Guest guest Posted December 2, 2003 Report Share Posted December 2, 2003 > > Plutonium from Sellafield in all children's teeth > > Government admits plant is the source of contamination but says risk is > 'minute' > > Antony Barnett, public affairs editor > Sunday November 30, 2003 > The UK Observer > > http://politics.guardian.co.uk/green/story/0,9061,1096570,00.html > > Radioactive pollution from the Sellafield nuclear plant in Cumbria has > led to children's teeth across Britain being contaminated with plutonium. > > The Government has admitted for the first time that Sellafield 'is a > source of plutonium contamination' across the country. Public Health > Minister Melanie Johnson has revealed that a study funded by the > Department of Health discovered that the closer a child lived to > Sellafield, the higher the levels of plutonium found in their teeth. > > Johnson said: 'Analysis indicated that concentrations of plutonium... > decreased with increasing distance from the west Cumbrian coast and its > Sellafield nuclear fuel reprocessing plant - suggesting this plant is a > source of plutonium contamination in the wider population.' > > Johnson claimed the levels of plutonium are so minute that there is no > health risk to the public. But this is disputed by scientists, MPs and > environmental campaigners who have called for an immediate inquiry into > how one of the world's most dangerous materials has been allowed to > continue to contaminate children's teeth. There have long been claims of > clusters of childhood leukaemia around Sellafield. > > In the late 1990s researchers collected more than 3,000 molars extracted > from young teenagers across the country during dental treatment and > analysed them. To their surprise they found traces of plutonium in all > the teeth including those from children in Scotland and Northern > Ireland. Alarmingly, they discovered that those living closer to > Sellafield had more than twice the amount of those living 140 miles away. > > Plutonium is a man-made radioactive material and the only source of it > in Britain is from Sellafield. The plant, which reprocesses nuclear fuel > from reactors, still discharges plutonium into the Irish Sea. > > The original research was carried out in 1997 by Professor Nick Priest > who was working for the UK Atomic Energy Authority. At the time the > conclusions of the research received little attention because the study > concluded that the contamination levels were so minuscule they were > thought to pose an 'insignificant' health risk. > > But earlier this year the Committee Examining Radiation Risks from > Internal Emitters, looking at health risks posed by radioactive > materials, examined Priest's study. Some of the committee's members have > now cast doubt on the conclusions that plutonium in children's teeth > posed no health risk. > > Professor Eric Wright, of Dundee University Medical School, is one of > the country's leading experts on blood disorders and a member of the > committee. He believes that the tiny specks of plutonium in children's > teeth caused by Sellafield radioactive pollution might lead to some > people falling ill with cancer. > > He said: 'There are genuine concerns that the risks from internal > emitters of radiation are more hazardous [than previously thought]. The > real question is by how much. Is it two or three times more risky... or > more than a hundred?' > > Wright believes that, while the plutonium contamination is unlikely to > pose a health risk to much of the British population, it might be a > problem for some individuals. > > He said: 'If somebody has a bad collection of genes which means their > body cannot deal with small levels of internal radioactive material, > then there could be an issue.' > > Wright's comments, coming on top of the admission from the Health > Minister, have led to calls for an independent inquiry. Liberal Democrat > environment spokesman Norman Baker said: '[This] stinks of a cover-up. > They have known for six years that Sellafield has contaminated the > population with plutonium but done nothing. Yet the plant continues to > discharge plutonium into the Irish Sea. It shows the wanton disregard > the nuclear industry has for public health and there needs to be an > independent inquiry.' > > Janine Allis-Smith of the campaign group Cumbrians Opposed to a > Radioactive Environment said: 'There is no safe amount of plutonium. The > plant must be closed down immediately.' > > However, Priest, who is now professor of environmental toxicology at > Middlesex University stands by his original conclusions. He said: '[The > plutonium in teeth] was at such low levels that it was toxicologically > insignificant. There really is nothing to worry about.' > > A spokesman for BNFL, which runs Sellafield, said: 'What is not clear is > whether the plutonium recorded in this study originated [from > Sellafield] or from nuclear weapons testing fall-out.' > -- > Posted for educational and research purposes only, > ~ in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107 ~ > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.