I love to see people growing because they deserve to grow...

[Guest guest]

--- " sunsidhe " <sbjames wrote:

>

> I was wondering what results are possible with remote viewing?

 

>If someone were eg to take a random playing card and put it in a

>box without looking at it, are there remote viewers who could read

>the card and tell you what it was? If so, would it matter if the

>inside of the box was pitch black or would there need to be a light

>inside?

 

What is interesting is that you are giving the exact test that was

performed with Ingo Swann, Dr's Targ and Putoff at Standford

Research Institute back in the early 70's.

 

So I'm pretty sure you are testing us to see if we've done our own

research, and nothing else.

 

Either way, it's a great question.

 

When it was dark, Ingo saw 'dark'.

 

Now, there are several questions you have not yet asked.

 

Questions that are very important, like, " from what viewpoint did

Ingo see " the target?

 

Above, below, north side, east side, south side, west side, or some

type of variation?

 

I do know that when I remote viewed distant objects, the way I came

in was always weird.

 

So example, one time I viewed a business location. I zoomed over

some mountains, then I finally focused on the exact location.

 

I had no clue what or where those mountains were.

 

Then several years later, I'm coming back from a trip to Kansas, and

I noticed in the distance those same exact mountains. So, for some

reason, in my remote viewing I came into the target from the East,

but I remote viewed the target from the West.

 

So, why is that?

 

Why the 180 degree difference when at level in the subjective dimension, than

the normal straight line of sight while in the objection dimension?

 

And, why is knowing that important?

 

> hand though I wasnt able to get calibration to work myself; my arm

> didnt seem to get appreciably stronger or weaker when I heard true

or

> false statements. Dr Hawkins seemed to think that it was easy

enough

> for anyone to do,

 

He's talking about muscle testing, which is also called " energy

testing " ...

 

It's better to use the word energy, thereby by-passing the

subconscious use of muscular power, as if an energy test is a

contest of strength between two people.

 

And, for the 45% of the population that are stressed out and

homolateral at any given moment, energy testing, especially on

emotional issues will NOT be valid.

 

So it's best to train with someone who knows how to pre-calibrate so

you know if your energies are running correctly first.

 

Then it's really nice to practice a few hundred times with a

verification process, so your positive results are anchored into

your behavior and neurology.

 

>but anyone who's seen me trying to dance (PLEASE no

> remote viewing of THAT!) will know that I'm capable of finding

even

> very simple physical skills almost impossible. Can anyone else

here

> get it to work?

 

Yes, I'm very good at it.

 

Then some days I need to do 20 minutes of energy balancing drills

before I do any energy testing at all. And it's so easy to verify

your condition before the test.

 

I do know that Doc la Tourrette has just released a 3 DVD set with a

102 page manual on " energy healing, and energy testing " that really

does do much on the real secrets behind energy testing.

 

The good Doc requested that I do the manual, so that 102 page manual

on DVD #1, took me 17 days to write, directly from a 1 hr DVD. I

also described some of what Doc was doing that most people did not

know about, and why and how it worked.

 

A massive undertaking, though much fun to do.

 

> I'm sure Sandy mentioned it recently and since Power

> v Force is quoted on the group's splash page, I'm guessing Jason

can

> calibrate also?

>

> Thanks in advance to anyone who's able to help.

>

> PS Now on 6 straight chess wins and playing again on Wednesday...

 

Congratulations on you having the brains, the drills and the

persistence to do those drills.

 

I love to see people growing because they deserve to grow, and not

because they whine about this and that.

 

Thank you.

 

Sandy Godheart