Seeing something beautiful!

[Guest guest]

Jim,

 

Thanks for this post. I thought it was really great when I read it, but I had

to think about it and try a few things before I could get back to you.

 

I have been working on seeing auras and energy. I have never been able to do

this to any great extent, but I feel that it is an important ability to develop.

 

My approach is a little different. First I go through a process of defining who

I am when I am seeing auras. (more on this later) then I go through the

practice of seeing auras.

 

My practice revolves around seeing the chi ball. I dim the lights to the level

where I can barely see my hands. I stand in a relaxed normal stance and let my

focus become soft as I put my hands out in front of me about 8 inches apart and

build a flow of chi between them. As the chi flow becomes stronger and my

radiant circuits open throughout my body, the energy becomes visible.

 

After reading your article it opened up a new understanding of who I am and what

I was looking at.

 

I was seeing something beautiful.

 

I began to move from working with the technicalities into enjoying the emotional

content of the effort and was more successful. I am still at the beginning of

seeing energy flow, but learning to enjoy the practice more. When one is

looking at something beautiful with their radiant circuits open they cant help

but be happy!

 

When you read Energy Medicine by Dona Eden you get the sense that she sees

energy about as easily as we are looking at this screen. Seeing energy this

easily is a powerful sense of validation and knowing your technique is working.

 

Thanks again,

 

William Leigh

 

, Jim Knippenberg

<erommel wrote:

>

>

> A few weeks ago, Doc posted on one of these groups about tapping in to the 3rd

eye seeing the colors of the roses and flowers in the garden, and it activated

his ability to see colors more vividly while looking at energy fields.

>

> And he talked about it some also at the seminar, if I recall correctly, about

what he NOW believes about tapping " joy " in to the third eye vs. what he used to

think.

>

> Well, interestingly enough, Kelly commented on my Facebook about Swann's book,

and it's eating me from the inside out to know if she figured out something from

that book I might have missed or not, so I dug it back out.

>

> Now keep in mind that Ingo is an artist, and maybe they sometimes get

" emotional " about things that most of us would just shrug our shoulders at,

BUT...

>

> I came across this on page 187 of Swann's book:

>

> " ...the multiplicity of dimensions can be conceptualized as interpenetrating.

>

> " And this helps explain, in some part at least, why certain clairvoyants

perceive only some of the auras and not others.

>

> " This can be elaborated a little by suggesting that clairvoyance (of any kind)

is both linked to and relative to different energetic dimensionalities.

Energies, if we might apply them to different dimensions, would in the whole of

human sensing systems then have distinct kinds or layers of receptor-faculties

that respond only to a given dimension.

>

> " So different kinds of clairvoyance or clairlucidity are dimensionally

dependent -- meaning that if one level of clairvoyance might activate, other

levels might not.

>

> " One additional and quite special factor needs to be pointed up. While it is

hardly mentioned anywhere, it is indicative of WHY SO MANY NEVER EXPERIENCE A

CLAIRVOYANT TURN-ON, SO TO SPEAK. [CAPS mine for EMPHASIS]

>

> " If one studies a larger number of artistic representations of aura energy

fields, it can be seen that although their differences can be quite remarkable,

they none the less have a very special factor in common -- beauty, to the degree

of being resplendent.

>

> " Aside from the fact that the entangled manifestation is complex and

complicated, the whole of it from the smallest to the biggest parts is of beauty

so extraordinary, so resplendent, that mere words, illustrations, or special

effects equipment are quite challenged in approximating it.

>

> " In this sense, then, it might be assumed that THOSE NOT PREPARED TO RECOGNIZE

OR DEAL IN BEAUTY ARE UNLIKELY EVER TO EXPERIENCE TURN-ON JOLTS OF CLAIRVOYANCE.

[CAPS mine again for emphasis]

>

> " Indeed such turn-on jolts might actually be mentally unbearable within

otherwise jerkwater realities that exclude or minimize beauty.

>

> " Thus, if anyone is curious about what auras (or energy fields) look like, it

can be said they are unbelievably beautiful. If this initial proviso does not

register, then one probably can forget about ever sighting one -- sexual or

otherwise. " (Swann, Ingo. PSYCHIC SEXUALITY, p. 187)

>

> Basically, we experience " turn on's " of clairvoyant and psychic ability

regarding what we are able to recognize and focus on. So, like when Doc talked

about " seeing targets " on people, and then eventually he was able to see the

meridians and meridian points because of that. And then recently, he started to

pay attention to and APPRECIATE the colors of the flowers in the garden, and

started to see colors more frequently and more vividly.

>

> I could go on and on and on and on about this, regarding how you could

practice with Remote Influence with specific segment intending, doing the energy

drills with specific segment intending, or how I've noticed similar things while

actually DOING the damn drills. But has anyone else noticed something similar

also?

>

> How else could you use this to enhance Remote Viewing, Remote Influencing,

Rapport skills, Covert Influence, Healing, or " other " types of interactions with

people?

>

> Sincerely,

> Jim Knippenberg

> Follow me on Twitter!

> http://twitter.com/jimknippenberg

>