Guest guest Posted May 4, 2003 Report Share Posted May 4, 2003 > Army Testing Finds Drugs That May Stop the SARS Virus > http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAHFVXS9FD.html > By Daniel Q. Haney The Associated Press > Published: May 3, 2003 > > > FORT DETRICK, Md. (AP) - The first strong evidence that medicine will > eventually defeat the SARS virus has come to light in recent days at the > Army's biodefense labs, where the world's most intensive and systematic > search for a cure is going on around the clock. > Scientists are concentrating on antiviral drugs already in drugstores, > hoping to find something that will quickly help people dying from the > new respiratory disease. > > While most of these medicines have failed so far, one category has > popped out as promising - the natural infection-fighting protein > interferon. <<< ED NOTE: NO! NO! NO! See: > http://www.who.int/emc- documents/hepatitis/docs/whocdscsrlyo20022/treatment/side_effects.html > > At the same time, the scientists have tested a few experimental > compounds that seem especially intriguing, based on what they know about > the internal mechanics of the SARS virus. The potentially pivotal > result: Drugs called protease inhibitors, chemical cousins of the > medicines that defeated AIDS, can stop the SARS virus cold. <<< ED NOTE: > DITTO! See: > http://www.hivpositive.com/f-Treatment/5-Treatments/ProteaseYou/prot10.html > > These hits, as the scientists call them, are just the first step in > finding possible treatments for SARS. All the tests are done in lab > dishes, and treatments that work spectacularly on that level can be > disappointing in people. In the months to come, they expect to test at > least 100,000 compounds, perhaps even 500,000. > > Nevertheless, the scientists are exultant that their search has so > rapidly turned up leads to take into more elaborate experiments. > > " It's a pretty big deal. We are excited about it, " says Peter Jahrling, > senior research scientist at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of > Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick. > > USAMRIID's usual work is finding defenses to the contagion troops can > encounter, intentionally or by chance, anywhere on the planet. These > scientists' expertise in handling odd, poorly understood and dangerous > bugs made them a natural choice for drug screening when severe acute > respiratory syndrome emerged in Asia as a never-before-seen form of > pneumonia. > > John Huggins, who is in charge of antiviral drugs, went to work > methodically infecting living cells with the SARS virus to see if > something, anything, will keep the cells alive. > > About 20 people work at Huggins' level 3 biosafety lab - one step down > from the most secure - housed in a blank-walled World War II relic > across the lawn from USAMRIID's headquarters. In these beginning days, > they are testing any medicine that makes sense - and some with no > biological plausibility at all - in search of quick hits. > > " Unfortunately, it is far better to be systematic than it is to be smart > in these early steps, " says Huggins. " Trying to guess and blindly going > where logic leads you is dangerous when you know so little. " > > By serendipity, they hope, something already in routine use will cure > SARS. But of the several dozen tested so far, mostly standard drugs for > HIV and herpes, only interferon has shown promise. > > Interferon is one of the body's general purpose virus-stoppers. It comes > into play before the immune system gears up production of more precisely > targeted antibodies. > > Duplicated through genetic engineering, interferon is available > commercially in several different forms. The Army lab found that a > variety called interferon beta blocks the SARS virus in the lab dish, > although it takes 10 times more than would ordinarily be given to a > patient. Still, experts say smaller doses might be effective inside the > human body. > > While interferon appears to have the best chance of quickly becoming a > treatment for the disease, Huggins says, extra testing is necessary to > make sure it does more good than harm. > > Because the respiratory disease is brand new, no one knows exactly why > it makes people so sick, in some cases destroying their lungs. > Certainly, the virus itself is capable of great damage. But in some > infections, the body's own over-the-top counterattack - including vast > production of interferon - can be as bad as the bug itself. > > So before interferon becomes a SARS treatment, doctors will have to be > sure patients are not already making more than enough interferon of > their own. > > However, Dr. Frederick Hayden, a respiratory virus expert at the > University of Virginia, notes that when the flu causes pneumonia, the > body produces too little interferon to fight back effectively, so the > Army lab results " raise the possibility of using interferon either for > prevention or for therapy of SARS. " > > Experts are also encouraged to learn that drugs called cysteine protease > inhibitors can stop the virus by jamming one of the enzymes it needs to > make new copies of itself. Jahrling says the lab has tested 19 of them, > and six work well. " They clearly inhibit replication of the virus and do > so at concentrations that are not toxic to the cells. " > > The drugs were all created by pharmaceutical firms to treat or ward off > colds caused by the rhinoviruses, but none of the six have been given to > people. Because of similarities between the various respiratory viruses, > scientists have hoped from the start that medicines aimed at colds and > flu will turn out to be good for the SARS virus, too. > > Even if these particular ones are not perfect, something like them might > be. So the lab will gather up lots of closely related compounds that > were abandoned by pharmaceutical companies along the way. > > If interferon and other on-the-market medicines fail, the conquest of > SARS will almost certainly be a slow business. Developers will have to > work their meticulous way through each plodding step, proving that the > medicine helps infected lab animals, that it is safe enough for people > and ultimately that it cures the sick, first in experiments on a few, > then on many. > > Because of SARS' urgency, drug development is likely to move at top > speed, and Hayden predicts that a medicine such as a protease inhibitor > could be ready for testing on people within a year. > > Meanwhile, Huggins' lab goes nonstop. It thoroughly tests about 25 drugs > at a time and must wait three days for an answer. Soon, the team expects > to scale up testing to 100 at once. > > Every drug gets a pair of 4-by-6-inch trays, each divided into 96 > separate compartments with varying concentrations of the medicine plus a > layer of monkey cells. The scientists add enough SARS virus to infect > one in 1,000 cells. > > As bad as the virus is for human lungs, it behaves obediently in the > lab, growing robustly in these cell cultures. Under 40-times > magnification, its destructive punch is obvious. The usual brick-like > rows of cells puff up as the virus takes control. Some of them literally > explode, leaving holes. > > If the drug works, the virus does not spread. Cells stay healthy. To see > how they fare, scientists douse them with a dye that is absorbed by > healthy cells. If they soak up a lot, they are doing fine, and the drug > is effective. > > The lab is working with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious > Diseases and the Food and Drug Administration to round up anything that > might work. They plan to test everything, within reason, that is offered > by drug developers or anyone else with a good idea. > > " We have been pleasantly amazed by the number of pharmaceutical firms, > large and small, as well as academic investigators who have offered > compounds for screening, " says Catherine Laughlin, virology chief at the > infectious disease institute. > > The government is not simply waiting for drugs to show up in the mail, > either. The FDA is coaxing drug companies to submit possible antiviral > drugs that the agency knows they are working on or may even have > discarded. > > To be sure nothing is missed, the Army lab will eventually try every > category of medicine sold around the world, no matter what it is > intended for. It will screen all 880 drugs in a collection of chemically > unique medicines maintained by Prestwick Chemical Inc. > > Much of the testing, though, will not involve the exhaustive screening > given to the top prospects. Instead, the labs will load five drugs into > each of the compartments on its trays, then go back and figure out which > one was responsible if they get a hit. > > Already, the labs have screened 3,000 compounds with this quick > run-through. And one of them, submitted by a small pharmaceutical > company, stopped the virus. The next step will be to test the five > separately to see which one did it. > > Some drug makers are anxious to get their compounds into the testing > queue. For instance, AVI BioPharma has just finished crafting a possible > drug intended to disable the virus' genes and is shipping it off to the > Army lab. > > Testing there " lends tremendous credibility, " says Denis Burger, the > firm's chief executive. " There is not another facility anywhere that > matches this in terms of the muscle they can throw at it. " > > But until they understand more about what is likely to work, the Army > scientists will entertain just about any idea. In fact, they say a high > point of their day is looking at the SARS cures that well-meaning people > propose out of the blue. > > Dried broccoli is Huggins' favorite. Elderberry syrup has come in at > least four times. " Eucalyptus oil! " Jahrling says, skimming his e-mail. > > > --- > > EDITOR'S NOTE: Medical Editor Daniel Q. Haney is a special correspondent > for The Associated Press. > > --- > > On the Net: > > NIAID site: http://www.niaid.nih.gov/factsheets/sars.htm > > AP-ES-05-03-03 1215EDT > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.