I suggest everyone here go to google, type in Dr. Hamer...

April 20, 2006

, drakotom

<drakotom wrote:

>

> > I was recently invited to a seminar where the materials of Dr

Hamer

> > (who is currently in jail for unrelated reasons were being

taught.

>

> From what I have read (if these were truthful sources), reasons

were

> rather very related to his teachings: " agitation against medical

> science and instigation of the New Medicine, with the purpose of

its

> practice " and " practising medicine without a licence " .

>

> Tom

Well, I take it that the gxxxxxxxxxt can throw anyone in jail for

any reason, if it wants to.

They killed Jesus on the Cross. A healer.

They killed W. Reich in jail. A healer.

The killed Ruth Drown in jail. A healer.

They ran Gerber out of the country. A healer.

Gosh. What is the common thread here?

Is it possible that the rules given by those in authority are NOT

for the good of the people, but for the FINANCES of those in charge?

I suggest everyone here go to google, type in " Dr. Hamer " , and

notice what they find.

Here's an excerpt from one of those posts found with a google search.

---------------------------

Evidence of a relationship between cancer and personality type has

existed for centuries. Going back in history to the second century

AD, Galen, a Greek physician famous for his astute observations of

patients and for his accurate descriptions of diseases, noted that

women with breast cancer frequently had a tendency to be melancholic.

In dealing with many thousands of cancer patients over the past 28

years, it has been my observation that there are certain personality

traits which are rather consistently present in the cancer-

susceptible individual. These characteristics are as follows:

1. Being highly conscientious, dutiful, responsible, caring, hard-

working, and usually of above average intelligence.

2. Exhibiting a strong tendency toward carrying other people's

burdens and toward taking on extra obligations, often " worrying for

others. "

3. Having a deep-seated need to make others happy, tending to

be " people pleasers. " Having a great need for approval.

4. Often having a history of lack of closeness with one or both

parents, sometimes, later in life, resulting in lack of closeness

with spouse or others who would normally be close.

5. Harboring long-suppressed toxic emotions, such as anger,

resentment and/or hostility. Typically the cancer-susceptible

individual internalizes such emotions and has great difficulty

expressing them.

6. Reacting adversely to stress, often becoming unable to cope

adequately with such stress. Usually experiencing an especially

damaging event about 2 years before the onset of detectable cancer.

The patient is unable to cope with this traumatic event or series of

events, which comes as a " last straw " on top of years of suppressed

reactions to stress.

[compare Dr. Hamer's " Iron Rule of Cancer " ]

7. Showing an inability to resolve deep-seated emotional problems

and conflicts, usually arising in childhood, often even being

unaware of their presence.

Typical of the cancer-susceptible personality, as noted above, is

the long-standing tendency to suppress " toxic emotions, "

particularly anger. Usually starting in childhood, this individual

has held in his/her hostility and other unacceptable emotions. More

often than not, this feature of the affected personality has its

origins in feelings of rejection by one or both parents. Whether

these feelings or rejection are justified or not, it is the

perception of rejection that matters, and this results in a lack of

closeness with the " rejecting " parent or parents, followed later in

life by a similar lack of closeness with spouses and others with

whom close relationships would normally develop. Those at higher

risk for cancer tend to develop feelings of loneliness as a result

of their having been deprived of affection and acceptance earlier in

life, even if this is merely their own perception. These people have

a tremendous need for approval and acceptance, developing a very

high sensitivity to the needs of others while suppressing their own

emotional needs.

These good folks become the " caretakers " of the world, showing great

compassion and caring for others, and going out of their way to look

after the needs of others. They are very reluctant to accept help

from others, fearing that it may jeopardize their role as caretakers

or that they might appear to have too much self-concern. Throughout

their childhood they have typically been taught " not to be selfish, "

and they take this to heart as a major lifetime objective. All of

this benevolence is highly commendable, of course, in our culture,

but must be somehow modified in the case of the cancer patient. A

distinction needs to be made here between the " care-giving " and

the " care-taking " personality. There is nothing wrong with care-

giving, of course, but the problem arises when the susceptible

individual derives his/her entire worth, value and identity from

his/her role as " caretaker. " If this shift cannot be made, the

patient is stuck in this role, and the susceptibility to cancer

greatly increases.

As noted above, a consistent feature of those who are susceptible to

cancer appears to be that they " suffer in silence, " and bear their

burdens without complaint. Burdens of their own as well as the

burdens of others weigh heavily, often subconsciously as well as

consciously, upon these people because they, through a lifetime of

suppression, internalize their problems, cares and conflicts. The

carefree extrovert, on the other hand, seems to be far less

vulnerable to cancer than the caring introvert described above.

How one reacts to stress appears to be a major factor in the

development of cancer. Most cancer patients have experienced a

highly stressful event, usually about 2 years prior to the onset of

detectable disease. This traumatic event is often beyond the

patient's control, such as the loss of a loved one, loss of a

business, job, home, or some other major disaster. The typical

cancer victim has lost the ability to cope with these extreme

events, because his/her coping mechanism lies in his/her ability to

control the environment. When this control is lost, the patient has

no other way to cope.

Major stress, as we have seen, causes suppression of the immune

system, and does so more overwhelmingly in the cancer-susceptible

individual than in others. Thus personal tragedies and excessive

levels of stress appear to combine with the underlying personality

described above to bring on the immune deficiency which allows

cancer to thrive.

These observations have given rise to the term psychoneuroimmunology.

[compare articles on psychoneuroimmunology and immune system]

In my experience, one of the most difficult and most important

hurdles to overcome in cancer patients is how to make major changes

in their life-styles. Not only is it necessary to make changes in

the physical aspects of their lives such as eating habits, but major

changes need to be made in the way they react to stress. The way

they react to stress is due largely to the way they think about

life. There can be no lasting changes of behavior without first

having a change in thinking and in belief systems. It is often

extremely difficult for these patients to make substantial changes

in these ingrained patterns of thought. Many find it too difficult

or too disagreeable to make such alterations in their settled way of

thinking and reacting. Many likewise find it too unpleasant to make

changes in the physical aspects of their life-style, even in the

face of life-threatening illness.

In my office patients are counseled to address their problems and to

make the appropriate adjustments to the best of their ability. A

psychologist with extensive experience in dealing with these unique

problems is readily available to our patients.

These patients are encouraged to take charge of their own health and

to be active participants in their care. They are urged to learn as

much as possible about the disease and all of the treatment options,

including the various conventional modalities.

89509

Also compare Laughter Is Medicine: Seriously!

Negative thoughts 'make you ill'

BBC News 22 September 2003

Having negative thoughts really could make you more illness-prone,

say scientists.

A study in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of

Sciences links " negative " brain activity with a weakened immune

system.

Researchers from the University of Wisconsin-Madison studied people

with high levels of brain activity in a region linked to negative

thoughts.

Those with the highest activity levels responded worse to a flu

vaccine.

Scientists already knew that pessimists - people rated as more

sensitive to negative events - show more activity in a part of the

brain called the right pre-frontal cortex.

More activity in the left pre-frontal cortex is linked to positive

emotional responses.

Happy thoughts

Dr Richard Davidson, who led the research, studied 52 people aged

between 57 and 60.

Each of them was asked to recall one event which made them feel very

happy, and one which left them feeling sad, afraid or angry.

The electrical activity in these parts of the brain was measured to

check whether their left or right pre-frontal cortex was more active.

Afterwards, each volunteer was given a standard flu vaccine shot.

Vaccines work by eliciting an immune response which should hopefully

persist and help the body tackle a genuine infection threat if it

should arrive.

Each research subject was tested over the following six months to

gauge the success of the vaccine by measuring the levels of

antibodies generated by the vaccine.

Those who had shown the most powerful right pre-frontal cortex

activity also had the worst immune reactions.

The reverse was true for those who had the most powerful reactions

in their left pre-frontal cortex, the side associated with happy

reactions.

Dr Davidson said: " Emotions play an important role in modulating

bodily systems that influence our health.

" We turned to the brain to understand the mechanisms by which the

mind influences the body. "

Also compare Laughter Is Medicine and Cancer Healing & Your Mind.

The Nocebo Effect: Placebo's Evil Twin

By Brian Reid

Special to The Washington Post

Tuesday, April 30, 2002; Page HE01

Ten years ago, researchers stumbled onto a striking finding: Women

who believed that they were prone to heart disease were nearly four

times as likely to die as women with similar risk factors who didn't

hold such fatalistic views.

The higher risk of death, in other words, had nothing to with the

usual heart disease culprits -- age, blood pressure, cholesterol,

weight. Instead, it tracked closely with belief. Think sick, be sick.

That study is a classic in the annals of research on the " nocebo "

phenomenon, the evil twin of the placebo effect. While the placebo

effect refers to health benefits produced by a treatment that should

have no effect, patients experiencing the nocebo effect experience

the opposite. They presume the worst, health-wise, and that's just

what they get.

" They're convinced that something is going to go wrong, and it's a

self-fulfilling prophecy, " said Arthur Barsky, a psychiatrist at

Boston's Brigham and Women's Hospital who published an article

earlier this year in the Journal of the American Medical Association

beseeching his peers to pay closer attention to the nocebo

effect. " From a clinical point of view, this is by no means

peripheral or irrelevant. "

Barsky's target is drug side effects, which cost the U.S. health

system more than $76 billion a year, according to a 1995 University

of Arizona study. If even a small percentage of those costs are

caused by patient expectations of harm, addressing the nocebo effect

could save a nifty sum.

But convincing doctors that their patients' problems may be more

than biochemical is no simple trick. The nocebo effect is difficult

to study, and medical training leads doctors to seek a bodily cause

for physical ills.

" Nocebos often cause a physical effect, but it's not a physically

produced effect, " said Irving Kirsch, a psychologist at the

University of Connecticut in Storrs who studies the ways that

expectations influence what people experience. " What's the cause? In

many cases it's an unanswered question. "

Looking for Trouble

The word nocebo, Latin for " I will harm, " doesn't represent a new

idea -- just one that hasn't caught on widely among clinicians and

scientists. More than four decades after researchers coined the

term, only a few medical journal articles mention it. Outside the

medical community, being " scared to death " or " worried sick " are

expressions that have long been part of the popular lexicon, noted

epidemiologist Robert Hahn from the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention in Atlanta.

Is such language just hyperbole? Not to those who accept, for

example, the idea of voodoo death -- a hex so powerful that the

victim of the curse dies of fright. While many in the scientific

community may regard voodoo with skepticism, the idea that gut

reactions may have biological consequences can't be simply dismissed.

" Surgeons are wary of people who are convinced that they will die, "

said Herbert Benson, a Harvard professor and the president Mind/Body

Medical Institute in Boston. " There are examples of studies done on

people undergoing surgery who almost want to die to re-contact a

loved one. Close to 100 percent of people under those circumstances

die. "

But the nocebo effect can lead to more subtle outcomes as well.

Fifteen years ago, researchers at three medical centers undertook a

study of aspirin and another blood thinner in heart patients and

came up with an unexpected result that said little about the heart

and much about the brain. At two locations, patients were warned of

possible gastrointestinal problems, one of the most common side

effects of repeated use of aspirin. At the other location, patients

received no such caution.

When researchers reviewed the data, they found a striking result:

Those warned about the gastrointestinal problems were almost three

times as likely to have the side effect. Though the evidence of

actual stomach damage such as ulcers was the same for all three

groups, those with the most information about the prospect of minor

problems were the most likely to experience the pain.

Despite the smattering of doctors' anecdotal reports and a few

modest clinical studies, research on the phenomenon has not been

robust, mostly for ethical reasons: Doctors ought not to induce

illness in patients who are not sick.

Changing ethical standards have made it difficult to even repeat

some of the classic nocebo experiments. In one century-old effort,

conducted long before anyone thought up the word nocebo, doctors set

an allergy sufferer wheezing by showing an artificial rose, proving

that at least some aspect of the allergic response is stimulated by

visual cues. In a study from the early 1980s, 34 college students

were told an electric current would be passed through their heads,

and the researchers warned that the experience could cause a

headache. Though not a single volt of current was used, more than

two-thirds of the students reported headaches.

Medical Distrust

But resistance to in-depth study of the nocebo effect rests on more

than ethical reservations, said the CDC's Hahn. Belief, he said,

does not have a strong place in the anatomy-centered world of modern

medicine.

" The fact is that phenomena that essentially come down to what

people believe are conceptually difficult in our medical system, "

Hahn said. " Health is thought to be a biological phenomenon. More

psychosomatic elements are hard to deal with. "

Science is wearing away at the wall between mind and body. With the

aid of high-tech imaging devices, neurologists are getting better at

taking pictures of the brain in action. In one blinded study last

year, researchers found that patients with Parkinson's disease given

a placebo released a brain chemical called dopamine, just as the

brain exposed to an active drug would do.

That flood of brain chemicals, it appears, has everything to do with

what the mind expects. In most cases, like the Parkinson's study,

the outcome is positive -- the placebo effect in action. But for

some patients -- depressed, wary of medication or worried about drug

side effects -- getting a prescription filled is an angst-ridden

experience. And such patients appear even more likely to exhibit

those side effects.

Barsky has even sketched out a profile of the kind of patient likely

to experience the nocebo effect -- worse side effects and poorer

outcomes -- on a given drug. When Barsky sees a patient with a

history of vague, difficult-to-diagnose complaints who is sure that

whatever therapy is prescribed will do little to battle the problem,

he says, those low expectations are inevitably met. The treatments

usually fail.

" Whether you trust your doctor or not probably makes a huge

difference in whether you report side effects, but there's almost no

data on that, " Barsky said. He hopes to include information about a

person's psychology in an upcoming placebo-controlled clinical trial

to see if patients with a particular outlook on life fare better or

worse than other subjects.

Far more esoteric factors may also shape both the placebo and nocebo

response. A Dutch study, for example, found that most people

considered red and orange pills to be stimulating, with blue and

green-colored pills more likely to have a depressant effect.

" One of the most important things about a pill is [its] color, " said

Daniel Moerman, an anthropologist at the University of Michigan-

Dearborn who has studied the placebo and nocebo effects across

different cultures. " That seems to be fairly widespread. "

But the mind is a funny thing, and generic responses to color go

just so far in explaining the placebo or nocebo response. Consider

this: In Italy, Moerman says, blue placebos made excellent sleeping

pills for women but had the opposite effect on men.

The apparent reason? " The Italian national football team's color is

azzurri, " he said. " Blue. "

Brian Reid is a Washington area freelance writer.

Also compare Laughter Is Medicine and Cancer Healing & Your Mind.

" Secrets of Health "

From August 1, 2002 Healthy Living Newsletter Volume 1 Number 1

The " secrets " of living longer and healthier are not really secrets

at all. In a large study of Finnish men, those that expressed a high

level of satisfaction with their lives are more likely to be alive

20 years later than those who are dissatisfied. One of the greatest

predictors of satisfaction was the ability to form intimate

relationships.

Conversely, dissatisfied men were found to be three times more

likely to die of serious diseases such as cancer. Men who drink

heavily are even more likely to die, while moderate drinking

appeared to extend life. Marriage, reasonable exercise, a good

social status and not smoking all proved to be life-extending.

Note: The above findings nearly seem self-evident since they appear

to mirror facts I assume many will be able to observe in their

immediate surroundings. There should be a number of similar studies

in existence.

Excerpted from

Optimists 'live longer'

BBC News Online

Optimists have a longer life-span than pessimists, researchers have

concluded.

They found that people with a positive outlook live, on average, 19%

longer than those who are miserable.

More than 1,100 patients attending the Mayo Clinic, in Minnesota,

USA, between 1962 and 1965 completed a personality survey, which

gave them an optimism ranking according to their views of the causes

of events in their lives.

By looking at the patients 30 years later, the researchers

discovered that those who had been classified as optimists had a 19%

higher chance of still being alive than the pessimists, reports the

Mayo Clinic Proceedings.

....

Optimists were less likely to suffer depression and helplessness and

were less fatalistic about their health chances.

Commenting on the report, Dr Martin Seligman, of the University of

Pennsylvania department of psychology, said: " Now I believe we have

converging and compelling evidence that optimists and pessimists

differ markedly in how long they will live. "

Pessimism was identifiable early and could be stabilised by therapy

which changed the individual's thinking about bad events, he said.

Philip Tata, head of adult psychology at St Mary's Hospital,

Paddington, in London, said: " Optimism and pessimism are more

complex than people think. Most people think they are opposite ends

of one scale, but you can actually have high levels of both at the

same time.

" A lack of optimism, rather than a negative outlook, can be just as

problematic. Having a reason to live rather than just seeing

terrible things coming down the road at you is important. "

Compare Laughter Is Medicine and Cancer Healing & Your Mind.

DNA experiments prove direct influence of feelings on DNA activity

from The Great Mystery Newsletter:

You will be happy to get the news I have from Gregg Braden

www.greggbraden.net, author of The Isaiah Effect and Awakening to

the Zero Point. I attended one of his all-day intensives on Sunday,

October 14, 2001 and what I am going to tell you is only a SMALL

portion of the information he covered.

The title of this program was Healing Hearts~Healing Nations: The

Science of Peace and the Power of Prayer.

Braden started off discussing how in the past we lost huge amounts

of information from ancient spiritual traditions (when the library

at Alexandria burned we lost at least 532,000 documents), and that

there may be information in those traditions which could help us

understand some of the mysteries of science. To this end he reported

on three very interesting experiments.

Braden started off as a scientist and engineer, before he began

pursuing these larger questions.

EXPERIMENT #1

The first experiment he reported was done by Dr. Vladimir Poponin, a

quantum biologist. In this experiment, first a container was emptied

(i.e., a vacuum was created within it), and then the only thing left

in it were photons (particles of light).

They measured the distribution (i.e., the location) of the photons

and found they were completely random inside the container. This was

the expected result. Then some DNA was placed inside the container

and the distribution (location) of the photons was remeasured. This

time the photons were LINED UP in an ORDERED way and aligned with

the DNA. In other words the physical DNA had an effect on the non-

physical photons.

After that, the DNA was removed from the container, and the

distribution of the photons was remeasured again. The photons

REMAINED ORDERED and lined up where the DNA had been. What are the

light particles connected to?

Gregg Braden says we are forced to accept the possibility that some

NEW field of energy, a web of energy, is there and the DNA is

communicating with the photons through this energy.

EXPERIMENT #2

These were experiments done by the military. Leukocytes (white blood

cells) were collected for DNA from donors and placed into chambers

so they could measure electrical changes. In this experiment, the

donor was placed in one room and subjected to " emotional

stimulation " consisting of video clips, which generated different

emotions in the donor.

The DNA was placed in a different room in the same building. Both

the donor and his DNA were monitored and as the donor exhibited

emotional peaks or valleys (measured by electrical responses), the

DNA exhibited the IDENTICAL RESPONSES AT THE EXACT SAME TIME. There

was no lag time, no transmission time. The DNA peaks and valleys

EXACTLY MATCHED the peaks and valleys of the donor in time.

The military wanted to see how far away they could separate the

donor from his DNA and still get this effect. They stopped testing

after they separated the DNA and the donor by 50 miles and STILL had

the SAME result. No lag time; no transmission time.

The DNA and the donor had the same identical responses in time. What

can this mean?

Gregg Braden says it means that living cells communicate through a

previously unrecognized form of energy. This energy is not affected

by time and distance. This is a non-local form of energy, an energy

that already exists everywhere, all the time.

EXPERIMENT #3

The third experiment was done by the Institute of Heart Math and the

paper that was about this was titled: Local and Non local Effects of

Coherent Heart Frequencies on Conformational Changes of DNA.

(Disregard the title! The info is incredible.)

This is the experiment that relates directly to the anthrax

situation.

In this experiment, some human placenta DNA (the most pristine form

of DNA) was placed in a container from which they could measure

changes in the DNA. Twenty-eight vials of DNA were given (one each)

to 28 trained researchers. Each researcher had been trained how to

generate and FEEL feelings, and they each had strong emotions.

What was discovered was that the DNA CHANGED ITS SHAPE according to

the feelings of the researchers:

• When the researchers FELT gratitude, love and appreciation, the

DNA responded by RELAXING and the strands unwound. The length of the

DNA extended.

• When the researchers FELT anger, fear, frustration, or stress, the

DNA responded by TIGHTENING UP. It became shorter and SWITCHED OFF

many of our DNA codes! If you've ever felt " shut down " by negative

emotions, now you know why your body was equally shut down too. The

shut down of the DNA codes was reversed and the codes were switched

back on again when feelings of love, joy, gratitude and appreciation

were felt by the researchers.

This experiment was later followed up by testing HIV positive

patients. They discovered that feelings of love, gratitude and

appreciation created 300,000 TIMES the RESISTANCE they had without

those feelings. So here's the answer to what can help you stay well,

no matter what dreadful virus or bacteria may be floating around.

Stay in feelings of joy, love, gratitude and appreciation!

Compare Gratitude Helps Heal.

These emotional changes went beyond the effects of electromagnetics.

Individuals trained in deep love were able to change the shape of

their DNA. Braden says this illustrates a new recognized form of

energy that connects all of creation.

This energy appears to be a TIGHTLY WOVEN WEB that connects all

matter. Essentially we're able to influence this web of creation

through our VIBRATION.

SUMMARY:

What do the results of these experiments have to do with our present

situation? This is the science behind how we can choose a timeline

to stay safe, no matter what else is happening. As Gregg explains in

The Isaiah Effect, basically time is not just linear (past, present

and future), but it also has depth. The depth of time consists of

all the possible prayers and timelines that could ever be prayed or

exist.

Essentially, all our prayers have already been answered. We just

activate the one we're living through our FEELINGS. THIS is how we

create our reality ~ by choosing it with our feelings. Our feelings

are activating the timeline via the web of creation, which connects

all of the energy and matter of the Universe.

Remember that the law of the Universe is that we attract what we

focus on. If you are focused on fearing whatever may come, you are

sending a strong message to the Universe to send you whatever you

fear. Instead if you can get yourself into feelings of joy, love,

appreciation or gratitude, and focus on bringing more of that into

your life, you are going to avoid the negative stuff automatically.

You will be choosing a different TIMELINE with your feelings.

You can prevent getting anthrax or any other flu, virus, and so on,

by staying in these positive feelings, which maintains an incredibly

strong immune system.

So here's your protection for whatever comes: Find something to be

happy about every day, and every hour if possible, moment to moment,

even if only for a few minutes. This is the easiest and best

protection you can have. If nothing else, be joyous that the

criminals have " already been caught " by the Universe!

Further related information is available at GreatMystery.org.

The above article was found at www.SouledOut.org who feature among

other things " For enlightened, inspired reading about our present

world crisis: How Can We Permanently End Terrorism? " .

Why should we forgive people?

by Andrew Matthews, seashell.com.au

At some point most of us learned that it is a good idea to forgive

people. We learned that it is " holy " or " spiritual " .

But there is a more basic reason to forgive people: when you don't

forgive them, it ruins your life!

Let's say:

a) you are my boss and you give me the sack, or

b) you are my girl, and you run off with my buddy.

So I say, " I'll never forgive you for that! "

Who suffers? Not you!

I'm pacing the floor. I've got the knot in my stomach. I'm losing

sleep. You are probably out partying!

Where do we get the idea that if WE don't forgive people, THEY

suffer? It's nuts!

Recent studies at the Public Health Institute in California confirm

that hostility and resentment tear down your immune system and

double your risk of heart attack, cancer and even diabetes.

Bitterness makes you sick!

To forgive someone, you don't have to agree with what they did. You

just have to want your life to work.

Is it easy? Usually not. But you don't forgive people for their

benefit.

You do it for your benefit.

Note by Healing Cancer Naturally

According to leading alternative cancer treatment researcher Lothar

Hirneise, forgiveness is a primordial quality to develop for cancer

patients. Also compare Dr. Bernie Siegel who writes: " I have

collected 57 extremely well documented so-called cancer miracles. A

cancer miracle is when a person didn't die when they absolutely,

positively were supposed to. At a certain particular moment in time

they decided that the anger and the depression were probably not the

best way to go, since they had such a little bit of time left, and

so they went from that to being loving, caring, no longer angry, no

longer depressed, and able to talk to the people they loved. These

57 people had the same pattern. They gave up, totally, their anger,

and they gave up, totally, their depression, by specifically a

decision to do so. And at that point the tumors started to shrink. "

Rescuing Hug

This is a picture from an article called " The Rescuing Hug " . The

article details the first week of life of a set of twins.

Apparently, each were in their respective incubators, and one was

not expected to live. A hospital nurse fought against the hospital

rules and placed the babies in one incubator. When they were placed

together, the healthier of the two threw an arm over her sister in

an endearing embrace. The smaller baby's heart rate stabilized and

her temperature rose to normal.

Let us not forget to embrace those whom we love.

April 20, 2006

omg i'm doomed to die of cancer rofl

that is a joke by the way. I'm young and I'll get over my crap, otherwise I

would be trying so hard, and I wouldn't be here.

Crystal

<snip>

In dealing with many thousands of cancer patients over the past 28

years, it has been my observation that there are certain personality

traits which are rather consistently present in the cancer-

susceptible individual. These characteristics are as follows:

5. Harboring long-suppressed toxic emotions, such as anger,

resentment and/or hostility. Typically the cancer-susceptible

individual internalizes such emotions and has great difficulty

expressing them.

6. Reacting adversely to stress, often becoming unable to cope

adequately with such stress. Usually experiencing an especially

damaging event about 2 years before the onset of detectable cancer.

The patient is unable to cope with this traumatic event or series of

events, which comes as a " last straw " on top of years of suppressed

reactions to stress.

[compare Dr. Hamer's " Iron Rule of Cancer " ]

7. Showing an inability to resolve deep-seated emotional problems

and conflicts, usually arising in childhood, often even being

unaware of their presence.

Typical of the cancer-susceptible personality, as noted above, is

the long-standing tendency to suppress " toxic emotions, "

particularly anger. Usually starting in childhood, this individual

has held in his/her hostility and other unacceptable emotions. More

often than not, this feature of the affected personality has its

origins in feelings of rejection by one or both parents. Whether

these feelings or rejection are justified or not, it is the

perception of rejection that matters, and this results in a lack of

closeness with the " rejecting " parent or parents, followed later in

life by a similar lack of closeness with spouses and others with

whom close relationships would normally develop. Those at higher

risk for cancer tend to develop feelings of loneliness as a result

of their having been deprived of affection and acceptance

etc. etc.

April 22, 2006

Well Doc id have to say this rings close to home for me, My mom has brain cancer

just found out last month, along with this cancer she had a midshift which means

that part of her brain was moved to the other side. She fit all 7 of those list.

That put aside the fact that my mom's father was not biological which she

found out in her 50's, she felt like she was treated different than others in

her family.

Her husband died and left her with 6 kids to raise on her own, she remaired

once and that did not last long. Her 2nd husband liked blowing up shoping

centers. After that i dont remember her having a relationship with anyone,

although she did work much.

For the past five years she has been rasing my brothers 3 children and living

with my brother who for the past 2 yrs has been a bible toting his way is the

only way kind of guy.

It has been interesting from my preception since i have been with huna and

have had people like you come into my life that has educated me on the ways of

changing not only my life, my beliefs and the way that i think, feel, see, hear

and do! (DRILLS)

I think my other siblings are wondering why she wants to be at my home.

IT is interesting.

Love T

P.S. I am eating those almonds everyday:--) Thanks Doc!

kahunamaker <kahunamaker wrote:

, drakotom

wrote: