Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

trigger point

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Question for everyone...

Does anyone have any experience with the trigger-point approach to

acupuncture?

Just came home from an open house of a school that concentrates mostly on the

trigger point approach, and heavily on the Japanese meridian system. Is the

effect that much different from the TCM or 5 elements approach?

Lauren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trigger point is usefull yet so primary that it almost resembles allopathy

in its approach. Trigger points become detectable when evil energy stagnates

in tendinomuscular meridians. It is important to disperse them, but also to

make the rest of the treatment, which is to strengthen the main meridian and

to deliver yang defence energy to the place, as to eliminate evil intruder.

Otherwise, pain and disease will come back soon.

TCM is a very complex structure of knowledge which takes some years to

manage, of which the trigger point manipulation is but a tiny aspect.

Personally I believe no serious student of Acupuncture will stay on that

stage of superficial layer therapies for long.

Pedro

-

<DautoBrody

<acupuncture >

Wednesday, January 19, 2000 4:59 AM

acupuncture trigger point

 

 

> DautoBrody

>

> Question for everyone...

> Does anyone have any experience with the trigger-point approach to

> acupuncture?

> Just came home from an open house of a school that concentrates mostly on

the

> trigger point approach, and heavily on the Japanese meridian system. Is

the

> effect that much different from the TCM or 5 elements approach?

> Lauren

>

> --------------------------- ONElist Sponsor ----------------------------

>

> Get great offers on top-notch products that match your interests!

> Sign up for eLerts at:

> <a href= " http://clickme./ad/elerts1 " >Click Here</a>

>

> ------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>Question for everyone...

>Does anyone have any experience with the trigger-point approach to

>acupuncture?

>Just came home from an open house of a school that concentrates mostly on

>the

>trigger point approach, and heavily on the Japanese meridian system. Is the

>effect that much different from the TCM or 5 elements approach?

>Lauren

>

>------------------------

 

With the risk of sounding paranoid and protectionist, " Trigger-point "

approach to acupuncture does not sound like " real " acupuncture. It

sounds like some kind of chiropractic or MD simplification. This is just

kind of based on a hunch, forgive me if I don't know what I'm talking

about. But can you tell us more about the school?

 

Greg Dember

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as I know....

 

This Japanese meridian system was part of the system that J.R. Worsley put

together that the list is tentatively calling Five Element. So there are some

similarities and it is very different. Stephen Birch is travelling the world a

lot at the moment ( yes even made down here to Australia) teaching this form as

another alternative approach to TCM.

 

Can I explain anything about it !?- no sorry.

 

All the best

 

Gye

Question for everyone...

Does anyone have any experience with the trigger-point approach to

acupuncture?

Just came home from an open house of a school that concentrates mostly on the

trigger point approach, and heavily on the Japanese meridian system. Is the

effect that much different from the TCM or 5 elements approach?

Lauren

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Guest guest

Since the description of trigger points was mentioned in the past as it relates to the importance of langue here

are some words. I just read Birch's abstract on trigger points and acupuncture points in which he states that 1. trigger point analogies ignore that most treatment of pain in acupuncture is by distal points. In saying this he ignores satellite trigger points. 2. He states that many of the acupuncture points are not indicated for pain. Again here he ignores the whole somatoviceral and vicerosomatic principle of trigger points and their use in other than pain disorders.

To me this is just another example of dogmatic rigid thinking and not to the fact that two completely different traditions

have noticed

that somatic points exist that are seen together with some painful conditions and visceral conditions. These often overlap anatomically with acupuncture points.

These thoughts are from someone that does not think much of the whole trigger point religion.

Alon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My teacher taught me that all the points have the same function and all

the points have a different function. The same part of the equasion was

that they all move the qi. Move Qi, stop pain.

g

 

> __________

>

> " Alon Marcus " <alonmarcus

> Re: Trigger point

>

> satellite trigger points. 2. He states that many of the

> acupuncture points are not indicated for pain. Again here he

> ignores the whole somatoviceral and vicerosomatic principle

> of trigger points and their use in other than pain disorders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

My teacher taught me that all the points have the same function and allthe points have a different function. The same part of the equasion wasthat they all move the qi. Move Qi, stop pain.>>That is another problem by the study. Although we have point indications in reality we use all points for various problems even when not " listed".

Alon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...