Guest guest Posted July 28, 2003 Report Share Posted July 28, 2003 Not bad. It is not until the second sentence, third paragraph that one encounters B.S. Many such articles start feeding the reader B.S. in the first or second sentence! > I often suspect Vitamin B-17 is purposely denied, " outlawed, " and >otherwise ignored for the benefit of the medi-pharma-gods.... > >deb > >http://www.joevialls.co.uk/vialls/laetrile1.html > > >Donadaghovi AiSv Nv wa do hi ya do >(Til next we meet, Walk in Peace) >--<<< --<<< --<<< -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ " Dragons is sooooo stupid! " -- Yosemite Sam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2003 Report Share Posted July 28, 2003 And – as I’ve always said – the reason someone has cancer is NOT because they are lacking in chemotherapy!! There are lots of natural ways to help your body cure itself, instead of fighting against your body. Carol ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ whole-food supplements that provide nutrients essential for the health of people, pets and plants. http://www.BlueGreenSolutions.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- d3feathers [d3feathers] Monday, July 28, 2003 6:43 AM Is Cancer Merely a Vitiman Deficiency? I often suspect Vitamin B-17 is purposely denied, " outlawed, " and otherwise ignored for the benefit of the medi-pharma-gods.... deb http://www.joevialls.co.uk/vialls/laetrile1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2003 Report Share Posted July 28, 2003 If you read up generally on orthomolecular subjects you'll run into many doctors that supplement heavily to reduce cancer. Following Linus Pauling's work, Dr. Abram Hoffer for example has used vitamin C for decades. And many cancer clinics do as well, albeit intravenously because the bowel can't handle up to 200 GRAMS they use daily. On my website you'll see that a cold-processed whey isolate has been successfully used on prostate cancer (seven out of seven). It's data like this that got Immunocal listed in the Physician's Desk Reference for (get this) Prescription Drugs! Not bad for a supplement!! Duncan Crow > > I often suspect Vitamin B-17 is purposely denied, " outlawed, " and > otherwise ignored for the benefit of the medi-pharma-gods.... > > deb > > http://www.joevialls.co.uk/vialls/laetrile1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 Neil.... That's why I'm on this list....I am not trained in any kind of healing / nutrition / vitamin / or any other kind of medical / health field.....I many times come to this board to read the professional knowledge / practical application of you health workers.....and I appreciate what you share with this list.... So....what kind of BS is this article plopping down for readers? To the uninitiated (that'd be me), it sounds good. What was said in a wrong way in the third paragraph? Is there enough time in the day to answer that one? :-) deb - Neil Jensen <neil Date: Mon Jul 28, 2003 7:32 am Subject: Re: Is Cancer Merely a Vitiman Deficiency? Not bad. It is not until the second sentence, third paragraph that one encounters B.S. Many such articles start feeding the reader B.S. in the first or second sentence! Donadaghovi AiSv Nv wa do hi ya do (Til next we meet, Walk in Peace) --<<< --<<< --<<< Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 The second sentence, third paragraph makes the bald-faced lie that vegetarians do not get cancer or, as i recall CHD. A bald-faced lie is B.S. IMHO. >Neil.... > >That's why I'm on this list....I am not trained in any kind of healing / >nutrition / vitamin / or any other kind of medical / health field.....I >many times come to this board to read the professional knowledge / >practical application of you health workers.....and I appreciate what >you share with this list.... > >So....what kind of BS is this article plopping down for readers? To >the uninitiated (that'd be me), it sounds good. What was said in a >wrong way in the third paragraph? > >Is there enough time in the day to answer that one? :-) > >deb -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ When the President is illegitimate, Then the Bastards have won. -- Pop Ott Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 Cancer can only grow in an acid environment. Diets that have a lot of acid forming foods, such as meat, tend to promote cancer. There have been several books written by people who have had terminal cancer and did everything modern medicine had to offer, and were still told that there is nothing else that could be done to save them. They went on a Macrobiotic lifestyle and the cancer magically went into remission. Macrobiotics balances both Yin & Yang energies, as well as Acid & Alkaline levels. There was a medical study that showed that smokers actually had an increase rick of cancer when taking vitamin C, than if they didn't take vitamin C. From an energy standpoint, tobacco has Yin energy and so does vitamin C. Therefore, taking vitamin C while using tobacco make these people more Yin. If they ate a diet that balanced the body to being neutral (not too Yin or Yang, and not to acidic or alkaline), I would expect the risk of cancer to go way down. If you take a lot of supplements, you may want to see someone who does Traditional Chinese medicine. Being in balance (Mind, Body, & Spirit) is the key to health. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker > If you read up generally on orthomolecular subjects you'll run into many > doctors that supplement heavily to reduce cancer. > > Following Linus Pauling's work, Dr. Abram Hoffer for example has used > vitamin C for decades. And many cancer clinics do as well, albeit > intravenously because the bowel can't handle up to 200 GRAMS they use > daily. > > On my website you'll see that a cold-processed whey isolate has been > successfully used on prostate cancer (seven out of seven). It's data like > this that got Immunocal listed in the Physician's Desk Reference for (get > this) Prescription Drugs! Not bad for a supplement!! > > Duncan Crow > > > > > I often suspect Vitamin B-17 is purposely denied, " outlawed, " and > > otherwise ignored for the benefit of the medi-pharma-gods.... > > > > deb > > > > http://www.joevialls.co.uk/vialls/laetrile1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 That is absolutely true. Even a strict vegan diet may not prevent or cure cancer. Large fries and a Diet Cola is vegan, and will guarantee health problems if that is your main source of nutrients. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker > The second sentence, third paragraph makes the bald-faced lie that > vegetarians do not get cancer or, as i recall CHD. A bald-faced lie is > B.S. IMHO. > > >Neil.... > > > >That's why I'm on this list....I am not trained in any kind of healing / > >nutrition / vitamin / or any other kind of medical / health field.....I > >many times come to this board to read the professional knowledge / > >practical application of you health workers.....and I appreciate what > >you share with this list.... > > > >So....what kind of BS is this article plopping down for readers? To > >the uninitiated (that'd be me), it sounds good. What was said in a > >wrong way in the third paragraph? > > > >Is there enough time in the day to answer that one? :-) > > > >deb Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 Valid research by objective scientists contradicts the idea that eating meat, per se, in any way causes or promotes cancer or CHD. If that hypothesis were true, cancer and CHD would have been epidemic at the beginning of the 20th century when most fats and proteins were derived from animal sources. They weren't! (See " The Neglected Nutritional Research of Dr. Weston A. Price, DDS. " ) <http://www.sumeria.net/health/price.html> (See also " The Oiling of America. " ) <http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/oiling.html> The lipid hypothesis was disproved BEFORE IT WAS EVEN FORMULATED!!! >Cancer can only grow in an acid environment. Diets that have a lot of >acid forming foods, such as meat, tend to promote cancer. -- -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ It has recently been discovered that research causes cancer in rats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 29, 2003 Report Share Posted July 29, 2003 You seem to be focusing on the word meat, and ignoring everything else. People at the beginning of the 20th century ate a balanced diet, not just mostly meat. Fruits and vegetables were also standard part of meals. Foods were not processed, packaged in plastic or styrofoam, and microwaved. Cattle were not pumped full of steroids and antibiotics. Many things contribute to cancer. An unbalanced diet is one of them. Toxins in the environment are another. Acid forming foods, whether animal or vegetable based, need to be balanced with alkaline forming foods (and that is based on valid research by objective scientists). -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker > Valid research by objective scientists contradicts the idea that > eating meat, per se, in any way causes or promotes cancer or CHD. If > that hypothesis were true, cancer and CHD would have been epidemic at > the beginning of the 20th century when most fats and proteins were > derived from animal sources. They weren't! > > (See " The Neglected Nutritional Research of Dr. Weston A. Price, DDS. " ) > <http://www.sumeria.net/health/price.html> > > (See also " The Oiling of America. " ) > <http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/oiling.html> > > The lipid hypothesis was disproved BEFORE IT WAS EVEN FORMULATED!!! > > >Cancer can only grow in an acid environment. Diets that have a lot of > >acid forming foods, such as meat, tend to promote cancer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2003 Report Share Posted July 30, 2003 Have you ever seen me disagree with the fact that a well balanced diet is important? I focus on meat and dairy because that the area in which the most false claims are being made. For example, why is it that the distinction between commercially grown vs. organically grown fruits and vegetables is made but the same distinction IS IGNORED when meat and dairy are are being discussed? Hydrogenation was invented in the second decade of the 20th century and shortly thereafter P & G came out with Crisco, which was hydrogenated cottonseed oil -- an oil that is unfit for human consumption even without hydrogenation. It was about the same time that the technology for extracting oil from corn -- a grain that does not easily give up its oil -- was invented. Other manufactured oils soon followed. The lipid hypothesis was also invented about the same time by the food manufacturers to boost sales. The use of plastics in food containers did not begin until the late 1930s/early 1940s, and were not used extensively until after WW II. The increases in CHD and cancer, however, began in the late 1920s -- immediately following the introduction of manufactured fats and oils derived from vegetable sources as replacements to the traditional fats and oils. Now will you accuse me of claiming that the use of plastics for food packaging is not a contributory factor? I think we can all agree to that. That is why i do not direct my attention there. Once again, it is in the area of meat and dairy where the most false claims are routinely being made, so THAT is where i direct my attention. >You seem to be focusing on the word meat, and ignoring everything else. > >People at the beginning of the 20th century ate a balanced diet, not >just mostly meat. Fruits and vegetables were also standard part of >meals. Foods were not processed, packaged in plastic or styrofoam, and >microwaved. Cattle were not pumped full of steroids and antibiotics. > >Many things contribute to cancer. An unbalanced diet is one of them. >Toxins in the environment are another. Acid forming foods, whether >animal or vegetable based, need to be balanced with alkaline forming >foods (and that is based on valid research by objective scientists). >-- >Donald E. Jacobs >Registered Massage Therapist >Macrobiotic Counselor >Reiki Practitioner >Professional Speaker -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ " Obtuse Anger is that which is greater than Right Anger. " -- Lewis Carroll Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 30, 2003 Report Share Posted July 30, 2003 It looks like we are pretty much in agreement. You focus on meat and dairy, while I focus on processed foods verses unprocessed foods. Much of the lies about the real value of foods comes from the advertising of processed foods. For example, look at hhow polyunsaturated fats were marketed as being healthy, even when they were highly processed into trans fatty acids. The Standard American Diet consists of a large portion of meat, little or no vegetables, and one or two large deserts (or is it desserts - I could never keep that one straight). All of it is, of course, out of a can or plastic bottle and micro waved. Is it any wonder that cancer is approaching almost 100%. I don't know if plastic food containers directly causes cancer, but it does directly cause many other health problems. Either way, I avoid plastic when I can. I do disagree that cancer is merely a vitamin deficiency. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker > Have you ever seen me disagree with the fact that a well balanced diet > is important? I focus on meat and dairy because that the area in which > the most false claims are being made. For example, why is it that the > distinction between commercially grown vs. organically grown fruits > and vegetables is made but the same distinction IS IGNORED when meat > and dairy are are being discussed? > > Hydrogenation was invented in the second decade of the 20th century > and shortly thereafter P & G came out with Crisco, which was > hydrogenated cottonseed oil -- an oil that is unfit for human > consumption even without hydrogenation. It was about the same time > that the technology for extracting oil from corn -- a grain that does > not easily give up its oil -- was invented. Other manufactured oils > soon followed. The lipid hypothesis was also invented about the same > time by the food manufacturers to boost sales. > > The use of plastics in food containers did not begin until the late > 1930s/early 1940s, and were not used extensively until after WW II. > The increases in CHD and cancer, however, began in the late 1920s -- > immediately following the introduction of manufactured fats and oils > derived from vegetable sources as replacements to the traditional fats > and oils. Now will you accuse me of claiming that the use of plastics > for food packaging is not a contributory factor? I think we can all > agree to that. That is why i do not direct my attention there. Once > again, it is in the area of meat and dairy where the most false claims > are routinely being made, so THAT is where i direct my attention. > > >You seem to be focusing on the word meat, and ignoring everything else. > > > >People at the beginning of the 20th century ate a balanced diet, not > >just mostly meat. Fruits and vegetables were also standard part of > >meals. Foods were not processed, packaged in plastic or styrofoam, and > >microwaved. Cattle were not pumped full of steroids and antibiotics. > > > >Many things contribute to cancer. An unbalanced diet is one of them. > >Toxins in the environment are another. Acid forming foods, whether > >animal or vegetable based, need to be balanced with alkaline forming > >foods (and that is based on valid research by objective scientists). > >-- > >Donald E. Jacobs > >Registered Massage Therapist > >Macrobiotic Counselor > >Reiki Practitioner > >Professional Speaker > > > -- > Neil Jensen: neil Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 Polyunsaturated oils are, for the most part, bad news. The mere fact that the the molecule is not saturated means that it is trying to become saturated. They will readily absorb oxygen atoms and the name for oxydized fats is rancid. Some of the highly unsaturated oils become rancid at almost the moment that the oil is extracted. Also, when they are heated above 320 deg. F, they convert into trans fatty acids which are, simply put, poison. The temperature of baking exceeds 320 deg. A short time ago, a McDonald's press release claimed that they were eliminating trans fatty acids from their french fries by ceasing the use of trans fatty acid-containing oils and, instead, using polyunsaturated oil for frying. Anyone with even a modicum of knowledge about saturated and unsaturated oils knows that this will INCREASE the amount of trans fatty acids in the fries, not decrease them. This news release was parroted on almost every national and local news program, as well as printed news media. The whole thing was a scam, a lie. Ignorance can kill you! One of the few polyunsaturated fats that is healthy is flaxseed oil. It must be remembered that this is a delicate oil and must be used fresh. If it is not fresh, or is used in cooking, it becomes just another unhealthy vegetable oil to be avoided. Rapeseed oil (euphemistically referred to as Canola oil) contains 40% or more TFA. Why? because during processing, it must be heated to temperatures exceeding 400 deg. F -- and held there for a considerable length of time -- during the deodorization process. Unless it is deodorized, no one would buy it. It is, however, an excellent penetrating oil for freeing rusted nuts and bolts. I keep a small amount on hand for lubricating the door hinges on my car. Below is a general guide to healthy fats and oils vs. unhealthy fats and oils from the Weston A. Price Foundation Website: <http://www.westonaprice.org/know_your_fats/know_your_fats.html> These nutrient-rich traditional fats have nourished healthy population groups for thousands of years: Butter Beef and lamb tallow Lard Chicken, goose and duck fat Coconut, palm and sesame oils Cold pressed olive oil Cold pressed flax oil Marine oils These new-fangled fats can cause cancer, heart disease, immune system dysfunction, sterility, learning disabilities, growth problems and osteoporosis: All hydrogenated oils Soy, corn and safflower oils Cottonseed oil Canola oil All fats heated to high temperatures in processing and frying I urge you to study Dr. Price's work. He was way ahead of his time so, because they cannot disprove his well documented work and because it is contrary to most modern theories of nutrition, it is mostly avoided. In fact, if you take most modern theories of nutrition and turn them to their opposite, you will be closer to the truth! BTW, deserts has three esses (two in singular form). I also agree that causes of cancer are much more complex than a mere vitamin deficiency. Main Entry: des·sert Pronunciation: di-'z & rt Function: noun Etymology: Middle French, from desservir to clear the table, from des- de- + servir to serve, from Latin servire 1600 1:a usually sweet course or dish (as of pastry or ice cream) served at the end of a meal 2British :a fresh fruit served after a sweet course >It looks like we are pretty much in agreement. You focus on meat and >dairy, while I focus on processed foods verses unprocessed foods. > >Much of the lies about the real value of foods comes from the >advertising of processed foods. For example, look at hhow >polyunsaturated fats were marketed as being healthy, even when they were >highly processed into trans fatty acids. > >The Standard American Diet consists of a large portion of meat, little >or no vegetables, and one or two large deserts (or is it desserts - I >could never keep that one straight). All of it is, of course, out of a >can or plastic bottle and micro waved. Is it any wonder that cancer is >approaching almost 100%. > >I don't know if plastic food containers directly causes cancer, but it >does directly cause many other health problems. Either way, I avoid >plastic when I can. > >I do disagree that cancer is merely a vitamin deficiency. >-- >Donald E. Jacobs >Registered Massage Therapist >Macrobiotic Counselor >Reiki Practitioner >Professional Speaker -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ Why would someone pay $1.89 for a bottle of Evian water? (hint: Try spelling " Evian " backwards!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2003 Report Share Posted August 1, 2003 Wow! All that AND a spelling lesson. I'm impressed! If you eat lunch in the desert and you eat sand at the end, does that make the desert dessert? If you go to a deserted island that has tropical fruit trees, is it really a desserted island? This sure is confusing. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker (snip) > Main Entry: des·sert > Pronunciation: di-'z & rt > Function: noun > Etymology: Middle French, from desservir to clear the table, > from des- de- + servir to serve, from Latin servire > 1600 > 1:a usually sweet course or dish (as of pastry or ice cream) served at > the end of a meal > 2British :a fresh fruit served after a sweet course (snip) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2003 Report Share Posted August 1, 2003 I remember the way I could remember the spelling of it when I was in school – dessert (what you eat at the end of a meal) has two s’s – because you always want more than one dessert! Carol Donald E. Jacobs [res1odrh] Wow! All that AND a spelling lesson. I'm impressed! If you eat lunch in the desert and you eat sand at the end, does that make the desert dessert? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ whole-food supplements that provide nutrients essential for the health of people, pets and plants. http://www.BlueGreenSolutions.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2003 Report Share Posted August 1, 2003 And if a soldier in Iraq goes AWOL carrying a piece of chocolate cake, is he a desert desserter deserting? Terry Donald E. Jacobs [res1odrh] Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:24 PM Re: Re: Is Cancer Merely a Vitiman Deficiency? Wow! All that AND a spelling lesson. I'm impressed! If you eat lunch in the desert and you eat sand at the end, does that make the desert dessert? If you go to a deserted island that has tropical fruit trees, is it really a desserted island? This sure is confusing. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker (snip) > Main Entry: des·sert > Pronunciation: di-'z & rt > Function: noun > Etymology: Middle French, from desservir to clear the table, > from des- de- + servir to serve, from Latin servire > 1600 > 1:a usually sweet course or dish (as of pastry or ice cream) served at > the end of a meal > 2British :a fresh fruit served after a sweet course (snip) «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤» NATIONWIDE DENTAL BENEFITS PACKAGE PLUS SAVE UP TO 80% on DENTAL, PRESCRIPTIONS DRUGS, GLASSES, CONTACTS, VISION CARE, & CHIROPRACTIC. $11.95 For Single or $19.95 For an entire household per month! Immediate Coverage * No Waiting Period Pre-existing Covered * No Limit on Benefits http://www.mybenefitsplus.com/MMerrill/ Email: MEM121 «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤ »¥«¤» § - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! § Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses. **COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2003 Report Share Posted August 1, 2003 I'm not sure, but I'll bet he's dead meat. -- Donald E. Jacobs Registered Massage Therapist Macrobiotic Counselor Reiki Practitioner Professional Speaker > And if a soldier in Iraq goes AWOL carrying a piece of chocolate cake, > is he a desert desserter deserting? > > Terry > > > Donald E. Jacobs [res1odrh] > Thursday, July 31, 2003 8:24 PM > > Re: Re: Is Cancer Merely a Vitiman > Deficiency? > > Wow! All that AND a spelling lesson. I'm impressed! > > If you eat lunch in the desert and you eat sand at the end, does that > make the desert dessert? > > If you go to a deserted island that has tropical fruit trees, is it > really a desserted island? > > This sure is confusing. > -- > Donald E. Jacobs > Registered Massage Therapist > Macrobiotic Counselor > Reiki Practitioner > Professional Speaker > > (snip) > > > Main Entry: des·sert > > Pronunciation: di-'z & rt > > Function: noun > > Etymology: Middle French, from desservir to clear the table, > > from des- de- + servir to serve, from Latin servire > > 1600 > > 1:a usually sweet course or dish (as of pastry or ice cream) served at > > > the end of a meal > > 2British :a fresh fruit served after a sweet course > > (snip) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 1, 2003 Report Share Posted August 1, 2003 My my, this discussion is certainly reaching new heights! >I'm not sure, but I'll bet he's dead meat. >-- >Donald E. Jacobs >Registered Massage Therapist >Macrobiotic Counselor >Reiki Practitioner >Professional Speaker > >> And if a soldier in Iraq goes AWOL carrying a piece of chocolate cake, >> is he a desert desserter deserting? >> > > Terry -- Neil Jensen: neil The WWW VL: Sumeria http://www.sumeria.net/ There was a young lady who begat, Three babies named Nat, Pat and Tat. It was fun in the breedin', But Hell in the feedin', When she found she had no tit for Tat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.