you are distorting the entire concept of energy just for your own purposes.

[Guest guest]

, docresults

<docresults@h...> wrote:

 

> The energy model simply moves one step up before

positive/negative. What if

> what you term " negative " , in the energy model, is only an absence

of the flow?

 

Houston,

 

Your deliberate attempt to distort and downplay the Donna Eden

Energy Model is deceitful at best.

 

Why are you attempting to install that the Donna Eden energy model

is false?

 

> In my energy model the flow is the

> flow (all there is).The ONLY way " no

> flow " (negative) can happen is a block or a disruption in the

flow.

 

There was never a lack of flow. Again it's your model for your own

products benefits.

 

> In the energy model life is the source of energy flow.

 

No that is not the normal energy model, nor the model used on this

group. What are you doing? why are you redefining the scope of this

group? Selling your products?

 

> The discovery statement as Callahan, Craig and others put forth is

this

> " The cause of all pain, disease, suffering or discomfort (negative

> emotions) is a disruption in the energy (flow).

 

Actually that is not how they define energy. You've deleted the

entire premise of mind, causing the energy flows in the body to do

wwhat they were designed to do.

 

You are ignoring 6,000 years of verified energy work. Work done in

India, work done in China, and work done in Egypt. Why?

 

> They did not discover an

> opposite or equal flow in the other direction, i.e.

>positive/negative.

 

Actually, they did discover a flow in the other direction, a flow

initiated by mind. Look to Gallo. Look to Thies. Look to Feinstein.

And look to Donna Eden who can see those flows. The others mentioned

can verify those flows and the direction of those flows by

appropiate tests.

 

> I also used to teach reversal of flow. I still do sometimes when I

am

> dealing with clients and using Energy Medicine and I don't want to

take the

> time to educate the client.

 

So you are invalidating Donna Eden. What is your premise for that

invalidation? Is it just because you cannot see energy? Or is it

because you cannot then sell your product?

 

>And yet on this list where we are edumcating

> ourselves I suspect the only way reversal could happen is through

some sort

> of resistance (i.e. block, constriction or disturbance). It can be

> perceived as flowing the opposite way when in more likelihood it

is the

> absence of what we want.

 

Once again, you define differently what is actually taught on this

group, by Energy Medicine, and by Donna Eden and by others that can

see and use energy.

 

Houston, you are distorting the entire concept of energy just for

your own purposes.

 

Barbara Ann