Fw: [NVIC] You Should Worry About Vaccine Safety

[Guest guest]

For those of you receiving this information maybe you will get a better understanding as to why I personally feel the way I do about what has happened to my children. What happened to Barbra isn't as rare as your doctors would like you to believe. If it were then why did the federal government set up (laughingly of course) the NVICP (national vaccine injury compensation program) to subdue parents into silence. If there isn't anything to worry about then the NVICP isn't needed. So you have a better understanding as to what we as parents of vaccine damaged children are striving for.

 

 

 

 

 

Be At Peace,

Deborah A Delp

Mother to:

Samantha (9, ADHD/ODD)

JR (6, ASD/ADHD)

dadelp

 

What we do with our lives depends on our

Motivation to do something with our lives.

D.A.Delp

 

Vaccine damaged children

are called the "acceptable risk"

group by pharmaceutical leaders.

As parents there is ABSOLUTELY

NOTHING acceptable about the risk!

It's time to tell these "leaders"

that we will no longer allow this!

IT'S TIME TO ACT!

 

DELP'S HOPE PAGE

http://www.delpshopepage.org

 

Autism & Vaccinations

autism_and_vaccinations

 

The Right to Fight Mercury Damage

http://factsformedia.com/factsformedia/coalition.cgi

 

Globe of Hope WebRing:

http://delpshopepage.org/my_web_ring.htm

 

 

 

 

----

 

 

kathi

02/25/04 13:57:28

news

[NVIC] You Should Worry About Vaccine Safety

 

E-NEWS FROM THE NATIONAL VACCINE INFORMATION CENTER

Vienna, Virginia http://www.nvic.org

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED WAY/COMBINED FEDERAL CAMPAIGN

#9119

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

"Protecting the health and informed consent rights of children since 1982."

 

==========================================================================================

http://www.coastalpost.com/04/03/07.htm

Costal Post Online, CA

March, 2004 - Volume 29, Number 03

 

 

You Should Worry About Vaccine Safety

By Carol Sterritt

 

 

Why do some parents and researchers now question vaccine safety? Are their

fears reasonable or mass-induced hypnosis? Let's examine the situation and

focus upon crucial experiences that have come into play. As you read this,

may you come to an awareness that at the very least, the vaccination

prescription needs to be altered to reflect the fact that 1) some children

may simply not be able to tolerate some vaccines, and 2) certain vaccines,

especially the hepatitis B vaccine, cause more injury and death than the

disease that they supposedly remedy.

 

In the early 1980s, a young mother, Barbara Loe Fisher, brought her oldest

child, who was two and a half years old, to the doctor's. They were there

for what should have been a routine vaccination. Within hours following the

shot's administration, the boy experienced convulsions and collapsed. He was

unresponsive or more than six hours as he lay motionless in his bed.

Everyone concerned was frantic.

 

Luckily for this child and his family, he did not stay unconscious or die.

However during the following

 

weeks, "he suffered physical, mental and emotional regression including

severe gastrointestinal dysfunction, failure to thrive, respiratory and ear

infections, personality change, and loss of cognitive memory concentration,

and motor skills. He was eventually diagnosed as having minimal brain

dysfunction that included multiple learning disabilities and attention

deficit disorder." (Quoted biographical material from B.L. Fisher)

 

This incident brought Fisher to a height of awareness. She began to question

the "science" behind vaccines. She began, as so many activists must do, to

unravel the link between industry profits and their production and

distribution of a financially lucrative product, in this case, vaccines. She

became effective in her work. By 1986 she had co-authored a book, "A Shot in

the Dark." Also she together with other parents of vaccine-injured children

founded an organization that became known as the National Vaccine

Information Center. (Ph. 703 938-3783, website www.909shot.com)

 

Over the years, she watched the development of the

vaccination-governmental-industrial complex and its effect on our

population. As time went by, more and more vaccines came on the market. The

number of immunizations now suggested or required is staggering. A baby can

experience as many as thirty-one vaccines by the time of its first birthday.

These include shots for diphtheria, measles, mumps, whooping cough,

hepatitis b, chicken pox, polio and flu. Other vaccines that were thrown on

the market have been withdrawn due to the fatalities that these hastily

created and examined products inflicted on their target population: babies.

(Parents in the late nineteen nineties who vaccinated their children for a

rotovirus lost their children to the bowel obstruction side-effects of the

supposed health aid. Fortunately it was rather quickly pulled from the

market, but it was lack of government oversight that allowed it on the

market to begin with.)

 

The group that Fisher heads, the National Vaccine Information Center, offers

links to resource groups to families whose children are negatively impacted

by vaccination. It is a clearinghouse for information, with its personnel

and its website giving out information on lawsuits, new vaccine regulations,

etc. As the number of "routine" vaccinations increases, so does the

likelihood of a child having autism, asthma, Attention Deficit Disorder,

seizures, and other impairments. Scientists are belatedly getting involved

by designing studies to sort out which, if any, of these problems can be

traced to vaccines.

 

There are now three camps of thought on the vaccine issue. One camp says,

"Look. I'm educated. I understand fully the science behind the vaccine

products. I have read about Edward Jenner and his discovery of a smallpox

vaccine in the late 1700's. I am pleased that modern generations have not

experienced polio, whooping cough, large pandemics of measles or chicken

pox, etc. We have, until lately, put the spectre of smallpox to rest. I do

not understand any people so uneducated, so backwards in their thinking that

they will not consider vaccinating their child. Their doing as they please

endangers everyone."

 

The more extreme camp says, "I would never vaccinate my child for any reason

whatsoever."

 

And the more moderate crowd says, "I understand the issue both

scientifically and from a consumer viewpoint. I might favor vaccination if I

had not fully investigated the issue and discovered that vaccination

material contains heavy metals such as mercury, thallium, tin, copper, and

also bacteria and virus material unrelated to the vaccine serum's desired

effect. I am aware that vaccine products are often created in labs that are

not fully investigated as to their cleanliness or in terms of the purity of

the product. I am also aware that some children are simply not able to

ingest certain vaccination materials, much the way that some members of the

population cannot withstand a shot of penicillin."

 

Lately. more and more people are falling into the latter camp of thought.

Included in this group is Senator Dan Burton (R-Indiana.) In the spring of

2000, he assembled a Congressional hearing on the vaccine controversy. He

specifically targeted the issue of autism and measles and the MMR vaccine.

His stake in the issue is personal, as one of his grandchildren had become

autistic after receiving a MMR vaccine. Among the witnesses that he called

to present scientific findings was Dr. Wakefield from the UK.

 

I was able to watch the hearing over C-Span. Wakefield's testimony concerned

a finding that when Wakefield examined the intestinal tissue of children in

his study, he discovered that the measles component of the MMR vaccine had

become active in that location in their body. According to the parents and

doctors of the affected children, after their shots, these children began to

experience chronic diarrhea and signs of autism. Wakefield concluded that it

was this biophysical reaction that led to their becoming autistic. The

non-autistic children were not found to have such components in the lining

of their gut tissue.

 

Senator Burton had a colleague of Wakefield's submit his findings, which

corroborated those of Wakefield. However critics have pointed out that they

believe that Wakefield's testing methods are not sensitive enough to rule

out that the measles material came about from a pre-existing, naturally

occurring measles infection.

 

However, the mainstream network of industry and government totally ridicules

Wakefield. They remark that his study did not consist of a large enough

group of children, that there was never a peer-review of his findings etc.

(What is amazing to me is that ALWAYS when a study differs with an

industry's need for exoneration, you never find industry, with all its money

and vast resources, attempting to duplicate the criticized findings. They

refuse to take action, regardless of the significance of the first finding.)

As usually is the case, once industry and government make their criticism,

the focus of their derision can no longer receive grant funding. Thus, that

scientist cannot return to a laboratory setting and conduct the very tests

that critics call on them to conduct. It is this way with the pesticide

issue, and so it is no surprise that the vaccination issue would handle such

a situation in a similar fashion.

 

So if you are a scientist who establishes a protocol for a study, and the

Establishment disagrees with you, your career is over. However, if you are a

governmental scientist who heads the American Advisory Committee on

Immunization Practices (ACIP) and you go ahead and recommend a rotovirus

vaccine that has little research done on its safety and if 113 babies are

immediately impaired by this vaccine, with one of them dying, what happens

to you then? Well, since industry, with its governmental revolving door

policies, ever lets any one of its own go down, you will be re-appointed.

Such was the case of Dr. John Modlin, whose scientifically lacking and

highly questionable rotovirus vaccine approval kept him in his highly paid

position during the late 1990's.

 

But Dr. Wakefield remains a pariah, banished from the halls of science,

although his work never injured anyone and might in fact be an important

step to understanding vaccines and how they might trigger conditions like

autism.

 

Now there does exist an entire body of research that proves that Wakefield's

study was invalid. But, boys and girls, there are also shelves full of

studies showing the gas additive MTBE is safe, and that cigarette smoking

has health benefits. When industry pays for the scientific piper, and when

the government is under industry's control, night is day, black is white,

and up is down, and so it shall remain.

 

In addition to Fisher and Wakefield being tireless forces in the fight for

truth about vaccines, a third person should be mentioned. Michael Belkin was

one of the world's foremost statisticians. He made his living by running the

numbers on market indications. He had done his life by the book. So when his

pediatrician stressed the importance of having his newborn daughter

inoculated with the hepatitis b series of vaccines, Belkin complied.

 

Tragically this vaccine killed Lyla Rose Belkin before she was even six

months old. The vaccine industry never contemplated having a foe like

Belkin. Once he ran the numbers on their various programs, their industry

looked pretty shabby. According to Belkin, "Children and adults are

developing the same encephalitic and neurological complications after

vaccination that science takes credit for eliminating."

 

Belkin's analysis slams the MMR vaccine. It also destroys all plausible

arguments for injecting minor children with the hep b vaccine. The analysis

underscores a most important doctrine of common sense much ignored by the

pseudo scientific pharmaceutical industry: "Don't attempt fixing something

if it is not broken." And also the maxim: "No individual should be subject

to a 'remedy' that is more dangerous than the ailment it supposedly wards

off."

 

It is almost unheard for middle and upper middle class families to have an

infant contract hepatitis b. Those infants suspected of such an infection

can simply be dealt with by their physician doing a blood test on the

mother, since the infection is usually passed on in utero.

 

Initially industry planned on making hep b vaccine part of a protocol for

twelve year olds nationwide. But they suddenly changed their minds and

issued directives to hospital maternity wards. Nowadays, a healthy baby

program at most hospitals involves inoculating a newborn with this vaccine

within twenty-four hours of its birth.

 

Why was this done? My suspicion is that the reason for this change was that

newborns have no personal history. This vaccine is perhaps the most

dangerous one on the market. Its side effects are pronounced and life

threatening. It actually injures and kills more infants than would be harmed

were there no vaccine programs for this disease. So its recipients must not

have a provable history. Harm a twelve year old, and a wealth of stored data

can make a court case that this individual was indeed harmed by the vaccine.

There are school report cards, home videos, and anecdotal accounts of how

healthy and active the youngster was before their paralysis or death. But a

newborn? Damage a newborn and it can quickly be said that the fault was with

the newborn and not the outside intervention. Too bad if the side effects

that the poor baby endures include a lifetime of migraine headaches, brain

dysfunction or worse.

 

But industry has the trump card. Marin County receives enough monies from

the vaccination program that its officials wish only to "Hear No Evil."

 

Eventually the tide must turn. But at what cost? Across how many more

coffins containing infant and toddler bodies must the shadow of vaccination

fall?

 

 

 

 

=============================================

News is a free service of the National Vaccine Information

Center and is supported through membership donations. Learn more about vaccines, diseases and how to protect your informed

consent rights http://www.nvic.org

 

Become a member and support NVIC's work https://www.909shot.com/order.htm

 

To sign up for a free e-mail subscription http://www.nvic.org/emaillist.htm

 

To from this list, send an email to news-request and type

UNSUBSCRIBE in the body of the email.

 

NVIC is funded through individual membership donations and does not receive government funding. Barbara Loe Fisher, President and Co-founder.

NOTE: This is not an interactive e-mail list. Please do not respond to messages.