STUPIDITY starts with a know-it-all want-ta-be

[Guest guest]

, " James R.

Knippenberg " <erommel@e...> wrote:

>

> Well, here's an observation, Lori... :-)

>

> YOUR posts are DAMN GOOD POSTS, written from your experience, not

from farts. Compare YOUR posts to the posts of the person you

replied to.

>

> Whoever the hell would say Doc is an auditory???? Have they MET

Doc? Have they seen / heard his posts and / or his products?

 

 

This was an example of how analyzing posts doesn't always work. NLP's

a great tool and it's good to be aware of it's potentials and limits.

 

 

>

> Doc does, in fact, have good auditory skills that he knows how to

use real well. And he is NOT a primary auditory.

 

 

Yep, that's my observation/conclusion as well, plus Doc's stated

numerous times on backposts what his " primary " is. And all anyone has

to do is see him in action at one of his workshops to validate it.

 

 

>

> BTW, ask that person who claims to have knowledge of what an

auditory's strategies are what the words to that Dire Straits song " I

WANT MY MTV " are...

>

> AN AUDITORY WOULD KNOW THAT THE WORDS TO THE DAMN SONG ARE " GET

YOUR MONEY FOR NOTHIN' AND YOUR CHICKS FOR FREE! " and wouldn't bitch

about " chicks hurts people " . Or TOOT their own horn saying

that " horns hurts people " .

>

> Well, MY horn might hurt people, but I can't help it I have a

really THICK horn! LOL Then again, that's a KINESTHETIC or VISUAL

strategy, as they go, " OH MY GOD! THAT THING IS REALLY THICK!!! "

>

> LOL

>

> Jim

>

 

Okay, okay, I think I'm getting the picture, just promise me you

won't gore ME with it, Okay?!!

 

Lori ;-)

 

 

>

>

>

>

> darthon4 <darthon4>

> Nov 29, 2005 9:10 PM

>

> Re: STUPIDITY starts

with FEAR and ends with NLP

>

> I'm a relative newbie to NLP and this just occured to be. Some

> people are trained in the art of writing, as well as being masters

of

> NLP. They can make the reader see, feel, hear, smell or taste only

> what they intend them to with the written word. In other words,

what

> they've written might have nothing in its structure that represents

> the actual personality of the writer.

>

> I've developed a real taste for NLP over the past few months, and

I'm

> beginning to see how picking apart, and basing someone's

personality

> on the content of posts could fall short of the target sometimes.

>

> Does this sound like a reasonable observation?

>

> Sometimes my feelings kick in about these sorts of things and I

begin

> to smell a rat, then I make a mental picture or note so I'll

remember

> it for next time I stumble across something like that.

>

> I see NLP as a fun and real cool tool! :-)

>

> Lori

> Nuclear Engineer ;-)

>

>

> , " Robin "

> <raggypants> wrote:

> >

> > Hello All,

> > Here in this thread we have a demonstration of why it is

important

> to

> > communicate with a knowledge, a feel for, the music of, the

imagery

> > created by knowing NLP. Once we have a working command of NLP and

> > apply it with all the visual and listening skills we can, we can

> > calculate more clearly how to discuss with even handed emotion.

> >

> > " learn how to READ BETTER, " {with NLP}

> >

> > " learn how to COMPREHEND! " {using NLP}

> >

> > I know something more about both the primary participants in this

> > thread as they both wrote in depth from their learning styles.

And

> > when we have an irritation with, are missing the sound of, can't

> see

> > the point, or lack the ability to comprehend, we resort to

> > communications most revealing of our learning styles. Doc is more

> > auditory. He's a good listener. And as such would be good at

making

> > verbal presentations at seminars, Is that true?

> >

> (snip)

> >>

> > Robin Marie Ward

> >

>

>