HIV=AIDS found ILLEGAL in Germany

[Guest guest]

HIV=AIDS found ILLEGAL in Germany

 

 

http://dc.indymedia.org/front.php3?article_id=74105 & group=webcast

 

 

by Repost 1:23am Tue Jun 24 '03 (Modified on 4:48am Tue Jun 24 '03)

 

 

After years of claims by the AIDS establishment that a link between HIV

 

and immune supression had been established, a High Court found the claim

 

without merit and a unfounded deception. This is the first legal trail

 

of the HUV/AIDS hypothesis and a historic defeat for AID$ Inc.

 

 

http://www.la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369.php

 

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson

 

 

The United Nations Centre for Human Rights, United Nations Office at Geneva

 

8-14 Avenue de la Paix

 

1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland

 

To all Heads of Government and all Heads of State

 

To all NGOs

 

 

 

Legal proceedings against the " Deutscher Bundestag " , the Parliament of

 

the Federal Republic of Germany: Because of the intentional continuation

 

of acts of killing and manslaughter (§ 220a StGB Germany) by the German

 

Parliament.

 

 

During the last six years proofs have been collected for the following

 

actions that have taken place inside Germany:

 

The State intentionally is using non-valid tests to persuade healthy

 

persons to take a deadly long-term medication. The persons, being

 

healthy before being tested die during the long-term-medication. The

 

German Parliament, since years intentionally is securing that this crime

 

continues.

 

 

Course of Events on January 15th 2001 at the District Court

 

(Landgericht) of Dortmund:

 

 

Judge Hackmann announced the statement of the

 

" Bundesgesundheitsbeh^?rde " , the Federal German Health Authorities,

 

which says that in connection with AIDS there has never been isolated a

 

virus (Dr. Marcus, Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) Berlin). The judge

 

figured out that the German Bundestag had been backing the lie of the

 

Federal Health Authorities (RKI, Dr. Marcus, 9.3.95) about a successful

 

isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS in the course of a petition

 

(Art. 17, Constitution of the Federal Republic of Germany, Pet.

 

5-13-15-2002-010526).

 

 

The trial was based on actions of the defendant which were caused by the

 

misleading statement made by the RKI (Dr. Marcus) on the 9th March 1995,

 

that there were photographs of the isolated HIV-virus inside the

 

publications of Montagnier (1983) and Gallo (1984). The judge proved the

 

untruthfulness of this statement using Dr. Marcus's statement itself.

 

The court imposed a suspended sentence of 8 months of jail because of

 

attempted coercion of the authorities to adhere and act according to law

 

and order.

 

 

The document of the German Bundestag DS 12/8591 holds proof that the

 

Bundestag had already known in 1994 that neither Montagnier (1983) nor

 

Gallo (1984) had isolated any virus in connection with AIDS. Based on

 

this the Bundestag safeguarded the persistent lie of the AIDS

 

information campaign (RKI) from 9th March 1995 about the successful

 

isolation of a virus in connection with AIDS. As a consequence of

 

non-tolerating this lie and because of non-tolerating the deadly

 

consequences of this lie, the trial took place on 15th January 2001.

 

 

It is impossible' as far as laboratory conditions are concerned ' to

 

develop a valid Virus-antibody-test, if the virus has not been isolated

 

before. Every layman understands that an individual proof for an

 

infection with a virus is impossible, if the existence of the virus has

 

never been generally proven. This knowledge of the German health

 

authorities, that the tests are not validated, can be proven via the

 

authorities' or with the documents themselves. The error concerning the

 

test validity is spread and supported by the authorities' against better

 

knowledge.

 

 

With two more petitions the Bundestag safeguarded the default of the

 

responsible authorities, not to carry out the law (§63 AMG, Stufenplan

 

II), to do studies and observations to protect persons taking the

 

AIDS-Medicine, the chemotherapy AZT (Pet. 5-13-15-2002-058744 and Pet.

 

5-13-15-212-023567a).

 

 

The health authorities and the Bundestag know that there will be no test

 

method to prove an HIV-Infection, as long as HIV has not been isolated.

 

And there is no doubt that AZT 'as well as the HIV-medications in

 

general ' are deadly themselves when used as long-term-medication.

 

In the course of the proceedings of the petitions the Bundestag created

 

an apparent peace of law ' by means of deliberately untruthful

 

statements. President of the German Parliament Wolfgang Thierse regards

 

untruthful behaviour of this kind (as shown by the Bundestag) as being

 

justified by the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional

 

Court). A videotape documenting an interview (28th June 1995) shows that

 

his predecessor in office, Prof. Rita Smuth did know, that there had

 

never been any proofs for a virus in connection with AIDS and that there

 

are no proofs for the claims of infectivitiy.

 

 

Still pending in the Bundestag is the petition Pet. 2-14-15-212-02608.

 

It is lodging a complaint against the legal authorities, which stayed

 

passive after getting the attention of the proofs for these act of

 

killings. Enclosed with the complaint were so many proofs, which had

 

made it necessary for the Bundestag to take actions right after perusal,

 

to stop the continuation of these acts of killing by the state. Within

 

the last six months every single member of the German Bundestag was

 

informed six times via mail about these acts of killing by the state.

 

 

The intention of the German Bundestag to safeguard killings by the state

 

after gaining insight into the facts must be regarded as proven,

 

especially because of the fact that several petitions were rejected by

 

means of untruthful statements. The German Bundestag and every

 

individual member of the Bundestag intentionally safeguards acts of

 

killing by the state by deliberately misleading the public. Healthy

 

people are intentionally lead into a deadly medication via tests with

 

invalid results - and then die.

 

 

The criminal law of the BRD and especially § 220a StGB (Genocide)

 

protects citizens from act of killings organised by a state which is

 

deliberately misleading the public. It also protects the citizens

 

binding the legal authorities to take actions after perusal. The

 

prosecuting attorneys attended the trial on 15th January 2001 at the

 

Landgericht Dortmund and learned about the facts in front of the public.

 

Their passivity afterwards serves as a further proof for their further

 

intention in this matter.

 

 

(LG Dortmund, Ns 70 Js 878/99 14(XVII) K 11/00) Karl Krafeld and Dr.

 

Stefan Lanka, Dortmund and Stuttgart, 14.3.2001 Science, Medicine and

 

Human Rights (Wissenschaft, Medizin und Menschenrechte e.V.), Germany

 

Albrechtstr. 17, D-44137 Dortmund, 0711 2220601, Lanka

 

 

 

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index/epapadopoulos.htm

 

 

or http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/index.htm

 

 

or the forum

 

 

http://www.aidsRC.org

 

 

www.la.indymedia.org/news/2003/06/66369

--

Neil Jensen: neil

The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/

HIV plus a terminal illness will kill ya.

http://www.sumeria.net/aids/