Guest guest Posted September 24, 2003 Report Share Posted September 24, 2003 > Rising Costs Prompt States to Reduce Medicaid Further > > By ROBERT PEAR > > WASHINGTON, Sept. 22 Struggling through a third consecutive year of fiscal > distress, states have again squeezed Medicaid, the nation's largest health > insurance program, by scaling back eligibility, cutting benefits, > increasing co-payments and freezing or reducing payments to doctors and > hospitals. > > Vernon K. Smith, former Medicaid director of Michigan, said today that > soaring health costs and plunging state revenues had forced virtually every > state to take action to slow the growth of Medicaid, the health program for > 51 million Americans. > > Economists and state officials said the cutbacks indicated the intense > pressure on the states as a result of declining tax receipts. > > The outlook for Medicaid remains grim, the officials said, because state > revenues are expected to grow much more slowly than the economy, and > inflation in health care is not expected to abate in the coming year. > > " The fiscal crisis facing states is far worse than the condition of the > nation's economy, " said Donald J. Boyd, director of fiscal studies at the > Rockefeller Institute of Government, an arm of the State University of New > York. State tax revenue dropped sharply even as the nation's economic > output grew at a slow pace in the past year, Dr. Boyd said. > > Mr. Smith interviewed officials in all 50 states in an annual survey > conducted for the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, a > private group created by the Kaiser Family Foundation. > > In the 2003 fiscal year, Mr. Smith said, 25 states restricted eligibility > for Medicaid, 18 reduced benefits, and 17 increased co-payments. Moreover, > he said, 21 states cut payment rates for one or more groups of health care > providers. > > For example, Mr. Smith said, Medicaid payment rates for doctors were cut in > 5 states and frozen in 36, while rates for hospitals were reduced in 9 > states and frozen in 22. > > The federal government and the states share the costs of Medicaid. Federal > Medicaid spending soared 13 percent in the 2002 fiscal year, to $147.5 > billion, and has increased again in 2003, though at a slower rate, 9.2 > percent, the Congressional Budget Office said. > > A sluggish economy and rising unemployment have reduced incomes for > millions of families, increasing the number eligible for Medicaid. > > Twenty states reported that increased enrollment was the biggest factor > driving up the cost of Medicaid. Sixteen cited prescription drug costs as > the biggest factor. > > John F. Holahan, director of health policy research at the Urban Institute, > said increased enrollment of the elderly and the disabled accounted for > nearly 60 percent of the growth in Medicaid spending in the past two years. > > The Medicaid director in Ohio, Barbara Coulter Edwards, said the recent > Medicaid cuts had unquestionably caused hardship for some. But, she said, > Congress averted deeper cuts by providing the states $20 billion in > temporary fiscal relief, including $10 billion for Medicaid. > > For years, doctors have complained that Medicaid paid them less than most > other insurers. Dr. Susan Fleischman, medical director of the Venice Family > Clinic in Los Angeles, said payments were so low that many doctors refused > to take Medicaid patients. > > " We will be issuing Medicaid cards, " Dr. Fleischman said, " but it won't > mean anything because people cannot get in to see a doctor. In parts of Los > Angeles, children have to wait weeks to see an ear, nose and throat doctor, > a neurologist or an orthopedist. " > > Nearly all states reported taking action to rein in prescription drug costs > in the past year. Thirty-two expanded the list of medications requiring > special approval, known as prior authorization. Fourteen established lists > of preferred drugs for certain conditions and discouraged doctors from > prescribing other medicines. Four required greater use of low-cost generic > drugs. Five imposed monthly limits on the number of prescriptions that > could be filled. Fourteen established new or higher co-payments for drugs. > > Medicaid officials said they needed to be careful in clamping down on the > use of prescription drugs. > > Robert Day, the Medicaid director in Kansas, said psychiatric drugs > accounted for at least 30 percent of his state's Medicaid drug spending. > " Those drugs have been a miracle for people with serious, persistent mental > illness, " Mr. Day said. > > Daniel N. Mendelson, president of Health Strategies Consultancy, said, > " Prescription drugs account for 15 percent to 25 percent of total Medicaid > spending, and Medicaid drug spending has increased much more rapidly than > the rest of the program. " > http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/23/national/23MEDI.html?th > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.