Concerns Increase Over Emergency Health Powers Act

[Guest guest]

Concerns Increase Over Emergency Health Powers Act

 

- http://www.rense.com/general24/dsd.htm -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Concerns Increase Over

Emergency Health Powers Act

By Duane Parde

USAToday Op/Ed

4-28-2

 

 

State legislators are making vigilant provisions just in case Osama

bin Laden's next cowardly shoe to drop is a biological, chemical or nuclear

attack. Thirty-three states are considering legislation to prepare for such

attacks. For this they should be heartily applauded. But such legislation must

also stand scrutiny in respect to civil liberties.

One controversial proposal, the Centers for Disease Control and

Prevention's Model Emergency Health Powers Act, is rightfully viewed as an

unprecedented legislative assault upon civil liberties. The CDC proposal allows

governors to unilaterally declare a public health emergency, stripping

individuals and families of their rights and liberties for 60 days. Only then is

a state legislature allowed to intervene by a majority vote.

 

Following a governor's emergency declaration, unelected state health

officials immediately assume broad powers to seize property, share your private

health information, quarantine individuals suspected of being infected, ration

goods and services, compel mass vaccinations and even assume control over state

and local police. The potential for blunder borne out of incompetence is

enormous, not to mention the potential for willful abuse.

 

The medical community and business owners have the most to fear. Under

a declared state of emergency, hospitals could be procured, through

''condemnation or otherwise,'' by anyone who meets whatever constitutes a public

health authority. The owner of a fleet of school buses, for example, could have

his property expropriated without compensation to transport infected people,

animals or waste. Private homes, businesses or our schools could be walled off

as quarantine locations. And there is not one thing anyone could do about it for

60 days.

 

If one set out to intentionally legislate extremism, the CDC model

would be it. Unlike Illinois, Pennsylvania and Maryland, not every state has

introduced the most extreme version of the bill. At the very least, each state

and its citizens should scrutinize every word of legislation being considered.

If states go too far, they hand the terrorists of the world a belated victory.

___

Duane Parde is executive director of the American Legislative Exchange

Council, a bipartisan organization of state legislators.

2002 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Co. Inc.

 

 

 

Email This Article

 

 

 

 

 

To learn more about the group, please visit

 

 

To to this group, simply send a blank e-mail message to:

-