Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Breast Cancer Deception

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

http://campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/151102/breastcancerdeception.htm

 

Breast Cancer Deception

by Sherrill Sellman

 

Every October since 1985, pink ribbons are displayed in posters, magazine

advertisements, and proudly adorn women's lapels heralding Breast Cancer

Awareness Month. The multitudes of runs, hikes, walks, and other fundraising

events raise hundred of millions of dollars to conquer that dreaded scourge of

the modern woman, breast cancer. High profile companies like Avon, Lee Denim,

and Revlon have joined ranks along with the Susan G. Komen Foundation's " Race

for the Cure " , and the City of Hope Hospital's " Walk for Hope " . Popular

celebrities lead the charge.

 

Each year, 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 44,000 will

die of the disease. The US has one of the highest breast cancer rates in the

world. Fifty years ago the incidence of Breast Cancer for a woman's lifetime

risk was one in twenty. Now it has skyrocketed to one in eight. Clearly the

so-called war on cancer has not even made a dent in the breast cancer epidemic

as the rates continue to climb at the rate of one per cent per year.

 

The motto of Breast Cancer Awareness Month is " Early Detection is Your Best

Protection " . The National Cancer Institute stated in 1995 that " Breast cancer is

simply not a preventable disease " . This tune was reiterated in 1997 by the

American Cancer Society who also announced that " there are no practical ways to

prevent breast cancer -- only early detection. " 1 So mammograms are the front

line of defense. Celebrities like Rosie O'Donnell offer free t-shirts with the

honorable words " I've Been Squished " if you'll make a date with your local x-ray

department.

 

So let's all join in and wave our pink ribbons and don those running shoes and

take to the roads, right? Wait! Before you get swept up by the emotional frenzy

of this call to arms, there is something you should know.

 

Who Profits from Breast Cancer?

Breast Cancer Awareness month's primary sponsor and mastermind of the event in

1985 was Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, now known as AstraZeneca. Zeneca is the company

that manufactures the controversial and widely prescribed breast cancer drug,

Tamoxifen. Did you know all TV, radio, and print media campaigns are paid for

and must be approved by Zeneca?

 

It is less known that Zeneca also makes herbicides and fungicides. One of their

products, the organochlorine pesticide, Acetochlor is implicated as a causal

factor in breast cancer. Its Perry Ohio chemical plant is the third largest

source of potential cancer causing pollution in the U.S., spewing 53,000 pounds

of recognized carcinogens into the air in 1996.

 

Why The Breast Cancer Increase?

When it comes to environmental toxicity, carcinogens found in pesticides,

herbicides, plastics, and other toxic chemicals that are known to cause cancer

-- especially breast cancer -- there is booming silence by all Breast Cancer

Awareness Month programs. Did the alarming increase of breast cancer rates just

mysteriously happen? Or perhaps, the focus on the cure has conveniently ignored

the cause? After all, it wouldn't really be good PR for Zeneca to have it known

that their chemical products directly contribute to the breast cancer epidemic.

 

Many experts predicted as far back as 30 years ago that cancer rates would

increase, citing an explosion of synthetic chemicals. From 1940 through the

early 1980's, production of synthetic chemicals increased by a factor of 350.

 

Billions of tons of toxic substances that never existed are now released into

the environment. Yet only 3 percent of the 75,000 chemicals in use have been

tested for safety. These toxic time bombs are found in our water, air, and soil.

Women who live near toxic waste dumps have 6.5 times the incidence of breast

cancer.

 

A survey conducted by Dr. Mary Wolff of Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York found that

women with breast cancer had four times the levels of DDE found in

non-carcinogenic tumors. Also, another study investigated why upper class women

in the community of Newton, Massachusetts had higher breast cancer rates than

the lower economic women. The researchers attributed the increase to greater use

of professional lawn care service and more dry cleaning.

 

Pesticides & Breast Cancer

The pesticide breast cancer link was stunningly highlighted in research from

Israel which linked three organochlorine pesticides detected in dairy products

to an increase of 12 types of cancer in 10 different strains of mice. After

public outcry in 1978, the Israeli government was forced to ban the pesticides

Benzene Hexachloride, DDT, and Lindane. Interestingly, breast cancer mortality

rates which had increased every year for 25 years, dropped nearly 8 per cent for

all age groups and dropped more than a thirty-three percent for women ages 25-34

in 1986.

 

The American Cancer Society was founded with the support of the Rockefeller

family in 1913. Members of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry have long

had a place on its board. Could that have something to do with the fact that the

American Cancer Society's latest report on cancer prevention makes no mention of

environmental factors?

www.ssellman.com

 

 

 

 

 

STEVEN RANSOM COMMENTS: While the above article is at pains to point out the

huge amounts of money involved in breast cancer and the link between cancer and

toxicity, nowhere does it mention the fact that the increase in 'cancer

screenings' across the populations is dramatically increasing the numbers of

'supposedly dangerous' cancers being detected. While screenings again are a very

lucrative means of income for the conventional institutes, there is abundant

evidence that a significant percentage of the cancers being detected may not

even progress, if left alone, and will in many instances disappear completely.

This is simply the result of allowing a well-nourished immune system to do its

job effectively - WITHOUT ANY NEED FOR CONVENTIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION.

 

 

For the very latest on false posive diagnoses in breast cancer, how to avoid

them and the vital role of nutrition in cancer prevention, obtain a copy of

Great News on Cancer in the 21st Century at www.credence.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a link between breast cancer and abortions. How much that this is

affecting the rate increase I don't know. In California, in Marin county the

rate of breast cancer is higher than normal, when hearing this, I notice

that it also has a low birth rate. I don't know if they get more abortions,

than ususall,but it would be something to consider. Ryan

 

 

Frank [califpacific]

Saturday, November 23, 2002 3:15 PM

gettingwell

Breast Cancer Deception

 

 

 

http://campaignfortruth.com/Eclub/151102/breastcancerdeception.htm

 

Breast Cancer Deception

by Sherrill Sellman

 

Every October since 1985, pink ribbons are displayed in posters, magazine

advertisements, and proudly adorn women's lapels heralding Breast Cancer

Awareness Month. The multitudes of runs, hikes, walks, and other fundraising

events raise hundred of millions of dollars to conquer that dreaded scourge

of the modern woman, breast cancer. High profile companies like Avon, Lee

Denim, and Revlon have joined ranks along with the Susan G. Komen

Foundation's " Race for the Cure " , and the City of Hope Hospital's " Walk for

Hope " . Popular celebrities lead the charge.

 

Each year, 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 44,000

will die of the disease. The US has one of the highest breast cancer rates

in the world. Fifty years ago the incidence of Breast Cancer for a woman's

lifetime risk was one in twenty. Now it has skyrocketed to one in eight.

Clearly the so-called war on cancer has not even made a dent in the breast

cancer epidemic as the rates continue to climb at the rate of one per cent

per year.

 

The motto of Breast Cancer Awareness Month is " Early Detection is Your Best

Protection " . The National Cancer Institute stated in 1995 that " Breast

cancer is simply not a preventable disease " . This tune was reiterated in

1997 by the American Cancer Society who also announced that " there are no

practical ways to prevent breast cancer -- only early detection. " 1 So

mammograms are the front line of defense. Celebrities like Rosie O'Donnell

offer free t-shirts with the honorable words " I've Been Squished " if you'll

make a date with your local x-ray department.

 

So let's all join in and wave our pink ribbons and don those running shoes

and take to the roads, right? Wait! Before you get swept up by the emotional

frenzy of this call to arms, there is something you should know.

 

Who Profits from Breast Cancer?

Breast Cancer Awareness month's primary sponsor and mastermind of the event

in 1985 was Zeneca Pharmaceuticals, now known as AstraZeneca. Zeneca is the

company that manufactures the controversial and widely prescribed breast

cancer drug, Tamoxifen. Did you know all TV, radio, and print media

campaigns are paid for and must be approved by Zeneca?

 

It is less known that Zeneca also makes herbicides and fungicides. One of

their products, the organochlorine pesticide, Acetochlor is implicated as a

causal factor in breast cancer. Its Perry Ohio chemical plant is the third

largest source of potential cancer causing pollution in the U.S., spewing

53,000 pounds of recognized carcinogens into the air in 1996.

 

Why The Breast Cancer Increase?

When it comes to environmental toxicity, carcinogens found in pesticides,

herbicides, plastics, and other toxic chemicals that are known to cause

cancer -- especially breast cancer -- there is booming silence by all Breast

Cancer Awareness Month programs. Did the alarming increase of breast cancer

rates just mysteriously happen? Or perhaps, the focus on the cure has

conveniently ignored the cause? After all, it wouldn't really be good PR for

Zeneca to have it known that their chemical products directly contribute to

the breast cancer epidemic.

 

Many experts predicted as far back as 30 years ago that cancer rates would

increase, citing an explosion of synthetic chemicals. From 1940 through the

early 1980's, production of synthetic chemicals increased by a factor of

350.

 

Billions of tons of toxic substances that never existed are now released

into the environment. Yet only 3 percent of the 75,000 chemicals in use have

been tested for safety. These toxic time bombs are found in our water, air,

and soil. Women who live near toxic waste dumps have 6.5 times the incidence

of breast cancer.

 

A survey conducted by Dr. Mary Wolff of Mt. Sinai Hospital, New York found

that women with breast cancer had four times the levels of DDE found in

non-carcinogenic tumors. Also, another study investigated why upper class

women in the community of Newton, Massachusetts had higher breast cancer

rates than the lower economic women. The researchers attributed the increase

to greater use of professional lawn care service and more dry cleaning.

 

Pesticides & Breast Cancer

The pesticide breast cancer link was stunningly highlighted in research from

Israel which linked three organochlorine pesticides detected in dairy

products to an increase of 12 types of cancer in 10 different strains of

mice. After public outcry in 1978, the Israeli government was forced to ban

the pesticides Benzene Hexachloride, DDT, and Lindane. Interestingly, breast

cancer mortality rates which had increased every year for 25 years, dropped

nearly 8 per cent for all age groups and dropped more than a thirty-three

percent for women ages 25-34 in 1986.

 

The American Cancer Society was founded with the support of the Rockefeller

family in 1913. Members of the chemical and pharmaceutical industry have

long had a place on its board. Could that have something to do with the fact

that the American Cancer Society's latest report on cancer prevention makes

no mention of environmental factors?

www.ssellman.com

 

 

 

 

 

STEVEN RANSOM COMMENTS: While the above article is at pains to point out the

huge amounts of money involved in breast cancer and the link between cancer

and toxicity, nowhere does it mention the fact that the increase in 'cancer

screenings' across the populations is dramatically increasing the numbers of

'supposedly dangerous' cancers being detected. While screenings again are a

very lucrative means of income for the conventional institutes, there is

abundant evidence that a significant percentage of the cancers being

detected may not even progress, if left alone, and will in many instances

disappear completely. This is simply the result of allowing a well-nourished

immune system to do its job effectively - WITHOUT ANY NEED FOR CONVENTIONAL

MEDICAL INTERVENTION.

 

 

For the very latest on false posive diagnoses in breast cancer, how to avoid

them and the vital role of nutrition in cancer prevention, obtain a copy of

Great News on Cancer in the 21st Century at www.credence.org

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> Each year, 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and 44,000

> will die of the disease. The US has one of the highest breast cancer rates

> in the world. Fifty years ago the incidence of Breast Cancer for a woman's

> lifetime risk was one in twenty. Now it has skyrocketed to one in eight.

> Clearly the so-called war on cancer has not even made a dent in the breast

> cancer epidemic as the rates continue to climb at the rate of one per cent

> per year.

 

Back in my grandmothers day they did not examine or even talk about breast

cancer so what the rates were are unknown. It may have been close to

today's. The population has increased so whatever cancer is there will also

increase. The US has a higher rate but also has a higher awareness and

screening rate. How can we possible compare ourselves with countries that

have virtually no screening, exams or public awareness. Women in my

grandmothers time and before did not live long enough to get breast cancer

which strikes menopausal women at a higher rate. Yes someone makes money

just like in MADD or any other " cause " buy I will not judge until all the

facts are in. Donna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Donna,

 

What rubbish, these comments would be called factoids not facts. I am

pretty sure that if you wait till all of the facts are, in that you

will be waiting an awfully long time.

 

Cancer has been around and under scrutiny for thousands of years. The

women in your grandmother's time were very aware of cancer. If

the " cure of cancer " , was the aim of the cancer industry they would

not have put eveyone out of business that showed promise of doing so.

 

I don't know where you get your ideas, but could you back them up

with a few facts, ie. on, not living as long, not being able to

recognize cancer, etc.

 

Most of the information available to people in the popular media are

only the point of view of the moneyied interest involved.

 

If anyone is intersted in a women's grass roots ideas on what is

happening in the world of cancer and breast cancer, I invite all to

view this site at:

 

http://www.bcaction.org/

 

There is a big difference between detection and prevention, between

survival and true cure, and between prevention and risk reduction.

BCA works towards true prevention through understanding and

eliminating the causes of cancer, a true cure with treatments that

don't nearly kill us, and universal access to quality health care.

 

 

regards,

 

Frank

 

 

 

Gettingwell, califpacific wrote:

>

> > Each year, 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer and

44,000

> > will die of the disease. The US has one of the highest breast

cancer rates

> > in the world. Fifty years ago the incidence of Breast Cancer for

a woman's

> > lifetime risk was one in twenty. Now it has skyrocketed to one in

eight.

> > Clearly the so-called war on cancer has not even made a dent in

the breast

********************************************************************

> In Gettingwell, Donna <kuanyin@m...> wrote:

 

> Back in my grandmothers day they did not examine or even talk about

breast

> cancer so what the rates were are unknown. It may have been close to

> today's. The population has increased so whatever cancer is there

will also

> increase. The US has a higher rate but also has a higher awareness

and

> screening rate. How can we possible compare ourselves with

countries that

> have virtually no screening, exams or public awareness. Women in my

> grandmothers time and before did not live long enough to get breast

cancer

> which strikes menopausal women at a higher rate. Yes someone makes

money

> just like in MADD or any other " cause " buy I will not judge until

all the

> facts are in. Donna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The main reason it wasn't a hot topic 60 years ago, is it wasn't

the " epidemic " that it is today.

 

here are some more links of the women that are affected by it, not by

the medical interests involved.

 

http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/

 

http://www.medicalconsumers.org/

 

http://www.mbcc.org/

 

http://www.womenshealthnetwork.org/

 

http://www.bcam.qc.ca/

 

 

F.

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell, " califpacific " <califpacific> wrote:

> Dear Donna,

>

> What rubbish, these comments would be called factoids not facts. I

am

> pretty sure that if you wait till all of the facts are, in that you

> will be waiting an awfully long time.

>

> Cancer has been around and under scrutiny for thousands of years.

The

> women in your grandmother's time were very aware of cancer. If

> the " cure of cancer " , was the aim of the cancer industry they would

> not have put eveyone out of business that showed promise of doing

so.

>

> I don't know where you get your ideas, but could you back them up

> with a few facts, ie. on, not living as long, not being able to

> recognize cancer, etc.

>

> Most of the information available to people in the popular media

are

> only the point of view of the moneyied interest involved.

>

> If anyone is intersted in a women's grass roots ideas on what is

> happening in the world of cancer and breast cancer, I invite all to

> view this site at:

>

> http://www.bcaction.org/

>

> There is a big difference between detection and prevention, between

> survival and true cure, and between prevention and risk reduction.

> BCA works towards true prevention through understanding and

> eliminating the causes of cancer, a true cure with treatments that

> don't nearly kill us, and universal access to quality health care.

>

>

> regards,

>

> Frank

>

>

>

> Gettingwell, califpacific@> wrote:

> >

> > > Each year, 180,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer

and

> 44,000

> > > will die of the disease. The US has one of the highest breast

> cancer rates

> > > in the world. Fifty years ago the incidence of Breast Cancer

for

> a woman's

> > > lifetime risk was one in twenty. Now it has skyrocketed to one

in

> eight.

> > > Clearly the so-called war on cancer has not even made a dent in

> the breast

> ********************************************************************

> > In Gettingwell, Donna <kuanyin@m...> wrote:

>

> > Back in my grandmothers day they did not examine or even talk

about

> breast

> > cancer so what the rates were are unknown. It may have been close

to

> > today's. The population has increased so whatever cancer is there

> will also

> > increase. The US has a higher rate but also has a higher

awareness

> and

> > screening rate. How can we possible compare ourselves with

> countries that

> > have virtually no screening, exams or public awareness. Women in

my

> > grandmothers time and before did not live long enough to get

breast

> cancer

> > which strikes menopausal women at a higher rate. Yes someone

makes

> money

> > just like in MADD or any other " cause " buy I will not judge until

> all the

> > facts are in. Donna

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...