Guest guest Posted March 7, 2004 Report Share Posted March 7, 2004 > CHEMTRAILS NOW TAUGHT IN U.S. SCHOOLS>> by William Thomas>> A is for Apple.>> B is for Boy.>> C is for Chemtrails.>> At least this is what one American father found while paging through> his child's science book. SmT was astonished to find seventh graders> being taught about chemtrails. And geoengineeering their home planet.>> Anyone with question about the "spray programs" he now says, "should> perhaps just ask their kids.">> The chemtrails section is found in the Centre Point Learning Science I> Essential Interactions science book. Under "Solutions for Global> Warming", section 5.19 features a photo of a big multi-engine jet> sporting a familiar orange/red paint scheme.>> The caption reads: "Figure 1- Jet engines running on richer fuel would> add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen".>> The logo on the plane says: "Particle Air".>> "I kid you not," SmT insists. "Why did I spend all of that time doing> research when I could have just asked my kids?">> Helping habituate children to a life under lethal sunshine and> "protective" spray planes, this trippy textbook urges young readers to> "Use Sun Block". But its authors are really referring to a sunscreen> spread across the sky.>> "Could we deliberately add particles to the atmosphere?" asks the text,> before helpfully suggesting that "Burning coal adds soot to the air.">> You might be old enough to recoil at such a notion. But in a country> where down is up and wrong is right, your kids could be learning that> what used to be bad and a bummer is a now good thing!>> RUNNING ON EMPTY>> "Be real interesting to see the politics of the folks putting this> out." SmT suggests.>> In the current White House, those politics are as "crude" as invading> oil-rich Iraq over a bogus nuclear threat - while permitting Pakistan> to export atom bomb materials to terrorist organizations in return for> the chance at an election-boosting capture of Osama bin Laden by US> forces in the Hindu Kush later this month. [New Yorker Mar1/04]>> So why shouldn't the same petty petrol politics produce textbooks for> kids inheriting a nightmare? Led by a piggish petroleum president, with> most major nations cutting back, US oil consumption is rising as> steeply as supplies of cheap crude are collapsing.>> The coal connection is this: In order to briefly "stretch the glide" of> the fast-looming end of cheap oil that will utterly transform life as> we know it, America's unelected oil president recently revoked> pollution regulations on more than 2,000 of the nation's biggest> polluting coal-fired power plants.>> Ironically, this move - like so many others made by an oil-addled White> House - will only hasten an Earthwreck as shattering to all onboard as> a lurching square-rigger striking a rocky reef. Except our spaceship is> surrounded by the cold, irradiated vacuum of deep space.>> It turns out that a single 150-megawatt coal-burning power plant> produces more emissions than 300,000 cars. Termed an "Extreme Human> health Hazard" by the EPA, microscopic coal particles also rot lungs,> stop hearts, kill lakes, choke cities - and stunt the lives of school> kids with deadly sulphuric acid rain. [AP Aug27/03; LA Times Aug28/03]>> Airborne soot also blocks sunlight, lowering greenhouse temperatures.> Volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Pinatubo - and globe-circling soot> from 1,000 burning oil wells during Desert Storm - belched enough> sulphur into the stratosphere to cause a plunge in world temperatures,> temporarily slowing global warming.>> World scientists looked at deliberately putting megatons more sulphur> into a closed, recirculating atmosphere already smoggy enough to> depresses orbiting astronauts. And decided that a sulphur sunscreen is> not a swift idea.>> But not this Jr. High science text. "Creating either kind of sunscreen> would be cheap," it tells young readers. As if "cheap" is the only> consideration.>> Even this claim is bogus. SmT says he looked, but the section on the> downstream costs associated with the health and environmental effects> of massive coal pollution - or the 10 million tons of a chemical> sunscreen suggested by the late Edward Teller - "seemed to have been> left out.">> Ditto "the cost to the solar industry". Or cumulative impacts on kids,> critters and plants on which our future depends.>> DIMMING PROSPECTS>> Sunlight is already on the way out. Repeatedly expressing shock at how> quickly our space colony's life-support systems are failing, scientists> are finding levels of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface> decreasing by almost 3% a decade.>> "Global Dimming" is too small to detect with the eye. "But it has> implications for everything from climate change to solar power and even> the future sustainability of plant photosynthesis," reports the> Guardian.>> All those jet-propelled vacations and car trips to the corner store add> up. Since 1960, 10% less sunlight has reached Earth's inhabitants.> Levels of solar radiation reaching parts of the former coal-belching> Soviet Union are down almost 20%.>> In any greenhouse, the rule of a green thumb is that every 1% decrease> in solar radiation results in a 1% drop in plant productivity.>> "It's actually quite a big deal,? says Graham Farquhar, a climate> scientist at the Australian National University in Canberra. But get> this: Farquhar doesn't think that identified pollutants, "by themselves> would be able to produce this amount of global dimming." [Guardian> Dec18/03]>> The baffled Aussie should check out the role of contrails in turning> off sunlight. Since the Jet Age took off in the 1960s, normal> condensation trails from five million jet flights every year have been> found to block 10% of sunlight across Europe and the USA. Over heavily> trafficked Atlantic and American air-routes, artificial cloud cover> caused by jet engine pollutants has increased 20%. [Chemtrails> Confirmed '04]>> Chemtrails are another major sunblock. Measurements taken with a> calibrated photometer by Clifford Carnicom in Santa Fe show a rapid> reduction in sunlight - from a value of 97% on a ?clear day? to around> 80% during the early stages of heavy chemtrailing. Using a simple UV> radiation meter, this reporter has confirmed similar drops in sunlight> beneath artificial "chemcasts" on Canada's west coast.>> WHAT JANE AND DICK DIDN'T LEARN IN SCHOOL TODAY>> In a country whose self-appointed regime routinely censors scientific> studies, at least some 7th grade science are more focused on> indoctrinating kids with risky techno "quick-fixes" than conscious> conservation and common sense.>> Forget science. SmT gazed in disbelief at another schoolbook picture> showing a helicopter seeding the ocean with iron particles. These> desperate "IronX" experiments did indeed trigger plankton "blooms"> that, in turn, transferred tons of atmospheric C02 underwater as those> carbon-inhaling critters eventually died and sank to the seafloor.>> But ? oops! ? his kid's science book fails to mention that the> resulting ocean blooms also sucked all available oxygen from the> seawater, suffocating all marine life in massive, spreading "dead> zones". [Chemtrails Confirmed '04]>> Where are the pictures, SmT wonders, "of people planting trees, or> turning down thermostats, or bicycling, or any of the other ways not to> add to the problem?">> Though his family gave up the idea of home schooling, he says, "it's> perhaps time to reconsider.">> Perhaps it's also time to reconsider state-sponsored brainwashing. And> other escalating consequences of our carbon addiction, as well.>> # # #>> William Thomas is the author of Chemtrails Confirmed (new 2004> edition).>> >> Please post freely.>> For commercial reprint rights please contact the author at> rwt@t....> karl theis jr http://groups.msn.com/exposureofthetruth Search - Find what you’re looking for faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2004 Report Share Posted March 7, 2004 Surprise---check this out...we're moving right along... Distributed at a fair honoring government workers in Washington, D.C., the coloring book is intended to teach children about the Missile Defense Agency's mission. After opening with a portrait of Reagan, the 11-page booklet shows some of the really cool stuff that the Missile Defense Agency buys with its $9 billion annual budget: the Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle, the Theater High Altitude Area Defense Interceptor, and, as expertly colored by Jeremy Morgan, age five, the Airborne Laser. © 2003 The Foundation for National Progress theis888 <k_t723 wrote: > CHEMTRAILS NOW TAUGHT IN U.S. SCHOOLS>> by William Thomas>> A is for Apple.>> B is for Boy.>> C is for Chemtrails.>> At least this is what one American father found while paging through> his child's science book. SmT was astonished to find seventh graders> being taught about chemtrails. And geoengineeering their home planet.>> Anyone with question about the "spray programs" he now says, "should> perhaps just ask their kids.">> The chemtrails section is found in the Centre Point Learning Science I> Essential Interactions science book. Under "Solutions for Global> Warming", section 5.19 features a photo of a big multi-engine jet> sporting a familiar orange/red paint scheme.>> The caption reads: "Figure 1- Jet engines running on richer fuel would> add particles to the atmosphere to create a sunscreen".>> The logo on the plane says: "Particle Air".>> "I kid you not," SmT insists. "Why did I spend all of that time doing> research when I could have just asked my kids?">> Helping habituate children to a life under lethal sunshine and> "protective" spray planes, this trippy textbook urges young readers to> "Use Sun Block". But its authors are really referring to a sunscreen> spread across the sky.>> "Could we deliberately add particles to the atmosphere?" asks the text,> before helpfully suggesting that "Burning coal adds soot to the air.">> You might be old enough to recoil at such a notion. But in a country> where down is up and wrong is right, your kids could be learning that> what used to be bad and a bummer is a now good thing!>> RUNNING ON EMPTY>> "Be real interesting to see the politics of the folks putting this> out." SmT suggests.>> In the current White House, those politics are as "crude" as invading> oil-rich Iraq over a bogus nuclear threat - while permitting Pakistan> to export atom bomb materials to terrorist organizations in return for> the chance at an election-boosting capture of Osama bin Laden by US> forces in the Hindu Kush later this month. [New Yorker Mar1/04]>> So why shouldn't the same petty petrol politics produce textbooks for> kids inheriting a nightmare? Led by a piggish petroleum president, with> most major nations cutting back, US oil consumption is rising as> steeply as supplies of cheap crude are collapsing.>> The coal connection is this: In order to briefly "stretch the glide" of> the fast-looming end of cheap oil that will utterly transform life as> we know it, America's unelected oil president recently revoked> pollution regulations on more than 2,000 of the nation's biggest> polluting coal-fired power plants.>> Ironically, this move - like so many others made by an oil-addled White> House - will only hasten an Earthwreck as shattering to all onboard as> a lurching square-rigger striking a rocky reef. Except our spaceship is> surrounded by the cold, irradiated vacuum of deep space.>> It turns out that a single 150-megawatt coal-burning power plant> produces more emissions than 300,000 cars. Termed an "Extreme Human> health Hazard" by the EPA, microscopic coal particles also rot lungs,> stop hearts, kill lakes, choke cities - and stunt the lives of school> kids with deadly sulphuric acid rain. [AP Aug27/03; LA Times Aug28/03]>> Airborne soot also blocks sunlight, lowering greenhouse temperatures.> Volcanic eruptions like Krakatoa and Pinatubo - and globe-circling soot> from 1,000 burning oil wells during Desert Storm - belched enough> sulphur into the stratosphere to cause a plunge in world temperatures,> temporarily slowing global warming.>> World scientists looked at deliberately putting megatons more sulphur> into a closed, recirculating atmosphere already smoggy enough to> depresses orbiting astronauts. And decided that a sulphur sunscreen is> not a swift idea.>> But not this Jr. High science text. "Creating either kind of sunscreen> would be cheap," it tells young readers. As if "cheap" is the only> consideration.>> Even this claim is bogus. SmT says he looked, but the section on the> downstream costs associated with the health and environmental effects> of massive coal pollution - or the 10 million tons of a chemical> sunscreen suggested by the late Edward Teller - "seemed to have been> left out.">> Ditto "the cost to the solar industry". Or cumulative impacts on kids,> critters and plants on which our future depends.>> DIMMING PROSPECTS>> Sunlight is already on the way out. Repeatedly expressing shock at how> quickly our space colony's life-support systems are failing, scientists> are finding levels of solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface> decreasing by almost 3% a decade.>> "Global Dimming" is too small to detect with the eye. "But it has> implications for everything from climate change to solar power and even> the future sustainability of plant photosynthesis," reports the> Guardian.>> All those jet-propelled vacations and car trips to the corner store add> up. Since 1960, 10% less sunlight has reached Earth's inhabitants.> Levels of solar radiation reaching parts of the former coal-belching> Soviet Union are down almost 20%.>> In any greenhouse, the rule of a green thumb is that every 1% decrease> in solar radiation results in a 1% drop in plant productivity.>> "It's actually quite a big deal,? says Graham Farquhar, a climate> scientist at the Australian National University in Canberra. But get> this: Farquhar doesn't think that identified pollutants, "by themselves> would be able to produce this amount of global dimming." [Guardian> Dec18/03]>> The baffled Aussie should check out the role of contrails in turning> off sunlight. Since the Jet Age took off in the 1960s, normal> condensation trails from five million jet flights every year have been> found to block 10% of sunlight across Europe and the USA. Over heavily> trafficked Atlantic and American air-routes, artificial cloud cover> caused by jet engine pollutants has increased 20%. [Chemtrails> Confirmed '04]>> Chemtrails are another major sunblock. Measurements taken with a> calibrated photometer by Clifford Carnicom in Santa Fe show a rapid> reduction in sunlight - from a value of 97% on a ?clear day? to around> 80% during the early stages of heavy chemtrailing. Using a simple UV> radiation meter, this reporter has confirmed similar drops in sunlight> beneath artificial "chemcasts" on Canada's west coast.>> WHAT JANE AND DICK DIDN'T LEARN IN SCHOOL TODAY>> In a country whose self-appointed regime routinely censors scientific> studies, at least some 7th grade science are more focused on> indoctrinating kids with risky techno "quick-fixes" than conscious> conservation and common sense.>> Forget science. SmT gazed in disbelief at another schoolbook picture> showing a helicopter seeding the ocean with iron particles. These> desperate "IronX" experiments did indeed trigger plankton "blooms"> that, in turn, transferred tons of atmospheric C02 underwater as those> carbon-inhaling critters eventually died and sank to the seafloor.>> But ? oops! ? his kid's science book fails to mention that the> resulting ocean blooms also sucked all available oxygen from the> seawater, suffocating all marine life in massive, spreading "dead> zones". [Chemtrails Confirmed '04]>> Where are the pictures, SmT wonders, "of people planting trees, or> turning down thermostats, or bicycling, or any of the other ways not to> add to the problem?">> Though his family gave up the idea of home schooling, he says, "it's> perhaps time to reconsider.">> Perhaps it's also time to reconsider state-sponsored brainwashing. And> other escalating consequences of our carbon addiction, as well.>> # # #>> William Thomas is the author of Chemtrails Confirmed (new 2004> edition).>> >> Please post freely.>> For commercial reprint rights please contact the author at> rwt@t....> karl theis jr http://groups.msn.com/exposureofthetruth Search - Find what you’re looking for faster. «¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§«¤»¥«¤»§ - PULSE ON WORLD HEALTH CONSPIRACIES! §Subscribe:......... - To :.... - Any information here in is for educational purpose only, it may be news related, purely speculation or someone's opinion. Always consult with a qualified health practitioner before deciding on any course of treatment, especially for serious or life-threatening illnesses.**COPYRIGHT NOTICE**In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml Search - Find what you’re looking for faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.