a high chance of not surviving through two more generations

(or less). However the idea of 2 billion casualties death and

permanent injury is not easy to swallow either.

 

Several attempts to improve the application of Shielding

material and getting the most out of each application are taking

place all the time. The combined resources of the nations of earth

are not enough to allow constant spraying. Though we have achieved a

high level of technology, there is a great surface area that needs to

be covered nearly daily. Large sections of ocean are all but ignored;

the remaining land masses are more than what can be covered

effectively. The Shield would work best if it was a single thin layer

with out interruption, however due to the movement of air, weather

patterns and the sad fact that we do not have the means to place

ample amounts of material at the same level at the same time we are

getting a small fraction of the effectiveness from our applications.

 

 

6. Why is spraying found before storm fronts? Is it to cause

drought?

 

Before a storm there is a front, the front clears the air

before a storm, pushing particulate matter ahead of it, leaving a

space relatively clear of particulate matter. UV radiation levels

rise in these areas, sometimes to dangerous levels. The shield must

be maintained. Since barium absorbs water as well as carbon dioxide,

precipitation has been affected. Other kinds of sprays are in

development and testing which may reduce the affects on

precipitation. As I stated above, this is a new technology we are

working with, it is still in its infancy and there are some problems

with it.

 

 

7. Why are UFO's and disappearing spray planes reported?

 

I do not know.

 

 

8. What about the reports of sickness after spraying?

 

There are several causatives for this. Some people are more

sensitive to metals, whiles others are sensitive to the polymer

chemicals. As stated in a previous email, people will get sick, and

some will die. It is estimated that 2 billion worldwide will be

affected to some degree by the spraying. Without spraying we have a

90% + chance of becoming extinct as a species with in the next 20

years.

 

 

9. What is the relationship between these spraying programs and

One World Order?

 

Personally I am against the move for globalization, and yes,

there is potential to use the Shield to speed up the process of

globalization, there are several countries that are involved in this

project: European Union Nations, USA and Russia are the largest

contributors to the project, many of the allied nations and UN

Members participate to one extent or another. The material (chemical

spray as you may call it) comes from all of these nations.

 

To insure that the chemicals are not tampered with, they are

mixed and sprayed over random nations. This means that chemicals

produced in the USA has a good chance of being sprayed over Russia,

England and the USA. This random spray of material means that no

nation would be certain that their chemicals will be sprayed over a

nation which they have issues with. Russian planes may be seen in USA

skies, but so too will USA planes be seen in Russian skies. The

canisters used are sealed in a third nation that has no idea where

its canister is going. Participating nations have their observers at

every station where canister loading is done. All of this to insure

that the shield is not used as a weapon. To further insure that the

shield is not used as a weapon, non participant nations are sprayed

by participants who must spray in order to get enough material to

maintain their nations shield. It is understood that not spraying is

as much a military offense as shooting at them.

 

Without the shield, UV poisoning would cause great death. The

threat is a common one, which has brought nations together in

defense. The natural outcome of having a common enemy is to

strengthen international ties - a step toward globalization.

 

 

10. Is the Spraying related to terrorism?

 

Yes and no. Recent terrorist activity can be traced to

resistance groups who feel that we should not interfere with the

natural order of things. As you know, there are many rumors out there

as to what the Shield Program is. Some believe that this is a

population reduction scheme, designed to kill off 'undesirable'

peoples. While others hold that this is a mind control program. There

are many theories which have sinister plots in them these are

propagated by the resistance groups in an attempt to stop the shield

regardless of the consequences.

 

The same delivery method could be used for biological and

chemical warfare. It could also be used to inoculate large

populations, the effectiveness of these uses are low, there are

better methods that can be used. As a means to fight terrorism it is

ineffectual, it is far easier to inoculate a population individually

and would insure full inoculation against germ warfare.

 

 

11. Why all the secrecy?

 

Due to the severity of the situation it is mandatory to

maintain public calm for as long as possible. The Earth is dying.

Humanity is on the road to extinction - without the Shield mankind

will die off with in 20 to 50 years. Most people alive today could

live to see this extinction take place. This means that an

announcement of the situation we face boils down to telling every

man, woman and child on earth that they have no future, they are

going to be killed. People would panic. There would be economic

collapse, the production and movement of goods would collapse.

Millions would die in all cities on earth, riots and violence would

reduce civilian centers to rubble within days. Half of the population

in dense metropolitan areas would try to leave the cities

seeking 'safety' in the rural areas thinking that they would be safe.

Those left behind in the cities would be at war with their neighbors,

fighting for the remaining supplies. We would be telling the world

that the world is coming to an end, and even with the Shield the

chances of survival are small.

 

UV Summer and Global Warming are the immediate problems we

face, there are far greater problems that are raising their ugly

heads and will present new problems which in some cases have no

viable solutions at this time. Ecologies are collapsing. The

extinction rate of species is climbing. The amount of chemical

pollutants in the water and soil are fast approaching and in many

places has surpassed the earth's ability to heal itself. Crop failure

is on the rise, even in the USA the returns on crops are smaller than

they were 10 years ago. Even with the advances in genetically altered

food crops, we are falling behind in our ability to produce enough to

go around. Throughout the 20th century chemical fertilizers and

pesticides were used to insure the best yields. Unfortunately many of

these have contaminated ground water, killed beneficial insects along

with the undesirable insects. These chemicals have gotten into the

food chain and are affected other species besides mankind. It is only

a matter of years before famine spreads like a cancer throughout the

world.

 

Clean fresh water is in short supply, in many places well water

is nonpotable, containing the run off of pesticides, herbicides and

fertilizers that have been used on crops and lawns. The water

treatment facilities we have are unable to scrub out all of the

toxins we have placed in the soil and water supply. Many of the

toxins we find build up over time in the body, a long slow poisoning

which has been making its presence felt in many areas of the world in

the form of cancers, leukemia, sterility, birth defects, learning

disorders, immune deficiency problems, etc. These are on the rise,

any good researcher can find the records. For decades there was

public outcry for the end to pollution. For every small step we made

to clean up our production, millions where born who added to the

problem. Yes, pollution is down per individual, however there are a

couple more billion individuals producing pollution, thus the real

numbers have an increase in over all pollution produced. Name a city

that does not have problems with smog. You would be hard pressed to

find one. Though smog controls on automobiles is higher than ever

before, the number of autos on the road has increased thus the amount

of smog producing pollutants is higher than ever before. All the

clean air acts passed to curb individual factory and auto emissions

did not address the production of more factories and more autos. Here

an uneasy compromise was made between the need to maintain the

economy against the need to maintain the ecology. The ecology lost

since it was estimated to be a problem decades from now. The economy

was a problem that would have dire effects today.

 

All of these factors combined have produced a scenario that in

shorts boils down to the end of the world in 50 to 75 years. Even if

we were to stop all emissions of pollution today, the inertia of past

decades is enough to carry us over the brink in 100 years. However we

cannot stop the production of pollution, to do so would mean shutting

down every factory, every auto, every train, truck, ship and every

household on the planet. Electricity is used to heat many homes in

the Western World. The production of electricity produces fewer

pollutants than heating all homes with wood or coal. Cutting our

power generation abilities down to hydroelectric and fission reactors

would leave a good chunk of the world in the dark. It is an

impossible situation, our civilization is geared to the use of

energy, take away our energy and civilization will collapse.

 

 

12. When will spraying stop?

 

There are several factors governing this:

 

A. Should the Ozone layer repair itself or our active attempts

at repair reduces the amount of ground level UV to acceptable levels,

spraying will stop. Present calculations place this between 2018 and

2024.

 

B. Should another method be found which is more effective, less

costly or presents us with long-term solutions the Shield project

would be replaced.

 

C. When the other problems become too big to make the

maintenance of the shield worth the effort. The estimated date for

this is 2025 to 2050.

 

 

13. Since Global Warming and UV summer are the problem, why is

the Government backing down on its pollution controls?

 

Because they are ineffectual and will cause more economic

problems than they would solve ecological problems. We surpassed the

threshold of Earth's ability to absorb pollutants in the 1970's.

Since that time the earth's population has nearly doubled. Emerging

Industrial nations have come into being, more pollutants are produced

now than back then, even with the stringent controls in place. The

world is heading for economic depression, more emission controls

would add to the economic problems. This translates into our being

unable to do anything to start solving the problems.

 

Unfortunately our technologies require a strong economy to

advance. We need that advancement, we need the trillions of dollars

spent on research that a strong economy causes. Each corporation that

produces a product has a product development program in place. Many

of the past products invented came by accident through other

unrelated products. There is a corporate drive to find methods to

clean up the ecology, to reduce emissions, etc. These goals have been

in place for decades, many of the large corporations are in the know

when it comes to the ecological problems we face thus they are

spending a great deal of money and time on finding solutions to the

problems we face. Take away the economy and their research stops.

 

 

14. How are you related to the Chemtrails? How do you know that

this is what is happening?

 

I would prefer to not state who I am or how I am related to all

of this. To validate what I say, would require a bit of research on

your behalf. I would recommend the following subjects to look up and

study:

 

A. Population numbers for industrial nations and the tons of

pollutants produced annually. Start with 1975 and work your way up.

 

B. Number of emerging Industrial Nations.

 

C. Number of cases of Skin cancers worldwide.

 

D. Crop Production vs. land area dedicated to crop production.

Simple math will show that more acreage is needed to produce food per

individual.

 

E. Automobile production from 1975 to present, estimated number

of autos on the road and the average emissions of later model cars

produced as compared the emissions of earlier model cars. A little

math will show that though individual autos produce less emissions,

the amount of emissions has risen due to the number of autos on the

road. Remember that many autos are the road that were built before

present emission control standards. 1980 is a cut off date - anything

put on the road before then produces more pollutants than autos

produced today. I would include research in the number of diesel

autos produced, diesel has not been under the emissions control acts.

 

F. Severity of storms and the number of severe storms. Also

include heat waves and droughts in that research, you will find that

the numbers are staggering when compared to data from 1950, 1960 and

1970.

 

G. Research how naturally occurring Ozone is produced in the

stratosphere. Compare to how it is produced industrially.

 

H. Research political reforms in the past 30 years, see which

political institutions have changed, which nations have joined with

whom. Concentrate more on these from 1982 onward. This would include

the fall of the Wall and Iron Curtain.

 

I. Research polymers and how they are made, look at recent

research done in biological polymers, medical polymers and filaments.

 

J. Check out spiders and spider web and the way spiders use

their different webs and threads.

 

K. Research clean fresh water estimates as compared to the

1970's to today - world wide.

 

L. Research the following medical conditions per capita: Birth

Defects Cancers Leukemia Immune deficiency diseases (excluding virus

borne ID illnesses such as HIV) Occurrences of Learning disabilities,

including dyslexia, ADD, and over all IQ tests Sterility for both

male and females world wide Instances of glaucoma and cataracts.

 

M. Compare the history of UV indexes from 1970 to present. You

may note that it was on sharp rise until 1997-99.

 

N. I would strongly recommend researching the reactions of

different barium and aluminum compounds and how they are used.

Research how long it takes for these metals in pure form to oxidize,

how they combine with nitrates, carbon monoxide carbon dioxide and

fluorocarbons and hydrocarbons and water vapor.

 

O. Research how mold propagates, the conditions it needs to

grow and just how abundant it is in the atmosphere.

 

If you pursue these lines of inquiry, you will see the Shield

Project as it really is.

 

 

 

 

 

----

----------

 

 

 

At the time of the US-lead invasion of Iraq I had the

opportunity to ask a few supplementary questions. There has been no

attempt to integrate these questions and answers into the previous

section therefore some may appear somewhat out of logical order.

 

A couple of the questions have a Canadian approach. By the

way, I came up with the name - have to call the source something!

 

 

 

 

Here we quote the further communication from " Deep Shield " :

 

15. Could you, " Deep Shield " - be described as a scientist

or...?

 

Scientist is a good generic term. I do study and research in a

scientific manner. I carry papers and degrees. My official capacity

is in direct research of atmospheric issues in relation to

pollutants. I also create models of potential long-term effects of

green house gasses on the climate. Predict wind patterns, weather

patterns, etc.

 

I have spent a good many years working on the project

calculating the amount of material needed and creating models for

dispersion patterns. I work other members who know the chemicals used

and their interactions with the atmosphere, pollution and water

vapor. I am part of a team which itself is part of a larger team,

which is part of still a larger team. Government work with many

chiefs and levels above the workers.

 

 

16. Are you prepared to comment upon your personal motives for

sharing this information?

 

Not at this time, no.

 

 

17. Have you signed a non-disclosure or Secrets Act document

that specifically relates to this project?

 

Yes.

 

 

18. To your knowledge what categories of individuals officially

know of the Project and are expected to remain silent? For example,

my list of suspects includes government down to the county level,

military especially air force, meteorologists, health specialists,

mainstream media etc.

 

All those who know are expected to remain silent. All of those

who suspect are either faced with trying to prove the virtually

unprovable or are faced with good enough reasons to remain silent. I

would assume that this situation is worldwide and could be considered

one of the dangers of this project.

 

It was presented to me as a matter of national security. I can

see the reasons why there is a desire to repress the information not

that spraying is taking place but the hard little fact that we are

facing a period of human history which might be the end of

civilization.

 

 

19. Is the mainstream controlled media specifically ordered to

avoid any mention of chemtrails? If so, have you anything further to

add such as how was this done?

 

I would assume that the Media is controlled by its own desire

to make money from what it reports. Since there is enough debunking

out there, which says that contrails are part of the normal use of

jet engines in the atmosphere, this would leave a reporter with very

little to report unless there was solid evidence or pictures or

something that could not be explained away.

 

You must know by now all the debunking methods that have been

employed. The 'official' announcements are the media's main dish. The

rest they regulate to the realm of the National Enquirer.

 

 

20. What government agency or agencies control this program? Is

it under international control?

 

It is an international program. Many nations contribute in

different ways. Measures have been taken to insure that what is

sprayed over all countries is the same through triple blind

deliveries; which include not knowing where a certain canister will

end up, not knowing which aircraft a certain canister will be flown,

and not even knowing who (in military craft) will be piloting a craft

which has the purpose of spraying (Note: in today's world there is

usually a mixed crew of different nationalities flying any one

military aircraft on a Shield mission). I believe the Media caught

Canadians in Iraq recently when Canada's official say on the matter

was that Canada was not giving any support to the military might.

 

The fact remains that there were Canadian military with the USA

forces. Some on aircraft carriers most being pilots. I think you can

connect the dots.

 

 

21. How is the project funded - who pays for it? Have you any

idea of the total direct operating cost? Also, does Canada make a

funding contribution for the activities in our skies?

 

Most governments tend to over charge themselves to cover for

their black operations (unofficial operations). That money comes out

of the collection of taxes. So in effect the taxpayers of the world

are paying for this project.

 

I would assume Canada does contribute funding to the Project.

Canada is one of the top nations contributing time, material and

funding to this project. Most of the Free World, the Western World,

has taken on most of the burden of the costs.

 

 

22. Is the Shield Project the only such aerial spraying program?

 

Is it the only project designed to avert ecological disaster?

Then yes. There are countless other projects that could be taking

place which include spraying of some sort or another. Pesticides are

usually sprayed. There has been great interest in weather control

such as bringing rain to arid regions and taking the punch out of

hurricanes and typhoons.

 

Weather control may be one of the final options left to us.

Considering the amount of global warming that has taken place. There

is a strong need to deflect a storm's fury, or to bring rain back to

those regions which have been suffering drought.

 

What Mother Nature has done for millions of years automatically

may now require mankind's hand to keep the schedule.

 

 

23. There are reports of four different chemtrail programs and

other " code " names. For example, see: Holmestead: Chemtrails - what

are they? Any comments?

 

It is possible that the Military does have a use for similar

sprays. I cannot speak for the Military. However, my own personal

research has come across these things as well. Are they possible?

Yes. Are they practical? Only in the small scale say over the

battlefield, or in the case of say the Iraq War, over Baghdad. Global

application would be far too expensive and would require an obvious

flight pattern of grids, circles and other heavy spray patterns.

 

 

24. Is all the spraying done using the " tank kits " described

earlier or are the KC-135R and KC-10 types filled to the brim? Such

aircraft have a load capacity of 200,000 pounds or more for refueling

missions.

 

No. Several types of craft are used. Commercial jet airliners

are used and they are not diverted from their flight paths to do so.

How the canisters and the spraying is done on this kind of craft is

unknown to me exactly. I do have my suspicions. I know best that

which is my field; this is not to say that we do not talk around the

water tank. So I know more than just my area and am able to think the

matter through to its logical end.

 

I do know that even all the commercial jetliners in use are not

enough to insure complete coverage all of the time. My computer

models require knowing how much material needs to be sprayed. Certain

conditions cause wide areas to suddenly (over hours) open up in the

Shield. Then and only then is mass spraying done - and would be done

with the most logical craft, a tanker.

 

Why not spray more from individual jetliners? That is one of

the problems. Jetliners do not carry much material (100 to 500

gallons) because the material has to be spread out thinly.

 

Look at the kinds of material being used, aluminum, barium,

titanium, etc. Most are highly reflective; in some instances the

material is an absorber of gasses. In the case of reflection the

desire is to reflect X amount of heat and X amount of UV while still

maintaining acceptable (nominal) levels of UV and heat reaching the

planet's surface.

 

Life requires a certain amount of both UV and Heat too much

will kill - so will too little. The apparent amount looks like a lot

more than what is actually being sprayed per volume of air it is

covering. Most of the whitening of the sky is not the material per

se, but the collection of water vapor, which forms into suspended ice

crystals. The introduction of the material causes the water vapor to

collect like rain collects on individual particles of dust.

 

Too much material would cause a " mud fall " of sorts where the

naturally occurring water vapor would precipitate carrying the

material with it.

 

Spraying is done in such away as to " layer " the material

through a volume that will allow an acceptable level of UV and heat

through along with all the other wavelengths of light. Photosynthesis

is the foundation of life on our planet.

 

Only when all the material is removed in a local area does it

require a massive spray, this is usually in the front of a weather

system, or after a heavy period of precipitation. Then a tanker is

flown, fully loaded.

 

 

25. Is there any truth in the story that some of the spraying

is done by jetliners with modifications in the " honey " or waste

compartment? For example, see mechanic story: Mechanic.

 

The technology used for spraying is rather simple. It requires

at least two tanks under pressure, each carries half of the mixture

which is sprayed at the same time forming a complete compound which

is designed to be lightweight (so as to be suspended for longer

periods of time).

 

There have been attempts to incorporate the materials in jet

fuel, however the material binds with unburned jet fuel, water vapor,

etc and does not have the added buoyancy of the polymer threads. The

end result is a spray that is less than half as effective and is more

dangerous since it can lead to sulfates, acids and other mixtures,

which are more lethal than the spray.

 

It is very possible that the " honey " compartment is used. The

amount of material needed is small compared to the payload of any

given commercial airliner.

 

However, there is a good deal of fuel tank that is not used.

Airliners only fuel their craft for the journey ahead of them; they

rarely top off the tank. This has become public knowledge in light of

9-11. It was this small fact that caused the terrorists to pick pan-

continental flights so they would have a plane fully loaded.

 

The majority of flights are short range and do not require the

full capacity of an airliners fuel tanks. Any adaptations needed

could easily be done during routine maintenance, and could be easily

explained away as being a modification for safety and-or pollution

controls.

 

This last is my own theory.

 

We can assume that any means possible to deliver the material

is tried. Independent nations may favor one way of doing so over

another.

 

 

26. Where are the official sources that state that a certain

number of people (worldwide?) will sicken and possibly die as a

result of the spraying? In other words, what *internal* studies have

been done on the health issues and who carried them out?

 

WHO (World Health Organization) carried out most of the

studies. Other nations have carried their own research on the matter.

Some have said the ill effects will be minimal - along the lines of a

million or so, while others have found the numbers to be far higher -

3 to 4 billion.

 

Some of the organizations include the CDC and independent labs.

We are dealing with a situation where the amount of contamination is

estimated to be far higher than what would normally take place but is

far lower than historical instances of industrial contamination. This

is important to note, the only real history we have with

barium/aluminum/titanium etc. contamination is through factory

workers, miners, etc, who receive a far greater dosage of the

material than what is to be experienced by the populace under the

Shield.

 

The amount of spray is very small compared to the volume of the

space that is covered. Most of the harmful chemicals that are used

are being dissipated over vast areas. Near coastal regions the fall

out is not reaching land at all, but is being carried out to the

oceans. The addition of polymers to make the material remain

suspended in the air longer means that less material is being used.

 

Today the material used and its application is nothing like in

the early days when it was sprayed in greater quantities and settling

far faster to be inhaled by all.

 

The accepted Estimated Casualties (from WHO) is 2 billion over

the course of 6 decades. The majority will be either the elderly, or

those who are prone to respiratory problems. These numbers are based

on the current estimates of the general health of the population, the

average age and the occurrence of respiratory problems as a health

issue. All are estimates since there are no solid numbers to work

with.

 

 

27. Could you summarize the root causes of the initial

destruction of the atmosphere that requires this " repair " work? Did

it perhaps result in part from fluorides released/produced by the

nuclear weapons programs?

 

In a word - Industry. Most fail to understand that the products

we use, wear and live with are made in a manner that dumps CFC's and

green houses gasses into the atmosphere. There is no one single

causative in this issue. It goes way back to the Industrial

Revolution and the use of coal to power steam engines. Since that

time we have consumed greater and greater energy resources, dumping

the waste where ever we wanted.

 

Up until very recently refrigeration was a big contributor,

imagine all those hundreds of millions of households that owned and

operated freon cooled refrigerators from 1940 to 1970. Not just one

refrigerator per household, but over the course of time often

multiple freon units. This doesn't include the various air

conditioner systems or industrial refrigeration systems.

 

For a long period when the refrigerator or air conditioner unit

was replaced, the old one was taken to the dump and thrown into the

heap - the freon was free to escape and make its way up into the

stratosphere to eat away at the ozone layer.

 

You can add to that list. Think of all the cars that had air

conditioners, think of all those hair spray cans with their

propellant gasses - the amount of those alone were enough to do great

damage.

 

Styrofoam is another industry and product that has contributed

to the problem. In the scheme of things atomic energy has contributed

little compared to the consumer goods that have been manufactured

during the past century.

 

Think of all the cars on the road today. In the late 1970's

smog controls started getting stronger. Think of all the pre-1978

cars on the road - they are still producing a good many chemicals

that leech into every corner of the globe.

 

 

28. Have you any comment on the use of so-called " CloudBusters "

based upon the theories of Wilhelm Reich? For an example of this see:

CloudBuster.

 

I could go on for hours about the particular errors of this

site. Let us just cut to the chase: I seriously doubt that this

machine does as it is reported to do. I could be wrong, but then I do

not work with alternative energy sources such as Orgone energy.

--- End forwarded message ---