Guest guest Posted December 6, 2003 Report Share Posted December 6, 2003 World Bracing for Yet Another Mosquito-Borne Health Threat http://www.americanfreepress.net/11_15_03/World_Bracing_for_/world_bracing_f or_.html Ironically, the rise of globalism, which has increased contact among the world’s populations, could eventually be responsible for bringing about its downfall, too. Exclusive to American Free Press By Jack Phillips Besides malaria and West Nile virus, dengue fever is another mosquito-borne threat to the world’s people. With as many as 50 million cases worldwide, 2.5 billion people are at risk. Dengue fever used to be considered a benign disease of visitors to the tropics. The first recorded epidemic occurred in 1879, over 200 years ago. Impeded by slow transportation, sailing ships, there were 10- to 40-year intervals between major epidemics. But the situation changed when a global pandemic originated in Southeast Asia after World War II. Today, the Centers for Disease Control considers it to be the most important viral disease. Four different dengue virus serotypes, isolated from one another, infested the tropics for a long time. However, the geographical distribution of these four viruses and their mosquito vectors has expanded. And more frequent exposure to multiple serotypes resulted in concomitant outbreaks of both dengue and a frequently fatal complication called dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF). The first DHF epidemic occurred in Southeastern Asia in 1950. By 1975 it was a leading cause of hospitalization and death for children in many countries in that region. Those who survive infection from a single serotype of the dengue virus are immune for life to that type and protected, for a short time, against the other three. When only one type was present in an area, one infection meant that there were no further worries about the disease. Now a subsequent infection, by a different type of virus, opens up the possibility of DHF. If not properly treated, death rates from DHF can reach 50 percent. In addition, genetic variants of the four serotypes are working their way around the world. The expanding geographical distribution of aedes aegypti mosquitoes, and the rapid rise in urban populations, are causing increasing numbers of people to be exposed to the disease. At the present time mosquito control is the only method available for countering these diseases. There is no virus-specific treatment. There are no vaccines, and there are not likely to be any for five to 10 years. There is hope that a vaccine capable of countering all four dengue serotypes can be generated by a process called DNA breeding. This can be likened to directed evolution. Willem Stemmer invented this and co-founded Maxygen, Inc. to develop the technology. Candidate vaccines have been successfully tested on mice, and trials with primates are following. Before 1970 when use of DDT for mosquito control was widespread, only nine countries had experienced dengue epidemics. Now the disease is endemic in more than 100 countries. With no new mosquito control technology available, the Public Health Department emphasis on disease prevention and community reduction of larval breeding areas is unlikely to have much of an impact. After successfully eradicating mosquitoes from the United States and most of Central and South America with DDT our government chose to ban the insecticide, which had been keeping diseases like yellow fever, malaria and dengue under control. The mosquitoes must be rejoicing, because, by 1997, they were more widely distributed throughout the world than before the eradication program began. A reevaluation of the decision to ban DDT ought to be seriously considered. While there is only a small risk of a dengue outbreak in Texas and the Southeastern United States, northern Mexico and South and Central America have experienced epidemics of this disease. There were, for example, 390,000 cases in Brazil in 2001 including 670 of DHF. With 40 percent of the world’s population at risk of acquiring a progressively more dangerous disease, refusing to act would be morally unacceptable. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.