Fwd: Background: Diane Booth - Please assist!

[Guest guest]

Sun, 02 Mar 2003 13:33:50 -0500

Background: Diane Booth - Please assist!

 

 

" Custody Relinquishment² for ³Essential² Psychiatric Treatment:

Surpassing Stalin, Gaining on Hitler!

 

by Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD 9/25/02

 

³Relinquishing custody: The Tragic Result of Failure to Meet Children¹s Mental

Health Needs.² (A Report by the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, 1101

Fifteenth Street, NW, Suite 1212, Washington, DC 20005). Nowhere is the ³big

lie² better exemplified than in the title of this report, or than in the

proposition of ³Relinquishing Custody.² The ³big lie² of psychiatry and of all

that is mental health is that they diagnose and treat actual diseases, and that

the children (in this case) and adults said to have ³mental health needs² have

actual diseases for which, without ³custody relinquishment² they would yet have

unmet mental health needs, just as would the epileptic child deprived of an

anticonvulsant medication, just as the diabetic child without insulin, just as

child with acute appendicitis without access to surgery. The pristine, pure

Œbig lie¹ of psychiatry and mental health is that all that we hold to be normal,

but negative, emotions, disruptive behaviors and all of the 350-odd entries (and

growing) in the DSM of the American Psychiatric Association, are actual disease;

diseases in a medical/surgical sense, having, as diseases must confirming,

characteristic, objective abnormalities to identify them as such. None of them

do. Not one. Nor have they come to this point of calling them diseases, by any

scientific route, such as that of the piece-meal process pertaining to medical

diseases that begins, in every instance, with the discovery, in nature; in a

patient of he confirming, characteristic abnormality that is the new disease.

Rather the ³biological² psychiatry they have arrived at today is the product of

a contrived, pre-planned scheme to pervert the language of science and medicine

to their own ends, referring, un-failingly to all such contrivances, and painful

emotions and behaviors as diseases, just as if they were, until the public,

trusting fools they, had come to believe there every word. And that is where we

are today. Ands the extent to which they‹psychiatry/mental health in collusion

with Big Pharma and Big Government tyrannize us with this fraud is nowhere more

evident than in a study of what is euphemistically called ³Relinquishing

custody.² In actuality, it is kidnapping by the state, for a preferred

industry: the psychiatric/pharmaceutical cartel.

 

This Report is dated March, 2000. Every American, every civil libertarian

should have a copy. Just as is always my aim, I will try to serve as

translator of biopsychiatry-speak for those not speaking or understanding their

language, which means everyone with a need and right to know.

 

In the Executive Summary, p1: ³Parents should never be asked to choose between

getting mental health treatment for their child and retaining legal custody of

the child. Yet for at least 20 years they have been asked to do just that.

Today, in half of the states almost one in four families seeking mental health

care for a child face such an inhumane choice.²

 

The Psychpharm cartel, necessarily, in collusion with government at all levels

has been doing this since 1980. They claim (1) that children with the likes of

ADD, CD, OCD, BD, ODD‹DSM psychiatric diagnose--have actual diseases. They

claim (2) that these ³diseases² ³need²/require ³necessary² treatment, i.e.,

psychiatrists and drugs. Further, they claim that if parents cannot afford them

such ³needed²/²necessary² treatment, and that such treatment can only be gotten

for the child by a government or government-affiliated payer scheme (such as

Medicaid) that requires that the child be a ward of the state, then, the only

responsible thing for the simply-biologic parent to do, would be to relinquish

custody, so that the payer is on line who can pay those who utilized the billing

bible of mental health/psychiatry‹the DSM‹and who prescribe the

psychopharmaceuticals always-to-be prescribed.

 

My reader should be aware here, and in reading anything whatsoever pertaining

to psychiatry and psychopharmaceuticals, that were it not for presumption of

³diseases² which is never, ever, once justified in psychiatry, their could be no

medical-speak, no doctor-speak‹we would be speaking only of normal human beings

and of their humane care and nurturing. Without the presumption of disease, we

would be talking of a tyrannical state kidnapping children and drugging those

normal children. Are you with meŠit is real quite easy once you understand how

brazen and total the deception, beyond anything you might imagine physicians

capable of.

 

Further all of this business of ³Custody Relinquishment² plays out in our

courts. The term relinquishment implies, voluntary, not the product of

deception or coercion, rather the product of informed consentŠwholly knowing,

understanding, voluntary, in the best interests of the child, for the absolutely

necessary treatment of his real, serious, terrible mental/psychiatric disease.

But it all starts and ends with the lie that the child is abnormal/diseased,

with rank deception, with not just psychiatry but all of medicine participating

in today, not just lying to patients and families to make patients of normals,

but taking them away from parents/families, capturing them, labeling and

drugging them no end, for profit, enslaving them, all of it beginning and

persisting through their lives a patients‹patients who were normal when

targeted, but distinctly abnormal/diseased/intoxicated once drugged with drugs

that like all drugs are poisons. The difference here is that these are

preferential brain toxins. This is 1984, and ³Brave New World as never before

and going on since 1980; happening to ³one in four families seeking mental

health care for a child.²

 

What about this ³one in four families seeking mental health care for a child.²

The child was invariably seen as the normal child he/she was when sent down the

path to the government school kindergarten, but was then ³fingered² for mental

health not by the parents, not by the family, but by those supposed to

discipline them, render them literate and educate them‹who do none of these

things. Rather they have become the patient capture apparatus, all of them

deputy brain diagnosticians. Give me a breakŠit is not the families that come

seeking mental health care for their children, it is this tyranny, very much a

tyranny of the state. What¹s more this abomination, this crime of kidnapping

(for there is no disease, never was, never will be), this crime them call

³custody relinquishment² is never justified because it is never for a real

disease. This sort of thing does not go on in general pediatrics, neurology,

medicine, or family practice, having to do with bona fide medical and surgical

diseasesŠvirtually never.

 

Doubt me? Read on¹

 

P 1 ³For example, when Rebecca E.'s husband got a job, the family¹s income rose

above the limit for Medicaid. Rebecca had to relinquish custody of her

daughter, Ginny, to the child welfare system so Ginny could continue receiving

the mental health services she needed.² All we have to do, all we had better

begin to do, is read between the lines: ³Rebecca had to relinquish custody of

her daughterŠ², ³ so Ginny could continue receiving the mental health services

she needed² (required). There is no disease, there is a never disease, custody

is never relinquished, the children are being stolen/kidnapped, there is never,

legitimate medical care, there is never informed consent.

 

P2: ³Erroneous interpretation of the federal Foster Care and Adoption Assistance

Program (Title IV-E creates a fiscal incentive for custody relinquishment. The

law reimburses some of the costs of care when children are removed from their

parent¹s home.² ³Many state officials and judges mistakenly assume that the

child welfare system must have custody of the child to access the federal

dollars.² Dollars to treat the fraudulent, non-existent diseases of

psychiatryŠisn¹t that sweet.

 

P 3: ³The Oregon law, passed in November 1993, bans custody relinquishment

³when the sole reason for the placement is the need to obtain services for the

child¹s emotional, behavioral or mental disorder or physical disability.² It

establishes a voluntary placement, supervised by the juvenile court.²

 

Isn¹t that heartening, one state not participating the stealing/kidnapping of

children, for psychopharmaceutical/mental health profit‹one state! ³It

establishes a voluntary placement, supervised by the juvenile court.² One

wonders, how voluntary, how valid the informed consent, how many mentions of

psychiatric diagnoses as illnesses, diseases, thwarting all informed consent, as

all informed consent throughout psychiatry/mental health is thwarted/abrogated.

Without the disease lie, they would not exist today--biological psychiatry.

 

P 7: ³For example, a 1989 report by the Research and Training Center on Family

Support and Children¹s Mental Health indicated that 25 percent of parent of

children with serious emotional disorders had received suggestions that they

relinquish custody (Focal Point, 1989). Ten years later, the National Alliance

for the Mentally Ill released the results of its survey of parent of children

with behavioral disorders (by which they mean diseases), finding that 23 percent

had been told that they needed to relinquish custody to get intensive mental

health services for their children and that 20 percent had actually done

so(Families on the Brink: The Impact of Ignoring Children with Serious Mental

Illness (by which they mean disease), 1999).²

 

³23 percent had been told that they needed to relinquish custody². When court

ordered to surrender their child to the state, is that ³custody relinquishment²?

When one and all are told, in so many words that their children have a brain

disease due to a chemical imbalance of the brain, their informed consent rights

have been abrogated, and any relinquishment of custody pursuant thereto would

have to be considered null and void.

 

Think of the magnitude of the fraud to ³steal² the children, for profit, to

support the entire, bloated psycho-drugging empire/enterprise.

 

A sidebar on the same page states: ³It is hard to imagine a more painful dilemma

for a parent: the treatment your child desperately needs is available, but only

if you relinquish custody and turn the child over to the state child welfare

agency.²

 

Desperately needs for his/her ³disease². Here again is the lynch-pin of it all:

the ³disease² when there is no disease‹when there is never a disease, when the

children are normal.

 

P 10, sidebar: ³Terry is a 16-year-old with severe attention deficit and

hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). (ADHD has never been proved to be a disease, an

abnormality within any part of the child; representations by any physician that

it is a disease, is fraud). Her mother, Barbara called the police because Terry

kicked a two-foot hole in the wall. Terry also had problems in school (as if

kicking a hole in the wall and school problems were ever a disease) and the

school was calling Barbara daily (insisting on one diagnosis or another, usually

ADHD, and often a drug as well) .² Over time, Terry¹s behavior escalated and

several psychiatric hospitalizations followed. Each time, Barbara was told that

no mental health services were available to her in the community. Desperate,

she turned to the child welfare system and gave up custody in the hope of

finally getting services. (would it not have been interesting to be a fly on the

wall as Barbara¹s ³giving up custody² was taking place). Terry continued to

have frequent hospitalizations, but Barbara was no longer able to make any

decisions about her medical care. Yet she had to attend so many meetings and

appointments required by the child welfare system that she lost her job and with

it, the family health insurance.²

 

If you think for a minute this is the delivery of essential health care, of

anything remotely resembling health care, you are tragically mistaken; what it

is tyranny‹preying upon and destroying, first, the previously medically,

physically normal child, and then the familyŠlikely the entire family.

 

P 10: ³Advocates also report that in some states, residential treatment

providers refuse to serve Medicaid-eligible children unless custody is

relinquished.² Just when you thought it couldn¹t get uglier.

 

P 13: ³ Judges often commit a child to the custody of a state agency, even when

state authorities argue that transfer is not necessary. Sadly, courts often

believe that custody relinquishment is the only way to assure that children get

help (always in the name of help) because the state is clearly required to

provide treatment for all children in its custody.²

 

³Yet fiscal incentive in child welfare still favor out of home placement over

family preservation or support services that can help families to raise their

children at home. The IV-E entitlement funding for out of home placement far

exceeds the small family preservation grants.²

 

Diane Booth had the audacity to disagree with the public school diagnosticians

and had her son Vincent, then 6, kidnapped from her by the state of California,

kidnapped and then poisoned/drugged. Diane is a refugee in Canada, having had

notion that she should flee with Vincent to Canada to rescue him from danger of

imminent harm and that what she was doing is in his best interests. Turns out,

Diane was correct, because Vincent developed serious drug-induced tics from the

Ritalin forced upon him. If that wasn't bad enough, he was physically abused and

sodomized in a child's prison. The state of California has seen fit, according

to the amoral psychiatry industry, the DSM and the pharmaceutical industry to

keep Diane and all of her family, and all of Vincent¹s family from ever seeing

him again. This, mind you is a case study in what psychiatry and the government

have come, harmoniously to call " custody relinquishment " . Diane the mother is

still a refugee in Canada, and Vincent is still being tortured, if he is even

still alive, in a " Level 14 " facility. No one has seen or heard from him since,

and Diane and her attorney are seriously beginning to doubt that Vincent is

still alive. Why else would the State of California go to such lengths to cover

up his location and to prevent him from contacting anyone in his biological

family or to see Diane's attorney?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc.

 

To , e-mail to: Gettingwell-

Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell

 

 

 

 

Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, and more