idiots that still believe the world is flat is sort of where you are coming from

[Guest guest]

--- , " Oliver Lark " <awenbendithia> wrote:

 

> Well firstly, I personally don't find NLP convincing at all after

> reading the research,

 

Well buckwheat, you are back again. Goody goody.

 

I suggest you give some type of verification of what you just said.

 

Quote from resources that HAVE DONE THE DRILLS, and NOT from source

materials that have their own ax to grind.

 

I mean, even talking with idiots that still believe the world is

flat is sort of where you are coming from.

 

> There is no need for belief in NLP,

 

Sorry buckwheat, NLP is NOT a belief.

 

NLP is a modeling process...

 

....and very similar to the exact processes you attempted to describe.

 

So do some of the drills BEFORE giving an " opinion " .

 

Is that fair?

 

What is funny GROUP, is that MOST very smart people use a variation

of NLP or General Semantics, or DHE, or Educational Psychology, or

neuro-semantics, Kenneth Key's works, or K's " Science into Sanity "

skills, or Gregory Bateson's " Ecology of Mind " training, in whatever

field they are an expert at.

 

Donna Eden uses NLP.

 

Gary Craig uses NLP.

 

Fred Gallo uses NLP.

 

Rodger Callahan uses NLP.

 

David Feinstein uses NLP.

 

Dan Kennedy uses NLP.

 

blab, blab, blab...

 

All of Napoleon Hill's book, " Think and Grow Rich " is based upon NLP

type technologies.

 

All of Maxwell Maltz's works are based upon NLP type technologies.

 

All of Jose Silva's SMC technologies are based upon NLP type

technologies (even though Jose refused to allow his SMC trainers to

teach any NLP, for business reasons of his own)...