Secrets of the Remote Viewing ENERGY FIELD and how to Anchor it!

[Guest guest]

,

Pandora51@a... wrote:

 

> cases.on the computer. When I first learned to do this many moons

>ago, the two cases that I worked on in the class I got 100% hits,

>plus noticed some things that my partner forgot to write down.

 

This is very common...great hits when in the " atmosphere " (Radiant

Energies) of other trained Remote viewers...

 

....then when you are alone, that " atmosphere " is no longer there, so

the FRIENDLY ENERGIES, the 'drivers' behind the Remote Viewing are

also lacking...

 

....which is why YOU were supposed to RV 10 cases and get the

automatic feedback while at level, on all THE CORRECT HITS, so you

could have enough SUCCESSES so that " feeling " would be anchored

automatically.

 

In other words, AFTER those successes, just by going to level, and

then doing the segment intending, ie, " I'm going to count from 1-3

and on the count of 3 I will put Mr. XXX on my

screen...1...2...3...sense him, visualize him...imagine him...let

whatever show up, show up... "

 

And be damn sure the " assistant " can calibrate your analog so that

when you start making those unconscious visual pictures, " he " can

point that out to you...

 

.... " You just saw something! Tell me NOW what you saw! That's right.

Continue scanning the body, left to right, top to bottom....blab,

blab, blab... "

 

If you don't have an assistant, then have a tape recorder and put

down every faint brain fart that comes though.

 

In my own case, those faint " gestalts " are the most valid remote

viewing and are bypassing my critical factor.

 

> it is much more difficult. I also am having problems

>understanding how to go back in time, since a lot of the cases are

>from a few years ago.

 

I have a video set out on that...

 

Normal price, $597...InnerCircle member price, $197 + P & H.

 

The above offer is only good for 5 days.

 

If interested, let me know.

 

It's very good for past time lines, and the materials on " self " that

you are asking about.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

> Sincerely,

>

> Paulina