STUPIDITY starts with FEAR and ends with NLP

[Guest guest]

I'm a relative newbie to NLP and this just occured to be. Some

people are trained in the art of writing, as well as being masters of

NLP. They can make the reader see, feel, hear, smell or taste only

what they intend them to with the written word. In other words, what

they've written might have nothing in its structure that represents

the actual personality of the writer.

 

I've developed a real taste for NLP over the past few months, and I'm

beginning to see how picking apart, and basing someone's personality

on the content of posts could fall short of the target sometimes.

 

Does this sound like a reasonable observation?

 

Sometimes my feelings kick in about these sorts of things and I begin

to smell a rat, then I make a mental picture or note so I'll remember

it for next time I stumble across something like that.

 

I see NLP as a fun and real cool tool! :-)

 

Lori

Nuclear Engineer ;-)

 

 

, " Robin "

<raggypants> wrote:

>

> Hello All,

> Here in this thread we have a demonstration of why it is important

to

> communicate with a knowledge, a feel for, the music of, the imagery

> created by knowing NLP. Once we have a working command of NLP and

> apply it with all the visual and listening skills we can, we can

> calculate more clearly how to discuss with even handed emotion.

>

> " learn how to READ BETTER, " {with NLP}

>

> " learn how to COMPREHEND! " {using NLP}

>

> I know something more about both the primary participants in this

> thread as they both wrote in depth from their learning styles. And

> when we have an irritation with, are missing the sound of, can't

see

> the point, or lack the ability to comprehend, we resort to

> communications most revealing of our learning styles. Doc is more

> auditory. He's a good listener. And as such would be good at making

> verbal presentations at seminars, Is that true?

>

(snip)

>>

> Robin Marie Ward

>