Guest guest Posted October 3, 2007 Report Share Posted October 3, 2007 coachdrgridley wrote: > > If I get what Jack means, he is able to more or less determine his own rules. Sort of. Know what you can live life with and what you choose NOT to live life with. > I know I can choose to reframe things. Actually better for me than a reframe is the meta-model violations. They, along with the Clarity Model give you understanding of your own deep processes of what is okay and what is NOT okay. > I also know I am a work in progress, and, esp when new > things come up, sometimes I get unbalanced before I can do the kind of thinking you both outline. I agree. New challenges need to be stepped back from so the emotionalism is NOT there. Then and only then can you make a rational decision on what choices you and they have. Then step back into the " situation " and process the difference choices you've chosen. >Who is better able to push buttons than your family? I guess it just me, but just because someone is family does NOT give them the right to " shit in my stew " on in the stew of others. They are still accountable and responsible to themselves and to others. And if they choose NOT to be responsible, then we can choose to distance ourselves emotionally and physically from their psychic attacks. > Thanks for your thoughts! Thank you Sue. I've always enjoyed talking with you, Barbara Ann and Kelmie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.