Guest guest Posted February 14, 2003 Report Share Posted February 14, 2003 :Fri, 14 Feb 2003 16:03:34 GMT califpacific ISIS Submission to GM Science Review #1 press-release BODY { MARGIN: 20px 0px 0px}LI { LIST-STYLE-POSITION: outside; FONT: 10pt/12pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}UL { LIST-STYLE-POSITION: outside; FONT: 10pt/12pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}OL { FONT: 10pt/12pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}P { FONT: 10pt/12pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}B { FONT: bold 10pt/12pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}H1 { FONT: 16pt/18pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}H2 { FONT: 16pt/18pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}H3 { PADDING-RIGHT: 1px; PADDING-LEFT: 1px; BACKGROUND: #ccffcc; PADDING-BOTTOM: 1px; FONT: 12pt/14pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; PADDING-TOP: 1px}H4 { FONT: bold 11pt/11pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}HR { COLOR: green}TH { BACKGROUND: #ccffcc; FONT: bold 11pt/11pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}TD { FONT: 10pt/10pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}.small { FONT: 8pt/10pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}.smallbold { FONT: bold 8pt/10pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif}.smallboldwhite { FONT: bold 8pt/10pt verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; COLOR: #ffffff} ISIS’ Submission to GM Science Review #1 ISIS’ Reply to ACRE’s Response on Chardon LL (Revised & Updated) 7 February 2003 By Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Director, Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London NW1 0XR, UK. An earlier version of our paper was submitted to the GMScience Review website (http://www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk) on Jan. 16, but we heard nothing. So, Dr. Ho e-mailed the submission again on Jan. 24, explaining that she was asked by Chief Scientist David King to make a contribution, and was anxious to comply. The GM Science Review Secretariat acknowledged the contribution on January 30; but a letter to her from Adrian Butt of the Secretariat dated February 4 rejected the contribution on grounds that she was criticising the scientists, and asked her to resubmit a version with the introductory paragraphs edited out. She consulted with local groups and other scientists and decided to resubmit an edited, updated version with the following covering letter, addressed to Adrian Butt. Dear Dr. Adrian Butt, Thank you for your letter dated 4 February rejecting ISIS’ contribution to the GM Science Review on grounds that " with the language that has been used in a few places " , in particular, " the introductory paragraphs " , I have criticised not the science but the scientists, and therefore " it fails to meet the terms of entry " . I have consulted widely with local groups and other scientists, and they are unanimous in their agreement over the validity of, and justification for my remarks. In particular, my opening paragraph cites statements that were actually made by pro-biotech scientists against a colleague who is trying to draw attention to evidence of hazards that they have ignored. Many independent scientists including myself have been trying to do the same, and have received similar treatments and worse. So it is merely a case of putting the mirror back on those who have criticised us. As to the language I used, it is far more moderate than what has been said in print and in the popular media by a number of scientists on the Science Review panel against some of us on many occasions. Those whom I have consulted are strongly divided as to whether I should edit ISIS’ contribution and re-submit. I have given the matter due consideration, and decided to do so in the interest of getting the scientific arguments properly aired. But in the interest of fair play, I must transmit the request made by those I have consulted, that members of the Science Review Panel should stop criticising and vilifying independent scientists who challenge their pronouncement that " there is no evidence of harm " . Yours sincerely, Dr. Mae-Wan Ho Institute of Science in Society The full document is now posted on the GM Science website http://www.gmsciencedebate.org.uk and also on ISIS’ website. If you would prefer to receive future mailings as plain text please let us know. If you would like to be removed from our mailing list - please reply to press-release with the word in the subject field The Institute of Science in Society, PO Box 32097, London NW1 OXR telephone: [44 20 8731 7714] [44 20 7383 3376] [44 20 7272 5636] General Enquiries sam - Website/Mailing List press-release - ISIS Director m.w.ho MATERIAL IN THIS EMAIL MAY BE REPRODUCED IN ANY FORM WITHOUT PERMISSION, ON CONDITION THAT IT IS ACCREDITED ACCORDINGLY AND CONTAINS A LINK TO http://www.i-sis.org.uk/ Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Send Flowers for Valentine's Day Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.