I think that God has a method of culling out the human species with the use of n

[Guest guest]

, Pandora51@a... wrote:

 

> Yes, I see what you mean about Jason's post, I read it earlier

>today. It made me think, however, about our public school system

>here in New York (and probably in other states, as well).

>Teachers only know one way to relate to their students, and have

>not learned to be flexible and alter their mode of

> transmitting information in the three primary representational

>systems. So, therefore, I think, a lot of students get left

>behind from getting a good education (relatively speaking).

 

Well,

 

There's a couple of different approaches here. A favorite one of

mine is John Gatto's.

 

Gatto taught in a manner that actually reached the teenagers in a

way that would be useful in real life, versus the manner that the

educational system of New York demanded. For more on this I suggest

you read, " Dumbing us Down " .

 

On another note, I think that God has a method of culling out the

human species with the use of natural disasters. Here's the

disaster. Now let's see who has the brains and the training to

survive. Disasters do happen and they happen all over the world all

the time. What happened in New Orleans was small in comparison to

what has happened many times over.

 

For example, " there's a hurricane coming, and we are below sea

level, so lets go hide in the storm cellar " .

 

Those people were culled by natural disaster. Or were they culled by

their own lack of creative imagination?

 

For example, " the water is rising, so let's hide in the attic. " The

water rose higher than the rooftops, so culled by natural disaster.

 

My point here is that " imagination is more important than knowledge

(Albert Einstein). What means the use of the magic question, " If I

could survive this diaster, how would I? "

 

Getting the answers from the subconscious mind, from the

superconscious mind, and then taking action on those answers. It is

a process of thinking and of direct action with calibration skills

to be sure that what you are doin is working, or not working. If

not, then the flexibility to do something else that is critical to

the task at hand.

 

My intention here is not to make fun of disaster, but to point out

that any educational system should have included in it some form of

the Clarity Model, some form of analisis based upon thinking skills

like Transformational Grammer, or NLP...

 

....a model where any decision is made on " thinking about all

possible results " .

 

If that Clarity model was included in their education, a lot less

people would be living in New Oleans, a city that the major

population lives below sea level, where in the event on any natural

disaster, they get real wet.

 

Those people then would not hide in the cellar. They would know

before-hand the possible diasterous results of such a limited

decision.

 

Those people might carry an ax with them to the attic just in case

the waters rose too high.

 

People with the Clarity model, and the use of imagination would not

hide in the attic without thinking before-hand of the negative

consequences of such action.

 

They also would have prepared before hand for most of the negative

posibilities.

 

I think that type of thinking is one of the reasons I liked the

McGyver television series back in the 90's.

 

It is not the government's job to take care of people, regardless of

whether the government demands that job, or not.

 

So it's not, " the hurrican is coming, I wonder how the government is

going to keep me safe " , but...

 

" The hurrican will hit in 8 hours. Do I want to survive it? "

 

" yes "

 

" Okay. How can I survive it? " Leave town. Okay. Go where? Houston.

Okay. How do I get there? modes of travel.

 

Okay. How can I survie it? " Go to high ground. Okay. Where's high

ground? How do I know it's high ground enough? How high do I need to

be?

 

And the presuppositions of many case senarios can be quickly

evaluated, and then tested by energy testing to see which is most

valid for each person.

 

And there is the concept of " do you want a fear driven life, a life

where every decision is made to avoid something negative? " , or do

you want a life where you can make positive choices?

 

Going towards where you want to be, physically, mentally,

emotionally and spiritually is probably a much better choice for

most people when compared to making decisions to where they don't

want to be, physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually.

 

I don't want to be sick, is much more disasterous than, I desire to

be health...

 

I don't want to be stupid, is much more disasterous than, I study

and train so I have the knowledge to go where I want in life...

 

So this post is about having the necessary training so that decision

making for normal situations and survival situations are just easy,

simple tasks that anyone can do.

 

Skills that Dr. La Tourrette teachs on a daily basis.

 

Sandy