Fwd: [drugawareness] Patients used as drug 'guinea pigs'

[Guest guest]

atracyphd2

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:24:05 EST

[drugawareness] Patients used as drug 'guinea pigs'

 

 

My Groups | drugawareness Main Page

 

Is your own doctor using you as a " guinea pig " in a medical study without

your knowledge and making money for doing so? This shocking info is hot of

the press in the UK where several drug companies are in trouble for doing

exactly that note the highlighted paragraphs below and read this article

before ever stepping into your doctor's office again!

 

This is shockingly similar to the information the United States released in

1993. That was when our government paid out a huge sum to families of people

whose family physicians had been hired by the US government to test plutonium

on people without their knowledge.

 

The family doctor shot plutonium in their patients and would call them in

ever so often for a " check up " to see how they were doing. The families

learned what had happened after the deaths of these people. Suits were filed

and the government had to admit what they did and pay up.

 

It is so frightening to know that medical doctors who are sworn to protect

their patients and our own government would be a party to such practices!! I

guess the next step would be to medicate us all for paranoia, huh?

 

Dr. Ann Blake Tracy, Executive Director,

International Coalition for Drug Awareness

www.drugawareness.org & author of Prozac: Panacea

or Pandora? - Our Serotonin Nightmare (800-280-0730)

 

" An investigation by The Observer has revealed that many doctors are risking

their patients' health by subjecting them to medical trials without their

knowledge. "

 

" Medical fraud experts estimate that one per cent of all drug trials involve

fraud, including failure to get proper consent from patients. This means

hundreds of patients a year are being given unapproved and potentially

dangerous drugs without their knowledge. "

 

" GlaxoSmithKline was using Adams to study its anti-depressant Paroxetine, but

had to cancel the trial at a cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds. "

 

" She was astonished to discover that her trusted GP had been using her as a

guinea pig by giving her tablets which had not been medically approved. Worse

still, he was being paid to do so by a pharmaceutical company. "

 

 

http://www.observer.co.uk/politics/story/0,6903,891938,00.html

 

Patients used as drug 'guinea pigs'

 

Firms pay out millions to doctors to test medicines

 

Antony Barnett, public affairs editor

Sunday February 9, 2003

<A HREF= " http://www.observer.co.uk/ " >The Observer</A>

 

When Italia Sudano went for a check-up with her GP, Dr Robert Adams, she was

in good health. Her husband had died a few months earlier and her blood

pressure was a little high.

 

Yet nothing could have prepared Sudano, 72, for the nightmare that was to

follow and the discovery of a trail of greed and fraud that went right to the

heart of the medical profession.

 

She was astonished to discover that her trusted GP had been using her as a

guinea pig by giving her tablets which had not been medically approved. Worse

still, he was being paid to do so by a pharmaceutical company.

 

An investigation by The Observer has revealed that many doctors are risking

their patients' health by subjecting them to medical trials without their

knowledge.

 

Sudano's ordeal began when Adams took a blood test and asked her to return

the next week. She had been living at Letchworth in Hertfordshire since

arriving from Italy 50 years earlier and she trusted British doctors.

 

Over the next few weeks Adams asked Sudano to return for more blood tests. By

the end of the second month her arms were black and blue. Her son, Joe, said

they looked as though they had been slammed in a door. She said: 'At one

point I asked if he was selling my blood.'

 

Little did Sudano know how close to the truth her comment was. On her last

visit, Adams took a bottle of pills from the top drawer of his desk and

suggested Sudano take one a day. While she thought it strange she wasn't

being given a prescription, she trusted her doctor.

 

But within hours of swallowing the pill, she could hardly walk because she

was so dazed. Her face had swollen up badly and she was in considerable pain.

 

 

She stopped taking the tablets and complained to Hertfordshire Health

Authority. This sparked an investigation that led to one of the largest cases

of medical research fraud ever uncovered in Britain.

 

It emerged that over the previous five years Adams had earned more than

£100,000 from drug companies, including the European giants AstraZeneca,

GlaxoSmithKline and Bayer. They were all paying him to test their new drugs

on his patients. Like Sudano, many of his patients had never given their

consent and had no knowledge they were being used as human guinea pigs in a

medical trial. Patients with no symptoms were given drugs and others who

needed proper medication were given placebos. Adams was receiving almost

£1,000 for each patient.

 

Last month Adams was found guilty by the General Medical Council (GMC) of

serious professional misconduct and suspended for 12 months. The GMC's lawyer

described it as 'assault' and Sudano is now looking to sue Adams.

 

GlaxoSmithKline was using Adams to study its anti-depressant Paroxetine, but

had to cancel the trial at a cost of hundreds of thousands of pounds.

 

The drugs industry talks of bad apples and the odd errant doctor milking the

system but insists that trials using GPs are essential for medical advances

and that payment to doctors for the extra work involved is ethically correct.

 

 

But an investigation by The Observer suggests the problem of GPs using

patients as guinea pigs without their consent is more widespread. Some 3,000

doctors each year are paid by drug firms to sign up their patients to tests

and on average 15 patients are needed for each trial. With doctors picking up

£1,000 per patient, drug companies are spending £45m on getting doctors

onside. There is no suggestion the companies are implicated in moves to carry

out the tests by doctors on patients secretly.

 

Medical fraud experts estimate that one per cent of all drug trials involve

fraud, including failure to get proper consent from patients. This means

hundreds of patients a year are being given unapproved and potentially

dangerous drugs without their knowledge.

 

The Observer has discovered that in the last five years the GMC has taken

action in a dozen cases involving GPs undertaking fraudulent research.

Examples include:

 

· Dr Vasu Agrawal from Chigwell, Essex, removed samples of womb from

menopausal women as part of a trial into a new hormone replacement drug

called Divina Nova. Agrawal failed to tell the women they were testing a drug

that could have serious side-effects. Agrawal, who forged signatures on

consent forms, received almost £6,000 from Orion Pharma International.

 

· Dr Paul Chima from Edinburgh is estimated to have received more than

£200,000 from a range of pharmaceutical companies for testing their new drugs

for angina, asthma, high blood pressure and depression. He failed to warn

patients of possible side-effects and offered one a £2,000 bribe not to give

evidence against him.

 

· Dr James Boschler from south London was given £22,500 from Bayer and Solvay

Healthcare. He claimed to have signed up 36 patients, but 25 of the consent

forms were discovered to be forgeries.

 

The country's foremost investigator of medical research fraud is Peter Jay,

the former Metropolitan Police detective chief inspector who arrested serial

killer Dennis Nilsen. Since 1996 Jay has run MedicoLegal Investigations, an

independent body, and has taken 12 doctors to the GMC.

 

Jay is investigating six further cases, including one involving a GP in

Manchester. Dr Mark Northfield is alleged not to have obtained consent from

patients for entering them into trials to test drugs manufactured by Bayer

and Roche to treat high blood pressure and heart problems. Northfield is

contesting the allegations before the GMC professional conduct committee.

 

Jay said: 'While the industry has become more alert to the problems over the

last decade there is still clearly a worrying and persistent problem in

research fraud involving doctors. This is not just an issue of patient

safety, but a problem that might lead to bad drugs being approved or good

drugs failing to be approved.'

 

The Observer's revelations of the continuing problem of research fraud have

sparked calls for industry guidelines to be toughened up. David Hinchcliffe,

the Labour chair of the House of Commons Health Select Committee, described

the situation as bordering on 'scandalous' and said his committee would look

into the issue.

 

He said: 'The relationship between the drug firms and the medical profession

is one that needs to be thoroughly investigated. It is extremely worrying

that patients' trust is being abused by doctors who are more interested in

making money from the pharmaceutical industry.'

 

Dr Evan Harris, health spokesman for the Liberal Democrats, suggested that

doctors involved in trials should be subject to on-the-spot inspections and

that a patient's consent to take part in a drug trial should be given outside

the GP's surgery, for example to a research officer acting for the firm.

 

Additional research by Charlotte Coulon

 

<A

HREF= " %20antony.barnett " >antony.barnett</A>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

Send Flowers for Valentine's Day