Guest guest Posted September 1, 2001 Report Share Posted September 1, 2001 I asked the soybean board and they said that there was enough sites/info (pro & con) out there that they would just report the studies and other info, and leave the arguing to the other sources. Other " forward " thinking doctors that I get newsletters from have said that the isolated concentrates should be watched, but there is too much positive to ignore. I heard an interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola, and he said basically that everything in this Asian diet thing is exaggerated to soy's side, as they eat alot of iodine rich foods (to counter the thyroid inhibiting effect), eat smaller quantities of soy food (except for the miso, tempeh, and other fermented foods - which don't, supposedly have the same effect), fish, and lots of fruit and veggies. Even in Alternative Medicine magazine, there were two articles of opposite opinion. So, that's a good start Valerie, but maybe I was looking to find a collective inventory of experiences, to see how (if at all) people were affected with potential long term use, and, if not, what (if anything) was unique about their lives/diet to dispel these accusations. Thanks, Steve ----------------------------- Steve, Thing is aside from the genetically-engineered issue, I at least always hope that when it says non-GMO, it actually is.....but I too have read that that is no guarantee. Aside from this there is a lot of negative press on this, including that soy blocks mineral absorption. Of some particular concern is that isoflavone supplements or soy protein act as potent anti-thyroid agents and are capable of suppressing thyroid function, and causing or worsening hypothyroidism. It's another one of those things you have to research, and then decide for yourself, but for me there is just so much negative stuff on this I hear that I would be very PROUD to say I never touch the stuff. Except that I occasionally do, actually. I don't eat meat or poultry and I no longer eat cheese (or almost never), so it is an occasional thing with me, but I would " like " to say I don't eat it. Doc Ian is someone who won't touch soy either, but in his case I " believe " it is mostly because of the GE issue and the fact that it can't be guaranteed. I don't remember where he lies on the other issues. If you do a search in the message archives, you " should " be able to come up with quite a few thoughts on this subject. It's definitely been discussed here before. Also, here are some good links: http://www.soyonlineservice.co.nz/ http://www.rheumatic.org/soy.htm http://thyroid.about.com/library/weekly/aa083099.htm Valerie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 Speaking of Dr. Mercola, that's a great place to do soy searching: http://www.google.com/custom?cof=AH%3Acenter%3BAWFID%3A5cdb2968a482194d%3B & domai\ ns=www.mercola.com & sitesearch=www.mercola.com & q=soy http://www.mercola.com/article/soy/ Must admit that was pretty clever of you to call the soy board, and it's interesting they took that approach. As far as looking for personal experiences from people affected with potential long term use, I'm sorry I can't tell you that. It is true that my thyroid isn't what it should be, but I also know that I don't know what the actual cause is....could be soy, but I think it could be other things too. Or all things. Happy hunting, Valerie --- Steve <bigbird3969 wrote: > I asked the soybean board and they said that there > was enough sites/info (pro & con) out there that > they would just report the studies and other info, > and leave the arguing to the other sources. Other > " forward " thinking doctors that I get newsletters > from have said that the isolated concentrates should > be watched, but there is too much positive to > ignore. I heard an interview with Dr. Joseph > Mercola, and he said basically that everything in > this Asian diet thing is exaggerated to soy's side, > as they eat alot of iodine rich foods (to counter > the thyroid inhibiting effect), eat smaller > quantities of soy food (except for the miso, tempeh, > and other fermented foods - which don't, supposedly > have the same effect), fish, and lots of fruit and > veggies. Even in Alternative Medicine magazine, > there were two articles of opposite opinion. So, > that's a good start Valerie, but maybe I was looking > to find a collective inventory of experiences, to > see how (if at > all) people were affected with potential long term > use, and, if not, what (if anything) was unique > about their lives/diet to dispel these accusations. Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Messenger http://im. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 Dear Steve, Sorry if I rained on your parade - so to speak - as the soy topic is one that should actually NOT be ignored. Much of today's prepared foods contain two ingredients - soy and corn syrup - two of the most genetically engineered foods in the Western World.. Both of these are used to replace other more traditional ingredients. Anyone eating prepared foods is consuming vast quantities of both during a year. Soy is not confined to the vegetarian dishes . Valeries article on the effect that soy has on the thyroid is fascinating. Since the thyroid is the main gland for controling hormones and since america has become a nation of over fat bodies with hormonal problems unlike anything in the past, that was an interesting comment........ Personally, I endeavour to not eat anything that has soy or corn products in its list of ingredients.............Love Penny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 ....and for that reason, do you suggest fermented soy over regular, or just a " blanket' moderation? Steve ----------------------------- I am inclined to agree. I too read the reports of the " damage " that soy does. Working in a health food store, we of course get a LOT of questions. One of the biggest things we see are people who a few years ago didn't know what a soy bean was that are now including it in everything they eat. Most end up with digestive and other problems. In my experience, the key IS digestion. Since we eat so little raw food (soy should NOT be one) we don't seem to have enough digestive enzymes to handle the load and process things the way they should be. Then we run into a variety of ills, even if we don't eat soy. I personally believe that the average person will do fine with moderate amounts of soy provided they use digestive enzymes. As to the GE questions - always go with certified. Being the cynic that I am, however, I believe that the majority of our food sources are GE or contaminated with GE and that this is just one more thing the " powers that be " have managed to keep relatively hidden from us. IMO, Nancy herbal remedies, Jennie <silvermist2@e...> wrote: > Taken in moderation and balanced out by other nutritious foods, I believe soy is a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 I am inclined to agree. I too read the reports of the " damage " that soy does. Working in a health food store, we of course get a LOT of questions. One of the biggest things we see are people who a few years ago didn't know what a soy bean was that are now including it in everything they eat. Most end up with digestive and other problems. In my experience, the key IS digestion. Since we eat so little raw food (soy should NOT be one) we don't seem to have enough digestive enzymes to handle the load and process things the way they should be. Then we run into a variety of ills, even if we don't eat soy. I personally believe that the average person will do fine with moderate amounts of soy provided they use digestive enzymes. As to the GE questions - always go with certified. Being the cynic that I am, however, I believe that the majority of our food sources are GE or contaminated with GE and that this is just one more thing the " powers that be " have managed to keep relatively hidden from us. IMO, Nancy herbal remedies, Jennie <silvermist2@e...> wrote: > Taken in moderation and balanced out by other nutritious foods, I believe soy is a good thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 NEVER MIND... I found it in the one that I just started (I'm on pg. 13, and the article is on 58)! Thanks, and disregard! Steve ----------------------------- Do you know which issue, as I take that magazine, but as with all of my books/magazines (I've got to many), I haven't finished most of them. Steve ----------------------------- It's my opinion that seafood (even if it includes seaweed) is not enough to balance the soy. We need to eat lots of raw organic fruits and vegetables in order to have the enzymes needed for complete digestion. There was an article on sea food for balancing the thyroid in the last " Herbs for Health " magazine that was very interesting, but I left it at the office and can't remember right off hand what all they suggested putting with the sea food other than wild and whole grain rice. It seems like there was an interesting salad that went with it. Jennie Steve wrote: > Thanks; Around here people eat fish for health, but I'm not sure if the thyroid is receiving much protection, for as much seafood that is available around here (mid-Atlantic area), tuna, farm-raised Atlantic salmon, flounder, tilapia, catfish (mostly farm-raised), and then perch, spot, trout are the norm around here. Of course you have the shrimp " gulpers " , but though they are high in iodine, there are other reasons that they are frowned upon (from biblical to health reasons - perse Dr. Mercola in the same interview mentioned earlier); so is seafood enough of a recourse to counteract soy, or do we start eating veggie sushi?? > > Steve > ----------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 It's my opinion that seafood (even if it includes seaweed) is not enough to balance the soy. We need to eat lots of raw organic fruits and vegetables in order to have the enzymes needed for complete digestion. There was an article on sea food for balancing the thyroid in the last " Herbs for Health " magazine that was very interesting, but I left it at the office and can't remember right off hand what all they suggested putting with the sea food other than wild and whole grain rice. It seems like there was an interesting salad that went with it. Jennie Steve wrote: > Thanks; Around here people eat fish for health, but I'm not sure if the thyroid is receiving much protection, for as much seafood that is available around here (mid-Atlantic area), tuna, farm-raised Atlantic salmon, flounder, tilapia, catfish (mostly farm-raised), and then perch, spot, trout are the norm around here. Of course you have the shrimp " gulpers " , but though they are high in iodine, there are other reasons that they are frowned upon (from biblical to health reasons - perse Dr. Mercola in the same interview mentioned earlier); so is seafood enough of a recourse to counteract soy, or do we start eating veggie sushi?? > > Steve > ----------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2001 Report Share Posted September 2, 2001 It was the last one so I guess September. It has a picture of James Duke on the front. I know what you mean. I scan them all and think I'll " read " them later, and never do. Jennie Steve wrote: > Do you know which issue, as I take that magazine, but as with all of my books/magazines (I've got to many), I haven't finished most of them. > > Steve > ----------------------------- > It's my opinion that seafood (even if it includes seaweed) is not enough to balance the soy. We need to eat lots of raw organic fruits and vegetables in order to have the enzymes needed for complete digestion. > There was an article on sea food for balancing the thyroid in the last " Herbs for Health " magazine that was very interesting, but I left it at the office and can't remember right off hand what all they suggested putting with the sea food other than wild and whole grain rice. It seems like there was an interesting salad that went with it. > Jennie > > Steve wrote: > > > Thanks; Around here people eat fish for health, but I'm not sure if the thyroid is receiving much protection, for as much seafood that is available around here (mid-Atlantic area), tuna, farm-raised Atlantic salmon, flounder, tilapia, catfish (mostly farm-raised), and then perch, spot, trout are the norm around here. Of course you have the shrimp " gulpers " , but though they are high in iodine, there are other reasons that they are frowned upon (from biblical to health reasons - perse Dr. Mercola in the same interview mentioned earlier); so is seafood enough of a recourse to counteract soy, or do we start eating veggie sushi?? > > > > Steve > > ----------------------------- > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2001 Report Share Posted September 3, 2001 No, I pretty much tell people what I said on list. We have those who come in and are positively rabid one way or the other so there is not much point discussing it with them. When someone asks, however, what is below is what I tell them. I do find that since becoming primarily vegetarian about 6 months ago, I am getting much better at utilizing the soy but still can't do tons of it nor do I want to. Perhaps it is easier for me because beans were a staple in my diet growing up. I like beans and feel the best when I eat beans, whole grains, fruits and veges and toss in small amounts of soy daily. I can definitely tell the difference when I stray from that diet, both in how I feel and my weight. Eating out is nearly always a challange, and then there are the occasional cravings for junk food, dairy, etc. I really haven't missed meat, though. I do eat fish or chicken 1-2 a month, usually when out. I had gotten to where I just couldn't seem to stomach the meat and had little desire for it. It is important to listen to what our body is telling us. Nancy herbal remedies, " Steve " <bigbird3969@m...> wrote: > ...and for that reason, do you suggest fermented soy over regular, or just a " blanket' moderation? > > Steve > ----------------------------- > I am inclined to agree. I too read the reports of the " damage " that soy does. Working in a health food store, we of course get a LOT of questions. One of the biggest things we see are people who a few years ago didn't know what a soy bean was that are now including it in everything they eat. Most end up with digestive and other problems. In my experience, the key IS digestion. Since we eat so little raw food (soy should NOT be one) we don't seem to have enough digestive enzymes to handle the load and process things the way they should be. Then we run into a variety of ills, even if we don't eat soy. I personally believe that the average person will do fine with moderate amounts of soy provided they use digestive enzymes. As to the GE questions - always go with certified. Being the cynic that I am, however, I believe that the majority of our food sources are GE or contaminated with GE and that this is just one more thing the > " powers that be " have managed to keep relatively hidden from us. IMO, > Nancy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2001 Report Share Posted September 3, 2001 I saw this data in an issue of Nexus magazine a couple of years back. I think that genetically, lots of Asians are more able to digest soy in general. This would also apply to a lot of Slavic people since they had a great infusion of Asian genes in the 1200's. But people of European and African ancestry are prone to having less ability to digest soy, and so should take it only sparingly. The general rule here seems to be that after 2000 years of relative isolation from a food, a tribe loses some ability to digest that food. Another reason why studying Anthropology is essential in nutritional consulting. Fermenting soy does make it easier to digest in most cases. And, particularly with Tempeh, it dramatically improves the flavor. In fact, i have taken Tempeh to a few potluck barbeques out here and have gotten rave reviews for it. Seems like its flavor is very complementary with most barbeque sauces. Definitely we should be eating more seaweeds. As for fish, unfortunately most fish are getting contaminated with mercury and other heavy metals if they're too close to shore. So some authorities are advising caution. Since there is a lot of overfishing these days, being conservative with fish is a good idea anyway. At 06:49 PM 9/1/01 EDT, you wrote: >What do ya'll think of the assertion that soy is the product of an overstocked, powerful lobbyist with nothing to do but slop the hogs/cattle, so they push these studies to let you think that soy is the wonder food, when in actuality, we overconsume (as usual - compared to the Asians), may be damaging our thyroids by not eating more seaweeds and fish, and that the fish, veggies, and FERMENTED soy (ie. miso, tempeh) is what makes the Asians less prone to our diseases? > >Steve > -- Michael Riversong ** Professional Harpist, Educator, and Writer ** RivEdu ** Phone: (307)635-0900 FAX (413)691-0399 http://home.earthlink.net/~mriversong Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.