Disagreeing is NOT a personal attack!

[Guest guest]

--- " cindy clark " <c-clark05 wrote:

>

>

> " mikeuggen "

> > Therefore, ALL members must feel comfortable and safe to post

> > questions, ideas and suggestions for the benefit of everyone in

the

> > group, where everyone can learn and grow from the shared

experience.

> > Consequently, the one absolute that will not be tolerated is a

> > personal attack on another member. Disagreements are just a part

of

> > having an open dialog, but they can and must be done with proper

> > respect to those with differing views or opinions. "

> ************************

> Thank you Mike. I agree. I certainly did not understand why he

had the

> reaction he did, but I read it like an attack.

> We all know writing here is not the same as speaking face to

face. the

> expressions and tone of voice are missing here. Doc, if you meant

something

> differently that the way we read it, I'd sure like to know. Not

all of us

> work from a place of book knowlege and classes. Not all of us

need

> verication for all we do. I use healing energy, & intuition and

it works.

> People get better. That IS my validation. I am not making a name

for myself

> nor do I plan to. I charge no fee for what I do. I work from a

place of

> love and compasion.

> Cindy

 

You really believe that " because I asked for clarity THREE TIMES "

and she chose NOT to give it, that I'm attacking her because I asked?

 

My question to you is, " How much better would she be 'if' she had a

clue to what she actually does? "

 

My presupposition is, " that she is actually valid " , and not a blow

hard.