Some Scientific Research Validating Energy Tapping Solutions!

[Guest guest]

---, " Paddy Landau " <coach@p...> wrote:

 

> -

> > I realize that EFT is popular because it takes very little

education or> > expertise to understand and use the process.

 

> Tom, you make tremendous sense.

> However, I don't think EFT takes very little education or

>expertise. Indeed, Craig himself not only has non-trivial courses

>(just as you have for your practitioners), but also strongly

>recommends a suitable NLP education.

 

> Non-therapists who practice EFT without a sound grounding are

>setting themselves up for problems.

 

> I agree that EFT has a hypnotic aspect to it. ECG scans have shown

>something significant going on in the brain during EFT,

 

Hi Paddy,

 

Nice post.

 

And the evidence is out there and is available for anyone that takes

the 10 minutes to find it. And there is much of it.

 

Here's one example. There are brain scans over 12 energy treatments

sessions on Severe Anxiety Disorder. And those brain scans are

compared to brain scans done of other therapies.

 

The other therapies were medication and Cognitive Behavior Therapy

protocol. In the study were 5,000 clients.

 

The brain scans are based upon readings from a digitized

electroencephalogram (EEG).

 

The research has been done by Joaquin Andrade, M.D.

 

The conclusions after the research?

 

Medication did not change the brain scans but only supressed the

symptoms without addressing the underlying wave-frequency imbalances.

 

With CBT/medication 63% had some improvement.

 

With Energy only, 90% improvement.

 

Complete Remissions of symptoms, with CBT/medication, 51%.

 

Complete Remissions of symptoms, with Energy, 76%.

 

Length of treatments?

 

With CBT/medication, 9 to 20 treatments.

 

With energy, 1 to 7.

 

Average # of sessions, with CBT/medications 15, with Energy 3!

 

When energy tapping was compared with acupuncture with a study of 38

clients?

 

Needles? Positive response, 50%.

 

Tapping? 77.5%.

 

Much more evidence is findable if one takes the 10 minutes to do the

research.

 

Again, Paddy, a nice post.

 

Sam

[Guest guest]

-

> Hi Paddy,

>

> Nice post.

 

Thank you, Sam.

 

I notice with humour that I had written " ECG " instead of " EEG " !

 

Your use of verifiable facts is, of course, commendable. I didn't have the

patience to go out and find the references. As you say, it's there for

anyone that wants to find it.

 

Paddy