Guest guest Posted February 10, 2004 Report Share Posted February 10, 2004 The Chicago Open Chapter for the Study of Psychoanalysis American Psychological Association Division 39 (Psychoanalysis), Section IV (Local Chapters) Presents a Symposium on An Ethic of Free Association: Reclaiming Our Profession, Education, and Practice Presenters: Patrick B. Kavanaugh, PhD David L. Downing, PsyD February 28, 2004 Chicago, Illinois, USA How much longer will we be able to conceptualize, educate, and legally practice in our increasingly regulative and instructive healthcare matrix? Recent years have witnessed the industrialization of healthcare and the healthcare professions. Industrialization has transformed our professional standards through proliferation of coercive regulations with far-reaching consequences for psychoanalytic education and practice: there has been an inexorable erosion of independent professional judgement, one of the defining characteristics of our profession. Standards standardize, regulations regulate, and a bureaucratic rationality is not tolerant of professional discretionary judgement. Industrialization and de-professionalization continue unabated, our state and national associations notwithstanding. An ethic of free association moves far beyond the narrowed definitional concept and meaning of the fundamental rule of free association. It speaks to how we understand and interpret ourselves as citizens and professionals. An ethic of free association embodies certain foundational and implicit meanings of an individual’s political, social, and personal freedoms; is premised on the recognition that the authority for a person’s thoughts and actions is inalienably her or his own; and, holds that each person -as citizen and professional- is the responsible author for her or his self, decisions, and actions (Kavanaugh,1999). Indeed, each person is a participant-observer in her or his life, professional or otherwise. In professional life, a participant-observer may be thought of as a person or group that partners with others for the purpose of sharing in or participating in those conversations that impact the practice or profession of which (s)he is a member. Indeed as a participant-observer, (s)he has a moral and ethical obligation to watch over the profession of which (s)he is a member; to preserve and safeguard its essential and defining characteristics such as the exercise of individual discretionary judgement in professional activities; and, to oppose and counter those industrializing trends that impact the space in which a psychological discourse takes place (Kavanaugh, 2003). In many respects, a participant-observer is guided by an ethic of free association. As a symposium, an Ethic of Free Association... provides the space and opportunity for concerned others from the learning and practice communites to gather and critically discuss these industrializing trends; their de-professionalizing impact on our professional standards and lived-in experiences; and, to participate in the process of reclaiming our profession, practice, and education. For questions, please contact: David L. Downing, Psy.D. at 312.266.1665 151 North Michigan Ave., Suite 1014 Chicago, IL 60601. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.