Guest guest Posted April 11, 2003 Report Share Posted April 11, 2003 WDDTY e-News <e-news wrote: " WDDTY e-News " WDDTY e-News Service - 03 April 2003 Thu, 3 Apr 2003 15:56:52 +0100 WHAT DOCTORS DON’T TELL YOU - E-NEWS BROADCAST No.29 - 03 Apr 03 Please feel free to email this broadcast to any friends you feel would appreciate receiving it. VACCINATIONS: The State versus mothers, part 496 Vaccinating your child is not compulsory in the UK—but the State likes to force the arm of recalcitrant parents whenever it has the chance. Cases we’ve reported in past issues of What Doctors Don’t Tell You haven’t made for easy reading. Doctors, aided by a police escort, have forced their way into homes, and given a vaccination to the child while restraining the mother, while, in one case we championed and raised funds for a legal challenge, the parents were forced into a special care home until they saw the sense of vaccination. Now we’ve been alerted about another distressing case, and it’s one that needs your immediate help and support. It concerns a British student midwife who is separated from her husband, and father of her child. She decided not to vaccinate the child, but her estranged husband took her to court over her ban on vaccinations, even though she was awarded full custody. Nobody at the time could believe that the husband, who is not British, could possibly win his case, considering she has full custody, that her ex-husband is not British, and that this country does not mandate vaccines. The draft judgment was passed in the last couple of days, giving the mother three months to take her child to a pediatric registrar to update all vaccines recommended by the UK government, at a set schedule. If you think this is bad, read on, it gets worse. The case was pooled; another family, involving a 12-year-old girl, received the same verdict. WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THIS COUNTRY? Two mothers who refused to allow the injection of various poisons which could possibly result in severe side effects, such as severe diarrhea, encephalitis, anorexia,anaphylaxis, arthritis, febrile convulsions, seizures,Guillain-Barré-Syndrome, encephalopathy, SSPE, or death (all these according to package inserts from vaccine manufacturers), are refused by a family court to execute their duties as responsible adults and loving, caring mothers. The Court will not accept expert witnesses who reside outside the UK if an appeal takes place. If you are resident in the UK and an expert in this field, or can give legal advice, please urgently contact justice. And if you are a resident in the UK, then please write to your MP, to Tony Blair, to the House of Lords, to voice your concerns over the way these two mothers are treated by our justice system. NEW DRUGS FOR OLD: When to say ‘no’ to your GP Zealous readers of our book Secrets of the Drugs Industry (we’ll be asking questions at the end) will know to be very wary if your GP suddenly prescribes for you a different drug. Chances are that it’s a new, untested drug, and you may even have been unwittingly conscripted into a drug trial. One such case came to light the other day. Dr Robert Macindoe Adams, who practised in Hertfordshire, enrolled 12 of his patients into drug trials without their consent, and even overstated the symptoms of two of them to make them eligible for the trial. One patient became suspicious after she was enrolled in a trial of the calcium channel blocker lercanidipine. She expressed concern about the sudden change of prescription, and the numerous times that Adams was taking blood samples. In his response, Adams failed to mention that she was taking the new drug. Adams was suspended for 12 months by a panel hearing of the General Medical Council, although his counsel says he is no longer practising. Interestingly, nothing was mentioned about the financial sums involved in recruiting ‘volunteers’ to new drug trials, but it’s been estimated at around £3,000 per person. Dr Adams’s recruitment campaign was modest compared with some doctors who carry on this iniquitous practice without ever being found out. Perhaps their patients never read Secrets of the Drugs Industry. (Source: British Medical Journal, 2003; 326: 304). · To order your copy of Secrets of the Drugs Industry, visit our website: http://www.wddty.co.uk/shop/details.asp?product=341 A SCARE THAT TAKES THE BISCUIT: Now snacks don’t cause cancer You may remember last year’s health scare number 3,267 which found a link between snack foods such as chips, biscuits and crisps and cancer. These snack foods have high levels of acrylamide, a suspected carcinogen that forms during the baking process. Acrylamide was recognized as a carcinogen in 1994 following animal studies. Once the discovery was made, American researchers immediately came out with the estimate of 3,000 new cases of cancer a year being caused by these snack foods. The snacks were especially blamed for causing cancer of the large bowel, bladder and kidney. Now Swedish researchers have turned these findings on their head. They compared the diets of 987 patients with cancers of the large bowel, bladder and kidney with those of 538 healthy people——and they could find no association at all with these snack foods. So can you get out the biscuit tin in celebration? Well, these foods are pretty bad for you, anyway, but perhaps cancer is one thing they don’t cause after all. (Source: British Journal of Cancer, 2003; 88: 84-9). SLINGS AND ARROWS: Mother was right after all (or: Mother 1, Doctor 0) More and more young mothers are replacing the conventional pram or pushchair for the baby sling. There’s plenty of evidence to show that the close, tactile connection between mother and baby is healthy and beneficial (probably for both parties). But the practice has had doctors worried. They are concerned that babies are not able to breathe properly, especially if he is facing towards the mother, and it may be particularly dangerous if the baby was premature. So, ignoring the instincts of the mothers, doctors decided to test if the baby was in danger. They monitored the health and well-being of 24 pre-term and 12 term babies while in a sling and in a pram. Not surprisingly, they could find no difference at all, except that babies in a pram were missing out on the closeness and comfort of the mother. (Source: Pediatrics, 2002; 110: 879-83). READERS’ CORNER Methotrexate: Our previous Enews broadcast mentioned the dangers of using methotrexate, an anti-cancer agent, for treating rheumatoid arthritis. One of the problems was the peculiar dosage: up to 30mg once a week. Some elderly patients were taking the dosage once a day. One reader, a retired pharmacist, adds to the confusion by pointing out that methotrexate is available only as a 2.5mg and 10mg tablet. And it gets curiouser and curiouser. The dosage recommended in the British Formulary is from 7.5mg to 20mg a week for arthritis treatment. Is this one more example of a miscommunication between drug manufacturers and doctors with the patient, yet again, at the sharp end? We feel we should be told. Listen to Lynne On the radio: Hear Lynne McTaggart on Passion the new DAB Digital Radio Station focusing on your health and your environment – http://www.wddty.co.uk/passion_main.asp. On demand: Select and listen to any of Lynne's archived broadcasts on Passion - http://www.wddty.co.uk/passion_archive.asp. Help us spread the word If you can think of a friend or acquaintance who would like a FREE copy of What Doctors Don’t Tell You, please forward their name and address to: info. Please forward this e-news on to anyone you feel may be interested,they can free by clicking on the followinglink: http://www.wddty.co.uk/e-news.asp. Thank you. ============================================================== Gettingwell- / Vitamins, Herbs, Aminos, etc. To , e-mail to: Gettingwell- Or, go to our group site: Gettingwell Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.