Doc is accused of evil deeds by...

[Guest guest]

First,

 

I only praise what Donna does.

 

I do not understand the accusation that I've dissed Donna by

mentioning that she uses convincer strategies. All good trainers use

convincer strategies.

 

So I'll assume that you don't know what one is.

 

Here's a brief explanation.

 

A " convincer strategy " is a strategy that helps a client know that

you know what you are doing.

 

Most people have unconscious strategies that they use BEFORE they

are motivated to do anything. And, since they are mostly

unconscious, most people don't know they exist.

 

I teach people to know what they think, feel and do, in the sequence

that motivates THEM.

 

Why is that important? Because they now have CONSCIOUS CHOICE in

following that strategy, or in choosing a better, different strategy.

 

Here's a few examples from energy medicine and energy psychology.

 

A pre-energy test, compared with a post energy test lets the client

know (versus hallucinate) that something positive is actually

occuring in the energy fields because of the energy technologies

they are using.

 

For example, Donna uses energy testing. Then she demonstrates that

certain flushings will either enhance the energy flows through the

meridians, or will back flush the energies through the energies.

 

Energy testing a SUDS before an Energy Psychology intervention, and

after an Energy Psychology will let the client know and be more

convinced that the process really worked.

 

Then the installation of a new resource, done with a pre SUDS and a

post SUDS will also help him know that he now has more resources and

better resources for where he is going with his intervention.

 

And on and on.

 

A " convincer " strategy is a good thing, and a thing that more in the

psychological, hypnosis and NLP fields should use.

 

When you use " convincer " teaching strategies you are using Trainer

Skills of teaching others in a manner where they can verifiy FOR

THEMSELVES that what they are learning is REAL for them, and is practical and

immediately beneficial for THEM.

 

It's a tool for education. It is NOT a tool of manipulation, unless

you call helping people get what they want in health and in their

pursuit of happiness, negative.

 

The term " convincer " strategy comes from the bio-data profiling

system that was put out by Rodger Bailey in the early 80's. He was a

student of Leslie Cameron Bandler.

 

Here's the first part of that write up. " The last category of the

IPU Profile is the category, Thinking Convincer. This category is

used to determine how a person is CONVINCED and MOVED TO ACTION. The

first question used to elicit this information is , " How do you know

that someone else(a co-worker) does a good job? " The answer to this

question indicates how a person best takes in the information to be

convinced. " (Pg. 42).

 

If someone is offended by my explanations of Donna's great teaching

techniques, then THEY ARE AT FAULT with their paranoia.

 

If that person has a problem with me, then they ethically should

talk with me, and not attempt to blacklist me with their lies and

unfounded fears to either Donna or David.

 

I am outspoken about what I do and say. I stay well within my own

ethical boundaries.

 

And, what post specifically are they refering to?

 

Have you read it?

 

If you did you would then know that I am in tremendous awe and

respect of anything the both of them do and teach.

 

And, group, what are the convincer strategies I've used in this post?