How The NSA Listens To Your Phone Calls

[Guest guest]

How The NSA Listens To Your Phone Calls

 

By Phillip Knightley

 

The Independent - UK

 

2-27-4

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=495514

 

 

>From the National Security Agency's imposing headquarters at Fort Meade,

Maryland, ringed by a double-chain fence topped by barbed wire with strands

of electrified wire between them, America " bugs " the world.

 

Nothing politically or militarily significant, whether mentioned in a

telephone call, in a conversation in the office of the secretary general of

the United Nations, Kofi Annan, or in a company fax or e-mail, escapes its

attention.

 

Its computers - measured in acres occupied by them rather than simple

figures - " vacuum the entire electromagnetic spectrum " , homing in on " key

words " which may suggest something of interest to NSA customers is being

conveyed.

 

The NSA costs at least $3.5bn (£1.9bn) a year to run. It employs at least

20,000 officers (not counting the 100,000 servicemen and civilians around

the world over whom it has control). Its shredders process 40 tons of paper

a day.

 

Its junior partner is Britain's Government Communications Headquarters

(GCHQ) at Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, the eavesdropping organisation for

which Katharine Gun worked. Like NSA, GCHQ is a highly secret operation.

Until 1983, when one of its officers, Geoffrey Prime, was charged with

spying for the Russians, the Government had refused to reveal what GCHQ's

real role was, no doubt because its operations in peacetime were without a

legal basis. Its security is maintained by massive and deliberately

intimidating security.

 

Newspapers have been discouraged from mentioning it; a book by a former GCHQ

officer, Jock Kane, was seized by Special Branch police officers and a still

photograph of its headquarters was banned by the Independent Broadcasting

Authority, leaving a blank screen during a World in Action programme. As

with NSA, the size of GCHQ's staff at Cheltenham, about 6,500, gives no real

indication of its strength. It has monitoring stations in Cyprus, West

Germany, and Australia and smaller ones elsewhere. Much of its overseas work

is done by service personnel.

 

Its budget is thought to be more than £300m a year. A large part of this is

funded by the United States in return for the right to run NSA listening

stations in Britain - Chicksands, Bedfordshire; Edzell, Scotland; Mentworth

Hill, Harrogate; Brawdy, Wales - and on British territory around the world.

 

The collaboration between the two agencies offers many advantages to both.

Not only does it make monitoring the globe easier, it solves tricky legal

problems and is the basis of the Prime Minister's statement yesterday that

all Britain's bugging is lawful. The two agencies simply swap each other's

dirty work.

 

GCHQ eavesdrops on calls made by American citizens and the NSA monitors

calls made by British citizens, thus allowing each government plausibly to

deny it has tapped its own citizens' calls, as they do. The NSA station at

Menwith Hill intercepts all international telephone calls made from Britain

and GCHQ has a list of American citizens whose phone conversations interest

the NSA.

 

The NSA request to GCHQ for help in bugging the diplomats from those nations

who were holding out for a second Security Council resolution to authorise

an attack on Iraq is unsurprising. Nor is it surprising that both

organisations wanted to provide their political masters with recordings of

private conversations of high-ranking international diplomats.

 

It is not difficult. Listening " bugs " can be planted in phones, electrical

plugs, desk lamps and book spines. Given a clear line of sight, one device

enables someone to detect and and interpret sound waves vibrating against

the glass window panes of an office.

 

Bugging the world is not the problem. The problem is avoiding drowning in a

sea of information. We should not be surprised that GCHQ and NSA eavesdrop

on us. We pay them to do it. We should be asking: " Do they earn their keep? "

And, unless we get a few more whistle-blowers like Ms Gun, we will not know,

because both agencies surround themselves with a wall of secrecy.

 

WHO DO WE BUG?

 

Although under domestic law GCHQ needs a warrant from the Home Secretary to

tap telephones in Britain, it can do so abroad without such authorisation.

 

But the United Nations headquarters in New York is considered sovereign

territory, and placing a bug there would be illegal under international law.

 

Intelligence services spy on hostile and friendly countries, the latter

mainly for commercial reasons, but also to gain an edge in diplomatic

negotiations. Nato allies are not always immune from intelligence operations

by Britain.

 

Staff working for the UN inspection teams in Iraq were convinced they were

under surveillance.

 

France, Germany and Russia complained of a rise in espionage against them.

There was intense activity directed at Jordan and Syria, as well as Saudi

Arabia, Yemen and Egypt.

 

Officials say the only shock about Katharine Gun's discovery of an e-mail

from the National Security Agency is that she was surprised by it.

 

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=495514