Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

CNN - Court splits on Agent Orange

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/06/09/scotus.agent.orange/index.html

 

 

 

Court splits on Agent Orange

By Bill MearsCNN's Washington Bureau

Monday, June 9, 2003 Posted: 10:50 PM EDT (0250 GMT)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RELATED

 

 

 

 

• Court hears Agent Orange case February 26, 2003

 

• Medical legacies of Vietnam live on April 28, 2000

 

• Opinion: http://laws.findlaw.com/us/000/02-271.html (FindLaw)

 

• U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs

 

• Agent Orange Web site

 

• Vietnam Veterans Home Page

 

• Dow Chemical Co.

 

 

 

 

AGENT ORANGE

 

 

• Agent Orange was a herbicide used during the Vietnam War to help U.S. troops kill vegetation.• More than 80 percent of the herbicides used in Vietnam was Agent Orange.• By 1971, more than 20 million gallons of herbicide were sprayed.• In 1978, the government set up an Agent Orange registry to examine the health of returning vets.Source: U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

 

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court has allowed a lawsuit against the makers of the Agent Orange herbicide to continue, despite a nearly two-decade-old class-action settlement.

In two unusual split decisions, the justices Monday granted a Vietnam veteran the right to continue pursuing claims that he was not properly represented in a 1984 settlement involving Dow Chemical, Monsanto and other chemical manufacturers.

But a second vet's claim was set aside for a lower court to re-examine the case.

At issue was whether veterans shut out of the old settlement had a right to make new illness claims, and whether businesses should continue to be held liable for a potentially unlimited period.

In an unsigned opinion, the court allowed Daniel Stephenson and his family to continue his lawsuit against Agent Orange makers. Stephenson is a retired helicopter pilot who served in Vietnam from 1965 to 1970. He was diagnosed with bone marrow cancer five years ago.

The nine-member court split in its decision 4-4. The tie vote essentially affirmed the federal appeals court decision giving Stephenson the right to sue.

A ninth justice, John Paul Stevens, did not participate. No reason was given, but his son was a Vietnam vet who reportedly died from cancer in the mid-1990s, according to a report from The Associated Press.

In a separate claim, the justices vacated the case of Joe Isaacson, ordering a lower court to reconsider his claims. Isaacson, a New Jersey teacher, served at an air base where Agent Orange was used from 1968 to 1969.

Agent Orange was sprayed from U.S. aircraft during the Vietnam War to clear forest and undergrowth, in an effort to expose enemy positions hiding below.

The two veterans in the case claim their due process rights were violated in the original 1984 settlement. The chemical companies agreed to pay out $180 million claims, but for only a 10-year period ending in 1994.

Lawyers for Stephenson and Isaacson told the justices during arguments in February that the men only learned of their illnesses after the settlement expired, essentially shutting them and their families out of any monetary compensation for death or disability.

But the court in issuing its ruling did not answer a key question in the case: whether those who did not participate in a class action lawsuit can later claim they were not adequately represented.

Veterans groups had supported the two men, calling it an injustice. Business groups supported the chemical companies, saying reopening settlements would discourage people from settling in the first place.

"A lot of veterans have been waiting for 10 years to hear this, their rights are vindicated," said Gerson Smoger of Oakland, California, the attorney for Isaacson and Stephenson, in a report from The Associated Press.

The case is Dow Chemical v. Stephenson, case no. 02-0271.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...