On Karma and Ecology, please do NOT submit Crap you think is true.

[Guest guest]

, " Freaky

Freak " <cornymovie wrote:

> If you think long term in terms of different lifetimes that means

> that you can't verify the specific cause-effect relationship of

> Karma that you are proposing.

 

Nope.

 

That statement just means that YOU have difficulty with that

verification process.

 

In terms of reincarnation it is

> really not possible to observe the cause in person A and the effect

> in person B and make a connection between the two.

 

Nope.

 

That just means that YOU can't verify.

 

You only have

> someone else's say-so that the Karma relation exists.

 

Nope.

 

That just means you need to take someone else's comments because YOU

don't yet know how.

 

It is a matter

> of faith.

 

Nope.

 

It's a matter of training.

 

> Also, who's to say what spiritual entity is in which

> physical entity, and if they have a name, how they got the name in

> the first place. You can't measure it or verify what spiritual

> entity is in who normally.

 

That's right. YOU can't. Others can.

 

> Karma could possibly also be a social control mechanism. Karma

> cannot be verified, just like the christian control mechanism of

> damnation cannot be verified.

 

Definitively true. It can be, but does NOT have to be.

 

> > Amilius, when he first was incarnated as Adam, was a loser. He

> > blamed Eve for his behavior of eating the apple from the

forbidden

> > tree of wisdom. That's living at " effect " . Not a productive way

to

> live.

> We only have Cayce's say so.

 

Incorrect.

 

Many different sources have been found that do give that same story.

 

> I believe that Edgar Cayce said also

> that the magnetic poles of the earth were going to reverse in 2001

> if my information is correct.

 

Nope.

 

More incorrect stuff.

 

 

Ps. Please do some research before submitting crap you " think " is

true.

[Guest guest]

healingenergies-

essentialskills , " docspeed2001 " <docspeed2001

wrote:

Depends on how you define verification.

 

Now, if the Nag Hammadi scrolls, which had been hidden for almost

two millenia, had been dug up in 1945 and had they mentioned Amilius

being Jesus and Adam (they didn't), and their discovery after EC's

death which was also in 1945 - then that would have been

verification.

 

If a psychic who had never heard of EC or what EC said about Amilius

mentioned Amilius and Jesus and Adam spontaneously that would be

close to verification. The only problem with that would be that the

psychic might have heard about it before and remembered it on a

subconscious level.

 

I haven't mastered theta brainwave RV and I'm not going to get onto

theta training for another two weeks - so if the skill takes place

at theta, I'm not there. I'd also need to do a few verifiable

targets before I could rely on my skills.

 

Anyway, If a psychic was asked a Yes/No question about Amilius and

energy tested it, the statistical norm would be 50% either way, yes

or no.

 

I've googled it, and from what I've seen, all the sources that

mention Amilius being Jesus and Adam seem to be quoting Cayce.

 

It all seems to lead back to Cayce. If there were other sources, is

it possible they were influenced by Cayce? (if after Cayce) or that

they influenced him? (if before Cayce)

 

> > I believe that Edgar Cayce said also

> > that the magnetic poles of the earth were going to reverse in

2001

> > if my information is correct.

>

> Nope.

>

> More incorrect stuff.

>

>

> Ps. Please do some research before submitting crap you " think " is

> true.

>

[Guest guest]

, " Freaky

Freak " <cornymovie wrote:

>

> healingenergies-

> essentialskills , " docspeed2001 " <docspeed2001@>

> wrote:

> Depends on how you define verification.

 

You remind me so much of A YOUNGER me, and my OLDER processes

of " outside verification " ...

 

....so now I use that outside stuff...

 

....then I program myself to " find, encounter, notice " other stuff...

 

....then I go to level and use conscious bridging for

transderivational search for getting what it gets...at LEVEL...

 

> If a psychic who had never heard of EC or what EC said about

Amilius

> mentioned Amilius and Jesus and Adam spontaneously that would be

> close to verification. The only problem with that would be that

the

> psychic might have heard about it before and remembered it on a

> subconscious level.

 

Yep.

 

You are looking for WHY IT CANNOT BE TRUE, which is okay.

 

Unfortunately that type of questing only brings one type of answer,

in most cases.

 

Now Robert Crookall actually started there, and ended up somewhere

else, mainly because he was brillant, and stepped back from his own

pre-conceived memories and habits, and looked at other evidence that

is all over the place.

 

He's got some great books.

 

So, think first position...second position...third position, which is

something all my clients now do simply and easily, for some reason...

 

....as they rake in oddles of money, have neat satisfying

relationships, and growth through life happy with where they are

going.

 

Do you notice that I virtually NEVER use the word spirituality?

 

I wonder why not?

 

> I haven't mastered theta brainwave RV and I'm not going to get onto

> theta training for another two weeks - so if the skill takes place

> at theta, I'm not there. I'd also need to do a few verifiable

> targets before I could rely on my skills.

 

You'll need much more than that.

 

Older, non-functioning habits are very difficult to replace, when you

are happy with them. So enjoy them while they last.

 

Sorry.

 

> I've googled it, and from what I've seen, all the sources that

> mention Amilius being Jesus and Adam seem to be quoting Cayce.

 

A start.

 

> It all seems to lead back to Cayce. If there were other sources,

is

> it possible they were influenced by Cayce? (if after Cayce) or that

> they influenced him? (if before Cayce)

 

Actually, in you mind, they probably wouldn't count, yet.

 

I studied them for years, and knew they had to be wrong, incorrect,

BEFORE I reached the point that I DID THE DAMN DRILLS TO REALLY

EXPERIENCE/STUDY what was going on.

 

It's okay if you want to keep the same beliefs you have.

 

It's okay if you want to drop it and continue thinking the same

things, just because you do.

 

I am not a person that convinces.

 

That's everyone else's own job.

 

The key's were already given over the past 2 months.

 

Now I'm curious to who will notice them being given.

 

This is sure a lot of fun;-)

 

DR. John M. La Tourrette