Guest guest Posted October 6, 2001 Report Share Posted October 6, 2001 Doctors may lack current drug prescribing info By Keith Mulvihill NEW YORK, Apr 12 (Reuters Health) - Doctors may not be prescribing medication based on the most up-to-date dosing information, which could lead to adverse side effects in some patients, a new report warns. " A gap exists in the availability of current and comprehensive dose information for physicians, " according to Dr. Jay S. Cohen of the University of California-San Diego in La Jolla. His findings are published in the April 9th issue of the Archives of Internal Medicine. In his study, Cohen evaluated 48 commonly prescribed drugs and compared the initial dose recommendations that are listed in the reference book, Physicians' Desk Reference (PDR), to lower effective doses sited in the medical literature. The PDR, a comprehensive book that includes prescribing information approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), is " the leading source of drug information for physicians, " the report indicates. The bottom line, Cohen told Reuters Health in an interview, is that " initial recommended doses of drugs that appear in the PDR often prove to be higher than many patients require. " When it comes to prescribing drugs, Cohen notes that " for many types of medications, physicians are frequently advised to use the lowest effective doses of drugs, especially initially. Yet effective low doses [that may be determined in other aspects of the drug testing process] are often omitted from the PDR, even when they have been recommended by expert panels. " As an example, Cohen sites dosage recommendations for estrogen, which was prescribed to roughly 48 million women in 1998. " Estrogen therapy causes a significant [number] of dose-related adverse drug events...and estrogens may promote uterine and, possibly, breast cancer, " the author writes. While " respected drug references and multiple studies indicate as little as 0.3 milligrams per day (mg/d) of estrogens...is adequate for many women, " from 1964 until 1999 the PDR listed the recommended dose as 1.25 mg/d, the researcher points out. " In 2000, the PDR recommendation was finally reduced to 0.625 mg/d, which may still be excessive for many women, " Cohen writes. The company that publishes the reference book notes that the PDR is only allowed to print FDA-approved prescribing information and relies solely on the drug manufacturers to submit updated information, according to Mukesh Mehta, vice president and spokesperson for Medical Economics Company located in Montvale, New Jersey. " The PDR is published once each year and has two updated supplements in June and September. The online version of the PDR--which is identical to the print version--is updated each month, " Mehta told Reuters Health. But if drug manufacturers choose not to send the information to the PDR or doctors do not continually educate themselves about new dosage information, patients may not be receiving optimal care, Cohen explained. SOURCE: Archives of Internal Medicine 2001;161:957-964. NEW from GeoCities - quick and easy web site hosting, just $8.95/month. http://geocities./ps/info1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.