Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

The FDA banned vitamin B17 years ago

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

The FDA banned vitamin B17 years ago

Actually in the 1980's when World Without Cancer was published

 

http://www.dob17.com/controlcancer/information/legality.htm

 

Although it is banned, it is not illegal

 

You Ask: What's the Difference

 

What it means is that ~ If any hospital uses laetrile the law says that they

jeopardize any grants from the government as well as any monies from

Medicaid and other hospital insurance originating from the government. Since

nearly all of hospital revenues come from patient insurance, not one

hospital in the U.S. will take the chance and use any banned substance

including, Amygdalin (also called vitamin B17 and Laetrile.)

 

Any Doctor that wants to use the substance from apricot pits, must have

their patient fill out a form and then the doctor must submit the form to

the FDA... Again, doctors don't want to get involved in this and would

rather keep their names off of the FDA lists. Additionally, the doctor's

malpractice insurance will not be valid if they prescribe laetrile (B17,

amygdalin) to a patient. The Americcan Medical Association (AMA) treats any

Doctor that prescribes laetrile to be a renegade (traitorous) and that he

has violated the AMA's membership policies and will be subject to membership

termination. Therefore any Doctor that prescribes laetrile may destroy his

carreer as a Doctor.

 

Any individual that sells laetrile must not claim that it does anything in

his place of business. Many health food stores in the past were raided and

had to give up their supplies of B17 because the B17 was near books that

claimed that the B17 was the answer to cancer...In other words the books

were near the B17 in the stores and was therefore considered " labeling "

which is a term used by the FDA. Labeling according to the FDA is against

the law and can be prosecuted.

 

However on the Internet, it is different. Internet law is tricky and not the

same as U.S. commercial law. In one case, Ken Kholas took the FDA to court

and won his B17 back. That court case proved it wasn't wrong for him to have

or to sell it thought it cost Ken's father a tremendous amount of money.

 

 

 

What THIS MEANS TO YOU is that you can purchase, use and have B17 and you

will not have violated

 

_______________

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!

http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...