HORMONE HERESY- Oestrogen's Deadly Truth 1/2

[Guest guest]

http://www.nexusmagazine.com/articles/hormone1.html

 

 

HORMONE HERESY

- Oestrogen's Deadly Truth -

Part 1

Women are misinformed about their hormones, to the detriment of their

health, while drug companies reap huge profits at their expense.

 

----------

----

 

Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 3, #4 (June-July '96).

PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia. nexus

Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381

From our web page at: http://www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/

 

© 1996 by Sherrill Sellman

Light Unlimited

Locked Bag 8000 - MDC

Kew, Victoria 3101, Australia

Telephone +61 (0)3 9810 9591

Fax: +61 (0)3 9855 9991

E-mail:golight

 

 

----------

----

 

For over 300 years, beginning in the 13th century and continuing well into

the 16th century, the Inquisition was a reign of terror for the vast

majority of people living throughout Europe and Scandinavia. The political,

economic and religious forces of that time joined together to consolidate

their power by eliminating those whom they perceived as impeding their

ultimate objectives.

 

The unfortunate target of their efforts were the keepers of the healing arts

and the ancient spiritual and cultural wisdoms. Historians debate the exact

toll of such a hellish time-whether it was several hundreds of thousands or

as many as nine million people-but what is undebatable is that the vast

majority of the victims were women. In fact, the Inquisition is now regarded

as a period of genocide against women, which successfully divested women of

their power, self-respect, wealth, healing arts, and prominence and

influence in their communities.

 

The Inquisition guaranteed that the Church fathers were the indisputable

spiritual authorities. It was also successful in enshrining medical

knowledge securely in the realm of men, since the Inquisition decreed that

only trained medical doctors could now practise the healing arts and,

needless to say, medical schools were barred to women (for that matter, so

was any form of education).

 

What a relief that such a violent and misogynous era ended long ago. Or did

it? Unfortunately, it appears that some traditions linger on. Women of today

are still prey to vast political and economic interests, with dire

consequences to their health, financial independence and personal power.

Perhaps the Inquisition didn't end at all but just took on a more subtle and

devious form.

 

Women are certainly big business to the medical and pharmaceutical

interests. According to John Archer, author of Bad Medicine, about 600,000

hysterectomies are performed every year in the USA, and about 45,000 in

Australia.1 In 1994, it was estimated that 45,000 Australian women were

taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT).2 Many women are presently

encouraged to remain on HRT for the rest of their post-menopausal lives.

 

According to Dr Stanley West, noted infertility specialist, chief of

reproductive endocrinology at St Vincent's Hospital, New York, and author of

The Hysterectomy Hoax, about 90 per cent of all hysterectomies are

unnecessary. Gynaecological consultants to Ralph Nader's Public Health

Research Group reached a similar conclusion in 1991 in their book, Women's

Health Alert. According to Dr West, the only 100-per-cent-appropriate reason

for performing an hysterectomy is for treating cancer of the reproductive

organs.3 However, hysterectomies are all too frequently offered as treatment

for a variety of conditions including endometriosis, fibroids, ovarian

cysts, pelvic inflammatory disease and uterine prolapse.

 

It is no accident that gynaecologists happen to be the highest earners of

all specialists. Throughout their lives, women are encouraged to be

subjected continuously to various medical treatments and procedures. Natural

female functions, from menstruation through childbirth and into menopause,

are taken over by medical and pharmaceutical interventions. Barraged by

misinformation, myths, propaganda and, in some cases, downright lies, it's

no wonder that so many women are thoroughly confused about matters relating

to their own bodies and their health.

 

The History of Hormone Replacement Therapy

Perhaps there's no topic of greater confusion to women than the highly

publicised introduction of HRT for the menopausal woman. It is touted as the

best thing for liberating women since the discovery of oral

contraceptives-even though the statistics now show that the wide use of the

Pill has given rise to health hazards such as breast cancer, high

blood-pressure and cardiovascular disease on a scale previously unknown in

medicine.4

 

Investigation into the theory of hormone replacement goes all the way back

to the 1930s with the research of Dr Serge Voronoff. His research involved

implanting fresh monkey's testicles into men's scrotums, with limited

effectiveness. Offshoots of his research led to the grafting of monkey

ovaries in women, with rather dire consequences. After several fatalities

(to both monkeys and women), the search was redirected to the use of

synthetic oestrogen. With the advent of World War II, research was put on

hold.

 

Menopause didn't really come into vogue as a topic of concern for the

medical profession until the 1960s. In 1966 a New York gynaecologist, Dr

Robert Wilson, wrote a best-seller called Feminine Forever, extolling the

virtues of oestrogen replacement to save women from the " tragedy of

menopause which often destroys her character as well as her health " . His

book sold over 100,000 copies in the first year. Wilson energetically

promoted menopause as a condition of " living decay " . According to him,

oestrogen replacement was a kind of long-sought-after youth pill that would

save poor, fading women from the horrors of age. He popularised the

erroneous belief that menopause is a deficiency disease.

 

Women's magazines eagerly seized upon his ideas and extensively promoted his

concepts. This pleased Wilson no end, since he had earlier set up The Wilson

Foundation for the sole purpose of promoting the use of oestrogen drugs. The

pharmaceutical industry generously contributed over US$1.3 million to his

Foundation. Each year he received funds from such companies as Searle,

Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories and Upjohn which made hormone products that Wilson

claimed were effective in treating and preventing menopause. Pharmaceutical

companies jumped on the bandwagon with aggressive promotions and advertising

campaigns. His message hit a receptive chord: mid-life women need hormone

drugs to be rescued from the inevitable horrors and decrepitude of this

terrible deficiency disease called menopause.

 

Wilson pioneered the use of unopposed oestrogen. However, there had been no

formal assessment of the safety of oestrogen therapy or its long-term

effects. Unopposed oestrogen went out of vogue when it became obviously

apparent that it shortened the lifetime of its users. In 1975, The New

England Journal of Medicine examined the rates of endometrial cancer for

oestrogen consumers, concluding that the risk was seven-and-a-half times

greater for oestrogen users. Women who had used oestrogen for seven years or

longer were 14 times more likely to develop cancer.5

 

As the popularity of unopposed oestrogen therapy waned, new approaches were

sought. The focus was also directed away from the false claims of preserving

feminine beauty and youthfulness and towards more urgent health matters. The

pharmaceutical industry resurrected oestrogen replacement therapy with the

new 'safe' hormone replacement therapy-a combination of synthetic

progesterone and oestrogen which would supposedly protect menopausal women

not only from cardiovascular disease but also from the ravages of

osteoporosis.

 

While the so-called 'experts' on women's health are reassuring women that

there are no, or at least only very minor, unpleasant side-effects, Dr

Lynette J. Dumble, Senior Research Fellow at the University of Melbourne's

Department of Surgery at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, believes that " the

sole basis of HRT is to create a commercial market that is highly profitable

for the pharmaceutical companies and doctors. The supposed benefits of HRT

are totally unproven. " She believes that HRT not only exacerbates the

presenting health problems but also contributes to the acceleration of the

ageing process of women. It either hastens the onset of other medical

conditions or worsens the existing ones.

 

This perspective seems to be validated by the recent findings from a

landmark study, published in The New England Journal of Medicine in 1995,

involving 121,700 women, which revealed startling effects from HRT. It

warned that women who used HRT to offset the symptoms of menopause also

increased their chance of developing breast cancer by 30 to 40 per cent by

taking the hormone for more than five years. In women aged between 60 and

64, the risk of breast cancer rose to 70 per cent after five years of HRT.

Finally, the study concluded that women using HRT were 45 per cent more

likely to die from breast cancer than those who chose not to use HRT or used

it for less than five years.6

 

According to Leslie Kenton, author of Passage to Power, " everybody who is

anybody will tell you that menopause is an oestrogen-deficiency disease and

that you will need to take more oestrogen as you approach mid-life. What may

surprise you is this: not only is most of such commonly given advice on

menopause wrong, a great deal of it can be positively dangerous. "

 

Fortunately there is another side to the hormone story-a perspective that

not only can assist women of all ages to attain greater health but also to

reclaim a greater sense of power, responsibility and dignity in their lives.

 

A Brief Gynaecological Tour of a Woman's Body

In order to understand the HRT debate, it is important, first, to have a

rudimentary knowledge of a woman's cyclic nature.

 

Until recently, doctors thought that menopause began when all the eggs in

the ovaries had been used up. However, recent work has shown that menopause

is probably not triggered by the ovaries but by the brain. It seems that

both puberty and menopause are brain-driven events.

 

Menstruation depends on a complex network of hormonal communications between

the ovary, the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland in the brain. The

hypothalamus secretes gonadotropin- releasing hormone (GnRH) which triggers

the production of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) by the pituitary gland.

The FSH then stimulates the growth of the egg follicles (a small excretory

sac or gland) in the ovaries to trigger ovulation. As the egg follicles

grow, oestrogen is manufactured and released into the blood.

 

This chain reaction is not just one-way. Oestradiol, one of the ovarian

oestrogens in the bloodstream, also acts on the hypothalamus, causing a

change in GnRH. Next, this altered hormone stimulates the pituitary to

produce luteinising hormone (LH) which causes the egg follicles to burst and

the ovum to be released. After the egg is expelled, progesterone is also

manufactured by the collapsed egg follicle which develops into the corpus

luteum.

 

All the hormones released during the menstrual cycle are secreted not in a

constant, steady way but at dramatically different rates during different

parts of the 28-day cycle.

 

For the first eight to 11 days of the menstrual cycle, a woman's ovaries

make lots of oestrogen. Oestrogen prepares the follicles for the release of

one of the eggs. It is oestrogen which proliferates the changes that take

place at puberty: the growth of breasts, the development of the reproductive

system and the shape of a woman's body.

 

The rate of oestrogen secretion begins to fall off on about day 13, one day

before ovulation occurs. As oestrogen falls, progesterone begins to rise,

stimulating very rapid growth of the follicle. Beginning with this secretion

of progesterone, ovulation occurs too. After the egg has been released from

the follicle (known as the luteal stage of a woman's cycle), the follicle

begins to change, enlarging and becoming a unique organ known as the corpus

luteum. Progesterone is secreted from the corpus luteum, this tiny organ

with a huge capacity for hormone production. The surge of progesterone at

the time of ovulation is the source of libido-not oestrogen, as is commonly

believed.

 

After 10 or 12 days, if fertilisation does not occur, ovarian production of

progesterone falls dramatically. It is this sudden decline in progesterone

levels that triggers the shedding of the secretory endometrium (the menses),

leading to a renewal of the entire menstrual cycle.

 

Ovarian oestrogen and progesterone stimulate the growth of the endometrium,

or lining of the uterus, in preparation for fertilisation. Oestrogen

proliferates the growth of endometrial tissue, and progesterone facilitates

the secretory lining of the uterus so the fertilised egg can implant

successfully. Adequate progesterone, therefore, is the hormone most

essential to the survival of the fertilised egg and the foetus.

 

At around 40 years of age, the interaction between hormones alters,

eventually leading to menopause. It is still not clear how. Menopause may

start with changes in the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland rather than

in the ovaries. Scientists have conducted experiments where young mice have

had their ovaries replaced with those from aged animals no longer capable of

reproducing. The young mice can mate and give birth. This shows that old

ovaries placed in a young environment are capable of responding. On the

other hand, when young ovaries are put into old mice, these mice cannot

reproduce.7

 

Whatever the mechanism triggering menopause, as fewer egg follicles are

stimulated, the amount of oestrogen and progesterone being produced by the

ovaries declines although other hormones continue to be produced. By no

means do the ovaries shrivel up and cease functioning, as is popularly

believed. With the reduction of these hormones, menstruation becomes

scantier and erratic and eventually ceases.

 

However, other body sites such as the adrenal glands, skin, muscle, brain,

pineal gland, hair follicles and body fat are capable of making these same

hormones, enabling the female body to make healthy adjustments in hormonal

balance after menopause-provided a woman has taken good care of herself

during the pre-menopausal years with proper lifestyle, diet and attention to

mental and emotional health.

 

Menopausal women have the opportunity to enter this phase of life empowered

in their wisdom and creativity as never before. They have access to profound

inner-knowing. The renowned sociologist Margaret Mead said, " There is

nothing more powerful than a menopausal woman with zest! " In many cultures

around the world, menopause is a transition and an initiation into the

fulfilment of a woman's power, totally symptom-free. She is held in the

highest regard in her community as a wise, respected elder.

 

The Myth of Oestrogen and Synthetic Progestins

The earlier research that led to the synthesis of oestrogen made possible

the development of the oral contraceptive by 1960. With consent of the US

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Pill was widely marketed as an

effective, convenient method of birth control. True sexual liberation for

women was at hand at last.

 

However, the entire basis for the FDA's consent was the result of clinical

studies conducted on 132 Puerto Rican women who had taken the Pill for one

year or longer.8 (Never mind the fact that there were five women who died

during the study without any investigation into the cause of their deaths.)

 

By the mid-1970s the death toll of women from heart attacks and strokes

began to attract public notice. A newer, supposedly safer Pill was then

created with a lower dose of oestrogen. But, in fact, there has never been

any valid scientific proof that the Pill is safe-nor, for that matter, that

any of the other forms of contraception presently available are safe. Women

are only now discovering the price they have been paying for their sexual

freedom: by altering their hormonal balance, many varied and devastating

emotional and physiological dysfunctions have been created.

 

It is now 35 years on from the introduction of oral contraception and there

are presently about 60 million women worldwide who are, in effect,

'trialling' the Pill. Its safety and long-term effects have still not been

established conclusively. It is interesting to note, however, that it has

produced a wide assortment of adverse effects and side-effects and has a

significant link to breast cancer, high blood-pressure and, in particular,

cardiovascular disease-the major cause of female deaths in Australia. In

1992, 27,833 women died from heart disease and strokes, compared to 2,438

from breast cancer.9 Is this merely a coincidence, or do these statistics

indicate, perhaps, the harmful side-effects of tampering with hormones?

 

While proclaimed also as the primary missing ingredient for the menopausal

woman, oestrogen is strongly recommended by the medical and pharmaceutical

industries for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and osteoporosis.

Just about any doctor's surgery you walk into these days will warn women of

the inherent risks of going through menopause and, for that matter, the

post-menopausal years without the protection of oestrogen. Women are further

reminded, once again, that menopause is a deficiency disease, which

supposedly means that they are lacking oestrogen and therefore must have

supplemental doses to maintain their health.

 

As Dr Lynette Dumble has noted, " Broadly speaking, cardiovascular prevention

in women has overwhelmingly focussed on hormone replacement. Yet, as

Elizabeth Barrett-Connor emphasises, the Big Trial, the Coronary Drug

Project of 1973 that included two oestrogen regimens, was conducted in men.

As part of the Big Trial design, oestrogen doses extravagantly in excess of

physiological levels were deliberately administered to men in order to

induce gynaecomastia [enlargement of male breasts] as an indicator of

successful feminisation. This resulted in thrombosis and impotence and

ultimately led to research failure because of treatment discontinuations

amongst the study's participants. " 10

 

According to medical practitioner, independent researcher and author Dr John

Lee, the one notable study (known as the Boston Health Study, conducted with

a large sampling of nurses) which formed the entire basis of the positive

oestrogen-cardiovascular link, was radically flawed. Although there is ample

evidence from numerous other studies showing that, indeed, the opposite is

true-i.e., oestrogen is a significant factor in creating heart disease-these

findings have been virtually ignored in the frenzy for profits. He goes on

to say that the pharmaceutical advertisements also neglected to mention the

fact that stroke death incidence from that study was 50 per cent higher

among the oestrogen users.

 

Dr Lee has compiled a list of side-effects and physiological impairments

which result from taking oestrogen. They include increased risk of

endometrial cancer, increased body fat, salt and fluid retention, depression

and headaches, impaired blood-sugar control (hypoglycaemia), loss of zinc

and retention of copper, reduced oxygen levels in all cells, thickened bile

and promoted gall bladder disease, increased likelihood of breast fibrocysts

and uterine fibroids, interference with thyroid activity, decreased sex

drive, excessive blood-clotting, reduced vascular tone, endometriosis,

uterine cramping, infertility, and restraint of osteoclast function.

 

With so many side-effects and dangerous complications, a woman must think

very carefully about the HRT decision. Unfortunately, most doctors will tell

her that there is no other alternative. While certainly most doctors are

well-meaning and sincerely concerned about their patients, their primary

source of education and product information comes directly from the

pharmaceutical companies. Since most women also lack essential education and

understanding about their options, menopause can be perceived as a rather

frightening and perilous time.

 

Enter Natural Progesterone

For the past 15 years, Dr Lee has conducted independent research into a

natural, plant-derived form of progesterone. His non-pharmaceutically-funded

research presents a much broader understanding of a woman's hormonal options

and offers a totally safe, effective alternative that is free of all

side-effects. He has found that this natural hormone-used in conjunction

with a good diet and lifestyle changes-is capable of eliminating much of the

suffering associated both with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and menopause.

Thousands of women in the Western world now use natural

progesterone-generally in the form of a non-prescription cream which is

rubbed into the body. They claim that they not only have relief from female

symptoms but experience increased vitality, better skin and renewed

emotional balance.

 

Natural progesterone seems to have been totally overlooked by medical

science while the erroneous focus has been on oestrogen. Considering that it

is non-patentable and inexpensive, it not surprising that this is so. It is

important, however, to have a much greater understanding and appreciation

for this remarkable hormone.

 

As was previously mentioned, it is progesterone that is responsible for

maintaining the secretory endometrium which is necessary for the survival of

the embryo as well as the developing foetus throughout gestation. It is

little realised, however, that progesterone is the mother of all hormones.

Progesterone is the important precursor in the biosynthesis of adrenal

corticosteroids (hormones that protect against stress) and of all sex

hormones (testosterone and oestrogen). This means that progesterone has the

capacity to be turned into other hormones further down the pathways as and

when the body needs them. The point needs to be emphasised that oestrogen

and testosterone are end metabolic products made from progesterone. Without

adequate progesterone, oestrogen and testosterone will not be sufficiently

available to the body. Besides being a precursor to sex hormones,

progesterone also facilitates many other important, intrinsic physiological

functions (which will be discussed later).

 

The Oestrogen Dominance Effect

Female problems seem to be on the rise. Between 40 and 60 per cent of all

women in the West suffer from PMS. In addition, women also suffer from a

plethora of symptoms, some menopausal and others not. Something quite

alarming certainly seems to be happening to women. There is indication that

proper hormonal balance necessary for a woman's body to function healthily

is being interfered with by a number of factors. Research has revealed that

a good portion of women in their 30s (and some even younger), long before

the onset of menopause, on occasion will not ovulate during their menstrual

month.11 Without ovulation, no corpus luteum results and no progesterone is

made. A progesterone deficiency ensues.

 

Several problems can result from this deficiency. One is the month-long

presence of unopposed oestrogen with all its attendant side-effects, as

already mentioned. Another is the generally unrecognised problem of

progesterone's role in osteoporosis. Contemporary medicine is still unaware

that progesterone stimulates osteoblast-mediated new bone formation.

Actually, it is progesterone that stimulates new bone tissue and is capable

of reversing osteoporosis at any age. Lack of progesterone means that new

osteoblasts are not created and osteoporosis can arise.12 A third major

problem results from the interrelationship between progesterone loss and

stress. Stress combined with a bad diet can induce anovulatory cycles. The

consequent lack of progesterone interferes with the production of the

stress-combating hormones, exacerbating stress conditions that give rise to

further anovulatory cycles. And so the vicious cycle continues.

 

Another major factor contributing to this imbalance between oestrogen and

progesterone is environmental in nature. We in the industrialised world now

live immersed in a rising sea of petrochemical derivatives. They are in our

air, food and water. These chemicals include pesticides and herbicides (such

as DDT, dieldrin, heptachlor, etc.) as well as various plastics

(polycarbonated plastics found in babies bottles and water jugs) and PCBs.

These oestrogen-mimics are highly fat-soluble, not biodegradable or

well-excreted, and accumulate in fat tissue of animals and humans. These

chemicals have an uncanny ability to mimic natural oestrogen. They are given

the name " xeno-oestrogens " since, although they are foreign chemicals, they

are taken up by the oestrogen receptor-sites in the body, seriously

interfering with natural biochemical changes.

 

Mounting research is now revealing an alarming situation worldwide created

by the inundation of these hormone-mimics. In a recently released book, Our

Stolen Future, authors Theo Colburn of the World Wildlife Fund, Dianne

Dumanoski of The Boston Globe and John Peterson Meyers, a zoologist, have

identified 51 hormone-mimics, each able to unleash a torrent of effects such

as reduced sperm production, cell division and sculpting of the developing

brain. These mimics are not only linked to the recent discovery that human

sperm-counts worldwide have plunged by 50 per cent between 1938 and 1990 but

also to genital deformities, breast, prostate and testicular cancer, and

neurological disorders.10

 

Dr Lee has discovered a consistent theme running through women's complaints

of the distressing and often debilitating symptoms of PMS, peri-menopause

and menopause: too much oestrogen, or, as he has termed it, " oestrogen

dominance " .

 

Now, instead of oestrogen playing its essential role within the

well-balanced symphony of steroid hormones in a woman's body, it has begun

to overshadow the other players, creating biochemical dissonance. The last

thing in the world a woman's body needs is more oestrogen-either in the form

of contraceptives or HRT. Then, when the oestrogen-dominant symptoms appear,

guess what is prescribed? More oestrogen! The delicate natural

oestrogen/progesterone balance is radically altered due to too much

oestrogen. Progesterone deficiency is then exacerbated even more.

 

Dr Lee has been able to balance the oestrogen-dominance effect through the

use of transdermal natural progesterone cream. Natural progesterone, a

cholesterol derivative, is made from wild Mexican yams or soybeans whose

active ingredients are an exact molecular match of the body's own

progesterone. It is interesting to note that in countries in Asia and South

America where women eat either the wild yams or soybeans, the term " hot

flush " doesn't even exist in their languages. They also rarely suffer from

the host of female problems presently plaguing Western women.

 

Supplementation with natural progesterone corrects the real problem:

progesterone deficiency. Natural progesterone is not known to have any

side-effects; nor have any toxic levels been found to date. Natural

progesterone increases libido, prevents cancer of the womb, protects against

fibrocystic breast disease, helps protect against breast cancer, maintains

the uterus lining, hydrates and oxygenates the skin, reverses facial hair

growth and hair thinning, acts as a natural diuretic, helps eliminate

depression and increase a sense of well-being, encourages fat-burning and

the use of stored energy, normalises blood-clotting, and is a precursor to

other important stress and sex hormones. Even the two most prevalent

menopausal symptoms-hot flushes and vaginal dryness-quickly disappear with

applications of natural progesterone.

 

There is one other very significant benefit of natural progesterone that

deserves a bit more attention. While most people are under the assumption

that oestrogen protects against osteoporosis-one of the biggest

selling-points for which a woman is encouraged to take HRT-this is

definitely not the case.

 

The early studies on which the oestrogen-protection assumption was based had

gross scientific defects. Canadian researcher Jerilyn Prior, chief

endocrinologist at the University of British Columbia in Vancouver, and her

colleagues, reporting in The New England Journal of Medicine, confirmed that

oestrogen's role in osteoporosis is only a minor one. In their studies of

female athletes, they found that osteoporosis occurs to the degree that they

become progesterone-deficient, even though their oestrogen levels seem to

remain normal. Prior continued her research with non-athletic women. They

showed the same results. While both these groups of women were menstruating,

they had anovulatory cycles and, therefore, were progesterone-deficient.

 

Prior then went on to discover that anovulation and a short-phase cycle now

occur in up to 50 per cent of North American women's menstrual cycles during

the final reproductive years.14 Unfortunately, these major findings went

relatively unnoticed in the medical community.

 

As a result of her extensive review of published scientific evidence in this

area, Prior confirmed that it is not oestrogen but progesterone which is the

bone-trophic hormone; that is, the bone builder. She was even able to

identify progesterone receptor-sites on osteoblast cells (bone

tissue-building cells). Nobody has ever found osteoblast receptors for

oestrogen. The bottom line is that it is in women with progesterone

deficiency that bone loss occurs.15

 

These results were verified by a three-year study of 63 post-menopausal

women with osteoporosis. Women using transdermal progesterone cream

experienced an average 7 to 8 per cent bone-mass density increase in the

first year, 4 to 5 per cent the second year, and 3 to 4 per cent in the

third year! Untreated women in this age category typically lose 1.5 per cent

bone-mass density per year! These results have not been found with any other

form of hormone replacement therapy or dietary supplementation.16

 

Dr Lee believes that the use of natural progesterone in conjunction with

dietary and lifestyle change can not only stop osteoporosis but can actually

reverse it-even in women aged 70 or more.

 

At this point, it is important to make the distinction between the natural

progesterone that is produced by the body and the synthetic progesterone

analogues classified as progestins, such as Provera, Duphaston and Primulut.

As you will learn, there is a big difference between the two in their effect

in the body, although doctors most often use their names interchangeably.

Since natural progesterone is not a patentable product, the pharmaceutical

companies have molecularly altered it to produce synthetic progestins

commonly used in contraceptives and HRT.

 

Synthetic progestins, because they are not exact replicas of the body's

natural progesterone, unfortunately create a long list of side-effects, some

of which are quite severe. A partial list includes headaches, depression,

fluid retention, increased risk of birth defects and early abortion, liver

dysfunction, breast tenderness, breakthrough bleeding, acne, hirsutism (hair

growth), insomnia, oedema, weight changes, pulmonary embolism and

premenstrual-like syndrome.17

 

Most importantly, progestins lack the intrinsic physiological benefits of

progesterone, thus they cannot function in the major biosynthetic pathways

as progesterone does and they disrupt many fundamental processes in the

body. Progesterone is an essential hormone that also plays a part in the

development of healthy nerve cells and brain and thyroid function.

Progestins tend to block the body's ability to produce and utilise natural

progesterone to maintain these life-promoting functions.

 

The hormone story is certainly a very complicated one. Up until now, only

one version of the story has been available to the majority of Western

women, especially Australian women. Serious doubt has been cast on the

efficacy and appropriateness of oestrogen and progestins in all the forms

they take. Women are certainly suffering from a wide variety of female

complaints.

 

What complicates the hormone story is that the prescribed treatments for

these complaints are actually making the problem worse. Without

understanding the far-reaching side-effects of oestrogen dominance and

progestin, doctors are misdiagnosing the cause of these aggravated

conditions. Often, other drugs are then prescribed with disastrous

side-effects, as the spiral of unnecessary medication increases. What is the

ultimate toll, not only on a woman's deteriorating health and emotional

well-being but also on her financial situation, her relationships and her

career?

 

Without adequate knowledge, education and access to natural products, women

have been easy prey to the powerful campaigns of the multinational drug

companies that have convinced doctors as well as governments of their

claims. It is becoming more evident that women's interests are not always

best met through such a biased approach. It is also not unusual for profits

to take precedence over health and well-being. The last thing a woman needs

is to have her natural bodily functions denigrated to deficiency

diseases-thus necessitating ongoing medical attention.

 

It is indeed time for women to take even greater responsibility for their

health, their choices and their lifestyles. The greatest weapon against

compliance and ignorance is knowledge. It's time to ask poignant questions

of your health provider, to demand answers and to be willing to investigate

safe, alternative approaches. It is apparent that women will need to

participate in educating their doctors about the other choices that exist as

well as the ones that they prefer.

 

Certainly, women have it well within their own power not only to find safe,

natural and effective ways to heal themselves but to live long, full lives,

preserving their vitality, youthfulness and health. Women deserve the right

to appreciate themselves and their bodies through all the stages of life. As

women find the way to return to a greater balance within themselves, they

will know profoundly the truth of what Dr Deepak Chopra has said about

women: " Feminine wisdom is the intelligence at the heart of creation. "

 

EFFECTS OF OESTROGEN DOMINANCE

1. When oestrogen is not balanced by progesterone, it can produce weight

gain, headaches, bad temper, chronic fatigue and loss of interest in sex-all

of which are part of the clinically recognised premenstrual syndrome.

2. Not only has it been well-established that oestrogen dominance encourages

the development of breast cancer thanks to oestrogen's proliferative

actions, it also stimulates breast tissue and can, in time, trigger

fibrocystic breast disease-a condition which wanes when natural progesterone

is introduced to balance the oestrogen.

3. By definition, excess oestrogen implies a progesterone deficiency. This,

in turn, leads to a decrease in the rate of new bone formation in a woman's

body by the osteoblasts-the cells responsible for doing this job. Although

most doctors are not yet aware of it, this is the prime cause of

osteoporosis.

4. Oestrogen dominance increases the risk of fibroids. One of the

interesting facts about fibroids-often remarked on by doctors-is that,

regardless of the size, fibroids commonly atrophy once menopause arrives and

a woman's ovaries are no longer making oestrogen. Doctors who commonly use

progesterone with their patients have discovered that giving a woman natural

progesterone will also cause fibroids to atrophy.

5. In oestrogen-dominant menstruating women where progesterone is not

peaking and falling in a normal way each month, the ordered shedding of the

womb lining doesn't take place. Menstruation becomes irregular. This

condition can usually be corrected by making lifestyle changes and using a

natural progesterone product. It is easy to diagnose by having a doctor

measure the level of progesterone in the blood at certain times of the

month.

6. Endometrial cancer (cancer of the womb) develops only where there is

oestrogen dominance or unopposed oestrogen. This, too, can be prevented by

the use of natural progesterone. The use of the synthetic progestins may

also help prevent it, which is why a growing number of doctors no longer

give oestrogen without combining it with a progesterone drug during HRT.

However, all synthetic progestins have side-effects.

7. Waterlogging of the cells and an increase in intercellular sodium, which

predispose a woman to high blood-pressure or hypertension, frequently occur

with oestrogen dominance. These can also be side-effects of taking synthetic

progestogen [progestins]. A natural progesterone cream usually clears it up.

8. The risk of stroke and heart disease is increased dramatically when a

woman is oestrogen-dominant.

(Source: Leslie Kenton, Passage to Power, Random House, UK, 1995)

 

Anti-ageing Benefits of Natural Progesterone

1. Progesterone is a primary precursor in the biosynthesis of the adrenal

corticosteroids. Without adequate progesterone, synthesis of the cortisones

is impaired and the body turns to alternate pathways. These alternate

pathways have masculine-producing side-effects such as long facial hairs and

thinning of scalp hair. Further impaired corticosteroid production results

in a decrease in the ability to handle stress, e.g., surgery, trauma or

emotional stress.

2. Many peri- or post-menopausal women with clinical signs of

hypothyroidism, such as fatigue, lack of energy, intolerance to cold, are

actually suffering from unrecognised oestrogen dominance and will benefit

from supplementation with natural progesterone.

3. Oestrogen and most of the synthetic progestins increase intracellular

sodium and water uptake. The effect of this is hypertension. Natural

progesterone is a natural diuretic and prevents the cell's uptake of sodium

and water, thus preventing hypertension.

4. Whereas oestrogen impairs homeostatic control of glucose levels, natural

progesterone stabilises them. Thus, natural progesterone can be beneficial

to both those with diabetes and those with reactive hypoglycaemia. Oestrogen

should be contraindicated in patients with diabetes.

5. Thinning and wrinkled skin is a sign of lack of hydration in the skin. It

is common in peri- and post-menopausal women and is a sure sign of hormone

depletion. Transdermal natural progesterone is a skin moisturiser which

restores skin hydration.

6. Progesterone serves a role in keeping brain cells healthy. A disorder

such as premature senility (Alzheimer's disease) may be, at least in part,

another example of disease secondary to progesterone deficiency.

7. Progesterone is essential for the healthy development of the myelin

sheath which protects the nerve cells. Low progesterone levels lead to

recurring aches and pains.

8. Progesterone creates and promotes an enhanced sense of emotional

well-being and psychological self-sufficiency.

9. Progesterone is responsible for enhancing the libido.

(Source: John R. Lee, M.D., Slowing the Aging Process with Natural

Progesterone, BLL Publishing, CA, USA, 1994, p. 14)

 

 

----------

----

 

Endnotes:

1. Archer, John, Bad Medicine, Simon & Schuster, Australia, 1995, p. 191.

2. Op. cit., p. 217.

3. Op. cit., p. 192.

4. Op. cit., p. 211.

5. Coney, Sandra, The Menopause Industry, Spinifex Press Pty Ltd, Australia,

1991, pp. 164-165.

6. The Sydney Morning Herald, 24 June 1995.

7. Coney, Sandra, op. cit., p. 584.

8. Archer, John, op. cit., p. 210.

9. Archer, John, op. cit., p. 211.

10. (a) Dumble, Lynette J., Ph.D., M.Sc., " Odds Against Women with Heart

Disease " , presented at Health Sharing Women's Forum, Royal College of

Surgeons, Melbourne,Victoria, Australia, 14 September 1995. (b)

Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth, " Heart Disease in Women " , Fertility and Sterility

(1994), 62(2):127S-132S.

11. Lee, John R., M.D., Natural Progesterone: The Multiple Role of a

Remarkable Hormone, BLL Publishing, California, USA, 1993, p. 29.

12. Ibid.

13. Newsweek, 18 March 1996.

14. Kenton, Leslie, Passage to Power, Random House, UK, 1995, pp. 19-20.

15. Ibid.

16. Lee, John R., M.D., " Osteoporosis Reversal: The Role of Progesterone " ,

International Clinical Nutrition Review (1990), 10:384-391.

17. Lee, John R., M.D., Slowing the Aging Process with Natural Progesterone,

BLL Publishing, California, USA, 1994, p. 12.

 

About the Author:

Sherrill Sellman presently lives in Melbourne where she conducts a private

psychotherapy practice and also devotes time to lecturing, training and

writing. She is a contributing writer to holistic publications in Australia,

New Zealand, Canada and the United States on topics of interest and concern

to her, relating to health, women's empowerment, relationships, and personal

and planetary transformation. She can be contacted at Light Unlimited,

Locked Bag 8000 - MDC, Kew, Victoria 3101, Australia, telephone +61 (0)3

9810 9591.

 

 

 

NEXUS ARTICLES, BOOKS, SUBS, ADS & VIDEOS